JIRA Labels with fixed set of values - jira

We have labels in JIRA. This "labels" is predefined field and not a custom field as I observed.
The labels are auto-complete fields and any value can be assigned to it.
I want these labels to pick values only from a set of values. Is there a way to do this?
Also, is it possible that the set of values can be uploaded from a list/excel/csv?

The easiest way to do this would be to add a custom field with your required settings (a single value or maybe a multi-pick selection).
I use the Jira Cloud solution and I'm not aware of any way to import values into custom fields. If you have a local installation and have a developer to help you might be able to find a way to import them but I'm guessing it might be easier/faster to do it manually even if there are a hundred or so.

Related

How can I filter by calculated field without using groups in tableau?

So I am working on a Tableau Dashboard. On the worksheet I'm working on I had to create 50-75 calculated fields. Now I am running into an issue where I dont know how to group all the calculated fields as that is not an option. I have tried a few things.
I tried doing an if then statement but it isn't working because floating values cant use and.
Then I tried to do an Case when then statements. That works but im not sure how to get it into a format i can use to filter.
I was told a parameter might work but i am running into an issue because i would have to run each calculated field instead of a group of multiple fields.
Does anyone have some suggestions to help with this?

Column Order with ui-grid-grouping

i'm struggling with the Ui-Grid. I am using the grouping option to group my results. This works pretty fine, but in the documentation of this feature Grouping you can find the following statement:
Optionally (and by default) grouped columns are moved to the front of the grid, which provides a more visually pleasing effect. In order to avoid creating a dependency on pinning, this is done by moving the columns themselves as part of the grouping feature, not through use of the pinning feature.
My understanding is, that it would be possible to disable this behavior. But i am not able to find how i can do so.
I want to have an action-column in the front of every entry.
Can anyone tell me how i disable the behavior that the "grouped" columns are always the first in the grid?
Thanks in advance
Found it out by myself:
You need to set the value "moveGroupColumns" to false
This value belongs to the gridOptions object

How to check that a TField has been modified manually

So I'm working on a form that makes use of database grids, I'm having an issue where I need to auto-default a field based upon the amount and GST fields. This will always auto-default my field for the user until the point where they manually change my field, at which point it obviously will not do anymore defaulting for that record.
Any ideas on how I can achieve the recognition of a manually modified field in Delphi? Please note I'm not talking about the manual modification of a record so the following code is not applicable to my situation (unless you can somehow find a way to use it).
Much appreciated!
Populate the value in the field when the amount or GST changes, and then calculate whatever the field is you want to auto-default. Allow the user to change it, and don't react to that change unless the user modifies the amount or GST again. You can use the TField.OnChange event (on the amount and GST fields) to do so.

Filter Issues by JQL

I have list of issues which contain certain set of fields (6 custom fields) these fields can be have values only "A"or "B". the my question is how can I filter those issues if one these field have a value "A". let say for a example these custom fields are
cus_field1,cus_field2,cus_field3,cus_field4,cus_field5,cus_field6 and if one these field have certain value how can I filter those issues?
I am not sure, do you mean how to use an 'or' clause? As I understand, a simple "cus_field1=A or cus_field2=A or cus_field3=A or cus_field4=A or cus_field5=A or cus_field6=A" should solve your problem, isn't it?
According to the reference, I couldn't find any possibility to combine different fields, so you have no other choice but specify the A filter value for each custom field...
https://confluence.atlassian.com/jira/searching-for-issues-185729570.html

How come "content_created_at" is later than "content_modified_at"

For some files the content_create_at field is set to a date that is later than the content_modified_at field. How can that be? Is this simply because these are the dates set by the client?
I have read http://developers.box.com/content-times/.
John is right. There is (likely) some client that is setting one or the other field. In general we recommend setting both the fields when you set them, so you don't provide confusing dates to other systems.

Resources