Is there an equivalent of the Eclipse "Project" menu "Clean..." command in the Dart Editor? If not, how can a project be cleaned of the files generated by the various tools?
Never heard of such a functionality in Dart.
What files of what tools? I guess from Run as JavaScript?
I guess the development goes in the direction that files are generated only in the build directory.
These files will be purged before rebuild.
But this is WIP.
I have the same question. However I am coming to this question with a suggestion. I would like people to consider the build model implemented by Apache Maven for Dart builds.
The nice thing about the maven model is that you can:
Define custom actions aside from the built-in ones.
Implement custom handlers for actions.
As for the clean action in Eclipse -- Add my vote for Dart Editor.
Eclipse normally use either Apache Ant or Apache Maven for build actions. 'Clean' is a standard action and found its way to the Build menu at a very early stage. Which gives me an idea;
Add some UI meta-management to the Dart Editor
Build tool = Current Dart build (default), OR user specified: Ant, Maven, ...
Build menu = Set standard actions, allow custom actions against the current build tool; e.g. a "database load".
I know with new frameworks and languages there's always more things to do that time to do it. There are probably better examples than just And or Maven. I'm just pondering some flexible options to make the Dart development environment a little "future proof". ;-)
Related
I am trying build automation for a project developed using legacy language called Team Developer 6. where each file needs to be compiled as an exe. also need to do some filter activity before building exes. there are 300 exes.
this process I could do in simple .Net utility which does the filtering and invokes Team Developer compiler for required files.
Is it possible to put this in to TFS build work flow? what is the best approach for this?
Write an MSBuild project that invokes the necessary commands for the tooling you require and check it in. In the TFS build definition, make use of the default template (at first) and set the MSBuild project file you created as the 'project to build'.
This way you can test your build process locally with MSBuild on the command line, and determine which command line switches you might need. You can set command line switches into the build definition, or if you need some further control you can modify the default template to inject the command line switches directly into the MSBuild activity.
I recommend this way, as then you won't have to create any customized workflow, and can avoid having to go down the road of using custom workflow activities in TFS (which is absolutely supported, but in my opinion a bit difficult to diagnose/debug/maintain/upgrade).
You would ideally want to use an InvokeProcess activity to call an executable which does the filtering and invoking. An alternative but more complex approach would be to create a custom activity, but that requires installation of binaries on the build servers.
How do I know if Dagger's code generation is working correctly? I see several threads where users have eventually discovered that reflection was being used instead.
I have run the example coffee maker application in Eclipse and when I set breakpoints in e.g. Thermosiphon I cannot see any generated classes in the stack. I do see ReflectiveAtInjectBinding which makes me suspect that my setup is not correct.
So there are a few aspects to this.
Dagger has recently removed (or is about to remote) reflection fallback for modules - so you should, upon the next release, not ever have to have reflective module adapters. If a module adapter was not generated, there will be a specific error that will prevent further action.
As to code-generation verification, it is probably worth creating a small verification script that confirms that any sources that contain #Module have a $$ModuleAdapter class generated. Presuming you run in Maven, then this could be attached to the verify step in your project.
If you're running in eclipse, then you need to have m2e plugin, and you need to enable in your maven settings to allow maven to configure the annotation processing settings in eclipse.
One caveat. If you have m2e manage annotation processing configuration, and if you have dagger itself open as an eclipse project, then you must, in the maven settings of your project, disable "Resolve dependencies from Workspace projects"
Android has an ant script file with generic targets for compile, clean, etc.
Are there any open source ant scripts that define standard targets such as these for general java projects?
I don't want to bother installing and using maven, but I also don't want to bother creating and maintaining ant scripts for each project.
I'm guessing you are new to both Maven and Ant. If I'm wrong you can ignore the rest of this post :)
I don't know of any generic open source Ant files. I've never had the need to look for one. I think its well worth the effort to learn Ant and create your own generic script. Ant is easy to learn and it is a very flexible, powerful and reliable build tool. You'll find it quite easy to create a build file that you can reuse over and over again on different projects.
With regards to having to maintain Ant scripts, its a bit of a fallacy. You'll find that once you've got a script that works in a generic way you'll hardly ever have to touch it again except when you need to do things in a custom way (usually around packaging and deployment). When that happens, you'll be glad you're using a tool like Ant that gives you the flexibility to do what you want to be able to do without getting in your way.
I am playing with TFS 2010, and am trying to setup a build process that will have some custom steps.
These include things like, stopping/starting IIS, search and replace files etc... across environments.
I have tried to look for examples online and have not found anything clear and meaningful on how to just run a script or something over the source files. Looking at the default build process template (DefaultTemplate.xml) I cant make much sense of it.
How do I go about doing this ?
For info on customising the TFS2010 workflow build templates have a look at Ewald Hoffman's series. Start with Part 1 (archived here).
I should also mention that since it looks like you're doing deployment then you may want to break deployment automation away from build automation.
This is almost exactly what I'd say for this question (Split build and deplyment stages, investigate TFSDeployer). One additional element is more generic - for deployment tasks you can't find an easy integrated tool you should create a custom deployment script. You can call any script by adding an "InvokeProcess" step in your Build workflow. TFSDeployer also has locations where you can insert custom PowerShell Scripts. (If you don't like PowerShell you can have PowerShell or "InvokeProcess" call a different script engine.)
I'm picking up support on a project that is currently built with MyEclipse and has a decent sized development team that has been working without any CI processes.
From what I can tell, the MyEclipse folks don't see any value in being able to build outside of the Eclipse platform, which makes no sense at all to me. Continuous Integration is extremely helpful when you have to integrate changes into a codebase from more than one development environment, and it's pretty tough to automate builds when you're tied to a GUI.
Does anyone have continuous integration processes set up around MyEclipse style project-sets? If so, what strategy did you use to accomplish it?
AFAIKT there is no OOTB feature that can generate an Ant script (or equivalent headless-build script) from MyEclipse, nor is there an exposed way to invoke MyEclipse builders from a build-script platform.
This would lead me to believe that I'll need to reverse engineer the scripts based on what MyEclipse generates, which I'd rather not have to do.
I'm not particularly concerned with a Maven-style solution for my needs, but if you know of one I'd like to hear about it. From my initial research it looks like Maven/MyEclipse integration is even worse.
This is remarkably similar to the problems I had working with a websphere 5.1 application that could only be built from WSAD6 running on build machine built from a disk image from the company IT dept. WSAD did have a headless mode. It was a real pain to get that working from Hudson.
I would not be surprised if there was a Maven plugin and/or Ant task for each of the builders you are using. I would start there.
Here is a Maven based solution so maybee a bit off topic for you..
In our company, we use MyEclipse as IDE and Hudson and Team City for continuous integration. The projects are Maven based, so Hudson and TC can work with them.
When you want to open the project in Eclipse, you have to check out the sources, setup maven repository path for eclipse with mvn eclispse:add-maven-repo, build them with mvn install and then run target mvn eclipse:eclipse, which creates the Eclipse project setup from the maven's POM configuration. Then it is possible to import the project into Eclipse and work with it seamlessly..
More information can be found on maven-eclipse-plugin project page
..seamlessly until you change something in the POM configuration - then you have to run the mvn eclipse:eclipse again and have the eclipse project configuration recreated acording to the new POM.. it's important not to forget about this step, unless your project in the IDE won't work properly and you'll be wondering why ;)
Me personally don't find this solution the best, but that's the way how Eclipse folks work with Maven :/
Hope this should inspire you at least :)
This is another reason why I intensely dislike Eclipse. The fact that an IDE can force you away from something that's acknowledged to be a best practice is shameful.
"AFAIKT there is no OOTB feature that can generate an Ant script (or equivalent headless-build script) from MyEclipse" - I'm not sure I understand why this is a problem. It's possible to write a simple Ant build.xml in an hour or two that would do the job for most Java EE apps packaged as WAR files. I don't know if you're using EJBs, but even adding app server specific tasks such as EJB and JSP compilation wouldn't be much of a challenge. If you can agree on a common directory structure it would even be reusable across projects.
With that Ant build.xml in hand, you should be able to drive your CI process simply by checking into Subversion. The Eclipse plug-ins to do that work well, I hear.
If it's really a problem, I'd recommend IntelliJ. It works nicely with CI based on either Cruise Control or Hudson or Jet Brains' own Team City. The cost isn't excessive, and it'll pay for itself quickly.
If I'm misreading your question, I apologize. But if I've got it right, there's no way I'd let the IDE dictate to the team this way.