Somewhere in my Vaadin application, I'm getting this exception as soon as I connect using a second browser
Caused by: java.lang.RuntimeException: A connector with id 22 is already registered!
at com.vaadin.ui.ConnectorTracker.registerConnector(ConnectorTracker.java:133)
It happens always in the same place but I don't know why exactly as the reason for this must be somewhere else.
I think I might be stealing UI components from the other session - which is not my intention.
Currently, I don't see any static instances of UI components I might be using in multiple sessions.
How can I debug this? It's become quite a large project.
Any hints to look for?
Yes, this usually happens because you are attaching a component already attached in other session.
Try logging the failed connector with a temporal ConnectorTracker, So the next time that it happens, you can catch it.
For example:
public class SomeUI extends UI {
private ConnectorTracker tracker;
#Override
public ConnectorTracker getConnectorTracker() {
if (this.tracker == null) {
this.tracker = new ConnectorTracker(this) {
#Override
public void registerConnector(ClientConnector connector) {
try {
super.registerConnector(connector);
} catch (RuntimeException e) {
getLogger().log(Level.SEVERE, "Failed connector: {0}", connector.getClass().getSimpleName());
throw e;
}
}
};
}
return tracker;
}
}
I think I might be stealing UI components from the other session - which is not my intention. Currently, I don't see any static instances of UI components I might be using in multiple sessions.
That was it. I was actually stealing UI components without prior knowledge.
It was very well hidden in a part which seems to be same for all instances. Which is true: the algorithm is the same.
Doesn't mean I should've reused the same UI components as well...
Thanks to those who took a closer look.
Here is how I fixed it -
1) look for components you have shared across sessions. For example if you have declared a component as static it will be created once and will be shared.
2) if you are not able to find it and want a work around until you figure out the real problem, put your all addComponent calls in try and in catch add following code -
getUI().getConnectorTracker().markAllConnectorsDirty();
getUI().getConnectorTracker().markAllClientSidesUnititialized();
getPage().reload():
This will clear old connectors and will reload the page properly only when it fails. For me it was failing when I was logged out and logged in back.
Once you find the real problem you can fix it till then inform your customers about the reload.
**** note - only solution is to remove shared components this is just a work around.
By running your application in debug mode (add ?debug at the end of URL in browser) you will be able to browse to the component, e.g:
-UIConnector(0)
--VerticalLayoutConnector(1)
---...
---LabelConnector(22)
where 22 is id from your stack trace. Find this component in your code and make sure that it is not static (yes, I saw such examples).
Related
I am using the CrossDownManager plugin for Xamarin Forms
Here
When I run the method on Android it processes as expected. On iOS Debug.Writeline("Success!") isn't being hit like it was on Android.
Here is the code:
void ViewImage(string imageLink)
{
var downloadManager = CrossDownloadManager.Current;
downloadManager.PathNameForDownloadedFile = new System.Func<IDownloadFile, string>(file =>
{
string path = DependencyService.Get<IImageSaver>().Save("YHTS" + DateTime.Today.Ticks.ToString() + ".jpg");
Debug.WriteLine("Success!");
return path;
});
try
{
var file = downloadManager.CreateDownloadFile(imageLink);
Debug.WriteLine("file created");
downloadManager.Start(file);
Debug.WriteLine("downloadstarted");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Debug.WriteLine(e.ToString());
}
}
For the life of me I can't figure out why the that code block isn't processed. Any ideas?
This is an interesting issue as technically your code should work as expected. I've done a little digging and found a reply to a similar question here.
your options are many... including:
DEBUG preprocessor as you show in your question.
Use System.Diagnostic.Debug.WriteLine: Any calls to Debug.* will be
removed by the compiler due to the [Conditional("DEBUG")] attribute
being applied.
Create your own "Logger" class as a wrapper to the stdout writers and
[Conditional("DEBUG")] it
Use Fody and re-weave the assemblies to remove/NOP/redirect the
WriteLine I do this to redirect the calls to in internal log and upon
crash or user stat requests, forward this log to our crash reporting
servers. etc, .....
So there are a few alternatives to consider, one of the common suggestions I've seen is to use the fully qualified reference for WriteLine(); as such:
System.Console.WriteLine("woop woop");
I would suggest giving the above a try first.
I want to load some content or page in a JavaFX WebView and offer a Bridge object to Java so the content of the page can do calls into java.
The basic concept of how to do this is described here: https://blogs.oracle.com/javafx/entry/communicating_between_javascript_and_javafx
Now my question is: When is a good time inject the bridge-object into the WebView so it is available as soon as possible.
One option would be after page load as described here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/17612361/1520422
But is there a way to inject this sooner (before the page content itself is initialized), so the bridge-object is available DURING page-load (and not only after page-load)?
Since no one has answered, I'll tell you how I'm doing it, although it is ugly. This provides the ability for the page to function normally in non-Java environments but receive a Java object in Java environments.
I start by providing an onStatusChanged handler to the WebEngine. It listens for a magic value for window.status. If the magic value is received, the handler installs the Java object. (In my case, it's more complex, because I have some more complex orchestration: I'm executing a script that provides a client-side API for the page and then sets another magic value on window.status to cause the Java object to be sent to an initialization method of the client-side API).
Then in my target page, I have the following code in the first script in the page:
window.status = "MY-MAGIC-VALUE";
window.status = "";
This code is essentially a no-op in a "normal" browser but triggers the initialization when running in the custom JavaFX embedding.
In Java 8, you can trigger event changing from SCHEDULED to RUNNING to inject objects at this time. The objects will present in WebEngine before JavaScript running. Java 7, I see the state machine quite differs in operating, no solution given for Java 7.
webEngine.getLoadWorker().stateProperty().addListener(
new ChangeListener<State>(){
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends State> ov,
State oldState,
State newState)
{
// System.out.println("old: "+oldState+", new: "+newState);
if(newState == State.RUNNING &&
oldState == State.SCHEDULED){
JSObject window = (JSObject)webEngine.executeScript("window");
window.setMember("foutput", foutput);
}
}
});
In ASP.NET MVC, when we call a post action with some data, we check ModelState and in case some validation error, it would be falst. For a big Enter User Information form, it is annoying to expand each Value and look at the count to see which Key (9 in attached example image) has validation error. Wondering if someone knows an easy way to figure out which element is causing validation error.
In VS2015+, you can use LINQ in the Immediate Window, which means you can just run the following:
ModelState.SelectMany(
x => x.Value.Errors,
(state, error) => $"{state.Key}: {error.ErrorMessage}"
)
I propose to write a method:
namespace System.Web
{
using Mvc;
public static class ModelStateExtensions
{
public static Tuple<string, string> GetFirstError(this ModelStateDictionary modelState)
{
if (modelState.IsValid)
{
return null;
}
foreach (var key in modelState.Keys)
{
if (modelState[key].Errors.Count != 0)
{
return new Tuple<string, string>(key, modelState[key].Errors[0].ErrorMessage);
}
}
return null;
}
}
}
Then during debugging open Immediate Window and enter:
ModelState.GetFirstError()
Sounds like you're looking for debugger enhancements. I recently came across this product in the visual studio gallery.
http://visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com/16acdc63-c4f1-43a7-866a-67ff7022a0ac
I have no affiliation with them, and haven't used it. It's also a trial version and have no idea how much it costs for the full thing.
If you're more focused on the debugger side of things, have a go with the trial copy of OzCode. It enhances the Visual Studio IDE by replacing the usual debugging tooltip with it's own, more powerful, debugging tooltip. It's hard to epxlain with words, check out their website, they have a gallery of features on there.
I've been playing around with the beta for a few weeks, and it's proved a very valuable tool. You can query against data in the debugger using OzCode. For example, you could query items in the ModelState by filtering against the Values collection.
I'm currently learning/testing BDD using SpecFlow, and it works great!
Before I choose to ask my question, I have read this one, and I felt like I had to ask my question despite the fact that the same problem is addressed, because of the Exception scenario which is not mentioned.
I'm actually testing this scenario:
Scenario: I should get an error whenever I try to remove an item from an empty stack
Given I have an empty stack
When I pop from it
Then I should get an error
public class StackBehaviour {
public void GivenIHaveAnEmptyStack() { stack = new CustomStack<string>(); }
// This will throw whenever called!
// So the Then method will never be run!
// I feel like I should just put a comment which says why it's empty,
// allowing a fellow programmer to understand the exact intention.
public void WhenIPopFromIt() { stack.Pop(); }
// It is here that it verifies whether the CustomStack meets the expected behaviour.
public void ThenIShouldGetAnError() {
Assert.Throws<IndexOutOfRangeException>(delegate {
stack.Pop();
});
}
private CustomStack<string> stack;
}
public class CustomStack<T> {
public T Pop() {
if (stack.Count == 0)
throw new IndexOutOfRangeException("Cannot pop from an empty stack!");
T item = stack[stack.Count-1];
stack.RemoveAt(stack.Count-1);
return item;
}
private ArrayList stack = new ArrayList();
}
I think that leaving a comment in the When method is correct, so that the business requirement doesn't lack any information, and on the code behind, I put it clear what my intention is exactly by commenting.
What do you think? Any other ideas why I shouldn't make it?
There is another trick that you can use where the bindings help make the feature's meaning a little clearer. In this case, let's start at the end.
Then I should get an error
Your problem is a basically here, you know want an error, but you don't know how to get it. In fact you've already missed it, the error has already occurred in the When step, and in your code example, you moved the action into the then step just so you could get the error.
But what if keep the when performing the action amd re-express our then to reflect what really happens
Then I should have had an error
Seems a trivial change but now our feature reflects that the error should have been associated with the When step and we are simply evaluating it later, and that is something we can code. We just need something to remember the error in the when and deliver it to the then.
private Exception errorFromWhen = null;
public void WhenIPopFromIt()
{
try
{
stack.Pop();
}
catch(Exception ex)
{
errorFromWhen = ex;
}
}
public void ThenIShouldGetAnError()
{
errorFromWhen.ShouldNotBeNull();
errorFromWhen.ShouldBe<IndexOutOfRangeException>();
}
SpecFlow has absolutely no problems with this, in fact due to its mini Dependency injection system, you can even pass this state between binding classes if necessary.
May a scenario not have a When in BDD?
In Specflow, neither given, when or then are mandatory.
However in your example, I don't believe this is a good use of Specflow and BDD. In this answer here Marcus states:
"BDD is about ensuring that we're building the right thing, TDD is about ensuring that we're building it right."
In your example the scope of what is being tested i.e. the CustomStack, should be tested via TDD. It is the end solution that makes use of the CustomStack should be tested via BDD (and hence SpecFlow) e.g. if this CustomStack was being exercised via a certain action on a website.
This answer is also pertinent to your question.
As far as I looked, there's no answered question about QTP's Ext. sdk on stackoverflow (and almost anywhere else on the net; there isn't even a appropriated tag for it...), so I'm aware it's unlikely I get my problem solved by asking , but whatever, it worth trying.
Anyway, before I lose the attention of anyone who never heard or used the Ext. sdk, maybe I will have more luck asking you to help me figure out how to locate the error log file QTP produces at run-time. I know such a file exists in the new UFT 11.5 version, but I couldn't locate it in QTP 10 or 11 (For the record, I don't talk about QTP's Log Tracking feature, but about the "meta" error log of errors/exceptions produced by QTP itself).
Now for the question:
I'm developing an extension for QTP to support native record and run tests on my application.
I'm currently able to import an object repository, and write test steps using The COM object testing agent I developed.
Problem started when I was trying to implement the IRecordable interface; I'm getting the IRecorder object from qtp, and even able to use it as ISuppressor object to exclude redundant steps from being recorded, but all my attempts to record a step (that is, to add new recorded objects to the repository, and add steps to the test) simply failed.
This is the code that I'm using:
public class MyTestingAgent :
AutInterface.ITestable,
AutInterface.IRecordable
{
QTPInterface.IRecorder recorder;
...
public void AutInterface.IRecordable.BeginRecording(object recorder)
{
IRecordSuppressor recordSuppressor = recorder as IRecordSuppressor;
recordSuppressor.Suppress(MyTestingAgentId,
"<Suppress><Item type=\"HWND\" value=\"[#HWND]\" /></Suppress>".Replace("[#HWND]", getMyAppHWND().ToString()));
this.recorder = recorder as QTPInterface.IRecorder;
...
}
public void recordNewObjStep(string parentName, string objName, string method, Object[] arguments)
{
object[] objectHyrarchy = new object[] { findObjectId(objName), findObjectId(parentName) };
string externalParent = null;
string appDescriptionXml = getDescriptionXml(parentName, objName);
try
{
recorder.Record(MyTestingAgentId, objectHyrarchy , appDescriptionXml, externalParent, method, arguments);
Trace.TraceInformation("Record successfully done.");
}
catch (Exception e)
{
Trace.TraceError("TEAAgent.recordSTElement: " + e.ToString());
}
}
...
}
I'm pretty sure all the arguments I send with the call to Record() are accurate. getDescriptionXml() and findObjectId() are used in different cases in the code, and works fine, the method name and argument are correct.
The annoying thing is that the call to Record doesn't even throw exception, and I get "Record successfully done." in the trace log. Needless to say no new object is created in the repository, and no step is added to the test.
As I can't debug QTP, I'm pretty much in the dark with what I'm doing wrong. That's why I'm asking for help with finding QTP's log file, or any other approach that might shed some light on the subject.
For QTP 11 you can turn on the logs by going to QTP's bin directory and running ClientLogs.exe.
Specifically for TEA extensibility do the following.
select the QTP node from the list on the left
find the LogCatPackTEA from the Available Categories list
Click the > button to move it to Selected Categories
Change TEAs level to Debug2 by selecting the category and changing the level
Click OK and run QTP
The logs will show up as QTP.log in the diretory specified in Path:
I'm curious on what the problem you're facing is, please update if you find the cause.