I was working on the ADempiere Web UI. But found many features are not working in Web UI like value format . And found some forms are not working properly. Can you list out the mis links in WEBUI compare to the application?
The important things are
1.Reset user password does not submit changes
2.Cannot create a new Sales Order. If created, cannot be saved. DocType and Partner Locations Fields doesn't retrieve anything.
3.When creating a line item, if product is updated to choose one different from the originally chosen, the unit price and line amount are not updated unless the quantity is changed.
4.When trying to create a PO from a requisition, the process fails with an error without any further description of the problem
5.Some pull down selection such as for categories and codes doesn't work. They have zoom buttons but some have no window error. The common error is eve though it has a window when zoomed, it doesnt do anything to get the selected value back.
6.Cannot Open/Close Periods, Period Action doesnt have values.
Related
We are using forms to allow people (staff) to book equipment out of a store, self service. We record who took what, and when they book it back in. They are asked if the tool condition is good, and if not, are taken to another part of the form to select a fault category. I record this information in the linked sheet.
so my question is can I read the information in the "fault" column of the linked sheet for that item ID, and generate a message to the form user such as "This item has been reported as faulty - please do not use it!" etc etc
If I could script the form so that it scans the linked sheet in the relevant column / row for the item they are trying to scan out, and then warn them that is has an entry in the "Fault" column, that would be perfect. Ideally as they scan the barcode of the item they are taking, before submitting the form, but after submit would be fine too.
I have searched widely and not yet found a solution
Since the only triggers which are available for Forms are the onOpen, onInstall and onFormSubmit, this cannot be done directly.
Possible solutions
1. You can develop your own form
This can be done by using Apps Script & HTML & JavaScript and creating your own Sheets add-on which will interract with the sheet you have in order to check the status of the tool.
2. You can programmatically update either the question name or the form description in order to include the accepted values for the question regarding the tools.
This can be done by creating a script attached to the sheet and using the onEdit(). So whenever a change is made in the tools section for example, this new data can be gathered as a string and update the fields to contain the updated values for the tools.
Reference
Apps Script Simple Triggers;
Extending G Suite with Add-ons.
I'm using Slack's modals + their new BlockKit interactive actions. I have a modal dialog with several section's that include select menu accessories. When one of those accessories changes (ex: user preference goes from Yes -> No), I want to update the modal's view to reflect the change in some contextual text.
The docs outline two ways to update a model. Because I'm not using the traditional modal inputs, I have to update the modal via the API and not via response_action. Proof: I don't even receive a view_submission payload at all... I receive a blockkit_action payload.
The docs conflict a bit. In the above link they say that to update a view you must pass in the returned ID of the view when it was opened:
Remember the view.id that was included in the success response when
you used views.open earlier? We hope you kept it, because you can now
use it to update that view.
But when you look at the docs for the views.open and views.update, it appears there is a second option: external_id. The views.update docs say this:
A unique identifier of the view set by the developer. Must be unique
for all views on a team. Max length of 255 characters. Either view_id
or external_id is required.
Initially I got everything working really nicely by choosing an external ID of myapp-mymodal-[userID]. But as soon as I tried opening the modal simultaneously on my Desktop + Mobile client, I started getting internal_error responses and have been unable to open the modal since!
So I started looking into saving the view ID, per the first quote. My problem is: that ID changes every time the modal opens. I don't understand how I am expected to possibly keep track of the 0-2 "active" view IDs that might be taking place across a user's Desktop + Mobile clients (or more than 2 if they have an iPad, a second laptop, etc).
I tried to look for some sort of unique client ID that I could either use to include in the external_id or in my view_id persistence logic, but given that Slack's API appears to be sesssion-less I couldn't find any such thing.
How do others solve this problem?
Try using the private_metadata field in the View
I initially did the same thing you did, which worked, but I wanted to avoid that edge case if possible. What I figured out, is that I could pass the external_id that I created when opening the view into the view's metadata, and then retrieve it when I receive an interaction.
When I set the external_id I set it to the userID + the current time (so it's always unique, even if the user opens the modal from different devices)
externalID := UserID + time.Now().String()
and pass that both as the external_id for the view, and as a string into the private_metadata.
PrivateMetadata string `json:"private_metadata"`
When the user interacts with one of my blocks and Slack sends me the interactive message, I retrieve the metadata like this:
Request.Payload.View.PrivateMetadata
I wrote my Slack app in Go, but I tried to make it clear for any language. Let me know if anything is unclear or needs expanding on - this is my first time giving back to the Stackoverflow community.
I am the SharePoint administrator for a company. Usually I can find how to fix problems rather easily but this time I am stumped. I have two problems. One of them is there is a person who has a MySite but when you use the people search she does not show up. The second problem is there is another whose job does not show correctly and when you search by job it doesn't show correctly. Its missing one word in the job title. To update profiles we use a data base that stores there information and sends it to a intermediate database when a specific job is run. We use AD groups to determine who gets a MySite.
I am working on a Grails project, its an accounting project. We have multiple clients and they can have multiple types of accounts. I have to create the 'create' page for client, there should be a way to add multiple types of account to the client.
So I was thinking of making a drop-down list with account types and few text boxes to enter account name and other info about account. Also, as a client can have multiple accounts, so I want to create a 'add' button, when clicked it would display a new row to add a new client. I have done this kind of UI before using javascript but in this case, as there is a drop-down list and other components, I think it would be very hard and may not work.
I was thinking of creating a partial view which would render each time user clicked the 'add' button with additional row, problem with this would be during validation errors, edit page and i would also have to pass all values each time user clicks 'add' button.
Is there any other for doing this?
For the template approach you must use ajax if you don't want to carry on the params that the user has already set.
It is possible to make new drop-down lists appear (or any group of elements inside a <div>) when a user clicks a button, since Grails already comes with jQuery you might want to take a look at the .clone() method.
The problem with the two listed approeaches is that it will be possible to have duplicates.
Now, another option is to use checkboxes, so you can check just the type of account you want.
But to be honest it does seems a bit odd or even inapropiate to let the user choose the type of account he wants with such freedom.
I'm once again looking into the world of tabbed browsing and Sessions. Looking over a few google searches it seems that there isn't a nice way of supporting this.
Does anyone know of a method that allows Bookmarking without stealing a session (cookieless) (and this doesn't work in MVC2 for dataannotations).
Supporting tabs in such a way that it's per use case (like Windows Workflow), going through two workflows at once.
I'm thinking a url in the query string might support this, but I'm wondering if anybody else has done a similar implementation.
[Edit] Use Case: Say I'm writing an application that uses something like Windows Workflow. Each UI workflow may do an action such as collect settings of a page and execute some external process. I may wish to do two of these workflows at once (not necessarily the same UI workflow). As such if I saved in session I would get:
a) Different tabs interfering with the workflow
b) Previous/Next buttons would be extremely difficult to work out, due to a).
I would like it so either, a user cannot open another tab to a url (don't think there is a 100% method of preventing this), or allow a user to use a UI workflow in isolation without one affecting another (much like running two workflows in two different browsers).
Hopefully that gives an indication of what I'm attempting to do.
Regards,
J
It sounds like you might be trying to do the following:
For example, let's say you have a two page questionaire, the first page has first name on it and the second page has last name on it. You desire that the user can open two tabs, and be at different pages in the questionaire while entering different data in the questionaire in each tab.
So in Tab A, you have entered Mark as the first name and submitted and you are at page two now in Tab A. You decide you are going to do a questionairre for your friend also, so you open up a new Tab, Tab B. In Tab B you enter Tom and submit the page.
Currently in the browser you have Tab A, which is at page 2 of the questionaire with firstname = "Mark" and Tab B which is at page 2 of the questionaire with first name = "Tom". Assuming you wanted to maintain both of these in session on the server here is an approach that i think will work for you.
When a web browser requests page 1 of your form, on a GET request(no posted questionaire data to the server), you supply a hidden field in the the response html and generate a random number to store in that field. When this form is submitted you do the following on the server:
Look in session using the random number as a key "var questionaire = session[Request.Form["questionaire_rnumber"]]
if the questionaire is not in session you create a new questionaire and update it's properties and stick it in session
var questionaire = new Questionaire();
questionaire.FirstName = Request.Form["firstName"]
session[Request.Form["questionaire_rnumber"]] = questionaire;
if the questionaire was in the session you simply update the object, and display the next page, however when you display the next page you will want to supply the hidden random number field in the html again, using the same random number you used on page 1.
This way you can hold any number of questionaires in a single session. With MVC.NET it should be straight forward for you to add the random number field to your view model and add the logic for looking in session for an existing questionaire or creating a new one and I think you'll be good to go.
You should keep in mind the possible issues with the approach also, like back button issues, security issues, and performance issues.
One example of a security and a performance issue would be that an attacker realizes your application works like this and the attacker requests page 1 of your form 10,000 times and submit the page 1 each time. You would have 10,000 questionaire objects in that one user session. If the attacker deleted his session ID cookie 10,000 times and for each session id cookie he created 10,000 requests for page 1 and submitted the page 1 form, you would have 100,000 questionaire objects cumulatively across 10,000 sessions on your server. So you should put some constraints on it also to protect your application, for example:
Any individual session can only have X questionaires in session
Any individual IP address can only have Y concurrent sessions (this you would probably need to track in the Application object)
ADDITIONAL RESPONSE TO ADDED USE CASE
Thanks for the use case. My solution should still work for you. You have two options.
If you want to ensure there is only one tab working with your workflow, then when the random number is passed to the server from a new tab you will be able to detect that there is another workflow in progress and that the random number from the new tab does not match the random number from the first, so you will throw an exception and show the user some messaging that says they can't start a new workflow until they finish the first one, and ask if they want to cancel the first. You have to ask if they want to cancel it because if they close their browser on the first workflow they started they will be stuck until their session expires. Which won't happen if they keep trying to start a new workflow.
Secondly, you could allow them to do multiple, but segment the context of each workflow by the random number, as suggested in the first answer. The whole point is that you are making little mini-sessions in your session, but keyed of a value that is only stored in the client. So since each tab has a different random number when the form posts to the server, it's easy to correlate that random number with an entry in your session that has all the information about the workflow initiated from that tab.
Hope this helps.
You need to store wizard state information in the client in some way, via query string or form values. As you've intuited, Session will not work. Nor will anything else that relies solely on what is on the server.