We are using DelayedJob to run tasks in the background because they could take a while, and also because if an error is thrown, we still want the web request to succeed.
The issue is, sometimes the job could be really big (changing hundreds or thousands of database rows) and sometimes it could be really small (like 5 db rows). In the case of the small ones, we'd still like to have it run as a delayed job so that the error handling can work the same way, but we'd love to not have to wait roughly 5 seconds for DJ to pick up the job.
Is there a way to queue the job so it runs in the background, but then immediately run it so we don't have to wait for the worker to execute 5 seconds later?
Edit: Yes, this is Ruby on Rails :-)
Delayed Job polls the database for new dj records at a set interval. You can reconfigure this interval in an initializer:
# config/delayed_job.rb
Delayed::Worker.sleep_delay = 2 # or 1 if you're feeling wild.
This will affect DJ globally.
How about
SomeJob.set(
wait: 0,
queue: "queue_name",
).perform_later
Related
I new to ROR. Wanted to ask something for confirmation. If I run long schedule job. Will it block others schedule job? I have others job running every 5 minutes, Plan to write something that easily run more than 3 hours. Will it block the 5 minutes job?
The whenever gem is basically only a way to configure and handle Cron jobs.
That said: At the given time Cron will just start and run a configured job. Cron will not block other jobs nor it cares if a job fails or if another job is still running.
Limiting factor might be:
Memory/CPU consumption: Each job consumes memory/CPU. If there are too many jobs running at the same time your server might run out of memory or might have a high load. But this doesn't really block other jobs it just slows down the whole server.
Database locks: If your jobs perform tasks that lock database tables other queries might be blocked and need to wait. But this is not Cron specific, this depends on what your code actually does.
I am using Delayed jobs for my Ruby app hosted in Heroku to perform a very long task that can take up to 5 minutes.
I've noticed that, in development mode at least, when this task is running the ones that come afterwards are not started until that one finishes. I would like other tasks to be able to start running without having to wait for the other to finish (to have at least 3 concurrent tasks, for example).
I don't wish to increase the number of workers in Heroku ($$$).
I noticed the 'pool' param in delayed jobs but I don't fully understand if this is what I need or how to use it.
https://github.com/collectiveidea/delayed_job/blob/master/README.md
I achieved it using threads in the task code, but maybe this is not the best way to do it.
If you could tell me exactly how I could achieve concurrency in delayed jobs I would really appreciate it.
A DJ worker only runs a single job at a time. If you want concurrent processing of your background jobs, you'll need multiple background workers.
You are way better off implementing sidekiq.
I am using Rails / Delayed Jobs, with Rails 4.1 on Heroku. I've noticed that my jobs take anywhere from 1 second to 10 seconds to actually start. Once they start, they run pretty fast.
How can I speed that up?
I am calling them with my_thing.delay.run!
I do have some other ongoing jobs, but there's not that many of them, so it doesn't seem like that would be the cause. It just seems like a lagginess in how often it checks to run jobs.
I think you want to configure Delayed::Worker.sleep_delay which is hinted at in the delayed job README. If delayed job can't find a job then it sleeps for this many seconds before looking again. The default sleep is for 5 seconds.
So, you might set the following in config/initializers/delayed_job.rb to only sleep for 2 seconds between queries for pending jobs.
Delayed::Worker.sleep_delay = 2
Obviously the trade-off is the more frequent polling for jobs when nothing is going on.
Also, if you're not wedded to delayed job then you might find resque or particularly sidekiq would probably process your jobs quicker than delayed job.
If I need to create recurring tasks in delayed jobs, what is a clean solution? I have an import task that I want to run every 5 minutes, but I don't want to fire up rails/rake in order to tell it to create a Delayed job that can be picked up. If Rails is already running on a system, perhaps I can just create an HTTP request that will make the rails app fire off a DJ? I could put that cron task in a ruby script which runs every 5 minutes, making requests to a server, but without firing up rails. What do you think?
This fork of delayed_job has recurrence built right in (and there may be other forks that do the same):
http://github.com/andrewroth/delayed_job
The cron approach still seems to be quite clean. It need only involve running a rake invocation, not a full Rails server. Rake doesn't need Rails to be running to work.
However if you really don't like that approach then you could arrange for the recurring jobs to be re-queue themselves when they are being processed setting a run_at time to 5 minutes (or whatever) in the future. Obviously you'd need to prime the queue the first time and make sure the delayed_job server stays running
About that... I have the same desire,
I'm planning to have a cron to fire up a curl request at a specific route at my site every 5 minutes, so it runs a action with the result, and I'm gonna be pretty sure it only ran once.
My purposes includes: Awarding Badges and compiling some Averages
I've got an app that could benefit from delayed_job and some background processing. The thing is, I don't really need/want delayed_job workers running all the time.
The app runs in a shared hosting environment and in multiple locations (for different users). Plus, the app doesn't get a large amount of usage.
Is there a way to start and stop processing jobs (either with the script or rake task) from my app only after certain actions/events?
You could call out to system:
system "cd #{Rails.root} && rake delayed_job:start RAILS_ENV=production"
You could just change delayed_job to check less often too. Instead of the 5 second default, set it to 15 minutes or something.
Yes, you can, but I'm not sure what the benefit will be. You say you don't want workers running all the time - what are your concerns? Memory usage? Database connections?
To keep the impact of delayed_job low on your system, I'd run only one worker, and configure it to sleep most of the time.
Delayed::Worker::sleep_delay = 60 * 5 # in your initializer.rb
A single worker will only wake up and check the db for new jobs every 5 minutes. Running this way keeps you from 'customizing' too much.
But if you really want to start a Delayed::Worker programatically, look in that class for work_off, and implement your own script/run_jobs_and_exit script. It should probably look much like script/delayed_job does - 3 lines.
I found this because I was looking for a way to run some background jobs without spending all the money to run them all the time when they weren't needed. Someone made a hack using google app engine to run the background jobs:
http://viatropos.com/blog/how-to-run-background-jobs-on-heroku-for-free/
It's a little outdated though. There is an interesting comment in the thread:
"When I need to send an e-mail, copy a file, etc I basically add it to the queue. At the end of every request it checks if there is anything in the queue. If so then it uses the Heroku API to set the worker to 1. At the end of a worker getting a task done it checks to see if there is anything left in the queue. If not then it sets the workers back to 0. The end result is the background worker will just work for a few seconds here and there. I can do all the background processing that I need and the bill at the end of the month rarely ever reaches 1 hour total worth of work. Even if it does no problem, I'll pay $0.05 for background processing. :)"
If you go to stop a worker, you are given the PID. You can simply kill -9 PID if all else fails.