I'm planning on allowing a client to provide a couple codes for each product that I'll need to reference with Javascript on the product pages.
Basically my plan was to use the Big Commerce's 'custom fields' to do so, but I'm having trouble spitting out the custom fields onto the product pages. I've been looking all over for some type of GLOBAL variable that allows me to reference custom fields, but I'm coming up dry. I would think there would be some type of GLOBAL array with all the custom fields in it, or a way to reference them by name directly.
Am I blind, or is there just no way to do this directly in the BC template file?
Thanks.
In Bigcommerce the custom fields can generally be found within the ProductOtherDetails.html Panel which contains a Snippet named ProductCustomFieldItem.html. This snippet has the markup for each custom field that the system outputs.
Inside of the ProductCustomFieldItem.html Snippet are the two codes you are looking for: %%GLOBAL_CustomFieldName%% and %%GLOBAL_CustomFieldValue%%.
I ran into this as well - given that it's quite a long time later, I'm supposing there's no better answer - a decent amount of searching turned up nothing useful as it seems all you can do is output the full set of custom fields as a set of divs.
So, I output them into a div which was hidden:
<div id="fpd-custom-fields" style="display:none;">
%%SNIPPET_ProductCustomFields%%
</div>
and then set up a javascript function to get the value based on the name:
function getCustomFieldValue(label)
{
var value = '';
$('#fpd-custom-fields div.Label').each(function()
{
if($(this).text().toLowerCase() == (label.toLowerCase() + ':'))
{
value = $('div.Value', $(this).parent()).text().trim();
}
});
return value;
}
Doesn't feel quite right as it's not a very clean solution, but was the best I could come up with unfortunately!
Related
I have a column that happens to be both a business key and a primary key for a particular entity in an existing, poorly-designed schema. It is impractical to allow edits to this key as they will not cascade as-is.
So I need to make a column editable only when creating but not when editing. I could not find anything in the documentation for jqGrid or Lib.Web.Mvc.JQuery.JqGrid that suggests this is a built-in feature, but if it is, I would love to know about it.
If not, what would be the best way for me to proceed in achieving this functionality? Should I make the column editable but add a custom (client-side) formatter? Is there another way?
Note: This is not a duplicate of jqGrid need a field editable on Add dialog but not Edit dialog because it pertains specifically to Lib.Web.Mvc.JQuery.JqGrid and not the JavaScript library in general.
All help appreciated.
Here is how I am doing it for now. This feels "wrong" and ugly to me, but it does work.
function fnSetAccessGroupCodeReadOnly() {
$("#AccessGroupCode").attr("readonly", "readonly");
}
function fnUnSetAccessGroupCodeReadOnly() {
$("#AccessGroupCode").removeAttr("readonly");
}
and in the helper, in the action navigator for edit:
new JqGridNavigatorEditActionOptions()
{
// Edit Options
Url = Url.Action("EditPartnerAccessGroup"),
MethodType = JqGridMethodTypes.Post,
AfterShowForm = "fnSetAccessGroupCodeReadOnly",
CloseAfterEdit = true
},
I just wasted half a day trying to figure this out, reading about some workarounds, and thinking "it can't be that bad - there must be a straightforward to do edit a collection in Grails, whethere using scaffolded views or my own."
Let's say I have this domain object:
class TreeGroup {
String name
List<Tree> trees
static hasMany = ['trees': MyTree]
}
Just to explain the choice of data structure - I need my records to be unique, but in the order I set. That's why I chose List, AFAIK one cannot rely on order in a Set. So there are 2 pieces to this question - 1) how to remove from any Collection, for example a Set, 2) is List the best replacement for Set in this context (preserving order).
I want to be able to create a group record with no trees in it and make 4 updates:
edit/save
edit the group record to reference 2 trees A and B
add another tree C
remove A
remove B and C
And obviously, I want the desired state after every step. Currently though, I can only add records, and if I even edit/save to list, the list elements are added to it again.
I am using the multiple select tag for this. It looks like this:
<g:select name="trees" from="${allTrees}" optionKey="id"
multiple="true" class="many-to-many"
value="${trees ? trees*.id : treeGroupInstance?.trees*.id}" />
and that's fine, in the sense that it generates an HTTP header with these variables on update:
_method:PUT
version:19
name:d5
trees:1
_action_update:Update
But the data binder only adds new elements, it never lets you edit a list.
What is the cleanest way to do it ? Is it me, not reading something obvious, or is this a design flaw of grails data binding (and of so, when/how will it be fixed) ?
Is there a way perhaps via a hidden HTTP parameter to clear the list before (re)adding elements ?
Thanks
I ended up doing this:
private repopulate(def domainObject, String propertyName, Class domainKlaz) {
if (params[propertyName] != null) {
domainObject[propertyName].clear()
domainObject[propertyName].addAll(
params[propertyName].collect { domainKlaz.get(it) }
)
}
}
and I am calling it in update controller method before save(), for every collection. OMG how ugly.
I am trying to localize selectOptions on the Visual Force page.
Here is the .class code snippet:
List<SelectOption> options = new List<SelectOption>();
List<MyOption__c> dropDownValues = [SELECT Id, Display_Label_Name__c FROM MyOption__c];
for (MyOption__c val : dropDownValues) {
// Display_Label_Name__c field is the label from *.labels that needs to be translated
options.add(new SelectOption(val.Id, val.Display_Label_Name__c));
}
Here is the .page code snippet:
<apex:selectList value="{!myVal}">
<apex:selectOptions value="{!options}"/>
</apex:selectList>
Right now the dropdown displays the Display_Label_Name__c verbose. I am trying to see how I can display the translated version from the .labels file. Is it possible? If not, what's the work around?
Thank you for your responses!
All localisation of page text can be done with Custom Labels.
Enable the translation workbench with the languages you require.
Create labels for all the localisible text on the page.
Replace the page text with the labels.
Add a translation for each label.
Change your profile langauge to test.
But for your case you pull the select option text from a custom object. If the values of the select list are not expected to change frequently, less than once a week or so, then I would change to using custom labels.
Otherwise, you lose the value of Salesforce automatic language selection and have to implement something yourself.
I would recommend extending the custom object MyOption__c to have columns for all the supported languages. You could use an if/else block or dynamic apex to select the select option text.
Sample using Dynamic Apex
string language = ParseForSupportedLangauges(UserInfo.getLanguage()); // includes __c
list<sobject> dropDownValues = Database.query('SELECT Id, '+language+' FROM MyOption__c');
for (sobject val : dropDownValues) {
options.add(new SelectOption(val.get('Id'), val.get(language)));
}
ParseForSupportedLangauges() would be a custom method that checks for supported languages and assigns the default when necessary.
EDIT
Turns out there is a solution: Don't look for something until you need it, right?
Introduced in Spring '12 is the ability dynamicaly select the label to display suing array syntax. Also, the ability to create visualforce components from the controller was added but using the array syntax would be sufficient for your problem. This method would allow you to select the labels you want by using the query results from MyOption__c.
Using a repeat in visualforce to loop over the query results
<apex:repeat value="{!displayResultsValues}" var="labelName">
<apex:outputText value="{!$Label[labelName]}"/>
</apex:repeat>
Here is a good article to show the usage and syntax.
I develop web part with custom editor part and faced with this question.
Is it possible in web part set Personalizable attribute to generic List?
For example I want something like this:
[WebBrowsable(false)]
[Personalizable(PersonalizationScope.Shared)]
public List<AnnouncementItem> Announcements
{
get { return _announcements; }
set { _announcements = value; }
}
Is it possible, and what kind of types at all can be used as "Personalizable"?
Thanks.
Solution:
I use a custom EditorPart to select multiple lists using AssetUrlSelector, but I need a way to personalize this collection for end user.List<of custom objects> doesn't work, but I found that List<string> (and only string) work perfectly. So, I get required lists in EditorPart and pass their to the web part using List<string>.
Try using a custom EditorPart to add/remove items from the collection. I've never built a web part that personalized a collection so I don't know if it works but I'd definitely try the collection with an EditorPart. If it doesn't work, serialize XML into a string property.
Your question does not seem to match your code. Your code shows a collection of custom objects. I doubt an end user will be able to set such a property. To have a property that points to a generic list, you would probably be better off defining the property as a string that contains the URL to a list.
Ok, I am new at jQuery, but the JQGrid has peaked my interest. While implementing the grid, I have come across two problems that I am not sure how to solve. Both involve loading the grid with results.
How do you load the grid when you have parameters in your route. For instance, http://domain.com/search/results/2010/KY...I am wanting all results matching 2010 in Kentucky. In the javascript section of the grid initialization, I need to supply a URL (such as /search/gridResults/). How does one pass the other route values or at least use them to load the grid.
Same question, but more along the lines of when the page is loaded with posted form values from a search form.
Perhaps the URL is mostly to do with AJAX-y functions. It would be nice to sort and page with AJAX but to load the grid with AJAX is not neccessary.
Sorry for the long post, but I am sure others have faced this problem even though Google tells me otherwise :) PS - I have looked at Phil Haacks (sp?) and Craig something's blogs about using JQGrid, but neither touch upon loading pre-determined search results.
You can specify that directly with the 'url' key. e.g.: /search/gridResults/2010/KY
I actually use a custom javascript method in the postData jqgrid key for this (which you could use to solve your question 1 depending on the situation). This seemed kind of lame to me that I had to write this method, but I found something on the internet and had to keep hacking on it to make it flexible enough for my uses.
Code for custom method below. It reads params from the url directly. For POST params, you would need to do something else obviously, but to get them to jqgrid, it's the same idea:
// Read a page's GET URL variables and return them as an associative array.
function getUrlVars() {
var vars = [], hash;
var hashes = window.location.href.slice(
window.location.href.indexOf('?') + 1
).split('&');
for(var i = 0; i < hashes.length; i++) {
hash = hashes[i].split('=');
if (hash.length == 2) {
vars.push(hash[0]);
vars[hash[0]] = decodeURIComponent(hash[1].replace("+", "%20"));
}
}
return vars;
}
Hopefully that helps... If you come up with something better, I'd love to hear it. :)