What does external mean in Dart? For example: external DateTime._now();
I'm new to Dart, I can't find documentation for external, so can you give an example to help explain？
9.4 External Functions
An external function is a function whose body is provided separately from its
declaration. An external function may be a top-level function (17), a method
The body of the function is defined somewhere else.
As far as I know this is used to fix different implementations for Dart VM in the browser and Dart VM on the Server.
When we make an external function inside a class like toString()
external String toString();
means this method is abstract and the child of the parent class will add the function body, that's because in Dart we only can make an abstract class.
Summary:
external function = abstract function in not abstract classes
I don't think external keyword is meant to be used to mark methods as abstract, even if that's possible
It's enough to leave a method with no implementation to set it abstract, inside an abstract class
It's the equivalent of declare in TypeScript, and extern in C#, those are used for interoperability with other runtimes, which means you're telling the compiler "Don't worry about this method's implementation, I promise it will exist at runtime", the runtime may be in C or Javascript or whatever
In case, if you are wondering why or where should I even use external keyword, here is a one more example for Flutter.
class MyStruct extends Struct {
#Int32()
external int a;
#Float()
external double b;
external Pointer<Void> c;
}
Sometimes, but not often when you play with native libraries, in this case with Struct to access native struct's field in memory. Under Struct We must declare all fields as external because it will be external fields from dart:ffi (C / C++).
So, external is more than just way to declare "abstract method".
9.4 External Functions
An external function is a function whose
body is provided separately from its
declaration.
What this does mean is that you define the function, but without implementation. It's exactly how you define the abstract method, but the only difference is that with external you don't implement the method in dart but in C or something else.
Something like String class it can be considered as external functions except that the String class it marked with #pragma('vm:entry-point') which make the entire class use native code.
See the following example to understand:
This dart's side.
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/blob/main/sdk/lib/core/string.dart#L711
This the implementation in C++.
https://github.com/dart-lang/sdk/blob/main/runtime/lib/string.cc#L467-#L472
In my opinion it is an equivalent of Java native keyword. For example, since current time milliseconds is implemented differently on Android, iOS, Linux etc, DateTime.now().millisecondsSinceEpoch will be linked to different implementations at runtime. So it is not initially known how this method will look like. For this reason it is marked as external meaning it is platform dependent.
Related
I tried to use method overloading in some dart code and quickly learned that overloading is not offered in dart.
My questions are: why is it not offered, and what is the recommended alternative? Is there a standard naming convention since methods that do the same thing but with different inputs must have different names?
Is it standard to use named parameters and then check that the caller has supplied enough information to complete the calculation?
Say I have a method that returns how much money someone makes in a year, called yearlyIncome.
In Java, I would create a method like this
double yearlyIncome(double hourlyRate, double hoursWorkedPerYear)
And maybe another method like this
double yearlyIncome(double monthlyRate, int monthsWorkedPerYear)
and so on. They're all used to calculate the same thing, but with different inputs. What's the best, standardized way to do this in dart?
Thanks so much in advance.
Function overloading is not supported in Dart at all.
Function overloading requires static types. Dart at its core is a dynamically typed language.
You can either use different names for the methods or optional named or unnamed parameters
// optional unnamed
void foo(int a, [String b]);
foo(5);
foo(5, 'bar');
// optional named
void foo(int a, {String b});
foo(5);
foo(5, b :'bar');
Optional parameters can also have default values. Optional named and unnamed parameters can not be used together (only one or the other for a single function)
In the case of a constructor you can use named constructors as an alternative
Dart did not support overloading originally because it was a much more dynamic language where the declared types did not have any semantic effect. That made it impossible to use static type based overload resolution.
Dart has since changed to be more statically type, and there is nothing fundamentally preventing Dart from adding overloading today, except that it would be a huge work and a huge change to the language. Or so I'd assume, because there isn't any obvious design that isn't either highly complicated or hugely breaking.
What you do instead in Dart is to use optional parameters. A method like:
String toString([int radix]);
effectively have two signatures: String Function() and String Function(int). It can act at both signatures.
There are definite limits to how far you can go with just optional parameters, because they still need to have exactly one type each, but that is the alternative that Dart currently provides. (Or use different names, but that's not overloading, you can do that in languages with overloading too).
Optional parameters is also one of the complications if we wanted to add overloading to the Dart language - would existing functions with optional parameters would count as multiple overloadings? If you declare a class like:
abstract class WithOverloading {
String toString();
String toString(int radix);
}
is that then the same signature as:
abstract class WithoutOverloading {
String toString([int radix]);
}
Probably not because you can tear off the latter and get one function with an optional parameter, and you might not be able to tear off both functions from the former and combine them into one function. Or maybe you can, that's why it's not a trivial design question how to include overloading into the existing Dart language.
Does Swift keep the the method lookup list when compiled or does it call a function in a specific memory location?
Best regards.
Regarding this: http://davedelong.tumblr.com/post/58428190187/an-observation-on-objective-c
I would recommend you have a look at the below links, especially the first one because it explains the concepts with examples from C++ and Objective-C, in order to have a better understanding of the difference between static, late and dynamic dispatch (for methods).
In a nutshell:
Static dispatch
The function and its implementation is determined at compile time and thus can’t fail at runtime (because the compiler will not continue the compilation process unless the binding is successful).
Late dispatch
The function is determined at compile time, but the actual implementation depends on the type of the object at runtime. Important for inheritance. The compiler will check if the the class or any of its parents have the function declared, but its up to the runtime to choose which implementation to use. The late binding can be implemented using virtual tables like in the case of C++.
Dynamic dispatch
The function is determined at runtime, which in the case of Objective-C can be called by name and thus can fail at runtime if the receiver (object) doesn't implement or inherit a method that can respond to a specified message.
References
What is the difference between Dynamic, Static and Late binding?
What is early and late binding?
What is the difference between dynamic dispatch and late binding in C++?
Sorry, this maybe a basic question. What are the difference between JNA direct mapping and interface mapping?
Is my interpretation correct:
Direct mapping: use the library object directly (like static main in Java)
Interface mapping: create an instance of the library object.
Thanks in advance!
Direct mapping directly binds your Java methods (declared with the native modifier) to native code which attempts to use the call stack as-is. Direct mapping is most effective if you restrict your function arguments and return values to primitive types (the Pointer type may be considered primitive).
The interface mapping uses a Proxy and dynamically translates Java function signatures into a generic native entry point with a list of arguments which must subsequently be translated into native primitives. It's more flexible w/r/t translating Java types to and from native, but can be much slower due to the runtime translation of arguments.
The attribute #inline(__always) forces the compiler to inline a particular function. How is code provided by external libraries inlined in one's project? Does the compiler actually copy code segments from the library's executable?
As far as I'm aware, #inline(__always) means that the function (or similar) is always inlined, no matter what. That means that its symbols are exposed in the compiled module so they can be inlined by projects consuming that module. Hence the "always".
This is largely an undocumented attribute, with the only official references I can find being in some stdlib devs' internal documentation, not even describing its behavior directly. The best unofficial documentation I can find is Vandad Nahavandipoor's disassembly-confirmed investigation into its behavior, which doesn't attempt to confirm the cross-module use case you are concerned with.
In Swift 4.2, #inlinable and #usableFromInline were introduced to finish this story.
My understanding:
#inline(__always) forces functions (et al) to be inlined every time no matter where they're declared or used
#inlinable allows functions (et al) in a module to be inlined into calling code in that module, or calling code using that module, if the compiler deems it necessary
#usableFromInline allows functions (et al) internal to a module to be inlined into #inlinable calling code that's also in that module, if the compiler deems it necessary. Unlike #inlinable, these must be internal; they cannot be public
According to Swift.org:
inlinable
Apply this attribute to a function, method, computed property, subscript, convenience initializer, or deinitializer declaration to expose that declaration’s implementation as part of the module’s public interface. The compiler is allowed to replace calls to an inlinable symbol with a copy of the symbol’s implementation at the call site.
Inlinable code can interact with public symbols declared in any module, and it can interact with internal symbols declared in the same module that are marked with the usableFromInline attribute. Inlinable code can’t interact with private or fileprivate symbols.
This attribute can’t be applied to declarations that are nested inside functions or to fileprivate or private declarations. Functions and closures that are defined inside an inlinable function are implicitly inlinable, even though they can’t be marked with this attribute.
usableFromInline
Apply this attribute to a function, method, computed property, subscript, initializer, or deinitializer declaration to allow that symbol to be used in inlinable code that’s defined in the same module as the declaration. The declaration must have the internal access level modifier. A structure or class marked usableFromInline can use only types that are public or usableFromInline for its properties. An enumeration marked usableFromInline can use only types that are public or usableFromInline for the raw values and associated values of its cases.
Like the public access level modifier, this attribute exposes the declaration as part of the module’s public interface. Unlike public, the compiler doesn’t allow declarations marked with usableFromInline to be referenced by name in code outside the module, even though the declaration’s symbol is exported. However, code outside the module might still be able to interact with the declaration’s symbol by using runtime behavior.
Declarations marked with the inlinable attribute are implicitly usable from inlinable code. Although either inlinable or usableFromInline can be applied to internal declarations, applying both attributes is an error.
In F#, can I omit the class name when calling a static method?
Example:
In C#, I can do something like:
using static Bizmonger.Patterns.MessageBus;
...
Publish("SOME_MESSAGE");
instead of:
MessageBus.Publish("SOME_MESSAGE");
Can I do something like this in F#?
In F#, you can use open on namespaces (just like using in C#) or on modules (which is useful when the API you are calling has been written in F#), but not on static classes (which is what you'd need when calling C# libraries).
One thing that you can do though to make the code a bit shorter is to define a type alias:
type M = Bizmonger.Patterns.MessageBus;
// Now you can write just
M.Publish("SOME_MESSAGE")
// Rather than writing the full
MessageBus.Publish("SOME_MESSAGE");
There is a feature request on the F# UserVoice to allow using open on static classes (just like in C#) and so if you'd like this to happen, please upvote and comment there.
I also learned that I could implement a function to serve as a wrapper for clients to call instead.
Create a wrapper function
module Messages
open Bizmonger.Patterns
let Publish (message:string, payload:_) =
MessageBus.Publish(message, payload)
Client
Then a client can now invoke a function without specifying a class name.
open Messages
...
Publish("SOME_MESSAGE", null);