I've looked on SO for an answer to this question, but can't seem to find one.
Basically what I want to do is something like Quora's Url Structure, where if a profile has the name Thomas Jefferson it becomes quora.com/thomas-jefferson. If there is already a Thomas Jefferson on the site, then it would become quora.com/thomas-jefferson-1, and so on for x number of duplicates.
The FriendlyId gem has something sort of like this, but instead of incrementing they generate a SecureRandom string, which is kind of ugly.
I have a Rails model that looks like this so far:
class Profile < ActiveRecord::Base
before_create :generate_slug
def generate_slug do
self.slug = loop do
slug = to_slug(self.name)
break slug unless Profile.exists?(slug: slug)
end
end
def to_slug(name)
self.transliterate.downcase.gsub(/[^a-z0-9 ]/, ' ').strip.gsub(/[ ]+/, '-')
end
end
I am assuming you have an index on name column in profiles table.
You can fire a query to database to get all entries like the currently generated slug and get the max value. If database does not return anything use current slug else parse the integer part of the max slug and increment it with 1 to get a new slug.
def generate_slug
slug = to_slug(self.name)
max_slug = Profile.where("slug like '#{slug}-%'").max.try(:slug)
self.slug = max_slug.present? ? slug : compute(slug, max_slug)
end
def compute(slug, max_slug)
max_count = max_slug.gsub("#{slug}-", "").to_i + 1
"#{slug}-#{max_count}"
end
*Untested code
Related
In my app that I am building to learn Rails and Ruby, I have below iteration/loop which is not functioning as it should.
What am I trying to achieve?
I am trying to find the business partner (within only the active once (uses a scope)) where the value of the field business_partner.bank_account is contained in the field self_extracted_data and then set the business partner found as self.sender (self here is a Document).
So once a match is found, I want to end the loop. A case exists where no match is found and sender = nil so a user needs to set it manually.
What happens now, is that on which ever record of the object I save (it is called as a callback before_save), it uses the last identified business partner as sender and the method does not execute again.
Current code:
def set_sender
BusinessPartner.active.where.not(id: self.receiver_id).each do |business_partner|
bp_bank_account = business_partner.bank_account.gsub(/\s+/, '')
rgx = /(?<!\w)(#{Regexp.escape(bp_bank_account)})?(?!\w)/
if self.extracted_data.gsub(/\s+/, '') =~ rgx
self.sender = business_partner
else
self.sender = nil
end
end
end
Thanks for helping me understand how to do this kind of case.
p.s. have the pickaxe book here yet this is so much that some help / guidance would be great. The regex works.
Using feedback from #moveson, this code works:
def match_with_extracted_data?(rgx_to_match)
extracted_data.gsub(/\s+/, '') =~ rgx_to_match
end
def set_sender
self.sender_id = matching_business_partner.try(:id) #unless self.sender.id.present? # Returns nil if no matching_business_partner exists
end
def matching_business_partner
BusinessPartner.active.excluding_receiver(receiver_id).find { |business_partner| sender_matches?(business_partner) }
end
def sender_matches?(business_partner)
rgx_registrations = /(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.bank_account.gsub(/\s+/, ''))})|(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.registration.gsub(/\s+/, ''))})|(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.vat_id.gsub(/\s+/, ''))})/
match_with_extracted_data?(rgx_registrations)
end
In Ruby you generally want to avoid loops and #each and long, procedural methods in favor of Enumerable iterators like #map, #find, and #select, and short, descriptive methods that each do a single job. Without knowing more about your project I can't be sure exactly what will work, but I think you want something like this:
# /models/document.rb
class Document < ActiveRecord::Base
def set_sender
self.sender = matching_business_partner.try(:id) || BusinessPartner.active.default.id
end
def matching_business_partners
other_business_partners.select { |business_partner| account_matches?(business_partner) }
end
def matching_business_partner
matching_business_partners.first
end
def other_business_partners
BusinessPartner.excluding_receiver_id(receiver_id)
end
def account_matches?(business_partner)
rgx = /(?<!\w)(#{Regexp.escape(business_partner.stripped_bank_account)})?(?!\w)/
data_matches_bank_account?(rgx)
end
def data_matches_bank_account?(rgx)
extracted_data.gsub(/\s+/, '') =~ rgx
end
end
# /models/business_partner.rb
class BusinessPartner < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :excluding_receiver_id, -> (receiver_id) { where.not(id: receiver_id) }
def stripped_bank_account
bank_account.gsub(/\s+/, '')
end
end
Note that I am assigning an integer id, rather than an ActiveRecord object, to self.sender. I think that's what you want.
I didn't try to mess with the database relations here, but it does seem like Document could include a belongs_to :business_partner, which would give you the benefit of Rails methods to help you find one from the other.
EDIT: Added Document#matching_business_partners method and changed Document#set_sender method to return nil if no matching_business_partner exists.
EDIT: Added BusinessPartner.active.default.id as the return value if no matching_business_partner exists.
I created a simple web form where users can enter some search criteria to look for venues e.g. a price range. When a user clicks "find" I use active record to query the database. This all works very well if all fields are filled in. Problems occur when one or more fields are left open and therefore have a value of null.
How can I work around this in my controller? Should I first check whether a value is null and create a query based on that? I can imagine I end up with many different queries and a lot of code. There must be a quicker way to achieve this?
Controller:
def search
#venues = Venue.where("price >= ? AND price <= ? AND romance = ? AND firstdate = ?", params[:minPrice], params[:maxPrice], params[:romance], params[:firstdate])
end
You may want to filter out all of the blank parameters that were sent with the request.
Here is a quick and DRY solution for filtering out blank values, triggers only one query of the database, and builds the where clause with Rails' ActiveRecord ORM.
This approach safeguards against SQL-injection, as pointed out by #DanBrooking. Rails 4.0+ provides "strong parameters." You should use the feature.
class VenuesController < ActiveRecord::Base
def search
# Pass a hash to your query
#venues = Venue.where(search_params)
end
private
def search_params
params.
# Optionally, whitelist your search parameters with permit
permit(:min_price, :max_price, :romance, :first_date).
# Delete any passed params that are nil or empty string
delete_if {|key, value| value.blank? }
end
end
I would recommend to make method in Venue
def self.find_by_price(min_price, max_price)
if min_price && max_price
where("price between ? and ?", min_price, max_price)
else
all
end
end
def self.find_by_romance(romance)
if romance
where("romance = ?", romance)
else
all
end
end
def self.find_by_firstdate(firstdate)
if firstdate
where("firstdate = ?", firstdate)
else
all
end
end
And use it in your controller
Venue
.find_by_price(params[:minPrice], params[:maxPrice])
.find_by_romance(params[:romance])
.find_by_firstdate(params[:firstdate])
Another solution to this problem, and I think a more elegant one, is using scopes with conditions.
You could do something like
class Venue < ActiveRecord::Base
scope :romance, ->(genre) { where("romance = ?", genre) if genre.present? }
end
You can then chain those, which would work as an AND if there is no argument present, then it is not part of the chain.
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/active_record_querying.html#scopes
Try below code, it will ignore parameters those are not present
conditions = []
conditions << "price >= '#{params[:minPrice]}'" if params[:minPrice].present?
conditions << "price <= '#{params[:maxPrice]}'" if params[:maxPrice].present?
conditions << "romance = '#{params[:romance]}'" if params[:romance].present?
conditions << "firstdate = '#{params[:firstdate]}'" if params[:firstdate].present?
#venues = Venue.where(conditions.join(" AND "))
I am attempting to generate a fragment cache (using a Dalli/Memcached store) however the key is being generated with "#" as part of the key, so Rails doesn't seem to be recognizing that there is a cache value and is hitting the database.
My cache key in the view looks like this:
cache([#jobs, "index"]) do
The controller has:
#jobs = #current_tenant.active_jobs
With the actual Active Record query like this:
def active_jobs
self.jobs.where("published = ? and expiration_date >= ?", true, Date.today).order("(featured and created_at > now() - interval '" + self.pinned_time_limit.to_s + " days') desc nulls last, created_at desc")
end
Looking at the rails server, I see the cache read, but the SQL Query still runs:
Cache read: views/#<ActiveRecord::Relation:0x007fbabef9cd58>/1-index
Read fragment views/#<ActiveRecord::Relation:0x007fbabef9cd58>/1-index (1.0ms)
(0.6ms) SELECT COUNT(*) FROM "jobs" WHERE "jobs"."tenant_id" = 1 AND (published = 't' and expiration_date >= '2013-03-03')
Job Load (1.2ms) SELECT "jobs".* FROM "jobs" WHERE "jobs"."tenant_id" = 1 AND (published = 't' and expiration_date >= '2013-03-03') ORDER BY (featured and created_at > now() - interval '7 days') desc nulls last, created_at desc
Any ideas as to what I might be doing wrong? I'm sure it has to do w/ the key generation and ActiveRecord::Relation, but i'm not sure how.
Background:
The problem is that the string representation of the relation is different each time your code is run:
|This changes|
views/#<ActiveRecord::Relation:0x007fbabef9cd58>/...
So you get a different cache key each time.
Besides that it is not possible to get rid of database queries completely. (Your own answer is the best one can do)
Solution:
To generate a valid key, instead of this
cache([#jobs, "index"])
do this:
cache([#jobs.to_a, "index"])
This queries the database and builds an array of the models, from which the cache_key is retrieved.
PS: I could swear using relations worked in previous versions of Rails...
We've been doing exactly what you're mentioning in production for about a year. I extracted it into a gem a few months ago:
https://github.com/cmer/scope_cache_key
Basically, it allows you to use a scope as part of your cache key. There are significant performance benefits to doing so since you can now cache a page containing multiple records in a single cache element rather than looping each element in the scope and retrieving caches individually. I feel that combining this with with the standard "Russian Doll Caching" principles is optimal.
I have had similar problems, I have not been able to successfully pass relations to the cache function and your #jobs variable is a relation.
I coded up a solution for cache keys that deals with this issue along with some others that I was having. It basically involves generating a cache key by iterating through the relation.
A full write up is on my site here.
http://mark.stratmann.me/content_items/rails-caching-strategy-using-key-based-approach
In summary I added a get_cache_keys function to ActiveRecord::Base
module CacheKeys
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
# Instance Methods
def get_cache_key(prefix=nil)
cache_key = []
cache_key << prefix if prefix
cache_key << self
self.class.get_cache_key_children.each do |child|
if child.macro == :has_many
self.send(child.name).all.each do |child_record|
cache_key << child_record.get_cache_key
end
end
if child.macro == :belongs_to
cache_key << self.send(child.name).get_cache_key
end
end
return cache_key.flatten
end
# Class Methods
module ClassMethods
def cache_key_children(*args)
#v_cache_key_children = []
# validate the children
args.each do |child|
#is it an association
association = reflect_on_association(child)
if association == nil
raise "#{child} is not an association!"
end
#v_cache_key_children << association
end
end
def get_cache_key_children
return #v_cache_key_children ||= []
end
end
end
# include the extension
ActiveRecord::Base.send(:include, CacheKeys)
I can now create cache fragments by doing
cache(#model.get_cache_key(['textlabel'])) do
I've done something like Hopsoft, but it uses the method in the Rails Guide as a template. I've used the MD5 digest to distinguish between relations (so User.active.cache_key can be differentiated from User.deactivated.cache_key), and used the count and max updated_at to auto-expire the cache on updates to the relation.
require "digest/md5"
module RelationCacheKey
def cache_key
model_identifier = name.underscore.pluralize
relation_identifier = Digest::MD5.hexdigest(to_sql.downcase)
max_updated_at = maximum(:updated_at).try(:utc).try(:to_s, :number)
"#{model_identifier}/#{relation_identifier}-#{count}-#{max_updated_at}"
end
end
ActiveRecord::Relation.send :include, RelationCacheKey
While I marked #mark-stratmann 's response as correct I actually resolved this by simplifying the implementation. I added touch: true to my model relationship declaration:
belongs_to :tenant, touch: true
and then set the cache key based on the tenant (with a required query param as well):
<% cache([#current_tenant, params[:query], "#{#current_tenant.id}-index"]) do %>
That way if a new Job is added, it touches the Tenant cache as well. Not sure if this is the best route, but it works and seems pretty simple.
Im using this code:
class ActiveRecord::Base
def self.cache_key
pluck("concat_ws('/', '#{table_name}', group_concat(#{table_name}.id), date_format(max(#{table_name}.updated_at), '%Y%m%d%H%i%s'))").first
end
def self.updated_at
maximum(:updated_at)
end
end
maybe this can help you out
https://github.com/casiodk/class_cacher , it generates a cache_key from the Model itself, but maybe you can use some of the principles in the codebase
As a starting point you could try something like this:
def self.cache_key
["#{model_name.cache_key}-all",
"#{count}-#{updated_at.utc.to_s(cache_timestamp_format) rescue 'empty'}"
] * '/'
end
def self.updated_at
maximum :updated_at
end
I'm having normalized database where multiple models relate to the same other model, think of clients, locations, etc. all having addresses by means of a street_id.
With this solution you can generate cache_keys based on scope, e.g.
cache [#client, #client.locations] do
# ...
end
cache [#client, #client.locations.active, 'active'] do
# ...
end
and I could simply modify self.updated from above to also include associated objects (because has_many does not support "touch", so if I updated the street, it won't be seen by the cache otherwise):
belongs_to :street
def cache_key
[street.cache_key, super] * '/'
end
# ...
def self.updated_at
[maximum(:updated_at),
joins(:street).maximum('streets.updated_at')
].max
end
As long as you don't "undelete" records and use touch in belongs_to, you should be alright with the assumption that a cache key made of count and max updated_at is sufficient.
I'm using a simple patch on ActiveRecord::Relation to generate cache keys for relations.
require "digest/md5"
module RelationCacheKey
def cache_key
Digest::MD5.hexdigest to_sql.downcase
end
end
ActiveRecord::Relation.send :include, RelationCacheKey
I'm currently generating url slugs dynamically for my models (and implementing to_param/self.from_param to interpret them). My slug generation code feels verbose, and could use a refactor.
How would you refactor this so that it is still readable, but less verbose and perhaps more clear?
Relationships
User has_many :lists
List belongs_to :owner
Code
def generate_slug
if self.owner
slug_found = false
count = 0
temp_slug = to_slug
until slug_found
# increment the count
count += 1
# create a potential slug
temp_slug = if count > 1
suffix = "_" + count.to_s
to_slug + suffix
else
to_slug
end
# fetch an existing slug for this list's owner's lists
# (i.e. owner has many lists and list slugs should be unique per owner)
existing = self.owner.lists.from_param(temp_slug)
# if it doesn't exist, or it exists but is the current list, slug found!
if existing.nil? or (existing == self)
slug_found = true
end
end
# set the slug
self.slug = temp_slug
else
Rails.logger.debug "List (id: #{self.id}, slug: #{self.slug}) doesn't have an owner set!"
end
end
You could maybe do this
def generate_slug
return Rails.logger.debug "List (id: #{self.id}, slug: #{self.slug}) doesn't have an owner set!" if !self.owner
count = 1
begin
temp_slug = %Q!#{to_slug}#{"_#{count}" if count > 1}!
existing = self.owner.lists.from_param(temp_slug)
if existing.nil? or (existing == self)
self.slug = temp_slug
end
end while count += 1
end
But there is two things. First you have an infinite loop which is not good. Secondly, instead of looping to check each time if the object exists and that you need to increase your suffix, you better get the last existing list and add just one after that.
I have a URL encoded resource such as:
http://myurl/users/Joe%20Bloggs/index.xml
This is for a RESTful webservice which uses user logins in the path. The problem is that the controller in rails doesn't seem to decode the %20. I get the following error:
ActionController::RoutingError (No route matches "/Joe%20Bloggs/index.xml" with {:method=>:post}):
What I'm actually trying to do is achieve one of 2 options (using authlogic as my registrations handler):
Either (preferably) allow users to register user names with spaces in them, and have these get routed correctly to my controller. Authlogic by default allows spaces & #/. characters - which is just fine with me if I can make it work...
Or I can restrict authlogic to dissallow the spaces. I know I can do this with:
.merge_validates_format_of_login_field_options...
but I'm not entirely sure of the correct syntax to provide the new regex and return message on failure...
Any suggestions greatly appreciated!
Generally it's a better idea to have a URL-safe "slug" field in your models for situations like this. For example:
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
before_validation :assign_slug
def to_param
# Can't use alias_method on methods not already defined,
# ActiveRecord creates accessors after DB is connected.
self.slug
end
def unique_slug?
return false if (self.slug.blank?)
if (new_record?)
return self.class.count(:conditions => [ 'slug=?', self.slug ]) == 0
else
return self.class.count(:conditions => [ 'slug=? AND id!=?', self.slug, self.id ]) == 0
end
end
def assign_slug
return if (slug.present?)
base_slug = self.name.gsub(/\s+/, '-').gsub(/[^\w\-]/, '')
self.slug = base_slug
count = 1
# Hunt for a unique slug starting with slug1 .. slugNNN
while (!unique_slug?)
self.slug = base_slug + count.to_s
count += 1
end
end
end
This may solve the problem of having non-URL-friendly names. Rails is particularly ornery when it comes to having dots in the output of to_param.