I'm working on a binary classification problem. I had this situation that I used the logistic regression and support vector machine model imported from sklearn. These two models were fit with the same , imbalanced training data and class weights were adjusted. And they have achieved comparable performances. When I used these two pre-trained models to predict a new dataset. The LR model and the SVM models predicted similar number of instances as positives. And the predicted instances share a big overlap.
However, when I looked at the probability scores of being classified as positives, the distribution by LR is from 0.5 to 1 while the SVM starts from around 0.1. I called the function model.predict(prediction_data) to find out the instances predicted as each class and the function
model.predict_proba(prediction_data) to give the probability scores of being classified as 0(neg) and 1(pos), and assume they all have a default threshold 0.5.
There is no error in my code and I have no idea why the SVM predicted instances with probability scores < 0.5 as positives as well. Any thoughts on how to interpret this situation?
That's a known fact in sklearn when it comes to binary classification problems with SVC(), which is reported, for instance, in these github issues
(here and here). Moreover, it is also
reported in the User guide where it is said that:
In addition, the probability estimates may be inconsistent with the scores:
the “argmax” of the scores may not be the argmax of the probabilities; in binary classification, a sample may be labeled by predict as belonging to the positive class even if the output of predict_proba is less than 0.5; and similarly, it could be labeled as negative even if the output of predict_proba is more than 0.5.
or directly within libsvm faq, where it is said that
Let's just consider two-class classification here. After probability information is obtained in training, we do not have prob > = 0.5 if and only if decision value >= 0.
All in all, the point is that:
on one side, predictions are based on decision_function values: if the decision value computed on a new instance is positive, the predicted class is the positive class and viceversa.
on the other side, as stated within one of the github issues, np.argmax(self.predict_proba(X), axis=1) != self.predict(X) which is where the inconsistency comes from. In other terms, in order to always have consistency on binary classification problems you would need a classifier whose predictions are based on the output of predict_proba() (which is btw what you'll get when considering calibrators), like so:
def predict(self, X):
y_proba = self.predict_proba(X)
return np.argmax(y_proba, axis=1)
I'd also suggest this post on the topic.
I am working on a classification-based project, and I am evaluating different ML models based on their training accuracy, testing accuracy, confusion matrix, and the AUC score. I am now stuck in understanding the difference between the scores I get by calculating accuracy of a ML model on the test set (X_test), and the AUC score.
If I am correct, both metrics calculate how well a ML model is able to predict the correct class of previously unseen data. I also understand that for both, the higher the number, the better, for as long as the model is not over-fit or under-fit.
Assuming a ML model is neither over-fit nor under-fit, what is the difference between test accuracy score and the AUC score?
I don't have a background in math and stats, and pivoted towards data science from business background. Therefore, I will appreciate an explanation a business person can understand.
Both terms quantify the quality of a classification model, however, the accuracy quantifies a single manifestation of the variables, which means it describes a single confusion matrix. The AUC (area under the curve) represents the trade-off between the true-positive-rate (tpr) and the false-positive-rate (fpr) in multiple confusion matrices, that are generated for different fpr values for the same classifier.
A confusion matrix is of the form:
1) The accuracy is a measure for a single confusion matrix and is defined as:
where tp=true-positives, tn=true-negatives, fp=false-positives and fn=false-negatives (the amount of each).
2) The AUC measures the area under the ROC (receiver operating characteristic), that is the trade-off curve between the true-positive-rate and the false-positive-rate. For each choice of the false-positive-rate (fpr) threshold,the true-positive-rate (tpr) is determined. I.e, for a given classifier a fpr of 0, 0.1, 0.2 and so fourth is accepted, and for each fpr it's dependent tpr is evaluated. Therefore, you get a function tpr(fpr) that maps the interval [0,1] onto the same interval, because both rates are defined in those intervals. The area under this line is called the AUC, that is between 0 and 1, whereby a random classification is expected to yield an AUC of 0.5.
The AUC, as it is the area under the curve, is defined as:
However, in real (and finite) applications, the ROC is a step function and the AUC is determined by a weighted sum these levels.
Graphics are from Borgelt's Intelligent Data Mining Lecture.
I have a dataset of state->action pairs, (s,a), where each s defines a probability distribution over the possible choices of a, and each a is sampled from that probability distribution. I'd like to train a classifier for this dataset, where rather than learning to predict the maximum likelihood, it predicts the distribution a was sampled from.
For example, if you're playing an iterative rock-paper-scissors, your state may be just the previous move you made and a ∈ { Rock, Paper, Scissors }, where the previous state reduces the probability of choosing that action again. My dataset would then look like:
PreviousAction,Chosen
Rock,Paper
Paper,Rock
Rock,Scissors
Scissors,Paper
Paper,Paper
...
Is it possible to learn probability distributions over the labels with random forests in scikit-learn?
Yes, it is. Train a RandomForestClassifier using fit (which expects labels, not probability distributions, as its y argument), then predict using predict_proba.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
When we have to predict the value of a categorical (or discrete) outcome we use logistic regression. I believe we use linear regression to also predict the value of an outcome given the input values.
Then, what is the difference between the two methodologies?
Linear regression output as probabilities
It's tempting to use the linear regression output as probabilities but it's a mistake because the output can be negative, and greater than 1 whereas probability can not. As regression might actually
produce probabilities that could be less than 0, or even bigger than
1, logistic regression was introduced.
Source: http://gerardnico.com/wiki/data_mining/simple_logistic_regression
Outcome
In linear regression, the outcome (dependent variable) is continuous.
It can have any one of an infinite number of possible values.
In logistic regression, the outcome (dependent variable) has only a limited number of possible values.
The dependent variable
Logistic regression is used when the response variable is categorical in nature. For instance, yes/no, true/false, red/green/blue,
1st/2nd/3rd/4th, etc.
Linear regression is used when your response variable is continuous. For instance, weight, height, number of hours, etc.
Equation
Linear regression gives an equation which is of the form Y = mX + C,
means equation with degree 1.
However, logistic regression gives an equation which is of the form
Y = eX + e-X
Coefficient interpretation
In linear regression, the coefficient interpretation of independent variables are quite straightforward (i.e. holding all other variables constant, with a unit increase in this variable, the dependent variable is expected to increase/decrease by xxx).
However, in logistic regression, depends on the family (binomial, Poisson,
etc.) and link (log, logit, inverse-log, etc.) you use, the interpretation is different.
Error minimization technique
Linear regression uses ordinary least squares method to minimise the
errors and arrive at a best possible fit, while logistic regression
uses maximum likelihood method to arrive at the solution.
Linear regression is usually solved by minimizing the least squares error of the model to the data, therefore large errors are penalized quadratically.
Logistic regression is just the opposite. Using the logistic loss function causes large errors to be penalized to an asymptotically constant.
Consider linear regression on categorical {0, 1} outcomes to see why this is a problem. If your model predicts the outcome is 38, when the truth is 1, you've lost nothing. Linear regression would try to reduce that 38, logistic wouldn't (as much)2.
In linear regression, the outcome (dependent variable) is continuous. It can have any one of an infinite number of possible values. In logistic regression, the outcome (dependent variable) has only a limited number of possible values.
For instance, if X contains the area in square feet of houses, and Y contains the corresponding sale price of those houses, you could use linear regression to predict selling price as a function of house size. While the possible selling price may not actually be any, there are so many possible values that a linear regression model would be chosen.
If, instead, you wanted to predict, based on size, whether a house would sell for more than $200K, you would use logistic regression. The possible outputs are either Yes, the house will sell for more than $200K, or No, the house will not.
Just to add on the previous answers.
Linear regression
Is meant to resolve the problem of predicting/estimating the output value for a given element X (say f(x)). The result of the prediction is a continuous function where the values may be positive or negative. In this case you normally have an input dataset with lots of examples and the output value for each one of them. The goal is to be able to fit a model to this data set so you are able to predict that output for new different/never seen elements. Following is the classical example of fitting a line to set of points, but in general linear regression could be used to fit more complex models (using higher polynomial degrees):
Resolving the problem
Linear regression can be solved in two different ways:
Normal equation (direct way to solve the problem)
Gradient descent (Iterative approach)
Logistic regression
Is meant to resolve classification problems where given an element you have to classify the same in N categories. Typical examples are, for example, given a mail to classify it as spam or not, or given a vehicle find to which category it belongs (car, truck, van, etc ..). That's basically the output is a finite set of discrete values.
Resolving the problem
Logistic regression problems could be resolved only by using Gradient descent. The formulation in general is very similar to linear regression the only difference is the usage of different hypothesis function. In linear regression the hypothesis has the form:
h(x) = theta_0 + theta_1*x_1 + theta_2*x_2 ..
where theta is the model we are trying to fit and [1, x_1, x_2, ..] is the input vector. In logistic regression the hypothesis function is different:
g(x) = 1 / (1 + e^-x)
This function has a nice property, basically it maps any value to the range [0,1] which is appropiate to handle propababilities during the classificatin. For example in case of a binary classification g(X) could be interpreted as the probability to belong to the positive class. In this case normally you have different classes that are separated with a decision boundary which basically a curve that decides the separation between the different classes. Following is an example of dataset separated in two classes.
You can also use the below code to generate the linear regression
curve
q_df = details_df
# q_df = pd.get_dummies(q_df)
q_df = pd.get_dummies(q_df, columns=[
"1",
"2",
"3",
"4",
"5",
"6",
"7",
"8",
"9"
])
q_1_df = q_df["1"]
q_df = q_df.drop(["2", "3", "4", "5"], axis=1)
(import statsmodels.api as sm)
x = sm.add_constant(q_df)
train_x, test_x, train_y, test_y = sklearn.model_selection.train_test_split(
x, q3_rechange_delay_df, test_size=0.2, random_state=123 )
lmod = sm.OLS(train_y, train_x).fit() lmod.summary()
lmod.predict()[:10]
lmod.get_prediction().summary_frame()[:10]
sm.qqplot(lmod.resid,line="q") plt.title("Q-Q plot of Standardized
Residuals") plt.show()
Simply put, linear regression is a regression algorithm, which outpus a possible continous and infinite value; logistic regression is considered as a binary classifier algorithm, which outputs the 'probability' of the input belonging to a label (0 or 1).
The basic difference :
Linear regression is basically a regression model which means its will give a non discreet/continuous output of a function. So this approach gives the value. For example : given x what is f(x)
For example given a training set of different factors and the price of a property after training we can provide the required factors to determine what will be the property price.
Logistic regression is basically a binary classification algorithm which means that here there will be discreet valued output for the function . For example : for a given x if f(x)>threshold classify it to be 1 else classify it to be 0.
For example given a set of brain tumour size as training data we can use the size as input to determine whether its a benine or malignant tumour. Therefore here the output is discreet either 0 or 1.
*here the function is basically the hypothesis function
They are both quite similar in solving for the solution, but as others have said, one (Logistic Regression) is for predicting a category "fit" (Y/N or 1/0), and the other (Linear Regression) is for predicting a value.
So if you want to predict if you have cancer Y/N (or a probability) - use logistic. If you want to know how many years you will live to - use Linear Regression !
Regression means continuous variable, Linear means there is linear relation between y and x.
Ex= You are trying to predict salary from no of years of experience. So here salary is independent variable(y) and yrs of experience is dependent variable(x).
y=b0+ b1*x1
We are trying to find optimum value of constant b0 and b1 which will give us best fitting line for your observation data.
It is a equation of line which gives continuous value from x=0 to very large value.
This line is called Linear regression model.
Logistic regression is type of classification technique. Dnt be misled by term regression. Here we predict whether y=0 or 1.
Here we first need to find p(y=1) (wprobability of y=1) given x from formuale below.
Probaibility p is related to y by below formuale
Ex=we can make classification of tumour having more than 50% chance of having cancer as 1 and tumour having less than 50% chance of having cancer as 0.
Here red point will be predicted as 0 whereas green point will be predicted as 1.
Cannot agree more with the above comments.
Above that, there are some more differences like
In Linear Regression, residuals are assumed to be normally distributed.
In Logistic Regression, residuals need to be independent but not normally distributed.
Linear Regression assumes that a constant change in the value of the explanatory variable results in constant change in the response variable.
This assumption does not hold if the value of the response variable represents a probability (in Logistic Regression)
GLM(Generalized linear models) does not assume a linear relationship between dependent and independent variables. However, it assumes a linear relationship between link function and independent variables in logit model.
| Basis | Linear | Logistic |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Basic | The data is modelled using a straight line. | The probability of some obtained event is represented as a linear function of a combination of predictor variables. |
| Linear relationship between dependent and independent variables | Is required | Not required |
| The independent variable | Could be correlated with each other. (Specially in multiple linear regression) | Should not be correlated with each other (no multicollinearity exist). |
In short:
Linear Regression gives continuous output. i.e. any value between a range of values.
Logistic Regression gives discrete output. i.e. Yes/No, 0/1 kind of outputs.
To put it simply, if in linear regression model more test cases arrive which are far away from the threshold(say =0.5)for a prediction of y=1 and y=0. Then in that case the hypothesis will change and become worse.Therefore linear regression model is not used for classification problem.
Another Problem is that if the classification is y=0 and y=1, h(x) can be > 1 or < 0.So we use Logistic regression were 0<=h(x)<=1.
Logistic Regression is used in predicting categorical outputs like Yes/No, Low/Medium/High etc. You have basically 2 types of logistic regression Binary Logistic Regression (Yes/No, Approved/Disapproved) or Multi-class Logistic regression (Low/Medium/High, digits from 0-9 etc)
On the other hand, linear regression is if your dependent variable (y) is continuous.
y = mx + c is a simple linear regression equation (m = slope and c is the y-intercept). Multilinear regression has more than 1 independent variable (x1,x2,x3 ... etc)
In linear regression the outcome is continuous whereas in logistic regression, the outcome has only a limited number of possible values(discrete).
example:
In a scenario,the given value of x is size of a plot in square feet then predicting y ie rate of the plot comes under linear regression.
If, instead, you wanted to predict, based on size, whether the plot would sell for more than 300000 Rs, you would use logistic regression. The possible outputs are either Yes, the plot will sell for more than 300000 Rs, or No.
In case of Linear Regression the outcome is continuous while in case of Logistic Regression outcome is discrete (not continuous)
To perform Linear regression we require a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables. But to perform Logistic regression we do not require a linear relationship between the dependent and independent variables.
Linear Regression is all about fitting a straight line in the data while Logistic Regression is about fitting a curve to the data.
Linear Regression is a regression algorithm for Machine Learning while Logistic Regression is a classification Algorithm for machine learning.
Linear regression assumes gaussian (or normal) distribution of dependent variable. Logistic regression assumes binomial distribution of dependent variable.
The basic difference between Linear Regression and Logistic Regression is :
Linear Regression is used to predict a continuous or numerical value but when we are looking for predicting a value that is categorical Logistic Regression come into picture.
Logistic Regression is used for binary classification.