I have code that replaces an entire stack of ViewControllers in a NavigationController, as sort of a "reset" that switches between a number of different threads of UI scenes. Instead of creating a different NavigationController for each flow in storyboard, I decided to just change the NavigationController.viewControllers array manually:
self.navController.viewControllers = [vc1, vc2]
What happens to the old stack of ViewControllers? Do they automatically get release/unloaded? or do they hang around forever and therefore causing memory leak?
Note:
I know about unwind segue, but I didn't want to use that since even if I unwound to the first VC in NavVC, I still have to replace it with a different VC, and setting .viewController is the only way I know to not result in a "Back button"
What happens to the old stack of ViewControllers?
The viewControllers property points to an array and has copy semantics, so when you assign an array of view controllers to that property, the navigation controller copies the array. When you assign a different array to that property, the previous one will be deallocated (assuming there are no other strong references to it). The same is true for any of the view controllers in the array -- if nothing else has a strong reference to them, they will be deallocated. This is no different from any other Objective-C object.
After you set the new view controllers, your UINavigationController will lose its strong reference to the old stack. If you do not have any remaining strong references to the items in the old stack, they will indeed be released by ARC.
One way to verify this behavior is to override -(void)dealloc in the view controllers you want released, and put some logging in there. you should be able to see when dealloc is called.
Related
If I instantiate a ViewController from my storyboard programatically, will its memory be freed once it's no longer be shown in the application?
I'm showing it as a modal.
Expanding on #Schemetrical's answer, you need to make sure there is at least one strong reference to your VC or it will be deallocated immediately.
This is a crash in the making:
func viewDidLoad()
{
childVC = self.storyboard.instantiateViewControllerWithIdentifier("childVC")
self.view.addSubview(childVC.view)
}
In the above example the current VC's content view keeps ownership of the newly created view, but nobody keeps ownership of the view controller. It gets deallocated as soon as the function returns, and the first time something tries to reference the now-deallocated VC, you crash (Say there is a button who's action points to the VC.)
If you push your VC onto the navigation stack, the navigation controller takes ownership. As soon as it's popped off the stack, it gets deallocated. If you present your VC modally, the system takes ownership for as long as it's on screen. As soon as it'd dismissed it gets deallocated.
If you want a VC to stick around after it's popped/dismissed, you need to keep a strong reference to it somewhere. You might save a reference to it in your app delegate, in a singleton, or in your app's root view controller.
As long as nothing holds strongly on the vc, it will dealloc. Once you dismiss that vc, the view releases its reference on the object and since there are no references, it will dealloc.
I'm pushing and popping ViewControllers in UINavigationController.
I'm tracking the memory consumption of my app.
While pushing the new viewController the memory consumption is increasing gradually, but when I'm popping the same ViewController using [self.navigationController popViewControllerAnimated:NO]; the memory consumption does not decrease but the constant.
That particular viewController can be pushed and popped by user many times which can lead the high memory consumption of app in RAM.
What should I do to optimise my memory consumption?
When you dismiss a view controller (or pop it), it will be deallocated if you didn't make any strong pointers to it (that controller is retained by the navigation controller, or the presenting view controller, so you usually don't need to have a pointer to it when you create it and push or present it).
It will be be released if there are no other strong pointers to it
Try to avoid using strong properties for IBOutlets.
Consider reviewing whether you are referencing self in a block. If you do, you risk holding onto the UIViewController reference after you have popped it.
For a more in-depth review of why, check out this answer:
How do I avoid capturing self in blocks when implementing an API?
If your app design allows the user to push and pop the same view controller over and over again, you may want to look at reusing the same view controller and just updating its contents each time it's pushed.
Instead of creating and destroying it over and over, create one, set up its contents and push, when it's popped, keep it around ready to be shown again. Next time it needs to be shown, update its contents and then push it again.
I would like to say, that my last few days were spent on searching the web for my app memory problem. I was switching between 2 UIViewControllers. One of them had a scroll view which kept all subviews on it. It turned out that that UIVC loads a new scroll view without releasing the previous one. It took me several hours to realize it.
What I did was:
Looking for any kind of deadlocks inside the app, then searching for every variable that had a strong atributte and other desperate measures. But what really worked was:
#IBAction func backBB(sender: UIBarButtonItem) {
collectionView.removeFromSuperview()
self.frontView.removeFromSuperview()
eventsPhotos.removeAll(keepCapacity: false)
symbolContainerView.removeFromSuperview()
self.myScrollView.removeFromSuperview()
dismissViewControllerAnimated(true, completion: {})
}
I manually removed some views and contents. I've done it in "Back" button but you can do this in other methods like viewWillDisappear(animated: Bool).
Once I made this, my allocation chart in the developer instruments showed the memory allocation going up and down... And it was solved...
I think you get an error, when you try to pop the view controller because the navigation controller does not have a valid reference to the view controller, as it was released after you pushed it.
Nil the popover on dismiss.
[menuPopup_ dismissPopoverAnimated:YES];
menuPopup_ = nil;
Make sure your viewcontroller (A) has no reference of any other viewcontroller (B) or any object it has. Incase it has then make sure that VC-B is not referencing back VC-A. If it has some reference back to VC-A then make it a weak property. Otherwise strong retain cycle will keep the VC in memory even if its popped.
Another thing is to check wether theres any closure in your VC, check its body if it is referencing any property or method with self then make a Capture list to avoid retain cycle as "Closures are Reference Types"
Check if theres any NSNotification observer you are not releasing
Make a print call in deinit method to check wether its deallocated.
For further understanding on memory management:
https://medium.com/mackmobile/avoiding-retain-cycles-in-swift-7b08d50fe3ef
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GIy-qnGLpHU
You should use an unwind segue instead of popping.
I have three view controllers pushed in navigationcontroller on the third one i used the statement
[self.navigationController popToViewController:(Main_View*) mainViewObj animated:YES];
It takes me directly to my specified controller say first. I have done some coding to remove objects from an NSMutableDictionary in viewWillDisappear method in all view controllers, i tried debugging using break points but it never comes to viewWillDisappear, it takes me directly to Main_View. Should i be worried about removing objects from dictionary or releasing it?
The viewWillDisappear: method is not called for the other view controllers because they have already disappeared when you were pushing view controllers on top of them. So basically, viewWillDisappear: was already called for them at an earlier point. It wouldn't make sense to call it again, because they weren't visible in the first place.
You can try to keep weak references to your NSMutableDictanories in your AppDelegate, then after poptoviewcontroller in mainViewController get them, and see, if they are nil, or not, and if not, you can remove objects from Dictionaries in your main view with that references.
Im transitioning from one view controller to another UINavigationController by using a modal segue. Its important for me that this view controller (and its child view controllers) stay in memory so specific references are kept up. Although obviously exactly this not happening. When debugging the viewWillAppear function the rootViewController (viewControllers[0]) reference points to different memory addresses between calls (and contains nil values, my actual problem).
Now there two possibilities which could cause this issue:
The UiNavigationController became destroyed
The rootViewController became destroyed
But to make it really confusing, none of them did happen; neither the UINavigationController nor the rootViewController became destroyed (viewDidUnload not called!).
Edit: Further investigation discovered that the UINavigationController is really recreated for every modal segue. I hope that by maintaining a property i can solve the problem.
I finally ended up by creating my own IBAction functions wich present the controller manually. This works just fine and is coded in less than 5 minutes. One just need to init the controller one time on ViewDidLoad from the storyboard.
Create a strong reference in the main view controller and point your new view controllers to that property. This will keep the view around as long as you need, although this is not recommended for n number of views because it defeats the purpose of a nav controller handling its own creation and removing of views.
I have an iOS-App which uses ARC. I don't use InterfaceBuilder, all UI is generated manually. In that app I have several UIViewControllers with SubViewControllers. Those ViewControllers a tied together from a menu (-ViewController) who pushes them on the stack.
My problem is, that memory doesn't get freed when switching between the ViewControllers.
Is it wrong to keep references to the SubViewControllers like this?
#property (nonatomic, strong) UIViewController subViewController1;
#property (nonatomic, strong) UIViewController subViewController2;
viewDidUnload never gets called. Has anyone a good example how to build a clean view hierarchy?
By assigning the view controllers which get pushed on the stack to a strong instance variable / property, they will not be deallocated when popped off of the stack. The strong properties are holding on to the pushed view controllers even after they are popped off the stack, so they never get to a state where they can be deallocated.
Normally I do something like the following when pushing a next-level-down view controller onto the navigation stack:
SLSMoleculeSearchViewController *searchViewController = [[SLSMoleculeSearchViewController alloc] initWithStyle:UITableViewStylePlain];
[self.navigationController pushViewController:searchViewController animated:YES];
Under ARC, the new view controller will be allocated and will be retained on creation. When pushed onto the navigation stack, it will be retained once by the navigation controller. Because this new view controller is not referred to after being pushed, and is not assigned to a strong property or instance variable, ARC will release it after the second line.
Remember, it's still being retained by the navigation controller, so it's still live in memory. However, once the navigation controller pops it off the stack this view controller will be released. Since nothing is holding on to it at that point, it will be deallocated as expected.
If for some reason you need to maintain a reference to this sub view controller in your higher-level view controller, you could use a weak property or __weak instance variable. This will not hold on to the view controller, and will turn to nil once the controller is deallocated.
weak references are only supported for applications that target iOS 5.0, though, so you won't be able to do this for anything that needs to run on iOS 4.0. The 4.0-compatible unsafe_unretained property is not something I would recommend in this case, due to the danger of a pointer to deallocated memory.
This most likely has nothing to do with ARC. viewDidUnload is only called on a view controller when the view property is released / set to nil and this typically only happens if the app receives a memory warning.
Try triggering a memory warning in the simulator and see if that causes your viewDidUnload method to fire. If it does then everything is fine. If not, you are probably over-retaining your views somehow, perhaps by assigning them to other strongly retained properties.
There are exceptions to the view-retaining policy, for example the UINavigationController frees up views in its view controller stack if they aren't frontmost, but it does that by simply setting the view of its child controllers to nil when they're covered by another controller's view.
If you want your views to be released when they aren't onscreen, either set the controller's view property to nil in the viewDidDisappear: method, or stop retaining the view controllers when their views aren't onscreen and just create fresh controller instances each time you need to display them (that way both the controller and view will be released when not in use).