Is it possible to not using angualar routes, because if I defined an routes like:
app.config(function($routeProvider){
$routeProvider.when('/home')
})
my url will look like www.app.com/#home,
I dont want to change url, just www.app.com nice and clean, in this case how to defined template for defferent controller and how to load the template in ng-view, and how to pass url parameter?
any idea?
You cannot do that with the built-in routing mechanism because path is required for every route. However, you can use ui-router library in order to create URL-less states and navigate to them using either code or directive.
I created this plunker to demonstrate how to use ui-router to navigate among states without modifying URL.
Related
I'm getting this issue:
Router::connect('/',array('controller' => 'Controller','action' => 'login'));
This will show www.mysite/controller/login as the site URL
I would like to overwrite www.mysite.com/controller/login with just www.mysite.com, but still go to the login page. Does anyone know how to do it with Cake 2.x?
The behavior It's not exactly as you describe.
What the following does:
Router::connect('/',array('controller' => 'Controller','action' => 'login'));
is allow you to type www.mysite.com in your browser, and get the view that www.mysite.com/controller/login renders.
It works like an url rewrite instead of a redirect. Therefore, the above should work as expected. However, if it's not an example, try to name your controller differently, as it may cause trouble with CakePHP.
As stated by Inigo Router::connect() just connects a route/URL to a controller action. So with your defined route you should be able to goto www.mysite.com and your login action will be served (although I'm not sure that it is a good idea to have the base URL act as the login page).
It does not prevent www.mysite.com/controller/login from working as this is one of CakePHP's default routes.
To disable the default routes you need to remove this line from routes.php:-
require CAKE . 'Config' . DS . 'routes.php';
Be warned, if you remove this line you must have defined routes for all your pages in your app's routes file. This is not necessarily a bad thing, Beware the Route to Evil is a good read in regards to this.
As I used the "Auth" component I had to add in the function
beforeFilter()
of my controller this line:
$this->Auth->allow('anAction', 'anotherAction', '**login**');
I want to get the full URI address of the current page in twig page in zf2. if I use url() it will only return back the zend url not the full adress.
I'm using a custom framework (similar as Symfony2). The way I handle this kind of things is by creating global twig variables inside the constructor of my controller. Take a look at this ZF2 - Rendering variables from Module.php to twig layout.
The solution on the top is a good solution to have customized global variables in twig for zf2 but to the specific problem I have I found the solution:
{{serverUrl(true)}}
the parameter true was what I was missing to get the full url.
We render HTML within a certain page and certain links don't have a http prefix (e.g. foo.com/bar) when you click on it throws a routing error. Is there a easier way to navigate to the right URL in such cases
Normally, the link_to takes care of you in this regard. You say html, so I assume we can't use ERB code, so you'll have to hardcode the links into the HTML.
Make sense?
Of course without any html code or routes.rb code, I can't tell you whether or not there isn't anything wrong with your existing code.
Why do you need to use absolute links within your application? Navigating to just "/bar" on that case would be fine.
If you use the link_to helper function on your views, it should rely on url_for which by default generates relative paths.
If you need absolute paths, you can specify a default host on your application (How do I set default host for url helpers in rails?) or specify it on the host option for the url_for function (http://apidock.com/rails/v3.2.13/ActionView/Helpers/UrlHelper/url_for).
We have been trying to implement shortcodes on an ASP.NET MVC web app that allow users to uniquely invoke a given article/page using an assigned short code.
For e.g.: www.mysite.com/power would map to an actual URL: www.mysite.com/Power/Home/.
I have created various routes throughout the site that map these shortcodes to various actions and controllers within the application. From a shortcode/route point of view, everything is working great.
I, however, noticed a couple of interesting things. I have hyperlinks that I use Url.Action method to generate the URL pointing pages. Many of these pages also have short codes associated with them. For e.g.: I have a link that says:
Go to Power page
This is a page that also has the previously mentioned short-code assigned to it. When I use Url.Action, I ideally expect it to create a link as /Power/Home/Index or /Power/Home, but since I also have a route constraint mapped to it, it now generates the link as /power.
Is there a way I can just use the actual link URL when generating links? I only want short-codes when I am sending out emails etc. I want the site to generate actual URLs.
This may or may not be possible, but I wanted to see if there were any ideas out there that I could use.
Anup
Index and Home are likely defined in your route table as defaults for the Action and Controller element. When you generate the Url it wont include the defaults if they aren't needed.
You could write your own Action overload or helper, which would allow you to take more direct control of the generated URL or action link. You could approach it from two different ways: 1) a helper to generate short-code specific urls and links, and/or 2) a helper to generate the full url and/or link. If Url.Action is returning the short-code version due to your routing configuration, I'd think a good place to start would be the second option, creating a helper/extension method that will generate the full url for you.
Here's how I solved this:
Instead of naming a route with short code to point to the action url, I made the route point to a different Controller action which would then redirect to the actual route that I want it to.
For e.g.: Originally I had the code "power" defined in the route table such that it would point to www.mysite.com/Power/Home.
Now instead of pointing it to that action - Index, controller - Home, area - Power, I make it resolve to: action - Power, Controller - Home, Area - ShortCode.
In the controller now, I simply do a RedirectToAction("Index", "Home", new { Area = "Power" });
This ensures that the actual links to /Power/Home do not resolve to the shortcode "power".
This is a simple fix increased the work by a little bit, but works like a charm.
My application works fine when I have only one parameter.
e.g.
/Product/Index/2
/Report/Sales/08-2009
But it failes when I add one more part to the url. Let's say I want to add the end month-year parameter to the url routing. Mow it becomes:
/Report/Sales/05-2009/09-2009
I do get both parameters in my action method. I parse it and retrieve the data and pass the Model to the View. With this scenario it throws the client side JS error when I try to access any of the form elements. I get "object expected" error. The same view works fine using just first parameter. What could be the issues here?
I also loose the CSS styles when this error occurs.
Thanks
well, without seeing any code at all this is difficult to troubleshoot, but I'd say it's likely because you are referencing your javascript and css files using a relative path like:
../content/scripts/myjavascript.js
Adding the second url parameter has caused the browser to be unable to find the urls because you have added what looks like an extra level of depth to the url.
You should provide absolute urls to your scripts and css files. An easy way to do this is to use the "ResolveUrl" method like so:
<%= ResolveUrl("~/Content/Scripts/myjavascript.css") %>