Sorry, these might be stupid questions, but the Apple doc doesn't really go into any great detail.
suppose a listener is set up, but then the app is closed and "wiped up", what happens if the user changes the settings?
if I don't remove the listener in the termination event, then there will still be a reference open, does ARC ensure the listener is still accessible?
is the notification queued until the application starts up again, or does it get lost, or never created?
Try synchronizing NSUserDefaults when your comes to the foreground. See Synchronizing and Detecting Preference Changes here: https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/UserDefaults/AccessingPreferenceValues/AccessingPreferenceValues.html
If it's a fresh launch, your previously registered listener is gone. You could register the listener before synchronizing, but if there was no caching (like the docs mention), then you would also not receive the notification. So you may just want to treat the settings as if the had been changed whenever you come to the foreground.
Related
I have a group email app where customers create emails in a standard iOS compose window. If they write a long email, then switch apps to do a memory intensive task, iOS may close the compose window, losing the contents of their email.
Is there a way to prevent the window being closed? or a way to ensure iOS saves the email to drafts before closing it?
I am wondering if I am not retaining a link that I should be, perhaps?
Can anyone else confirm whether they see the same problem?
The best way to do this is to understand the App Life Cycle on iOS.
When the App is running in background, the method applicationWillTerminate will be called, this is one of your options to save the content of the email. But this method is not called every time, it is only called when your app isn't suspended or when the user reboots his device.
One solution is to save this data inside the method applicationDidEnterBackground, it is called as soon as your app starts to run in background. And reload the data inside application:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions, this allows you to perform any final initialization before your app is displayed to the user.
Is there a way to prevent the window being closed? or a way to ensure iOS saves the email to drafts before closing it?
There's nothing you can do to prevent the window from being closed, because iOS is killing the app. What you can do is to save the email at some point before that happens. Since the user obviously can't modify the email while the app is in the background, saving the message when the app goes into the background would be a good choice. That way, you'll have the data saved if iOS does end up killing the app, and you can check to see if there's a saved message that needs to be restored when the app launches.
If you take that approach, though, you'll also have to figure out a way to help the user get back to their saved message, which means that you also need to keep track of how they got there in the first place so you can recreate that state. If it's just a simple message, maybe all you need to do is to open a message editor view and set it up with the saved message. In general, though, this can be a thorny problem. Luckily, Apple has provided a nice solution...
The View Controller Programming Guide for iOS has a section called Preserving and Restoring State, which explains how you can set your app up to automatically save and restore its state. With a relatively small amount of work, you can set your app up so that the user will never even notice that the app has restarted -- if they launch it after iOS has killed it, the app will recreate the view controllers so that it looks like the app was running the whole time, even if the device was shut down in the interim.
I am working on an app that, among other things, provides alarms in emergencies. Users can toggle a setting to have alarms be put through even if their iPhone is muted, but this service has another hurdle to leap: when the app has been force quit, it cannot receive (content-available) notifications until the app is relaunched by the user.
There is a geofencing event in place which buys me some processing time even if the app has been force quit, and in that time, I would like to check if such a block is in place, and if so, request the user to open their app again, and not aggressively force-quit in the future. (Many people still think it's just a way to keep things clean, even though it actually costs you battery life to not just leave apps in the background)
SO THE CORE OF THE PROBLEM: I need an (API call? Something else?) that will tell me whether the app is in such a 'force quit, cannot receive notifications' state, assuming that I do have processing time to do this check.
Anything is welcome, I have not been able to find proper Apple documentation on the notifications block.
Thank you very much.
While there is no API I am aware of to find state after, you can infer the state just before the application is terminated, and record that.
Code
applicationDidEnterBackground
will be called when an app has received a terminate signal.
More Info
This question describes what lifecycle functions to use, and
I'm making a simple app with a Today Widget extension that logs events.
The user can tap a button in the app or the related Today Widget to log an event. These events are saved with Core Data any time the button is pressed either place.
Whenever a new event is logged in the app, I run a function called updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData(). It handles the setup of UILocalNotifications based on the most recent event in Core Data after clearing the appropriate existing notifications.
However, when a new event is logged from the Today Widget, I can't use this function because I need to register the Local Notification with UIApplication.sharedApplication().scheduleLocalNotification(), and UIApplication is not available in the Today Widget extension.
I realize I'll probably need do something unconventional or hacky to get this working, so I'm trying to evaluate possible approaches and come up with a relatively robust solution.
Basically, I want to find a way I can call my
updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData() function right away any time a new event is logged.
If I can't do it every time an event is logged, an alternative would be to trigger the updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData() function periodically (somewhat frequently) another way. Here are some solutions I was thinking about using, but I don't like any of them:
Do it in AppDelegate when the app is launched (or another state change)
One approach I'm thinking about is running my updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData()function in AppDelegate somewhere, like didFinishLaunchingWithOptions.
The downside is that it would require the user to open the app periodically. If the user didn't open it much the notification behavior would be inconsistent. I'd prefer a solution where a user could interact with only the Today Widget and reliably get Local Notifications without ever opening the app.
Sync the events to a server and use Push Notifications
I've thought about syncing the data in Core Data to a server, then setting up Push Notifications to the user's phone based on that.
I don't like this, because I want the user to still be able to get notifications without an Internet connection. It also introduces a lot of extra overhead of syncing the data with a server.
Ping a server, and send a content-available Push Notification
When someone logs an event with the widget, I could ping a server. That server could send back a silent content-available push notification to trigger the app to run updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData() in the background.
I found a similar question (Scheduling local notification from within a Today extension) where one answer proposes a similar solution. Unlike the previous solution, an Internet connection is not needed to receive the notifications, but an Internet connection would be required to make sure the notifications are up to date when a new event is logged.
Background fetch
I thought about using Background Fetch to fetch something arbitrary from a server, then run the updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData(). This would be a way to trigger the update in the background, although it seems silly to fetch data if that data isn't being used, and seems like something for which an app could be rejected. There also seems to be a risk of the system not calling the background update regularly if the user doesn't open the app much and mostly uses the Today Widget.
Use background location updates
This seems like the dumbest approach, but I thought I would mention it anyway since I thought about it. I could use one of the low accuracy background location update modes to trigger updateLocalNotificationsFromCoreData().
It would require the user to allow location in the background, which would be hard to explain. And, it would require the user to at least move around a few blocks to trigger the function, which could provide an inconsistent user experience. Also, it would increase power consumption of the app for a silly reason.
I'd really appreciate fresh ideas about how I might be able to reliably schedule local notifications when Core Data changes on a device that doesn't have an Internet connection!
Or, if that doesn't seem possible, I'd appreciated feedback on which approach seems to make the most sense.
EDIT: I came up with a new solution. It's not ideal, but I think it's better than these other approaches I was considering. When someone taps the button to log the event, I launch the full app. It's annoying because I have all the data I need at that point to give the user feedback and log the event within the Today Widget without launching the app, but by launching the app I have the opportunity to check and schedule local notifications.
Also, in iOS 9 the annoyance on the user is slightly minimized because the system-wide "back" button will appear and let the user go back to the previous app easily once my app has launched from the Today Widget.
In the future I may try a solution where one of the server-based approaches above is used when an Internet connection is available, and I would then fall back to this system of opening the app only when the network connection is not available and I need to schedule the local notifications within the app.
I have a volume control app in the iOS store, but one problem that my users have frequently is that the device kicks it for memory control. Is there any way to either force it to stay active (by permission) or to at least alert the user when its no longer active or in danger?
All the answers are under Background Execution in the iOS Developer Library.
Of course, here's the philosophy:
Always try to avoid doing any background work unless doing so improves
the overall user experience.
See Table 3-1 for the types of background execution. There's a category for audio but it requires audio to be played from the app. It does not sound like your app fits in here. So you'll want to look at notifying the user.
You could send a notification to the user when the app falls to background with applicationDidEnterBackground(), or just before it quits with applicationWillTerminate(), supposedly time-permitting.
Running in the background is permitted. I have an app that does it and while the rules have changed and adapting to it has been gut wrenching at times, it is pretty straightforward. In your case, I would think that you could setup to be notified and then just disappear, no? waking from a notification is part of the state changing protocol and you should be able to do that.
As a point of comparison, in Android, background operations like yours would be implemented as services and would have no fear of being terminated. The strangest thing about the way ios chooses to allow background activity is that you are applying for status one time. In Android, I was able to indicate that a single activity should be kept alive when the app is backgrounded, all others could be terminated. There is no way to do that in ios.
I take it my disappear and wait for notifications is probably not going to work for you because there is no way to be notified of volume changes. You must be polling? In which case, you probably are going to have to ask to be kept alive. Would be nice if you could just piggyback on other services, e.g. keep me alive while music is playing.
To answer your other question, yes you will get notified if/when you really are going to get termed, so you could send a notification at that point.
i have database in my app and i want to delete all information from database when user force quit from app. I looked this question Which Event When i close app in iOS? , but when the user click home button, app has force quit in applicationWillTerminate.I don't want to close my app. I just want to catch close event in my app.
Sorry for my bad english.
Thanks for advice and interest.
the OBJC runtime will shut down without any final notification
BUT
you can write a posix signal handler to get the signal. but note that since the runtime is already shutting down it is unsafe to do much work here.
see e.g.:
http://chaosinmotion.com/blog/?p=423
You can't. The last notification you get that you can be sure of is a didEnterBackground when you get switched to the background. After that, you will likely be killed silently, either from memory pressure or from the user force-quitting you.