I want to get the full URI address of the current page in twig page in zf2. if I use url() it will only return back the zend url not the full adress.
I'm using a custom framework (similar as Symfony2). The way I handle this kind of things is by creating global twig variables inside the constructor of my controller. Take a look at this ZF2 - Rendering variables from Module.php to twig layout.
The solution on the top is a good solution to have customized global variables in twig for zf2 but to the specific problem I have I found the solution:
{{serverUrl(true)}}
the parameter true was what I was missing to get the full url.
Related
I'm getting this issue:
Router::connect('/',array('controller' => 'Controller','action' => 'login'));
This will show www.mysite/controller/login as the site URL
I would like to overwrite www.mysite.com/controller/login with just www.mysite.com, but still go to the login page. Does anyone know how to do it with Cake 2.x?
The behavior It's not exactly as you describe.
What the following does:
Router::connect('/',array('controller' => 'Controller','action' => 'login'));
is allow you to type www.mysite.com in your browser, and get the view that www.mysite.com/controller/login renders.
It works like an url rewrite instead of a redirect. Therefore, the above should work as expected. However, if it's not an example, try to name your controller differently, as it may cause trouble with CakePHP.
As stated by Inigo Router::connect() just connects a route/URL to a controller action. So with your defined route you should be able to goto www.mysite.com and your login action will be served (although I'm not sure that it is a good idea to have the base URL act as the login page).
It does not prevent www.mysite.com/controller/login from working as this is one of CakePHP's default routes.
To disable the default routes you need to remove this line from routes.php:-
require CAKE . 'Config' . DS . 'routes.php';
Be warned, if you remove this line you must have defined routes for all your pages in your app's routes file. This is not necessarily a bad thing, Beware the Route to Evil is a good read in regards to this.
As I used the "Auth" component I had to add in the function
beforeFilter()
of my controller this line:
$this->Auth->allow('anAction', 'anotherAction', '**login**');
Is it possible to not using angualar routes, because if I defined an routes like:
app.config(function($routeProvider){
$routeProvider.when('/home')
})
my url will look like www.app.com/#home,
I dont want to change url, just www.app.com nice and clean, in this case how to defined template for defferent controller and how to load the template in ng-view, and how to pass url parameter?
any idea?
You cannot do that with the built-in routing mechanism because path is required for every route. However, you can use ui-router library in order to create URL-less states and navigate to them using either code or directive.
I created this plunker to demonstrate how to use ui-router to navigate among states without modifying URL.
I need to implement an application with multi-language support using an AngularJS front-end and a Ruby on Rails server.
I am looking for a reasonable approach to render translated templates in multiple languages. I have come up with an approach I would like feedback on.
In the Angular routes definitions, set the template property to an html partial that just has an ng-include with the src attribute value set by the controller. This approach is needed to dynamically modify the path to the template to be fetched from the server; it is described here:
AngularJS - How to use $routeParams in generating the templateUrl?
So the Angular route config would look like:
angular.module('myApp', []).
config(function ($routeProvider) {
$routeProvider.when('/sites/new', {
template: '<div ng-include src="templateUrl"></div>',
controller: 'RouteController'
});
});
And the controller would look like:
// Set a prefix on the URL path, something like “es”
function RouteController($scope, $routeParams) {
$scope.templateUrl = $routeParams.locale + "/template/sites/site";
}
Here $routeParams.locale is used to set the locale, but could be a variable set by user action. The approach for dynamically modifying the template URL path to add a locale prefix seems a bit convoluted, but I know of no other way.
On the Rails side, in routes.rb, add a route:
match '/:locale/template/*template' => 'template#get'
The route uses route globbing so the params[:template] value can be a multi-level path.
The TemplateController#get action just renders the partial determined by params[:template]
The Template controller code is something like:
class TemplateController < ApplicationController
layout false
caches_page :get
def get
render(template: "template/#{params[:template]}")
end
end
The Rails I18n support for translations is used in the erb templates, translating according to the locale parameter.
In production, caching would be turned on. This would avoid incurring translation overhead. The locale prefix of the URL path would result in a per language set of translated templates to be cached.
This approach pushes translations processing to the server side as much as possible.
Is there any fundamental problems with this approach?
Could it be done better?
You may be interested in the angular-translate module.
We achieved client side internationalization in AngularJS with the i18next JQuery plugin http://i18next.com/ and created a filter called i18n.
When you initialize the Angular Application, you initialize the i18n plugin where you can provide a pattern to locate the file containing labels, and in the template use this as an example for binding labels and values.
{{'mynamespace:labels.firstname' | i18n}}
where "mynamespace" is used to separate your labels logically and used to locate JSON files with the labels. Within json files you can have one or more JSON objects with labels as properties. In the above example, the file called mynamespace-i18n-en-US.js if you provided a pattern __ns-i18n-__lng__.js
Is there a reason why the translation has to happen on the server?
Do you really need to translate the entire template?
I have a Struts2 app and I'm having a bit of a problem:
at the first page (index.jsp) I have a javascript line that sets the url to './admin/Search' like this:
window.location='./admin/Search';
that sends me to the login page and if I have access it will redirect me directly to the mentioned page. The problem is that, after that, all my actions keep this first namespace '/admin'. Other actions just do not have this '/admin' namespace, for example, they could have a '/users' namespace. In this cases the server can't locate the right action because it will look for /admin/myAction in the struts.xml file. It's like struts 2 doesn't change the whole namespace/action. It just replaces the action and that's it. I really need help on this guys! Thanks.
You need to change the package namespace specified in the in struts.xml files. That will help you redirect your namespace inside your application.
I have searched the forum, and google for this topic. Most of the articles are talking about using JSON to call the controller/action on the server and do ajax effect on the result.
I am trying to use some very basic JQuery features, like the JQuery UI/Tabs, and JQuery UI/Block for a dialog window. I cannot get these simple samples to work in my MVC project. Any ideas how I should modify these samples? I only need these basic feature now and I can go from here.
Thanks!
Actually I just got it working. The problem is that I need to modify the path to an absolute path to the view page because the relative path doesn't work with the MVC routes {controller}/{action}/{id}.
Thanks!
For info, re the relative path issue - I discussed this here (the same concept applies to any page, not just master pages). The approach I used is like so:
1: declare an extension method for adding scripts:
public static string Script(this HtmlHelper html, string path)
{
var filePath = VirtualPathUtility.ToAbsolute(path);
return "<script type=\"text/javascript\" src=\"" + filePath + "\"></script>";
}
2: when needed (for example in the <head>...</head>) use this method:
<%=Html.Script("~/Scripts/jquery-1.2.6.js")%>
The advantage of this is that it will work even if the web app is hosted in a virtual directory (i.e. you can't use "/Scripts" because you aren't necessarily at the site root) - yet it is a lot clearer (and less messy) than the full script with munged src, i.e.
<script ... src="<%=Url.Foo(...)%>"></script>
I just implemented the jquery autocomplete textbox in one of my asp.net project. I only had to import the js file and drop some code into my aspx page. Could you be more detailled about what sample you are trying to run?
This is quick response!!
I am trying to run this "Simple Tabs" on this page:
http://stilbuero.de/jquery/tabs/
I think it is the same with this one: http://docs.jquery.com/UI/Tabs
I just copied and pasted the whole thing into my MVC view page, with corrected path to the jquery.js and .css files, but the content in the tabs all show up together (two of them are supposed to be hidden). My understanding is that this simple jquery plugin just show and hide content.
I had the exact same problem with the jquery thickbox plugin, that the item marked as "hidden" (the dialog box) will always show up in my MVC view page.
I can understand some of the MVC+Jquery+json articles, but I don't understand why the hide/show doesn't work.
Thanks!
I just made a walkthrough on how to do this:
http://blogs.msdn.com/joecar/archive/2009/01/08/autocomplete-with-asp-net-mvc-and-jquery.aspx