I need a little help... I have these relationships... Users belong to Department, a Department has a manager, Managers (Users) can have many managed departments.
I'm having one of those days and I can't for the life of me figure out what to put inside the User model to define the `has_many :managed_departments' part of the relationship.
Department
class Department < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users
belongs_to :manager, foreign_key: "manager_id", class_name: "User"
end
User
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :department
# has_many :managed_departments
end
This works: Department.last.manager which returns:
=> #<User id: 2, etc...
I'm having a mindblank on what to put in the User model.
Can anyone help?
You can use class_name option same like you used it in Department model
#user.rb
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :department
has_many :managed_departments, class_name: "Department", foreign_key: "manager_id"
end
You are not creating right association. You have many to many relation ship between user and department.
user has_many departments (Can manage multiple department)
department has_many users
As a database standard you should break many to many relationship and introduce a new intermediate table.
So your new table should be users_departments. In this table you can add column user is manager or not.
table should have column :
user_id , department_is, is_manager
class Department < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :users, :through => :users_departments
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :departments, :through => :users_departments
end
class UsersDepartment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :department
end
Here you can find anything with association. and with simple scope you can find manager of department also.
Related
So I have two tables, a Customers table and a Companies table. I have also created an empty Employees table that I would like to use as a join table.
These are the associations I have: (I want customers to be associated with their respective company)
class Company < ApplicationRecord
has_many :employees
has_many :customers, :through => :employees
end
class Customer < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :employees
end
class Employee < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :customer
belongs_to :company
end
Where would be the best way to do this? In my Customer#new method in the controller? I read that I need to use <<, but I don't know how to approach that.
You need to use the concept of Inverse association here:
class Customer has_many :companies, :through => :employees
You could just try delegating the company call on customers to their employee:
customer.rb
delegate :company, to: :employee
Now whenever you ask a customer its company, it will ask its employee to handle it.
I have a Student, Teacher, and University model. A Teacher has_many Universities and a Student has_one University.
Currently there is no Teacher or Student model but a single model User. In this way what would be relation between User and University? And what would be the correct schema?
Firstly,you are lot confused with the associations.It is university has_many teachers not
Teacher has_many Universities and also it is not Student has_one University,it is student belongs_to university.
And your point of giving only one model as User instead of having two models(teacher and Student) should be given like this
class University < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :teachers, :class_name => "User"
has_many :students, :class_name => "User"
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :university
end
And I would recommend to read these Guides before going any further with associations.
Hope it helps!
Update
Well,in that point,you can do like this
class University < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :teacher, :class_name => "User",:foreign_key => 'user_id'
has_many :students, :class_name => "User"
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :universities
end
I believe you are looking for something called single table inheritance. Check out this article:
http://www.alexreisner.com/code/single-table-inheritance-in-rails
In RoR3,
I have Users and Skills and each skill is created by a user. I wanted to record that, so I created a one to many relationship.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :skills
end
class Skill < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
end
However, each user also has many skills in the sense that, user "Bob" created skill "Kung Fu", user "Charlie" created skill "Karate" and user "Bob" both created and is able to do both "Kung Fu" and "Karate"
How should I represent this with ActiveRecord? Should I just create a new table "user_skills" which has_many :skills? and belong_to :user?
There are two different associations here. The first is a one-to-many association. An user can be the creator of any number of skills. The second one is a many-to-many association, an user can have many skills and a skill can have many users.
The first one is a simple belongs_to <-> has_many declaration. For the second one, you either need a has_and_belongs_to_many declaration in both models, and a related join table, or a dedicated join model, and a has_many :through declaration. Let's try the first one:
Method 1: HABTM
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :created_skills, :class_name => 'Skill', :inverse_of => :creator
has_and_belongs_to_many :skills
end
class Skill < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :creator, :class_name => 'User', :inverse_of => :created_skills
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
This requires a join table called "skills_users" that has columns named user_id and skill_id
Method 2: Has many through (Join model)
The second one is similar, but adds a model that acts as the middleman. This has an added benefit that you can include additional columns in the join model, like for example a skill level.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :created_skills, :class_name => 'Skill', :inverse_of => :creator
has_many :user_skills
has_many :skills, :through => :user_skills
end
class Skill < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :creator, :class_name => 'User', :inverse_of => :created_skills
has_many :user_skills
has_many :users, :through => :user_skills
end
class UserSkill < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :user
belongs_to :skill
end
Having those two models
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :skills
end
class Skill < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :users
end
You would have to create an extra migration (without the model)
rails generate migration CreateSkillsUsersJoin
which will give you
class CreateSkillsUsersJoin < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :skills_users, id => false do |t|
t.references "user"
t.references "skill"
end
add_index :skills_users,["user_id","skill_id"]
end
def self.down
drop_table :skills_users
end
end
The methods self.up and self.down you will have yo add them
You'd be well served using a gem like acts_as_taggable_on which you'd be able to simply setup and use in your User model, something like:
acts_as_taggable_on :skills
Honestly, they've figured all this stuff out, as it's not as simple as what you're trying to do, OR I should rephrase that and say, what you are trying to do is overtly 'complex' and this gem allows you to just keep on, keeping on after it's set up.
Read the Readme.
I have a User model, Person model and Company model.
a User has many companies through Person and vice versa.
But i would like to be able to populate People and Companies that are not tied to Users that can be tied later.
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name
has_many :people
has_many :companies, :through => :people
end
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :user_id, :company_id
belongs_to :users
belongs_to :companies
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
attr_accessible :name
has_many :people
has_many :users, :through => :person
end
now in the console i want to be doing the following
User.find(1).companies
then it should find me the companies in which user(1) is a person of interest.
Have I got this wrong, is there a small change that I should be making.
Your Person model can't directly "belong_to" more than one, your belongs_to :users and belongs_to :companies associations won't work that way. Companies-to-people need to be connected through another join table that describes the relationship between them, for example Employment which points to one instance of each model:
class Person < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :employments
has_many :companies, :through => :employments
end
class Employment < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :person
belongs_to :company
end
class Company < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :employments
has_many :people, :through => :employments
end
You can then use the :through option to associate the many companies/people on the other side of that employment relationship in the middle.
Similarly, if a Person can be owned by more than one User then you will need a join model between those two entities as well.
Just as a followup, in a has_many :through relationship, there is nothing that says you cannot use your join table (in your case, Person) independently. By nature of the relationship, you are joining through a completely separate ActiveRecord model, which is what most notably distinguishes it from the has_and_belongs_to_many relationship.
As Brad pointed out in his comment, you need to pluralize 'person' to 'people' in your relationship. Other than that, it looks like you set it up correctly. Exposing :user_id and :company_id with attr_accessible will enable you to mass-assign these values later from a postback, but often times you want to shy away from doing so with role-based associations, as you may not want to leave them exposed to potential HTTP Post attacks.
Remember, in your controller you can always do something like this with or without attr_accessible:
#person = Person.new
#person.user = User.find(...)
#person.company = Company.find(...)
#person.save
Hope that helps.
I have an application which has the following characteristics
There are Clubs
Each Club has Teams
Each Team has Players
I have a users table. The user table basically contains the username and password for the club manager, team manager and the player to login to the system.
How should I structure the models and the tables?
I plan to create tables for Club, Team and Players. But I am not sure show to structure the relationship between them and the users table.
I could create user_id in each of the model, but the relationship would be Club belongs_to User which doesn't seems right. Moreover I would end up with a User model that has the following
has_one :club
has_one :team
has_one :player
Which is not right. A user will have only one of them at any given time.
Is there a better way to structure this?
Under Rails, has_one is really "has at most one". It's perfectly valid to have all three has_one decorators in User. If you want to ensure they only have precisely one, you could add a validation, for instance:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :club
has_one :team
has_one :player
validate :has_only_one
private
def has_only_one
if [club, team, player].compact.length != 1
errors.add_to_base("Must have precisely one of club, team or player")
end
end
end
Since you have the ability to change the users table in the database, I think I would put club_id, team_id, player_id in users, and have the following:
class Club < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :user
has_many :teams
has_many :players, :through => :teams
end
class Team < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :user
belongs_to :club
has_many :players
end
class Player < ActiveRecord::Base
has_one :user
belongs_to :team
has_one :club, :through => :team
end
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :club
belongs_to :team
belongs_to :player
validate :belongs_to_only_one
def belongs_to_only_one
if [club, team, player].compact.length != 1
errors.add_to_base("Must belong to precisely one of club, team or player")
end
end
end
I'd even be tempted to rename User as Manager, or have has_one :manager, :class_name => "User" in the Club, Team and Player models, but your call.