Trying to learn webix (and javascript at all). Usually the common practice is loading javascript libraries at the end of the body.
The webix quick start doc says:
<!DOCTYPE HTML>// specifies document type
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../../codebase/webix.css" type="text/css">
<script src="../../codebase/webix.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</head>
<body>
e.g. it loads the library in the head.
Questions:
the webix lib should be loaded in the <head>?
if yes, where should be loaded jQuery and twitter bootstrap?
and in what order?
You can place webix.js anywhere on the page. Just be sure that JS code that uses Webix API is used after webix.js loading
Normally scripts are placed at the end of HTML file as they only add some interactivity to the page. In case of Webix UI, without webix.js you will not see any content on page at all, so there is no benefits from putting webix.js at the end of page.
As for jQuery - if you plan to use webix-jquery integration you need to load webix.js AFTER loading the jQuery ( at the head, or at the end of file, doesn't matter )
You need to follow the below syntax or process for using the webix.
<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<!-- Required meta tags -->
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1, shrink-to-fit=no">
<title>Title</title>
<link href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato|Open+Sans:300|Raleway|Roboto" rel="stylesheet">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="https://stackpath.bootstrapcdn.com/font-awesome/4.7.0/css/font-awesome.min.css"
/>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="https://fonts.googleapis.com/icon?family=Material+Icons" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.webix.com/edge/webix.css" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="assets/css/app.css" />
</head>
<body>
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.3.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://cdn.webix.com/edge/webix.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" >
webix.ui({
view:"calendar",
id:"calendar1"
})
</script>
</body>
</html>
Any dependencies must load on top webix.js, so that you can use them in your JS file.
Related
I see Telerik provides open source version of Kendo UI at following URL
http://www.telerik.com/download/kendo-ui-core
I downloaded it but not able to make it work in ASP.NET MVC application.
I am not sure what i am missing. I make a call to CSS and JS files as mentioned in below link:
http://docs.telerik.com/kendo-ui/getting-started/using-kendo-with/aspnet-mvc/asp-net-mvc-4
Although I am missing one step Add reference to Kendo.Mvc.dll because Telerik don't provide installer in free version and I need JavaScript version of Kendo UI not with MVC selector.
Any idea here?
If you go to: http://dojo.telerik.com/
The default page contains everything you will need to get up and running and in what order:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<title>Untitled</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/styles/kendo.common.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/styles/kendo.rtl.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/styles/kendo.default.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/styles/kendo.dataviz.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/styles/kendo.dataviz.default.min.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/styles/kendo.mobile.all.min.css">
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.9.1.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.716/js/kendo.all.min.js"></script>
</head>
<body>
</body>
</html>
If it is still not working after you put this in your page then something else is going on.
Comment out the following line in _layout.cshtml page
##Scripts.Render("~/bundles/jquery")#
and add the below lines at the end of the head section :
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.9.1.min.js"></script>
<script src="http://cdn.kendostatic.com/2014.2.903/js/kendo.all.min.js"></script>
I am facing problem of stabilizing styles in my html page.
Whenever I am using datepicker (jqmobile UI datepicker), the look and feel is affected terribly. The icons on the header, the icons for closing dialog, the icons for type dropdown all vanishes.
Here is my header portion,
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8" />
<title></title>
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<link href="jquery-mobile/styles/jquery.mobile-1.3.1.min.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link href="styles/main.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="jquery-mobile/styles/jqm-icon-pack-fa.css" >
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.4/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css">
<link type="text/css" href="styles/datepicker.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link type="text/css" href="jquery-mobile/styles/jquery.mobile.simpledialog.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<script src="cordova.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="jquery-mobile/js/jquery-1.9.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="jquery-mobile/js/jquery.mobile-1.3.1.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script src="scripts/jquery-ui.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript" src="jquery-mobile/js/jquery.mobile.simpledialog2.js"></script>
<script src="scripts/Common.js"></script>
<script src="scripts/FlightServices.js"></script>
</head>
If I comment out the line:
link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.4/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css
then the icons appear properly but datepicker style is spoiled.
If I put this line:
script src="scripts/datepicker.js"
instead of :
script src="scripts/jquery-ui.js"
Datepicker is completely disabled.
Is there any mistake I am making in this above mentioned portion?
Any wrong file included?
Anyone any suggestion, I shall be thankful.
Thanks
santu ghosh
The order of style sheets is important.
Change the order of style sheets instead of keeping one or the other. Usually, the themes style sheet template should be added first and then, your own style sheet(main.css) which adds in your own modifications to the base template. Edit your main.css to super-impose major conflicts.
I would also recommend putting the mobile style sheets conditionally for mobile platforms only unless this page is strictly for mobile anyways.
<link rel="stylesheet" href="//code.jquery.com/ui/1.10.4/themes/smoothness/jquery-ui.css">
<link href="jquery-mobile/styles/jquery.mobile-1.3.1.min.css" rel="stylesheet" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="jquery-mobile/styles/jqm-icon-pack-fa.css" >
<link href="styles/main.css" rel="stylesheet" />
I made an application with dart / polymer / sockets, and i want to compile it in Javascript. But I don't know how to do. I tried to do "Generate Javascript", but it said "You do not have main entry point".
Should I compile manually each dart files ?
Does build.dart useful ?
Edit Added index.html from comments:
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="fr">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="bootstrap.min.css" />
<link rel="import" href="console.html" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="base.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/main.css" />
<script src='packages/polymer/boot.js'></script>
<title>XXX</title>
</head>
<body>
<fei-console></fei-console>
<script type="application/dart">
main() { }
</script>
</body>
</html>
If it is complaining about a main entry point, I suspect it cannot find a main() function defined anywhere. In your index.html (or whatever the main html file is called), you presumably have a link to a Dart file. Does that file have a main() function defined?
Please find 2 set of code blocks below and let me know which one is to follow and why?
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Set 1</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/jquery.mobile-1.2.0.min.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/customStyle.css" />
</head>
<body>
<div data-role="page">
<div data-role="header" data-position="fixed"></div>
<div data-role="content"></div>
<div data-role="footer" data-position="fixed"></div>
</div>
<script src="js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js"></script>
<script src="js/customScript.js"></script>
<script src="js/jquery.mobile-1.2.0.js"></script>
</body>
</html>
and set 2 is....
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
<title>Set 1</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/jquery.mobile-1.2.0.min.css" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="css/customStyle.css" />
<script src="js/jquery-1.8.2.min.js"></script>
<script src="js/customScript.js"></script>
<script src="js/jquery.mobile-1.2.0.js"></script>
</head>
(ie) which one is right, putting all the scripts at the top or at bottom?
Both of them are correct, only difference is how are you going to bind events.
In the first case, because HTML is already loaded into the DOM events can be bound directly like this:
$('#buttonID').on('click', function(){
});
Because button is already into the DOM, click event can be bound directly to it.
In the second case, because jQuery Mobile is loaded before page content all event binding must be done like delegation:
$(document).on('click', '#buttonID',function(){
});
This is a safer but slower solution. It don't require for object to exist to bind an event to it.
To make a story short, solution 1 is slightly faster.
First case to improve performance .... this is said to be general practise to keep javascript down the page ...so that content is loaded faster .... though no facts or analysis personally I have on same. Check this nice post sameelegantcode.com/2010/03/30/your-javascript-goes-where/
It will good to place all javascript at the bottom of the page. Never forget that page rendering can be delayed by javascript parsing/execution. Well, I believe you love to read http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#js_bottom
When I try to set the title of a view page using the title tag I got this title on the page body and I found the head tag to be empty. Here is the head of the page:
<head>
<meta name="layout" content="main">
<title>Implementation Error</title>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="${resource(dir: 'css', file: 'errors.css')}" type="text/css">
<r:require modules="bootstrap"/>
</head>
When the page get rendered I got the following:
<body>
Implementation Error
<script src="/accountcontrol/static/plugins/jquery-1.7.2/js/jquery/jquery-1.7.2.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<link href="/accountcontrol/static/bundle-fixtaglib_head.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" media="screen, projection">
<link href="/accountcontrol/static/bundle-bundle_bootstrap_head.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" media="screen, projection">
<link href="/accountcontrol/css/style.css" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet">
<script type="text/javascript" src="/accountcontrol/static/js/lputil.js"></script>
</body>
what is going wrong with that?
Thanks,
I had this exact same issue with Grails 2.2 and it brought me here. After a lot of yak shaving, I found out that you need to look in your main.gsp layout file and actually wrap the layout title tag in a title tag like so:
<title><g:layoutTitle/></title>
Once I did this, the problem went away. I must have looked at this page a million times and not seen that.
Check your "main" layout and make sure that "g:layoutTitle" tag defined in head section. For more info see layoutTitle docs.