Here's what I have:
if (something) throw new Exception("whatever");
I would like to find a tool which will do a one-time pass over all my code and change statements like the above one to this:
if (something) { throw new Exception("whatever"); }
Note that I want everything to stay on the same single line (if it was like this).
Any tool/editor/plugin/script/anything which can do the job, just once, for all my code - is helpful.
Thank you.
Apparently IntelliJ can do this via a combination of 2 settings:
Code Style > Java > If() statement > Force braces > Always
Code Style > Java > Keep when reformatting > Simple blocks in one line
Related
When using MathQuill one needs to type \nsub to get the ⊈ symbol. The latex you get back is \not\subset, which is fine.
But when you try to set back the same \not\subset expression to the MathQuill field, you get a different result : \neg\subset, which translates to a different rendering.
The problem can be reproduced directly on the MathQuill page (http://mathquill.com/) using the browser console :
Any ideas on how to handle or work around this ?
MathQuill will accept \nsub while typing, but also \notsubset, which got me to a simple find-and-replace solution, which does not require any other code change.
Not the best, but it works; the only downside is that the list of text replacements is fixed; the set operators are the one I found; could be more.
// special math pre-processing
var mathFix = {
"\\not\\subset" : "\\notsubset",
"\\not\\supset" : "\\notsupset"
}
var mathTextFixed = '<your latex here>';
Object.keys(mathFix).forEach(function(t1) {
mathTextFixed = mathTextFixed.replace(t1, mathFix[t1]);
});
mathField.latex(mathTextFixed);
local code = [[
print("this is a trap")
asd("XDasdsadasdasd")
print("this is a trap")
]]
print("\n\n\n\n\n")
print(string.match(code, 'asd(.*)'))
I made this but the problem is it also returns the print under it. It'll return anything under the asd("XDasdsadasdasd"), but i only want whats inside asd("XDasdsadasdasd") to return that will be "XDasdsadasdasd"
Parentheses are magic chars in Lua patterns. You need to escape them. Also, you need to stop at the first closing parenthesis. See the code below:
print(string.match(code, 'asd%(.-%)'))
If you only want what's inside asd(...), then use
print(string.match(code, 'asd%((.-)%)'))
<promise>No, I am not kicking the "inline curly braces versus aligned ones" dead dog.</promise>
In Xcode 7.x, if I start an if/then block and push the opening curly brace down to the next line (or if I Alt-[ everything over to column one then Ctrl-I Re-Indent), Xcode dutifully obeys what I consider to be one (and my personal choice) of the two standards for placement of the opening brace, to wit:
if (condition)
{
/*blah blah*/
}
else
{
/*yadda yadda*/
}
But... if I do this with var or let, Xcode decides that there needs to be another level of indentation on the open --- but not the close --- brace, to wit:
var x: Int
{
didSet
{
/* handle it*/
}
}
Am I missing something? Is there a reason for this, or should I log it as a bug?
I asked on the dev forum and was told it's an open bug. Thanks!
Just new in Prestashop (1.6.0.6), I've a problem with my product page in admin. All translatable-field are to display:none (I inspect the code with chrome).
So when I want to create a new product I can't because the name field is required.
I thought that it was simple to find the .js whose do that but it isn't.
If somebody could help me, I would be happy.
Thank you for your help
Hi,
I make some searches and see that the function hideOtherLanguage(id) hide and show translatable-field element.
function hideOtherLanguage(id)
{
console.log(id_language);
$('.translatable-field').hide();
$('.lang-' + id).show();
var id_old_language = id_language;
id_language = id;
if (id_old_language != id)
changeEmployeeLanguage();
updateCurrentText();
}
When I set the Id to 1 (default language), it works. It seems that when I load the page, the function is called twice and the last calling, the id value is undefined. So the show() function will not work.
If somebody could help me. Thank you.
In my console, I see only one error
undefined is not a function.
under index.php / Line 1002
...
$("#product_form").validate({
...
But I find the form.tpl template and set this lines in comment but nothing change.
EDIT: According to comment on this link http://forge.prestashop.com/browse/PSCFV-2928 this can possibly be caused by corrupted installation file(s) - so when on clean install - try to re-download and reinstall...
...otherwise:
I got into a similar problem - in module admin page, when creating configuration form using PrestaShop's HelperForm. I will provide most probable cases and their possible solutions.
The solution for HelperForm was tested on PS 1.6.0.14
Generally there are 2 cases when this will happen.
First, you have to check what html you recieve.
=> Display source code - NOT in developer tools/firebug/etc...!
=> I really mean the pure recieved (JavaScript untouched) html.
Check if your translatable-fields have already the inline style "display: none":
Case 1 - fields already have inline style(s) for "display: none"
This means the template/html was already prepared this way - most probably in some TPL file I saw codes similar to these:
<div class="translatable-field lang-{$language.id_lang}"
{if $language.id_lang != $id_lang_default}style="display:none"{/if}>
Or particularly in HelperForm template:
<div class="translatable-field lang-{$language.id_lang}"
{if $language.id_lang != $defaultFormLanguage}style="display:none"{/if}>
Case 1 is the most easy to solve, you just have to find, where to set this default language.
Solutions
HelperForm
Look where you've (or someone else) prepared the HelperForm object - something like:
$formHelper = new HelperForm();
...
Somewhere there will be something like $formHelper->default_form_language = ...;
My wrong first solution was to get default form language from context - which might not be set:
$this->context->controller->default_form_language; //THIS IS WRONG!
The correct way is to get the default language from configuration - something like:
$default_lang = new Language((int)Configuration::get('PS_LANG_DEFAULT'));
$formHelper->default_form_language = $default_lang->id;
...this particularly solved my problem...
Other form-creations
If there is something else than HelperForm used for form creations, the problem is still very similar.
You have to find where in files(probably tpls) is a condition for printing display:none for your case - then find where is the check-against-variable set and set it correctly yourself.
Case 2 - fields don't have inline style(s) for "display: none"
This means it is done after loading HTML by JavaScript. There are two options:
There is a call for hideOtherLanguage(), but there is wrongly set input language - that means no language will be displayed and all hidden.Solution for this one can be often solved by solving Case 1 (see above). In addition there can be programming error in not setting the after-used language id variable at all... then you would have to set it yourself (assign in JavaScript).
Some script calls some sort of .hide() on .translatable-field - you will have to search for it the hard way and remove/comment it out.
PS: Of course you can set the language to whatever you want, it is just common to set it to default language, because it is the most easier and the most clear way how to set it.
I'm editing an ActionScript file and I've run into an issue.
When I put the following, everything is fine.
if (x=x) {
//blah
}
If I put this, it says unexpected ; for one line and } for the another:
for (x=x) {
//blah
}
Same with when I put this:
while (x=x) {
//blah
}
Of course I only put those there as examples to test it, because I thought something was wrong with my code. Is ActionScript, in this part of my file, only allowing IF statements or what? I need to do the same long series of steps to two different strings, but I don't want to put the code in there twice. Do I have to make a function?
Read up on the looping syntax here.
The For loop doesn't take a boolean (true/false), it needs a counter, a boolean check for the limit and an increment.
i.e.
for (counter; condition; action){
statements;
}
I've never used action script but I would suggest trying this with
x==x
Since once = is assignment, not a comparison.
if the for loop still does not function try
for(;x==x;){
}
the semicolons tell it that you want to only use the second statement in the for loop declaration, the condition; since for loops use three statements,
for (variable; condition; iterative action)
by placing semicolons before and after x==x you specify only the condition, which seems to be what you're trying to do.
Turns out using any IF or WHILE statements caused the error no matter what was inside.
I was able to accomplish what I wanted by making another function and sending each string though those.
Appreciate the help, voted up on both of y'all.
you have to write it like this:
if(a==x){
// do that
}
for (x=0; x<maxloops; x++){
// do that
}
while(a==x){
}
The = symbol is used to define values to varialbes, while == has to be used when you comparing / checking (i.e. whether this is equal to that). This both applies to IF and WHILE
the FOR LOOP. Let's say that you want to execute the action "do that" 10 times. then you write
for (x=0; x<10; x++){
// do that
}
the first part x=0 is the definition of the counting variable and its initial value
the second part is the condition (run the loop as long as x is less than 10)
the third part is the stepper. (how the counter will raise its value in each loop). x++ is a short way to write x = x +1;