I have a great confusion about tshark.
What is the basic unit of the messages captured by tshark? Ip, tcp, or http?
I see TCP http or ssl and so on in the protocol column in wireshark.
These protocols are in different layer.
In addition, what is the tshark command to capturing the http message with tshark.
See the man page. To quote:
TShark is a network protocol analyzer. It lets you capture packet data from a live network, or read packets from a previously saved capture file
Packets are usually either TCP or UDP (you can find a list of protocols here), When wireshark states that it is HTTP or SSL, then it is based on introspection of the packet (Probably based on destination port).
Related
I am trying to debug an LWM2M protocol issue. I need to know what messages are transferred between the COAP server and the COAP client. As the traffic is encrypted using DTLS, I need to give the pre-shared key in wireshark to see the payload. Wireshark is successfully decrypting the payload, but I am not able to see the underlying COAP protocol messages. I am seeing just the raw data("Application data"):
But when I try sniffing unencrypted COAP traffic on a dummy setup, I could see the COAP messages properly:
How can I view the COAP protocol traffic using wireshark when it is encrypted?
The problem is that you're using a non-standard port number for COAPS instead of the IANA-registered port of 5684, and the Wireshark COAP dissector's proto_reg_handoff_coap() function only registers to the DTLS dissector with that fixed, non-configurable port (DEFAULT_COAPS_PORT). There are some possible ways to fix this and/or work-around it.
If possible, change your application to use the standard port, 5684.
Modify the Wireshark COAP dissector to also register to the DTLS dissector with your desired port, or better yet to allow the port to be configurable, perhaps even with a port range preference to allow multiple ports to be registered. You can reference the Wireshark Developer's Guide for information about compiling and developing for Wireshark on your particular platform.
Submit a Wireshark Issue, asking for an enhancement to the COAP dissector to allow the DTLS-registered port to be configurable. Again, a range preference would probably be even better, as it would allow more than just 1 port to be registered.
Assuming the first option isn't possible and the other options would take longer and not solve the immediate problem of dissecting the payload as COAP for your existing capture file, you could use a program such as TraceWrangler (or other such Capture file editors and/or anonymizers tools) to rewrite the UDP port value of 57845 to 5684 for all packets. That should allow the payload to be passed to the COAP dissector without requiring any other changes. If you do use TraceWrangler, then the basic steps would be:
Add Files: Choose your file, i.e., file.pcapng.
Taskname: Anonymize Files.
Payload: Deselect "Remove all unknown layers..." as you want to keep everything.
PCAPng: Action=Passthrough, as there's no need to replace original comments here.
Layer 4, UDP: Action=Replace. Select "Replace UDP ports by list", then choose Add. Enter 57845 for the Original port number and 5684 for the Replacement port number, then click Add.
Select Okay.
Select Run.
When the Status indicates, "Task complete", you should be able to open the newly created packet capture file, named file_anon.pcapng, in Wireshark and Wireshark should now recognize the payload as COAP.
DISCLAIMER: I have not tested this myself, but it should work.
When I enable Wireshark capture on my laptop, the application becomes slow because it captures all the packets. I am running about 100 Mbps of traffic with different packet sizes.
Let's say, I only need to capture rtp,sip packets and ignore the other UDP, TCP, DHCP etc.
How can I do it using Wireshark?
Note: I know the filter option to view only the packets I need, but the request is to only capture rtp packets
From the Wireshark SIP wiki page:
Capture Filter
You cannot directly filter SIP protocols while capturing. However, if you know the UDP or TCP or port used (see above), you can filter on that one.
For help with writing capture filters, refer to the pcap-filter man page.
I have an application that is designed and working that is receiving UDP broadcasts on a port. The application has been working just fine, but I have wanted to compare the packets received by the application with a Wireshark capture. I'm trying to make sure that I'm capturing as many of the packets as possible with minimal data loss.
I initially thought that I'd run Wireshark and compare the raw packets captured against the packets shown in our application. However, when I run Wireshark, the packets are never captured at the IP layer for that port. I see other traffic from the server, but I never see Wireshare packets for this specific port.
The application continues to capture the data just fine. When I look at the IP src/dest fields, the src looks correct, 10.12.10.42, however the destination IP address is 0.0.0.0. I would have expected something like 255.255.255.255 instead for the destination address.
I don't have access to the application that is broadcasting the data, but I did write a quick sample UDP broadcaster and receiver to make sure I my expectations were correct. the sample application worked as expected.
Any ideas on why a UDP broadcast would be received by an application, but not show up in a Wireshark capture? Does Wireshark ignore an address like 0.0.0.0 and not capture it all?
Wireshark only captures Ethernet frames that are going through an interface you are listening on. Thus, packets destined on loopback addresses are not captured. I would check your machine's routing tables to see where packets are actually going.
I am running tcpdump to capture UDP messages on a specific port. The UDP traffic being captured contains fragmented UDP packets.
When a fragmented UDP packet is encountered, tcpdump is only capturing the first fragment. (Probably because only the first fragment contains the port information).
Is there a switch on TCP dump that will capture all the fragments of a UDP packet even when messages from a port are being filtered?
I could be wrong but I think what you mean is how to extend the snaplen as you're only catching a snippet of the packet with tcpdump. The default snaplen is usually 68 bytes.
Setting snaplen to 0 sets it to the default of 65535 bytes so run tcpdump with "-s 0" to capture everything. Are you running with the '-s' switch?
It's recommended that you limit snaplen to the smallest number that will capture the protocol information you're interested in.
HTH!
I'm writing a dissector for a protocol that I have to work with. This protocol runs atop TCP and is stateful.
In order to dissect the fields correctly, I need to identify which endpoint opened the TCP connection (the client).
Is there a way to get this info from the tcp dissector? Would I have to write a tap? I'm not so clear on how to do this in lua.
Cross posted on the Wireshark stack site here.
To write stateful protocol dissector in Lua you can use closures to store state information.
you can easily decipher which endpoint started conversation if you analyse flags SYN/SYN+ACK for the first packets of given TCP stream # (which is generated by TCP dissector).
To make this work you should install a post dissector and check for 'tcp.stream' field.
You can checkout that technique in sources of my small Lua wireshark dissector to capture HTTP state information