How to run travis-ci locally - travis-ci

I'd rather not have to push every little change to .travis.yml and every little change I make to the source in order to run the build. With jenkins you can download jenkins and run locally. Does travis offer something like this?
Note: I've seen the travis-ci cli and downloaded it, but all it seems
to do is call their API, which then connects to my GitHub repo, so if
I don't push, it won't matter that I restart the last build.

This process allows you to completely reproduce any Travis build job on your computer. Also, you can interrupt the process at any time and debug. Below is an example where I perfectly reproduce the results of job #191.1 on php-school/cli-menu
.
Prerequisites
You have public repo on GitHub
You ran at least one build on Travis
You have Docker set up on your computer
Set up the build environment
Reference: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/
Make up your own temporary build ID
BUILDID="build-$RANDOM"
View the build log, open the show more button for WORKER INFORMATION and find the INSTANCE line, paste it in here and run (replace the tag after the colon with the newest available one):
INSTANCE="travisci/ci-garnet:packer-1512502276-986baf0"
Run the headless server
docker run --name $BUILDID -dit $INSTANCE /sbin/init
Run the attached client
docker exec -it $BUILDID bash -l
Run the job
Now you are now inside your Travis environment. Run su - travis to begin.
This step is well defined but it is more tedious and manual. You will find every command that Travis runs in the environment. To do this, look for for everything in the right column which has a tag like 0.03s.
On the left side you will see the actual commands. Run those commands, in order.
Result
Now is a good time to run the history command. You can restart the process and replay those commands to run the same test against an updated code base.
If your repo is private: ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096 -C "YOUR EMAIL REGISTERED IN GITHUB" then cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa.pub and click here to add a key
FYI: you can git pull from inside docker to load commits from your dev box before you push them to GitHub
If you want to change the commands Travis runs then it is YOUR responsibility to figure out how that translates back into a working .travis.yml.
I don't know how to clean up the Docker environment, it looks complicated, maybe this leaks memory

Travis-ci offers a new container-based infrastructure that uses docker. This can be very useful if you're trying to troubleshoot a travis-ci build by reproducing it locally. This is taken from Travis CI's documentation.
Troubleshooting Locally in a Docker Image
If you're having trouble tracking down the exact problem in a build it often helps to run the build locally. To do this you need to be using our container based infrastructure (ie, have sudo: false in your .travis.yml), and to know which Docker image you are using on Travis CI.
Running a Container Based Docker Image Locally
Download and install the Docker Engine.
Select an image from Docker Hub. If you're not using a language-specific image pick ci-ruby. Open a terminal and start an interactive Docker session using the image URL:
docker run -it travisci/ubuntu-ruby:18.04 /bin/bash
Switch to the travis user:
su - travis
Clone your git repository into the / folder of the image.
Manually install any dependencies.
Manually run your Travis CI build command.

UPDATE: I now have a complete turnkey, all-in-one answer, see https://stackoverflow.com/a/49019950/300224. Only took 3 years to figure out!
According to the Travis documentation: https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-ci there is a concoction of projects that collude to deliver the Travis CI web service we know and love. The following subset of projects appears to allow local make test functionality using the .travis.yml in your project:
travis-build
travis-build creates the build
script for each job. It takes the configuration from the .travis.yml file and
creates a bash script that is then run in the build environment by
travis-worker.
travis-cookbooks
travis-cookbooks holds the
Chef cookbooks that are used to provision the build environments.
travis-worker
travis-worker is responsible for
running the build scripts in a clean environment. It streams the log output to
travis-logs and pushes state updates (build starting/finishing)
to travis-hub.
(The other subprojects are responsible for communicating with GitHub, their web interface, email, and their API.)

Similar to Scott McLeod's but this also generates a bash script to run the steps from the .travis.yml.
Troubleshooting Locally in Docker with a generated Bash script
# choose the image according to the language chosen in .travis.yml
$ docker run -it -u travis quay.io/travisci/travis-jvm /bin/bash
# now that you are in the docker image, switch to the travis user
sudo - travis
# Install a recent ruby (default is 1.9.3)
rvm install 2.3.0
rvm use 2.3.0
# Install travis-build to generate a .sh out of .travis.yml
cd builds
git clone https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-build.git
cd travis-build
gem install travis
# to create ~/.travis
travis version
ln -s `pwd` ~/.travis/travis-build
bundle install
# Create project dir, assuming your project is `AUTHOR/PROJECT` on GitHub
cd ~/builds
mkdir AUTHOR
cd AUTHOR
git clone https://github.com/AUTHOR/PROJECT.git
cd PROJECT
# change to the branch or commit you want to investigate
travis compile > ci.sh
# You most likely will need to edit ci.sh as it ignores matrix and env
bash ci.sh

Use wwtd (what would travis do) ruby gem to run tests on your local machine roughly as they would run on travis.
It will recreate the build matrix and run each configuration, great to sanity check setup before pushing.
gem i wwtd
wwtd

tl;dr Use image specified at https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#troubleshooting-locally-in-a-docker-image in combination with https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-build#use-as-addon-for-travis-cli.
EDIT 2019-12-06
#troubleshooting-locally-in-a-docker-image section was replaced by #running-builds-in-debug-mode which also describes how to SSH to the job running in the debug mode.
EDIT 2019-07-26
#troubleshooting-locally-in-a-docker-image section is no longer part of the docs; here's why
https://github.com/travis-ci/docs-travis-ci-com/issues/2342
https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-10-04-combining-linux-infrastructures
https://blog.travis-ci.com/2018-11-30-announcing-xenial-build-environment-for-enterprise
Though, it's still in git history: https://github.com/travis-ci/docs-travis-ci-com/pull/2193.
Look for (quite old, couldn't find newer) image versions at: https://travis-ci.org/travis-ci/docs-travis-ci-com/builds/230889063#L661.
I wanted to inspect why one of the tests in my build failed with an error I din't get locally.
Worked.
What actually worked was using the image specified at Troubleshooting Locally in a Docker Image docs page. In my case it was travisci/ci-garnet:packer-1512502276-986baf0.
I was able to add travise compile following steps described at https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-build#use-as-addon-for-travis-cli.
dm#z580:~$ docker run --name travis-debug -dit travisci/ci-garnet:packer-1512502276-986baf0 /sbin/init
dm#z580:~$ docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
travisci/ci-garnet packer-1512502276-986baf0 6cbda6a950d3 11 months ago 10.2GB
dm#z580:~$ docker exec -it travis-debug bash -l
root#912e43dbfea4:/# su - travis
travis#912e43dbfea4:~$ cd builds/
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds$ git clone https://github.com/travis-ci/travis-build
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds$ cd travis-build
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/travis-build$ mkdir -p ~/.travis
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/travis-build$ ln -s $PWD ~/.travis/travis-build
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/travis-build$ gem install bundler
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/travis-build$ bundle install --gemfile ~/.travis/travis-build/Gemfile
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/travis-build$ bundler binstubs travis
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/travis-build$ cd ..
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds$ git clone --depth=50 --branch=master https://github.com/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid.git DusanMadar/PySyncDroid
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds$ cd DusanMadar/PySyncDroid/
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid$ ~/.travis/travis-build/bin/travis compile > ci.sh
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid$ sed -i 's,--branch\\=\\\x27\\\x27,--branch\\=master,g' ci.sh
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid$ bash ci.sh
Everything from .travis.yml was executed as expected (dependencies installed, tests ran, ...).
Note that before running bash ci.sh I had to change --branch\=\'\'\ to --branch\=master\ (see the second to last sed -i ... command) in ci.sh.
If that doesn't work the command bellow will help to identify the target line number and you can edit the line manually.
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid$ cat ci.sh | grep -in branch
840: travis_cmd git\ clone\ --depth\=50\ --branch\=\'\'\ https://github.com/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid.git\ DusanMadar/PySyncDroid --echo --retry --timing
889:export TRAVIS_BRANCH=''
899:export TRAVIS_PULL_REQUEST_BRANCH=''
travis#912e43dbfea4:~/builds/DusanMadar/PySyncDroid$
Didn't work.
Followed the accepted answer for this question but didn't
find the image (travis-ci-garnet-trusty-1512502259-986baf0) mentioned by instance at https://hub.docker.com/u/travisci/.
Build worker version points to travis-ci/worker commit and its travis-worker-install references quay.io/travisci/ as image registry. So I tried it.
dm#z580:~$ docker run -it -u travis quay.io/travisci/travis-python /bin/bash
travis#370c23a773c9:/$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 12.04.5 LTS
Release: 12.04
Codename: precise
travis#370c23a773c9:/$
dm#z580:~$ docker images
REPOSITORY TAG IMAGE ID CREATED SIZE
quay.io/travisci/travis-python latest 753a216d776c 3 years ago 5.36GB
Definitely not Trusty (Ubuntu 14.04) and not small either.

You could try Trevor, which uses Docker to run your Travis build.
From its description:
I often need to run tests for multiple versions of Node.js. But I don't want to switch versions manually using n/nvm or push the code to Travis CI just to run the tests.
That's why I created Trevor. It reads .travis.yml and runs tests in all versions you requested, just like Travis CI. Now, you can test before push and keep your git history clean.

I'm not sure what was your original reason for running Travis locally, if you just wanted to play with it, then stop reading here as it's irrelevant for you.
If you already have experience with hosted Travis and you want to get the same experience in your own datacenter, read on.
Since Dec 2014 Travis CI offers an Enterprise on-premises version.
http://blog.travis-ci.com/2014-12-19-introducing-travis-ci-enterprise/
The pricing is part of the article as well:
The licensing is done per seats, where every license includes 20 users. Pricing starts at $6,000 per license, which includes 20 users and 5 concurrent builds. There's a premium option with unlimited builds for $8,500.

I wasn't able to use the answers here as-is. For starters, as noted, the Travis help document on running jobs locally has been taken down. All of the blog entries and articles I found are based on that. The new "debug" mode doesn't appeal to me because I want to avoid the queue times and the Travis infrastructure until I've got some confidence I have gotten somewhere with my changes.
In my case I'm updating a Puppet module and I'm not an expert in Puppet, nor particularly experienced in Ruby, Travis, or their ecosystems. But I managed to build a workable test image out of tips and ideas in this article and elsewhere, and by examining the Travis CI build logs pretty closely.
I was unable to find recent images matching the names in the CI logs (for example, I could find travisci/ci-sardonyx, but could not find anything with "xenial" or with the same build name). From the logs it appears images are now transferred via AMQP instead of a mechanism more familiar to me.
I was able to find an image travsci/ubuntu-ruby:16.04 which matches the OS I'm targeting for my particular case. It does not have all the components used in the Travis CI, so I built a new one based on this, with some components added to the image and others added in the container at runtime depending on the need.
So I can't offer a clear procedure, sorry. But what I did, essentially boiled down:
Find a recent Travis CI image in Docker Hub matching your target OS as closely as possible.
Clone the repository to a build directory, and launch the container with the build directory mounted as a volume, with the working directory set to the target volume
Now the hard work: go through the Travis build log and set up the environment. In my case, this meant setting up RVM, and then using bundle to install the project's dependencies. RVM appeared to be already present in the Travis environment but I had to install it; everything else came from reproducing the commands in the build log.
Run the tests.
If the results don't match what you saw in the Travis CI logs, go back to (3) and see where to go.
Optionally, create a reusable image.
Dev and test locally and then push and hopefully your Travis results will be as expected.
I know this is not concrete and may be obvious, and your mileage will definitely vary, but hopefully this is of some use to somebody. The Dockerfile and a README for my image are on GitHub for reference.

It is possible to SSH to Travis CI environment via a bounce host. The feature isn't built in Travis CI, but it can be achieved by the following steps.
On the bounce host, create travis user and ensure that you can SSH to it.
Put these lines in the script: section of your .travis.yml (e.g. at the end).
- echo travis:$sshpassword | sudo chpasswd
- sudo sed -i 's/ChallengeResponseAuthentication no/ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
- sudo service ssh restart
- sudo apt-get install sshpass
- sshpass -p $sshpassword ssh -R 9999:localhost:22 -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no travis#$bouncehostip
Where $bouncehostip is the IP/host of your bounce host, and $sshpassword is your defined SSH password. These variables can be added as encrypted variables.
Push the changes. You should be able to make an SSH connection to your bounce host.
Source: Shell into Travis CI Build Environment.
Here is the full example:
# use the new container infrastructure
sudo: required
dist: trusty
language: python
python: "2.7"
script:
- echo travis:$sshpassword | sudo chpasswd
- sudo sed -i 's/ChallengeResponseAuthentication no/ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes/' /etc/ssh/sshd_config
- sudo service ssh restart
- sudo apt-get install sshpass
- sshpass -p $sshpassword ssh -R 9999:localhost:22 -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no travisci#$bouncehostip
See: c-mart/travis-shell at GitHub.
See also: How to reproduce a travis-ci build environment for debugging

Related

Separating Docker files and application source files to optimize production environment

I have a bunch of (Ruby) scripts stored on a server. Up until now, my team has used them by opening an accessor app that launches a list of the script names, and they select the script they want to run in that instance on the files in their working folder. The scripts are run directly from the server, so updates made to the script files are automatically reflected when a user runs the script.
The scripts require a fair amount of specific dependencies, so I'm trying to move to a Docker-based workflow to eliminate the problems we encounter with incongruent computer environments. I've been able to successfully build an image with our script library and run an instance of it on my computer.
However, all of the documentation and tutorials include the application source files when building an image, so that all the files are copied over by the Dockerfile. From my understanding, this means that any time the code in the application files needs to be updated, all the users will need to rebuild the image before trying to run anything. I would very rarely ever need to make changes to the environment settings/dependencies, but the app code is changed relatively frequently, so it seems like having every user rebuild an image every single time a line of app code is changed would actually slow down everyone's workflow considerably.
My question is this: Is it not possible to have Docker simply create the environment that a user must have to run the applications, but have the applications themselves still run directly off the server where they were originally stored? And does a new container need to be created every single time a user wants to run any one of the scripts? (The users are not tech-savvy.)
Generally you'd do this by using a Docker image instead of the checked-out tree of scripts. You can use a Docker registry to store a built copy of the image somewhere on the network; Docker Hub works for this, most large public-cloud providers have some version of this (AWS ECR, Google GCR, Azure ACR, ...), or you can run your own. The workflow for using this would generally look like
# Get any updates to the "latest" version of the image
# (can be run infrequently)
docker pull ourorg/scripts
# Actually run the script, injecting config files and credentials
docker run --rm \
-v $PWD/config:/config \
-v $HOME/.ssh:/config/.ssh \
ourorg/scripts \
some_script.rb
# Nothing in this example actually requires a local copy of the scripts
I'm envisioning a directory that has kind of a mix of scripts and support files and not a lot of organization to it. Still, you could write a simple Dockerfile that looks like
FROM ruby:2.7
WORKDIR /opt/scripts
# As of Bundler 2.1, there is no compatibility between Bundler
# versions; this must match exactly what is in Gemfile.lock
RUN gem install bundler -v 2.1.4
# Copy the scripts in and do basic installation
COPY Gemfile Gemfile.lock .
RUN bundle install
COPY . .
ENV PATH /opt/scripts:$PATH
# Prefix all commands with...
ENTRYPOINT ["bundle", "exec"]
# The default command to run is...
CMD ["ls"]
On the back end you'd need a continous integration service (Jenkins is popular if a little unwieldy; there are a large selection of cloud-hosted ones) that can rebuild the Docker image whenever there's a commit to the source repository. You can generally rig this up so that it happens automatically whenever anybody pushes anything.
This process makes more sense of most people are just using the set of scripts and few of them are developing them. It's also a little bit difficult to discover what the scripts are (you might be able to docker run --rm ourorg/scripts ls though).
Is it not possible to have Docker simply create the environment that a user must have to run the applications, but have the applications themselves still run directly off the server where they were originally stored?
This always strikes me as an ineffective use of Docker. You have all of the fiddly steps of your current workflow that require everyone to run a git pull or equivalent routinely, but you also have to inject the host source tree into the container. If there are OS incompatibilities in, for example, native gems in the vendor tree, you have to work around that.
# You still need to do this periodically
git pull
# And you also need to
sudo docker run \
--rm \
-v $PWD:/app \
-v $HOME/config:/config \
-v $HOME/.ssh:/config/.ssh \
-w /app \
ruby:2.7 \
bundle exec ./some_script.rb
Some of these details (especially the config file and credentials) you'd have to deal with even if you did build an image; some others of the details you could improve by building an image. Inside the image you need to correct the ownership and permissions on the ssh keys and replace the $PWD/vendor tree with something the container can run, without modifying the mounted host directories.
Is it not possible to have Docker simply create the environment that a user must have to run the applications, but have the applications themselves still run directly off the server where they were originally stored?
You can build an image with all the environment already installed then mount the directory with the scripts so the container can read the scripts from the host. Something like
docker run -it --rm -v /opt/myscripts:/myscripts myimage somescript.rb
Then your image Dockerfile would end with:
WORKDIR /myscripts
ENTRYPOINT ["/usr/bin/ruby"]
And does a new container need to be created every single time a user wants to run any one of the scripts?
Of course, a container is just an isolated process managed by docker, you could make a wrapper so the users wouldn't need to type the full docker run command.

`docker-credential-gcloud` not in system PATH

After the latest updates to gcloud and docker I'm unable to access images on my google container repository. Locally when I run: gcloud auth configure-docker as per the instructions after updating gcloud, I get the following message:
WARNING: `docker-credential-gcloud` not in system PATH.
gcloud's Docker credential helper can be configured but it will not work until this is corrected.
gcloud credential helpers already registered correctly.
Running which docker-credential-gcloud returns docker-credential-gcloud not found.
I have no other gcloud-related path issues and for the life of me can't figure out how to install/add docker-credential-gcloud to path. Here's what I have installed (shown via gcloud version):
Google Cloud SDK 197.0.0
beta 2017.09.15
bq 2.0.31
container-builder-local
core 2018.04.06
docker-credential-gcr
gsutil 4.30
I also have Docker CE Version 18.03.0-ce-mac60 (23751).
Here's my $PATH:/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin
I also ran source /usr/local/Caskroom/google-cloud-sdk/latest/google-cloud-sdk/path.zsh.inc on original gcloud install.
Notice: All docker-credential-gcr below can be replaced with docker-credential-gcloud. I think it is just different versions of gcloud, I might be wrong.
I used Homebrew Cask to install gcloud too. I installed docker-credential-gcr with
$ gcloud components install docker-credential-gcr
And then like you said, which docker-credential-gcr doesn't gave you anything.
So I ran which gcloud to find there is a symlink to gcloud in /usr/local/bin. This symlink is created by Homebrew when you installed gcloud at first place. Now docker-credential-gcr wasn't installed by Homebrew but by gcloud itself, so there isn't a symlink.
I called readlink /usr/local/bin/gcloud and found out gcloud is installed in /usr/local/Caskroom/google-cloud-sdk/latest/google-cloud-sdk/bin/.
Then:
$ ls /usr/local/Caskroom/google-cloud-sdk/latest/google-cloud-sdk/bin
There you should see docker-credential-gcr listed there.
I simply linked it to /usr/local/bin:
$ ln -s \
/usr/local/Caskroom/google-cloud-sdk/latest/google-cloud-sdk/bin/docker-credential-gcr \
/usr/local/bin/
Then run:
$ docker-credential-gcr configure-docker
It should succeed.
Just had the same issue on Windows, running Docker with Linux containers, Docker engine v19.03.8. Using docker compose. I do not use gcloud for my dockerfiles...
DT1001 dockerpycreds.errors.InitializationError:
docker-credential-gcloud not installed or not available in PATH
Option 1: Edit the docker configuration file and remove all gcloud entries from there.
Windows c:/Users/<your account>/.docker/config.json
Linux & MacOS ~/.docker/config.json
Option 2: Go to Troubleshoot -> Reset to factory defaults.
After this my docker compose was creating containers and running the images without any issues.
On MacOS
Step 1:
Install gcloud and docker-credential-gcr,
following this tutorial
Step 2:
$ ln -s /usr/local/google-cloud-sdk/bin/docker-credential-gcr /usr/local/bin/docker-credential-gcloud
Step 3:
$ rm -rf ~/.docker
Step 4:
$ docker-compose build --pull
Finished!
Never found a way to directly resolve the docker-credential-gcloud issue, but the following got me up and running again. WARNING: the following will delete all your existing docker images and install a bunch of gcloud utilities:
gcloud components install docker-credential-gcr,
Restart the terminal completely
docker-credential-gcr configure-docker.
screen ~/Library/Containers/com.docker.docker/Data/com.docker.driver.amd64-linux/tty
umount /var/lib/docker/overlay2
rm -rf /var/lib/docker
Restart the terminal completely.
The new version of google-cloud-sdk has only docker-credential-gcr but not docker-credential-gcloud anymore. On the other hand one of my python packages always requested docker-credential-gcloud.
The solution was to symlink docker-credential-gcloud to docker-credential-gcr:
ln -s /path/to/google-cloud-sdk/bin/docker-credential-gcr /usr/local/bin/docker-credential-gcloud
ls -l /usr/local/bin | grep docker should now print:
...
docker-credential-gcloud -> /path/to/google-cloud-sdk/bin/docker-credential-gcr
...
Usually, this error indicates that your $PATH variable has been clobbered by a package or program you have recently installed so that the Google Cloud SDK can't be found.
$PATH is altered by many programs when they install by altering ~/.profile, ~/.bash_profile or ~/.bashrc or their non-bash equivalents. With a bad $PATH, Google Cloud SDK is configured in docker but can't be seen as executables so we get this error. This assumes you have used the Google Cloud SDK in the past, but if gcloud is configured with your docker then you probably have. Don't reinstall gcloud or disable it, you already have it on your system and that is fine.
The solution then is to fix your $PATH, not to install anything.
echo $PATH
This should be a pretty long : delimited list of directories that your files are in. Do you see a google-cloud-sdk/bin in the string? Is the string way too short given all the trouble you've gotten into in your life on this computer? You use NVM but it is missing? Use Homebrew but it is missing? Try brew from the command line, does it work?
If the answer is "no" to any of the above, inspect the files above to see if there are any new entries at the bottom of each that might have broken things. Did you just install anything new?
Something is clobbering your $PATH and you need to figure out what that is. For me it is usually something to do with Anaconda Python via the conda init command. For you it might be nvm or something else. Figure out what it is and fix the problem. Don't start over with a new $PATH and install the same stuff over again or disable gcloud authentication.
It really seems to be something with the Homebrew Cask. I uninstalled the cask and then reinstalled the Google Cloud SDK by manually downloading the tar ball and running the packaged install script as described there.
Now docker-credential-gcloud is in my path:
$ which docker-credential-gcloud
/Users/moritz/google-cloud-sdk/bin/docker-credential-gcloud
I can't figure out what Google is trying to achieve here. On Linux there is docker-credential-gcloud and on Windows there is docker-credential-gcr.exe, and then there is docker-credential-gcloud.cmd which calls gcloud auth docker-helper. This is kind of a nightmare if you're trying to write portable build scripts or gradle rules because not everything seems capable of finding and calling docker-credential-gcloud.cmd when you exec docker-credential-gcloud... it might work from the dos prompt, but in general doesn't work.
After a ton of fooling around with .bat scripts, cygwin scripts, .cmd scripts and so forth, I found the best solution was to go into the gcloud installation and just copy docker-credential-gcr.exe docker-credential-gcloud.exe ... not a very satisfying solution, but is the only thing I found that would do the trick.
I got the issue when I tried to SSH from Google Cloud Build into an Engine VM Instance, so I had
steps:
- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/gcloud'
args: ['compute', 'ssh',
'--project', '$PROJECT_ID',
'--zone', 'asia-southeast1-b',
'--strict-host-key-checking=no',
'username#instance-1',
'--command' ,'sh start.sh'
My start.sh
#!/bin/sh
echo "Started: $(date --iso-8601=seconds)"
docker pull gcr.io/aaa/bbbc/cccc
echo "Finished: $(date --iso-8601=seconds)"
The issue was How to set PATH when running a ssh command?
https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/332532/how-to-set-path-when-running-a-ssh-command
So I just faced the same problem where I am trying to pull an image from GCR to an GCP instance and want to share my solution.
I ran gcloud auth configure-docker and got the warning:
WARNING: `docker-credential-gcloud\` not in system PATH.
gcloud's Docker credential helper can be configured but it will not work until this is corrected.
I applied the accepted answer for this thread and ran gcloud components install docker-credential-gcr and got a long error:
ERROR: (gcloud.components.install) You cannot perform this action because this Cloud SDK installation is managed by an external package manager.
Please consider using a separate installation of the Cloud SDK created through the default mechanism described at: https://cloud.google.com/sdk/
When no solution was working, I uninstalled the Google provided google-cloud-sdk package that was installed via snap and instlled with distro specifice package manager, for me that is apt-get as instructed in the Installing Google Cloud SDK: Installation options page and re-ran the gcloud auth configure-docker and this time it solved my problem.
In my case the problem was due to how WSL 1 works with Docker on Windows. At first I only installed and initialized gcloud in WSL Ubuntu, not in Windows. However as Docker daemon is actually run by Windows, you need to install gcloud for Windows as well (and don't forget to run all of the inits and authorizations there).
On Windows 10/11, you need to ensure that C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Local\Google\Cloud SDK\google-cloud-sdk\bin\ is added to your system $PATH environment variable. It may not have been added if the Google Cloud SDK was not able to add it during GCloud installation. So add it manually like this:
Windows Task Bar ➔ Press the search icon 🔍 or the search bar
Type "environment" ➔ and click on "Edit the System Environment Variables" (ensure that you have Administrator access)
At the bottom of the dialog, click the Environment Variables... button
System Variables ➔ click Path ➔ Edit... ➔ New ➔ paste in C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Local\Google\Cloud SDK\google-cloud-sdk\bin\ (replace "USERNAME" with your username)
Close and restart any open Command Prompt windows.
Then verify on the Git Bash for Windows console:
Optional: Note that the AppData folder is hidden by default, so you may want to unhide AppData first, to see its contents.
Restart the Git Bash Terminal window
echo $PATH ➔ This should print a long string that contains: :/c/Users/USERNAME/AppData/Local/Google/Cloud SDK/google-cloud-sdk/bin
where docker-credential-gcloud ➔ This should print C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Local\Google\Cloud SDK\google-cloud-sdk\bin\docker-credential-gcloud.cmd

Setup Docker Jenkins with default plugins

I want to create a Jenkins based image to have some plugins installed as well as npm. To do so I have the following Dockerfile:
FROM jenkins:2.60.3
RUN install-plugins.sh bitbucket
USER root
RUN apt-get update
RUN curl -sL https://deb.nodesource.com/setup_8.x | bash -
RUN apt-get install -y nodejs
RUN npm --version
USER jenkins
That works fine however when I run the image I have two problems:
It seems that the plugins I tried to install manually didn't get persisted for some reason.
I get prompted the list of plugins I want to install but I don't want to install anything else.
Am I missing anything configuring the Dockerfile or is it that what I want to achieve is simply not possible?
Without seeing the contents of install-plugins.sh, I can't comment as to why the plugins aren't persisting. It is most likely caused by an incorrect installation destination; persistence shouldn't be an issue at this stage, since the plugin installation is built into the image itself.
As for the latter issue, you should be able to skip the installation wizard altogether by adding the line ENV JAVA_OPTS=-Djenkins.install.runSetupWizard=false
to your Dockerfile. Please note that this can be a security risk, if the Jenkins image is exposed to the world at large, since this option disables the need for authentication
EDIT: The default plugin directory for the Docker image is /var/jenkins_home/plugins
EDIT 2: According to the README on the Jenkins Docker repo, adding the line RUN echo 2.0 > /usr/share/jenkins/ref/jenkins.install.UpgradeWizard.stateshould accomplish the same thing
Things have changed since 2017, when the last answer was posted, and it no longer works. The current way is in following Dockerfile snippet:
# Prevent setup wizard from running.
# WARNING: Jenkins will start with security disabled, without any password.
ENV JENKINS_OPTS="-Djenkins.install.runSetupWizard=false"
# plugins.txt must contain the list of plugins to be installed
# (One plugin per line, e.g. sidebar-link:1.11.0)
COPY plugins.txt /tmp/plugins.txt
RUN /usr/local/bin/install-plugins.sh < /tmp/plugins.txt

Docker hub automated build fails but locally does not

I have setup an automated build on Docker hub here (the sources are here).
The build goes well locally. I have also tried to rebuild it with --no-cache option:
docker build --no-cache .
And the process completes successfully
Successfully built 68b34a5f493a
However, the automated build fails on Docker hub with this error log:
...
Cloning into 'nerdtree'...
[91mVim: Warning: Output is not to a terminal
[0m
[91mVim: Warning: Input is not from a terminal
[0m
[m[m[0m[H[2J[24;1HError detected while processing command line:
E492: Not an editor command: PluginInstall
E492: Not an editor command: GoInstallBinaries
[91mmv: cannot stat `/go/bin/*': No such file or directory
[0m
This build apparently fails on the following vim command:
vim +PluginInstall +GoInstallBinaries +qall
Note that the warnings Output is not to a terminal and Input is not to a terminal appears also in the local build.
I cannot understand how this can happen. I am using a standard Ubuntu 14.04 system.
I finally figured it out. The issue was related to this one.
I am using Docker 1.0 in my host machine, however a later version is in production in Docker Hub. Without the explicit ENV HOME=... line in the Dockerfile, version 1.0 uses / as home directory, while /root is used by the later version. The result is that vim was not able to find its .vimrc file, since it was copied in / instead of /root. The solution I used is to explicitly define ENV HOME=/root in my Dockerfile, so there are no differences between the two versions.

Docker build from source fails

After git clone from dotcloud/docker
cd docker
sudo make VERBOSE=1
Fetching https://net/http/cookiejar?go-get=1
https fetch failed
**
unrecognized import path "net/http/cookiejar"
Can any one please tell me what should i be looking at. I have Go 1.1 installed. The reason i wanted to build docker from src it to remove sys_rawio from lxc.cap.drop. I needed to make CUDA work with lxc containers. I was able to compile cuda code but while running it. I keep getting driver related error that says Operation not permitted.
Installed Go from https://go.googlecode.com/files/go1.1.1.linux-amd64.tar.gz
As suggested by user creack in above comments.
cd docker/docker; go build; ./docker -d& ./docker version
I have docker build successfully now.
Docker can now be used to build docker and is the recommended (and only supported) method, see:
https://docs.docker.com/project/set-up-dev-env/

Resources