I use StackExachange.Redis to remove keys from Redis DB. It is quite slow to get list by mask *val* and delete then.
Looking for sample code that is runable with .ScriptEvaluate.
Solution found. Created following method that returns number of keys deleted.
public int RedisPurge(string keyContains)
{
var serializer = new NewtonsoftSerializer();
var cacheClient = new StackExchangeRedisCacheClient(serializer);
var mask = string.Format("*{0}*", keyContains);
var result = cacheClient.Database.ScriptEvaluate("local keys = redis.call('keys', ARGV[1]) for i=1,#keys,5000 do redis.call('del', unpack(keys, i, math.min(i+4999, #keys))) end return keys", null, new RedisValue[] { mask });
try
{
return Convert.ToInt32(result.ToString().Split(" ".ToCharArray(), StringSplitOptions.RemoveEmptyEntries)[0]);
}
catch (Exception)
{
return 0;
}
}
Related
My Problem is very similar to the one mentioned here and here, but for some reason these are not working for me.
Basically, I want to do some simple I/O operations (on a mobile), returning of list of strings (folder path) that contain a certain file format (let's assume for the sake of argument that I want to find all mp3 files).
This is the code I have
Future<List<String>> getFolders() async {
List<String> _dirs = new List();
await SimplePermissions.requestPermission(Permission.ReadExternalStorage);
_dirs = await findAllFolders();
return _dirs;
}
Future<List<String>> findAllFolders() async {
Directory _root = Directory("/sdcard");
bool _notInList = true;
List<String> _dirs = new List();
_root.list(recursive: true, followLinks: false)
.listen((FileSystemEntity entity) {
if(entity.toString().contains("mp3")) {
if(_dirs.length==0) {
_dirs.add(entity.parent.path.toString());
} else {
_notInList = true;
for (var i = 0; i < _dirs.length; ++i) {
if(_dirs[i] == entity.parent.path.toString()) {
_notInList = false;
}
}
if(_notInList) {
_dirs.add(entity.parent.path.toString());
}
}
}
});
return _dirs;
}
where I want to use _dirs outside of getFolders().
I know that findAllFolders() returns _dirs immediately, before my listen() event has finished (and so its length is always 0, although the actual method works fine, i.e. if I put print statements where I have _dirs.add() I can see that the correct directories are added, _dirs contains what I want but I have no idea how to return the finished _dirs list). I tried to do something in a similar way to the above mentioned post, where a Completer is used (to which I am getting an error message "Bad State: Future already completed"). The respective code would be
Future<List<String>> findAllFolders() async {
Directory _root = Directory("/sdcard");
bool _notInList = true;
List<String> _dirs = new List();
Completer<List<String>> _completer = new Completer<List<String>>();
_root.list(recursive: true, followLinks: false)
.listen((FileSystemEntity entity) {
if(entity.toString().contains("mp3")) {
if(_dirs.length==0) {
_dirs.add(entity.parent.path.toString());
} else {
_notInList = true;
for (var i = 0; i < _dirs.length; ++i) {
if(_dirs[i] == entity.parent.path.toString()) {
_notInList = false;
}
}
if(_notInList) {
_dirs.add(entity.parent.path.toString());
}
}
}
_completer.complete(_dirs);
});
return _completer.future;
}
The getFolders() function remains the same in this case. Could anyone point out where my logic is going wrong?
You're setting a listener, then immediately returning before any results are received - that's why your return is always empty. The body of findAllFolders() needs to wait for a response before returning. Try the below to replace _root.list().listen():
List<FileSystemEntity> files = await _root.list(recursive: true, followLinks: false).toList();
for (FileSystemEntity entity in files) {
// Do your filename logic and populate _dirs
This is what I see in the test results in the Test Manager: some attachments (1) are on the test steps (in this case - on a shared step). Some (2) are on a result level. In the report I'm working on, I can extract information about attachments (2), but fail to get information about (1). Any suggestions?
In the debugger I can see, that the steps are iterated, I can see, i.e. "Verify the stuff" string etc, but the step has 0 attachments.
For reference, this is most of the code I am using to extract test case results:
foreach (ITestCaseResult testCaseResult in resutlsToDisplay)
{
project.TestCases.Find(test.Id);
var testRun = testCaseResult.GetTestRun();
var testPlanEntry = project.TestPlans.Find(testRun.TestPlanId);
var artifacts = testCaseResult.QueryAssociatedWorkItemArtifacts();
if (testPlanEntry.Name != testPlan)
continue;
var testResult = new TestResult // CUSTOM CLASS
{
TestConfiguration = testCaseResult.TestConfigurationName,
TestRun = testRun.Id,
DateCreated = testRun.DateCreated,
DateStarted = testRun.DateStarted,
DateCompleted = testRun.DateCompleted,
Result = testCaseResult.Outcome.ToString(),
TestResultComment = testRun.Comment,
RunBy = testCaseResult.RunBy == null ? "" : testCaseResult.RunBy.DisplayName,
Build = testRun.BuildNumber ?? ""
};
foreach (var iteration in testCaseResult.Iterations)
{
var iterationResult = testResult.Clone();
iterationResult.ResultAttachmentHtml = getAttachments(iteration.Attachments, testCase.TestCaseId.ToString(), string.Empty, iteration.IterationId.ToString()); // HERE I GET THE ATTACHMENTS OF TYPE 2
iterationResult.Iteration = iteration.IterationId;
iterationResult.IterationComment = iteration.Comment;
foreach (var step in steps)
{
var stepCopy = step.Clone();
iterationResult.Steps.Add(stepCopy);
var actionResult = iteration.FindActionResult(stepCopy.TestStep);
if (actionResult == null)
continue;
stepCopy.Result.Comment = actionResult.ErrorMessage;
stepCopy.Result.Result = actionResult.Outcome.ToString();
stepCopy.Result.AttachmentHtml = getAttachments(actionResult.Attachments, testCase.TestCaseId.ToString(), step.Number, iteration.IterationId.ToString()); // HERE I DO NOT GET ATTACHMENTS OF TYPE 1 - WHY?
}
config.TestCaseResult.TestResults.Add(iterationResult);
}
} //end foreach testCaseResult in resutlsToDisplay
I think I figured it out eventually.
The ITestCaseResult contains ITestIterationResultCollection Iterations.
The ITestIterationResult contains TestActionResultCollection of ITestActionResult.
ITestActionResult can be either ITestStepResult or ISharedStepResult.
If it is ITestStepResult, then it has Attachments collection right there.
If it is ISharedStepResult, however, then it has its own TestActionResultCollection. So this is the one that I have to iterate to find if each member has Attachments.
The code to iterate over steps, including shared steps, looks like this:
foreach (ITestIterationResult iteration in testCaseResult.Iterations)
{
var iterationResult = testResult.Clone();
iterationResult.ResultAttachmentHtml = getAttachments(iteration.Attachments,
testCase.TestCaseId.ToString(),
string.Empty, iteration.IterationId.ToString());
iterationResult.Iteration = iteration.IterationId;
iterationResult.IterationComment = iteration.Comment;
foreach (ITestActionResult action in iteration.Actions)
{
if (action is ITestStepResult)
{
GetStepResults(steps, action, iterationResult, iteration, getAttachments, testCase, false);
}
else if (action is ISharedStepResult)
{
ISharedStepResult result = action as ISharedStepResult;
foreach (var sharedAction in result.Actions)
{
if (sharedAction is ITestStepResult)
{
GetStepResults(steps, sharedAction, iterationResult, iteration, getAttachments, testCase, true);
}
}
}
}
The app I'm integrating returns a 400 bad request when the search doesn't find a match which Zapier sees as an error.
How can I catch the error and return a [] to tell Zapier there is no match?
Here's the existing post_search code of got:
match_person_email_post_search: function(bundle) {
console.log(bundle.response.content);
var res = JSON.parse(bundle.response.content);
var data;
if(res.person!==null)
{
data = [ res.person ];
}
else
{ data = []; }
return data;
},
I should probably mention I'm a rookie at this scripting!
Thanks!
As long as the search API result returns something, you should be able to capture that using Zapier scripting. Assuming your Zapier search key is contact_data, here is how the function would look:
var Zap = {
search_contact_post_search: function(bundle) {
return bundle.response.content;
}
};
So you can check (within that function) if the data is empty or containing something other than search data, and just return an empty array:
var Zap = {
search_contact_post_search: function(bundle) {
var response_content = JSON.parse(bundle.response.content);
if (!response_content.some_field) {
return [];
}
}
};
I'm using Q Promises to retrieve data from my redis repository. The problem I'm having, is that through each iteration, the array object (localEncounter) I'm using to store data returned from the chained functions is never updated at each iteration. Previously, I tried to solve this with a foreach loop and spread but the results were the same.
How should I correct this so that localEncounter is updated at each iteration, and ultimately localEncounters contains correct data when returned? Thank you.
var localEncounters = [];
var localEncounter = {};
Promise.all(ids.map(function(id) {
return localEncounter, getEncounter(id, client)
.then(function (encounter) {
encounterObject = encounter;
//set the fields for the return object
localEncounter['encounterid'] = encounterObject[f_id];
localEncounter['screeningid'] = encounterObject[f_screening_id];
localEncounter['assessmentid'] = encounterObject[f_clinical_assessment_id];
localEncounter['psychevalid'] = encounterObject[f_psych_eval_id];
//get screening
return getScreening(encounterObject[f_screening_id], client);
})
.then(function (screening) {
//set the fields for the return object
localEncounter['screeningbegintime'] = screening[f_begin_time];
//get assessment
return getAssessment(localEncounter['assessmentid'], client);
})
.then(function (assessment) {
//set the fields for the return object
localEncounter['assessmentbegintime'] = assessment[f_begin_time];
//get psycheval
//localEncounters.push(assessment);
return getPsychEval(localEncounter['psychevalid'], client);
})
.then(function (psychEval) {
//set the fields for the return object
localEncounter['assessmentbegintime'] = psychEval[f_begin_time];
localEncounters.push(localEncounter);
}
, function (reason) {
console.log(reason); // display reason why the call failed;
reject(reason, 'Something went wrong creating the encounter!');
})
})).then(function(results) {
// results is an array of names
console.log('done ');
resolve(localEncounters);
})
Solution: I only needed to move the declaration of localEncounter inside the map iterator
before:
var localEncounter = {};
Promise.all(ids.map(function(id) {
after:
Promise.all(ids.map(function(id) {
var localEncounter = {};
This now allows that each id iteration gets its own localEncounter object.
I am trying to do a simple CRUD app using Ember + Rails and I'm getting the following error when trying to go to the /workouts route.
Error while loading route: TypeError {} ember.js?body=1:415
Uncaught TypeError: Object function () {
if (!wasApplied) {
Class.proto(); // prepare prototype...
}
o_defineProperty(this, GUID_KEY, undefinedDescriptor);
o_defineProperty(this, '_super', undefinedDescriptor);
var m = meta(this), proto = m.proto;
m.proto = this;
if (initMixins) {
// capture locally so we can clear the closed over variable
var mixins = initMixins;
initMixins = null;
this.reopen.apply(this, mixins);
}
if (initProperties) {
// capture locally so we can clear the closed over variable
var props = initProperties;
initProperties = null;
var concatenatedProperties = this.concatenatedProperties;
for (var i = 0, l = props.length; i < l; i++) {
var properties = props[i];
Ember.assert("Ember.Object.create no longer supports mixing in other definitions, use createWithMixins instead.", !(properties instanceof Ember.Mixin));
for (var keyName in properties) {
if (!properties.hasOwnProperty(keyName)) { continue; }
var value = properties[keyName],
IS_BINDING = Ember.IS_BINDING;
if (IS_BINDING.test(keyName)) {
var bindings = m.bindings;
if (!bindings) {
bindings = m.bindings = {};
} else if (!m.hasOwnProperty('bindings')) {
bindings = m.bindings = o_create(m.bindings);
}
bindings[keyName] = value;
}
var desc = m.descs[keyName];
Ember.assert("Ember.Object.create no longer supports defining computed properties.", !(value instanceof Ember.ComputedProperty));
Ember.assert("Ember.Object.create no longer supports defining methods that call _super.", !(typeof value === 'function' && value.toString().indexOf('._super') !== -1));
Ember.assert("`actions` must be provided at extend time, not at create time, when Ember.ActionHandler is used (i.e. views, controllers & routes).", !((keyName === 'actions') && Ember.ActionHandler.detect(this)));
if (concatenatedProperties && indexOf(concatenatedProperties, keyName) >= 0) {
var baseValue = this[keyName];
if (baseValue) {
if ('function' === typeof baseValue.concat) {
value = baseValue.concat(value);
} else {
value = Ember.makeArray(baseValue).concat(value);
}
} else {
value = Ember.makeArray(value);
}
}
if (desc) {
desc.set(this, keyName, value);
} else {
if (typeof this.setUnknownProperty === 'function' && !(keyName in this)) {
this.setUnknownProperty(keyName, value);
} else if (MANDATORY_SETTER) {
Ember.defineProperty(this, keyName, null, value); // setup mandatory setter
} else {
this[keyName] = value;
}
}
}
}
}
finishPartial(this, m);
this.init.apply(this, arguments);
m.proto = proto;
finishChains(this);
sendEvent(this, "init");
} has no method 'find'
My code is located here: https://github.com/ecl1pse/ember-workouts
What am I doing wrong?
Edit: Upon further investigation I believe the culprit is
EmberWorkouts.WorkoutsRoute = Ember.Route.extend(
model: -> EmberWorkouts.Workout.find()
This doesn't actually return anything. How do I debug from there?
If I replace that with this
EmberWorkouts.WorkoutsRoute = Ember.Route.extend
model: -> [{title: 'hi'}, {title: 'damn'}]
The view actually renders content.
How do I get the model to collect from Rails properly?
Ember Data's interface has changed a little with the current release:
You can clear out the store.js file entirely. Ember Data will automatically set up a data store for you using the REST Adapter (unless you tell it otherwise).
Use model: -> #store.find('workout') instead.
I tested this with your app and it works.
If you haven't read through the Ember Data Guide in the last week or two (it's changed a lot), I would spend a few minutes on it.
The fix for this error (as of ember-data 1.0.0.beta.6) for me was to make sure that the JSON returned from the server included an "id" field for each model, BUT not to explicitly declare the id when setting up the Ember DS.Model.
jbuilder template:
json.scans do
json.array! #scans do |scan|
json.id scan.id # This prop has to be there
json.name scan.name
end
end
Ember model:
EmberApp.Scan = DS.Model.extend(
// Don't include the id prop here
name: DS.attr("string")
)