This is my code in ViewController.m file,
- (void)viewDidAppear:(BOOL)animated
{
[super viewDidAppear:animated];
NSLog(#"%f",[self usedMemory]);
NSMutableArray *array= [[NSMutableArray alloc]init];
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
NSMutableData *data = [NSMutableData dataWithLength:10000];
[array addObject:data];
}
NSLog(#"%f",[self usedMemory]);
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
[array removeObjectAtIndex:0];
}
NSLog(#"%f",[self usedMemory]);
}
Here is the usedMemory method:
- (double)usedMemory
{
task_basic_info_data_t taskInfo;
mach_msg_type_number_t infoCount = TASK_BASIC_INFO_COUNT;
kern_return_t kernReturn = task_info(mach_task_self(),
TASK_BASIC_INFO,
(task_info_t)&taskInfo,
&infoCount);
if (kernReturn != KERN_SUCCESS
)
{
return NSNotFound;
}
return taskInfo.resident_size / 1024.0 / 1024.0;
}
Here is the result:
2015-01-26 22:39:00.058 audio_memory_test[9050:874963] 25.011719
2015-01-26 22:39:00.060 audio_memory_test[9050:874963] 26.312500
2015-01-26 22:39:00.060 audio_memory_test[9050:874963] 26.312500
Why has memory not been released when I deleted objects in the array? What has the removeObjectAtIndex method done? How can I release this memory?
When you call [self usedMemory] after the final loop, your objects are still held in memory. The autorelease pool to which they belong hasn't yet been drained; this generally happens when you leave the scope of your source code and the system takes control again.
All because [NSMutableData dataWithLength: ] returns an autoreleased object, so you get exactly the expected behaviour.
To fix this: Either use [[NSMutableData alloc] initWithLength: ] or use an autorelease pool.
As others have said, the problem is that you're creating auto-released objects. Here is a change you could make to your code so your objects would actually be released:
- (void)viewDidAppear:(BOOL)animated
{
[super viewDidAppear:animated];
NSLog(#"%f",[self usedMemory]);
//all autoreleased objects created inside the braces
//of the #autorleasepool directive will be released
//when we leave the braces
#autoreleasepool
{
NSMutableArray *array= [[NSMutableArray alloc]init];
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
NSMutableData *data = [NSMutableData dataWithLength:10000];
[array addObject:data];
}
NSLog(#"%f",[self usedMemory]);
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
[array removeObjectAtIndex:0];
}
}
NSLog(#"%f",[self usedMemory]);
}
Related
I am sorting an array.
There are three types of elements in the array.
1. featured
2. organic and
3. claimed.
Among them, I want to sort only organic elements and keep the featured and claimed elements at their own index.
Below is my code in which, I am extracting the claimed and featured indices in a dictionary as key being the index and value is the array element.
//Initialization
NSMutableArray *sortedArray = nil;
NSMutableDictionary *tempFeaturedDictionary = [[NSMutableDictionary alloc]init];
NSMutableDictionary *tempClaimedDictionary = [[NSMutableDictionary alloc]init];
NSMutableArray *tempOrganicArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc]init];
for (int i = 0; i < array.count; i++) {
DRListing *isFeaturedObj = (DRListing*)[array objectAtIndex:i];
if (isFeaturedObj.featured) {
[tempFeaturedDictionary setObject:isFeaturedObj forKey:[#(i)stringValue]];
}else if (isFeaturedObj.claimed)
{
[tempClaimedDictionary setObject:isFeaturedObj forKey:[#(i)stringValue]];
}else
[tempOrganicArray addObject:isFeaturedObj];
}
Again I am adding the claimed and featured back to their original indices after sorting as:
sortedArray = [NSMutableArray arrayWithArray:[tempOrganicArray sortedArrayUsingDescriptors:sortDescriptorsArray]];
for (int i = 0; i<sortedArray.count; i++) {
for (NSString *key in tempFeaturedDictionary) {
if ( [[#(i)stringValue] isEqualToString: key] ) {
[sortedArray insertObject:[tempFeaturedDictionary objectForKey:[#(i)stringValue]] atIndex:i];
}}
for (NSString *key in tempClaimedDictionary) {
if ([[#(i)stringValue]isEqualToString:key ]) {
[sortedArray insertObject:[tempClaimedDictionary objectForKey:[#(i)stringValue]] atIndex:i];
}
}
}
The code works good. Except there is claimed/(and)featured elements at the last index of the 'array'. Because the 'sortedArray' index remains less than the 'array.count' in this scenario.
Thanks in advance.
Update -
I receive response array of type:
[{featured1 featured2}, {organic1, organic2..}, {claimed1}, {featured11, featured12}, {organic11, organic12..}, {claimed2}, ..]
and I am allowed to sort only organic elements within this array. Featured and claimed should not loose their original index position.
I would iterate through the array, extracting the organics to sort. Then sort your organic array. Then iterate through the original array taking either the element from the original array or an element from the sorted organics array as appropriate.
NSMutableArray *organicsArray = [NSMutableArray new];
for (int i = 0; i < array.count; i++) {
DRListing *isFeaturedObj = (DRListing*)array[i];
if ((!isFeaturedObj.featured) && (!isFeaturedObj.claimed)) {
[organicsArray addObject:isFeaturedObj];
}
}
NSMutableArray *sortedOrganicsArray = [[organicsArray sortedArrayUsingDescriptors:sortDescriptorsArray] mutableCopy];
NSMutableArray *outputArray = [NSMutableArray new];
for (int i = 0; i < array.count; i++) {
DRListing *isFeaturedObj = (DRListing*)array[i];
if ((!isFeaturedObj.featured) && (!isFeaturedObj.claimed)) {
[outputArray addObject:sortedOrganicsArray[0]];
[sortedOrganicsArray removeObjectAtIndex:0];
} else {
[outputArray addObject:isFeaturedObject];
}
}
You could possibly make it a little more efficient if you reversed your sort order for the organics array since then you could say
[outputArray addObject:[sortedOrganicsArray lastObject]];
[sortedOrganicsArray removeLastObject];
But if your array isn't particularly large then the performance improvement will probably be negligible.
Maybe this is an alternative:
NSMutableArray *organics = [NSMutableArray new];
NSMutableArray *others = [NSMutableArray new];
for (DRListing *isFeaturedObj in array) {
if (isFeaturedObj.organic) {
[organics addObject:isFeaturedObj];
} else {
[others addObject:isFeaturedObj];
}
}
NSMutableArray *sorted = [NSMutableArray alloc]initWithObjects:organics,others, nil];
You can take the first 2 functions. The others are what I used for testing.
- (DRListing *)getNextObjectFromArray:(NSArray *)array WithStartingIndex:(int)index
{
for (int i=index; i<array.count; i++) {
DRListing *obj = (DRListing*)[array objectAtIndex:i];
if (!obj.featured && !obj.claimed)
{
return obj;
}
}
return nil;
}
- (void)sortArray:(NSMutableArray *)array
{
for (int pass = 0; pass<array.count-1; pass++) {
for (int i=0; i<array.count-1; i++) {
DRListing *obj = [self getNextObjectFromArray:array WithStartingIndex:i];
int foundIndex = (int)[array indexOfObject:obj];
DRListing *obj2 = [self getNextObjectFromArray:array WithStartingIndex:foundIndex+1];
int foundIndex2 = (int)[array indexOfObject:obj2];
if (obj!=nil && obj2 !=nil) {
if (obj.value >= obj2.value) {
[array exchangeObjectAtIndex:foundIndex withObjectAtIndex:foundIndex2];
}
i = foundIndex;
}
}
}
NSLog(#"Sorted Data: %#",array);
}
- (NSMutableArray *)testData
{
NSMutableArray *array = [NSMutableArray new];
for (int i=0; i<20; i++) {
DRListing *obj = [DRListing new];
obj.featured = i*i%2;
obj.claimed = i%2;
obj.value = i*3%10;
[array addObject:obj];
}
NSLog(#"Test Data: %#",array);
return array;
}
#interface DRListing : NSObject
#property (nonatomic) BOOL featured;
#property (nonatomic) BOOL claimed;
#property (nonatomic) int value;
#end
Ok, I'm a bit out of my league but here goes... I'm working on making some updates to an iPhone app for a client (it hasn't been updated since 2013...just to put into context how old the programming is). While making simple updates to the app, I noticed the twitter feed section kept crashing. I checked the debug and came up with this error.
[_NSArrayM objectAtIndex:]: index 0 beyond bounds for empty array
I know the array is empty... I'm just not sure why. Here's the code where I think it is filling the array
- (void)loadData {
NSURL *tutorialsUrl = [NSURL URLWithString:#"https://twitter.com/EdwinOrange/lists/kentucky-general-assembly"];
NSData *tutorialsHtmlData = [NSData dataWithContentsOfURL:tutorialsUrl];
TFHpple *tutorialsParser = [TFHpple hppleWithHTMLData:tutorialsHtmlData];
NSString *tutorialsXpathQueryString = #"//p[#class='TweetTextSize js-tweet-text tweet-text']";
NSArray *tutorialsNodes = [tutorialsParser searchWithXPathQuery:tutorialsXpathQueryString];
NSMutableArray *newTutorials = [[NSMutableArray alloc] initWithCapacity:0];
for (TFHppleElement *element in tutorialsNodes) {
NSString *strResponse = #"";
for (int l=0; l<[[element children] count]; l++)
{
strResponse =[strResponse stringByAppendingString:[[[element children] objectAtIndex:l] content]];
NSArray *_children = [[[element children] objectAtIndex:l] children];
NSLog(#"count = %d",[_children count]);
for (int k=0; k<[_children count]; k++)
{
NSLog(#"%#",[[_children objectAtIndex:k] children]);
NSArray *_internalChildren = [[_children objectAtIndex:k] children];
for (int j=0; j<[_internalChildren count]; j++)
{
NSLog(#"%#",[[_internalChildren objectAtIndex:j] content]);
strResponse = [strResponse stringByAppendingFormat:#"%#",[[_internalChildren objectAtIndex:j] content]];
}
}
}
Tutorial *tutorial = [[Tutorial alloc] init];
[newTutorials addObject:tutorial];
tutorial.title = strResponse;
NSLog(#"strResponse = %#",strResponse);
NSLog(#"Data---%#",tutorial.title);
}
_data = newTutorials;
delegateObj.arrDetailContent = [_data mutableCopy];
}
It might also we worth it to note the Log does not return any information for the above code. I added an exception breakpoint which breaks at this line (because the _data array is empty)
Tutorial *data = [_data objectAtIndex:indexPath.row];
This may also help to track down the problem (this is at the top of the TwitterController.m)
#pragma mark - Calling Twitter feeds
-(void)getAndParseTwitterFeeds
{
[self loadAtData];
[self loadNames];
[self loadData];
[self loadImages];
[self loadHours];
[self loadLink];
[self loadImages];
[self loadHours];
}
-(void)getFeeds
{
[self getAndParseTwitterFeeds];
}
-(void)getFeedsLocally
{
_link = delegateObj.arrTwitterLink;
_objects = delegateObj.arrObjects;
_members = delegateObj.arrMemberName;
_data = delegateObj.arrDetailContent;
arrProfileImages = delegateObj.arrImages;
_hours = delegateObj.arrHour;
[self updateTableViewWithTheData];
}
Hope that is enough explanation... I'm really hoping someone can help me figure out why the array is not being filled. Thanks!!!!
EDIT: I'm starting to wonder now if the HTML parser is having trouble with images in tweets. This code is from around 2013 which pre-dates twitter's inline images. Could this be causing the array to return empty?
Also of note the arrays _link, _members, _hours, etc. are all being populated correctly and have identical coding up until the "NSString *strResponse" section for loadData.
I am playing around with NSOperationQueue in order to run some code in the background and have it update a UILabel. Here's the viewDidLoad.
- (void)viewDidLoad
{
[super viewDidLoad];
queue = [[NSOperationQueue alloc] init];
NSInvocationOperation *operation = [[NSInvocationOperation alloc] initWithTarget:self selector:#selector(counterTask) object:nil];
[queue addOperation:operation];
}
And here's the method called as the invocation operation:
- (void)counterTask {
for (int i=0; i<5000000; i++) {
if (i % 100 == 0) {
[self.firstLabel performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:)
withObject:[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d", i]
waitUntilDone:YES];
}
}
[self.firstLabel performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:) withObject:#"finished." waitUntilDone:NO];
}
As the loop counts up, and more and more #"%d" NSStrings are created, the memory usage naturally goes up. Once the loop finishes however, the memory doesn't seem to deallocate. I expected the memory to fall as the setText: message uses new instances of NSString and releases the old ones.
If I change the loop condition to i<5000000*2, the memory usage is roughly double by the end – so it's definitely something happening on each iteration causing the leak.
Why is memory leaking here?
EDIT: Forgot to mention that I'm using ARC.
ARC doesn't remove retain / release / autorelease, it just controls the calling of these methods. You can add your own autorelease pool into your loop to force cleanup as it goes:
for (int i=0; i<5000000; i++) {
if (i % 100 == 0) {
#autoreleasepool {
[self.firstLabel performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:)
withObject:[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d", i]
waitUntilDone:YES];
}
}
}
Let's try:
- (void)counterTask {
#autoreleasepool {
for (int i=0; i<5000000; i++) {
if (i % 100 == 0) {
[self.firstLabel performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:)
withObject:[NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d", i]
waitUntilDone:YES];
}
}
}
[self.firstLabel performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:) withObject:#"finished." waitUntilDone:NO];
}
What happening in your loop that you are creating NSString and ARC add it to auto release pool.
not releases the memory(NSString*) immediately , will release later.
One more thing is that, actually performSelectorOnMainThread retains both target and objects.
So best way is that you create nsstring instance after sending it to selector set it to nil so ARC will release it.
NSString* strText=[[NSString alloc]initWithFormat:#"%d",i ];
[self.firstLabel performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:)
withObject:strText
waitUntilDone:YES];
strText=nil;
IMO, the suggested approach of #Wain should fix the issue.
But you may also use this:
- (void)counterTask {
assert([NSThread currentThread] != [NSThread mainThread]);
for (int i=0; i<5000000; i++) {
if (i % 100 == 0) {
dispatch_sync(dispatch_get_main_queue(), ^{
#autoreleasepool {
self.firstLabel.text = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d", i];
}
});
}
}
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_main_queue, ^{
self.firstLabel.text = #"finished";
});
}
Try this
(void)counterTask {
__weak NSString *str;
for (int i=0; i<50000; i++) {
if (i % 100 == 0) {
str = [NSString stringWithFormat:#"%d", i];
[self.logInTxtField performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:)
withObject:str
waitUntilDone:YES];
}
}
[self.logInTxtField performSelectorOnMainThread:#selector(setText:) withObject:#"finished." waitUntilDone:NO];
}
I am trying this code for generating a random number and saving the list of numbers in an array, then i am trying to delete those numbers from the list one by one which appeared once, e.g
1, 5, 9 , 4, 3, 7 ,6 ,10, 11, 8, 2 are the list of integers now 9 is appeared once and now i do not need 9 again.. this is my code of random non repeating numbers array.
NSMutableArray *storeArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
BOOL record = NO;
int x;
for (int i=0; [storeArray count] < 10; i++) //Loop for generate different random values
{
x = arc4random() % 10;//generating random number
if(i==0)//for first time
{
[storeArray addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:x]];
}
else
{
for (int j=0; j<= [storeArray count]-1; j++)
{
if (x ==[[storeArray objectAtIndex:j] intValue])
record = YES;
}
if (record == YES)
{
record = NO;
}
else
{
[storeArray addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:x]];
}
}
}
Try this,
NSArray *arrRandoms = [[NSArray alloc]initWithObjects:1,5,8,7,36,17,96,32,5,7,8,13,36,nil] ; // This contains your random numbers
NSMutableArray *arrFresh = [[NSMutableArray alloc]init];
// Now removing the duplicate numbers
BOOL checkRepeat = NO;
int _Current;
for (int i=0; i<[arrRandoms count]; i++)
{
_Current = [arrRandoms objectAtIndex:i];
if (i == 0)
[arrFresh addObjects:_Current];
else
{
checkRepeat = NO;
for(int j=0; j< [arrFresh count]; j++)
{
if ( _Current == [arrFresh objectAtIndex:j])
checkRepeat = YES;
}
if (checkRepeat == NO)
[arrFresh addObjects:_Current];
}
}
I think this code will work. Check It.
try it
//**************remove repeat objects from array***************************//
NSArray *noDuplicates = [[NSSet setWithArray: yourArray] allObjects];
you add
.h file
BOOL isSame;
NSMutableArray *countArray;
NSInteger randomNumber;
.m file
countArray=[[NSMutableArray alloc]init];
//get randon no
-(NSInteger)getRandomNo:(NSInteger)range
{
isSame=TRUE;
while (isSame){
isSame = FALSE;
randomNumber = arc4random() % range;
for (NSNumber *number in countArray){
if([number intValue] ==randomNumber){
isSame = TRUE;
break;
}
}
}
[countArray addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:randomNumber]];
return randomNumber;
}
Tested Please try this,
NSMutableArray *storeArray = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
NSMutableSet * setUnique = [[NSMutableSet alloc] init];
for (int i=0; [setUnique count] < 10; i++) //Loop for generate different random values
{
[setUnique addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:arc4random() % 10]];
}
storeArray = [[setUnique allObjects] mutableCopy];
// check this how to get random number in array (i.e.. this array(below arr_numbers) contain non repeated number)
// for general purpose i am posting this.. so people cannot check for another answer
int num_count = 10;
int RandomNumber;
NSMutableArray *arr_numbers = [[NSMutableArray alloc] init];
for (int j =0; j < num_count; j++)
{
RandomNumber = 0 + arc4random() % num_count;
NSLog(#"%d",RandomNumber);
if ([arr_numbers count]>0)
{
if (![arr_numbers containsObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:RandomNumber]])//
{
[arr_numbers addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:RandomNumber]];
}
if (j == num_count-1)
{
if ([arr_numbers count] != num_count)
{
j = 0;
}
}
}
else
{
[arr_numbers addObject:[NSNumber numberWithInt:RandomNumber]];
}
}
NSLog(#"%#",arr_numbers);
I'm developing an iOS application with latest SDK.
My app is a port from an Android application and I have these two methods:
- (MyObject*)getMyObject:(MyObjectType)myObjectType
{
#synchronized(self)
{
for (int index = 0; index < [myObjects count]; index++)
{
MyObject* myObject = (MyObject*)[myObjects objectAtIndex:index];
if (myObject.Type == myObjectType)
return myObject;
}
return nil;
}
}
- (BOOL)isMyObjectVisible:(MyObjectType)myObjectType
{
#synchronized(self)
{
return ([self getMyObject:myObjectType] != nil);
}
}
I have isMyObjectVisible:, that is #synchronized, calling another #synchronized method.
Is it necessary that isMyObjectVisible: has to be #synchronized?
To answer your first question, no, the double locking is not needed.
You can keep the lock in getMyObject. That protects it. However, there is nothing in isMyObjectVisible other than a call to getMyObject, so there's nothing else to protect in that method.
However, borrrden's comment is not an issue here. You get a recursive lock when using #synchronized, so you can nest synchronized calls like you're doing without a deadlock. There's just no need to, in your case.
Here is an Example of that you need to use double #synchronized :
NSString * str;
str = [[NSString alloc] initWithFormat:#"str"];
-(void)viewDidLoad{
NSString *foo = #"foo";
NSString *bar = #"bar";
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
[self firstAction:foo];
});
dispatch_async(dispatch_get_global_queue(DISPATCH_QUEUE_PRIORITY_DEFAULT, 0), ^{
[self secondAction:bar];
});
}
- (void)firstAction:(NSString *)sender {
NSLog(#"firstAction");
#synchronized (self) {
str = sender;
for (int i=0; i<5; i++) {
NSLog(#"first: %#",str);
}
}
}
- (void)secondAction:(NSString *)sender {
NSLog(#"secondAction");
#synchronized (self) {
str = sender;
for (int i=0; i<5; i++) {
NSLog(#"second: %#",str);
}
}
}
(str is static variable )
-Try to run it without the #synchronized (self) and see what will happen.