Hey guys I'm learning Ruby and trying to connect it to PostgreSQL database in my computer. I have the connection and two tables created one with two tuples. I want to display the values of each tuple in its own line but add a line break '\n' between tuples.
I've been trying to apply my knowledge of Procs and figure out a way of making the queries reusable and thought Procs was a good idea although it would like a bit messy to some of you. You are free and welcome to criticize my code
res = conn.exec("select * from one.employees") #The table with the tuples as Hashes
iter=Proc.new do
|tuple| tuple.map{|tupleVals| tupleVals}
end #This goes over each tuple
stripTuples2=Proc.new do |hash| #a is a Hash containing all the tuples.
hash.each do
|tuple| tuple.each{|str| puts "#{str[0]}: #{str[1].strip}"}.to_s+"\n"
end
end #End of stripTuples2
That's the structure and I call it like this
stripTuples2.call(iter.call(res))
Although it prints all the values, each one in a new line it omits the "\n" I added in the code, it was the only place It let me do it without trowing an error. What can I do to fix this or to make my code better?
Related
Our task is create a table, and read values to the table using a loop. Print the values after the process is complete. - Create a table. - Read the number of values to be read to the table. - Read the values to the table using a loop. - Print the values in the table using another loop. for this we had written code as
local table = {}
for value in ipairs(table) do
io.read()
end
for value in ipairs(table) do
print(value)
end
not sure where we went wrong please help us. Our exception is
Input (stdin)
3
11
22
abc
Your Output (stdout)
~ no output ~
Expected Output
11
22
abc
Correct Code is
local table1 = {}
local x = io.read()
for line in io.lines() do
table.insert(table1, line)
end
for K, value in ipairs(table1) do
print(value)
end
Let's walk through this step-by-step.
Create a table.
Though the syntax is correct, table is a reserved pre-defined global name in Lua, and thus cannot should not be declared a variable name to avoid future issues. Instead, you'll need to want to use a different name. If you're insistent on using the word table, you'll have to distinguish it from the function global table. The easiest way to do this is change it to Table, as Lua is a case-sensitive language. Therefore, your table creation should look something like:
local Table = {}
Read values to the table using a loop.
Though Table is now established as a table, your for loop is only iterating through an empty table. It seems your goal is to iterate through the io.read() instead. But io.read() is probably not what you want here, though you can utilize a repeat loop if you wish to use io.read() via table.insert. However, repeat requires a condition that must be met for it to terminate, such as the length of the table reaching a certain amount (in your example, it would be until (#Table == 4)). Since this is a task you are given, I will not provide an example, but allow you to research this method and use it to your advantage.
Print the values after the process is complete.
You are on the right track with your printing loop. However, it must be noted that iterating through a table always returns two results, an index and a value. In your code, you would only return the index number, so your output would simply return:
1
2
3
4
If you are wanting the actual values, you'll need a placeholder for the index. Oftentimes, the placeholder for an unneeded variable in Lua is the underscore (_). Modify your for loop to account for the index, and you should be set.
Try modifying your code with the suggestions I've given and see if you can figure out how to achieve your end result.
Edited:
Thanks, Piglet, for corrections on the insight! I'd forgotten table itself wasn't a function, and wasn't reserved, but still bad form to use it as a variable name whether local or global. At least, it's how I was taught, but your comment is correct!
I'm going to preface that I'm still learning ruby.
I'm writing a script to parse a .csv and identify possible duplicate records in the data-set.
I have a .csv file with headers, so I'm parsing the data so that I can access each row using a header title as such:
#contact_table = CSV.parse(File.read("app/data/file.csv"), headers: true)
# Prints all last names in table
puts contact_table['last_name']
I'm trying to iterate over each row in the table and identify if the last name I'm currently iterating over is similar to the next last name, but I'm having trouble doing this. I guess the way I'm handling it is as if it's an array, but I checked the type and it's a CSV::Row.
example (this doesn't work):
#contact_table.each_with_index do |c, i|
puts "first contact is #{c['last_name']}, second contact is #{c[i + 1]['last_name']}"
end
I realized this doesn't work like this because the table isn't an array, it's a CSV::Row like I previously mentioned. Is there any method that can achieve this? I'm really blanking right now.
My csv looks something like this:
id,first_name,last_name,company,email,address1,address2,zip,city,state_long,state,phone
1,Donalt,Canter,Gottlieb Group,dcanter0#nydailynews.com,9 Homewood Alley,,50335,Des Moines,Iowa,IA,515-601-4495
2,Daphene,McArthur,"West, Schimmel and Rath",dmcarthur1#twitter.com,43 Grover Parkway,,30311,Atlanta,Georgia,GA,770-271-7837
#contact_table should be a CSV::Table which is a collection of CSV::Rows so in this:
#contact_table.each_with_index do |c, i|
...
end
c is a CSV::Row. That's why c['last_name'] works. The problem is that here:
c[i + 1]['last_name']
you're looking at c (a single row) instead of #contact_table, if you said:
#contact_table[i + 1]['last_name']
then you'd get the next last name or, when c is the last row, an exception because #contact_table[i+1] will be nil.
Also, inside the iteration, c is the current (or (i+1)th) row and won't always be the first.
What is your use case for this? Seems like a school project?
I recommend for_each instead of parse (see this comparison). I would probably use a Set for this.
Create a Set outside of the scope of parsing the file (i.e., above the parsing code). Let's call it rows.
Call rows.include?(row) during each iteration while parsing the file
If true, then you know you have a duplicate
If false, then call rows.add(row) to add the new row to the set
You could also just fill your set with an individual value from a column that must be distinct (e.g., row.field(:some_column_name)), such as email or phone number, and do the same inclusion check for that.
(If this is for a real app, please don't do this. Use model validations instead.)
I would use #read instead of #parse and do something like this:
require 'csv'
LASTNAME_INDEX = 2
data = CSV.read('data.csv')
data[1..-1].each_with_index do |row, index|
puts "Contact number #{index + 1} has the following last name : #{row[LASTNAME_INDEX]}"
end
#~> Contact number 1 has the following last name : Canter
#~> Contact number 2 has the following last name : McArthur
I'm attempting to write a Ruby method which accepts an array of strings (for example, ["EG", "K", "C"], and returns all records from a database table where the icao_code field starts with any of those strings (for example, KORD, EGLL, and CYVR would all match). The length of the array will vary, and it will be input by a user, so it needs to be sanitized.
If I were only searching for a single string, I could do something like Airport.where("icao_code LIKE ?", "#{icao_start}%"). However, since I need to search against an arbitrary number of strings, I can't use that syntax.
Right now, I've got it working as follows:
def in_region(icao_starts)
where_clause = icao_starts.map{|i| "icao_code LIKE '#{i}%'"}.join(" OR ")
return Airport.where(where_clause)
end
However, I'm a bit worried using a setup like this with untrusted user input, since I suspect it would be vulnerable to SQL injection.
Is there a better way to get the same result in a more secure way?
You could consider something like this:
def in_region(icao_starts)
where_clause = "icao_code LIKE '#?%' OR " * icao_starts.length
return Airport.where(where_clause.sub(/\ OR\ $/, ''), *icao_starts)
end
This will build up a (potentially very long?) string with ? placeholders. The *icao_starts will expand that array into arguments to the where clause, so each ? will end up getting safely replaced. The sub(/\ OR\ $/, '') simply trims off the final OR (you could append 1=0 instead if you wanted).
If I were you I would also perform a .uniq on icao_starts before you do anything, truncate the array at some sensible upper length limit, and also have a whitelist of permitted values (oh, forget that, I thought users were searching by airport code). That should be pretty much infallible.
You are right about not interpolating user input into your SQL query. This is dangerous and makes your code vulnerable for SQLI attacks.
def in_region(icao_starts)
conditions = icao_starts.map { "icao_code LIKE ?"}
Airport.where(conditions.join(' OR '), *icao_starts.map { |name| "#{name}%"})
end
It is pretty similar than the solution of bogardpd but does not use a Regexp to get rid of the last " OR"
I am writing an app that needs to quickly process hundreds of thousands of rows of data, so I've looked into nesting raw SQL in my Ruby code using ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute, which is working beautifully. However whenever I run it I get the following Object as a result:
#<PG::Result:0x007fe158ab18c8 status=PGRES_TUPLES_OK ntuples=0 nfields=1 cmd_tuples=0>
I've googled around and can't find a way to parse the PG Result into something actually useful. Is there any built-in PG way to do this, or a workaround, or anything really?
Here is the query I'm using:
SELECT row_to_json(row(company_name, ccn_short_title, title))
FROM contents
WHERE contents.company_name = '#{company_name}'
AND contents.title = '#{title}';
Actually PG::Result responds to many well-known methods from Enumerable module. You can output them all to watch for the desired ones:
query = "SELECT row_to_json(row) from (select * from users) row"
result = ActiveRecord::Base.connection.execute(query)
result.methods - Object.methods
# => returns an array of methods which can be used
For example, you could iterate the results and map them to something more suitable...
result.map do |row|
JSON.parse(row["row_to_json"])
end
# => returns familiar hashes
Get a desired result hash by its index...
result[0]
And much more.
I'm importing data from old spreadsheets into a database using rails.
I have one column that contains a list on each row, that are sometimes formatted as
first, second
and other times like this
third and fourth
So I wanted to split up this string into an array, delimiting either with a comma or with the word "and". I tried
my_string.split /\s?(\,|and)\s?/
Unfortunately, as the docs say:
If pattern contains groups, the respective matches will be returned in the array as well.
Which means that I get back an array that looks like
[
[0] "first"
[1] ", "
[2] "second"
]
Obviously only the zeroth and second elements are useful to me. What do you recommend as the neatest way of achieving what I'm trying to do?
You can instruct the regexp to not capture the group using ?:.
my_string.split(/\s?(?:\,|and)\s?/)
# => ["first", "second"]
As an aside note
into a database using rails.
Please note this has nothing to do with Rails, that's Ruby.