I understand how respond_to works when it's called with something like this:
def index
#users = User.all
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.json { render json: #users }
end
end
But I've seen some apps which pass respond_to a list of symbols, outside of the controller methods, e.g.:
class UsersController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html, :json
def index
# blah blah bah
end
end
What does this do? I've been playing around with it in one of my controllers and I can't figure out what difference it makes.
For a given controller action, #respond_with generates an appropriate response based on the mime-type requested by the client.
If the method is called with just a resource, as in this example -
class PeopleController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html, :xml, :json
def index
#people = Person.all
respond_with #people
end
end
then the mime-type of the response is typically selected based on the request's Accept header and the set of available formats declared by previous calls to the controller's class method respond_to. Alternatively the mime-type can be selected by explicitly setting request.format in the controller.
If an acceptable format is not identified, the application returns a '406 - not acceptable' status. Otherwise, the default response is to render a template named after the current action and the selected format, e.g. index.html.erb. If no template is available, the behavior depends on the selected format:
for an html response - if the request method is get, an exception is raised but for other requests such as post the response depends on whether the resource has any validation errors (i.e. assuming that an attempt has been made to save the resource, e.g. by a create action) -
If there are no errors, i.e. the resource was saved successfully, the response redirect's to the resource i.e. its show action.
If there are validation errors, the response renders a default action, which is :new for a post request or :edit for patch or put.
Thus an example like this -
respond_to :html, :xml
def create
#user = User.new(params[:user])
flash[:notice] = 'User was successfully created.' if #user.save
respond_with(#user)
end
is equivalent, in the absence of create.html.erb, to -
def create
#user = User.new(params[:user])
respond_to do |format|
if #user.save
flash[:notice] = 'User was successfully created.'
format.html { redirect_to(#user) }
format.xml { render xml: #user }
else
format.html { render action: "new" }
format.xml { render xml: #user }
end
end
end
for a javascript request - if the template isn't found, an exception is raised.
for other requests - i.e. data formats such as xml, json, csv etc, if the resource passed to respond_with responds to to_, the method attempts to render the resource in the requested format directly, e.g. for an xml request, the response is equivalent to calling render xml: resource.
Related
respond_with is acatually meant to use with ActiveModel's instances. I tried to use it with OpenStruct's instance, but it raises an error.
Is that ever possible to use respond_with with custom objects?
class CryptController < ApplicationController
respond_to :json
def my_action
respond_with OpenStruct.new(foo: 'foo', bar: 'bar')
end
# ...
end
Raises: **undefined method persisted?' for nil:NilClass**
ruby-2.1.4#rails4/gems/actionpack-4.2.5.1/lib/action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb:298:inhandle_list'
/home/workstat/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.4#rails4/gems/actionpack-4.2.5.1/lib/action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb:206:in polymorphic_method'
/home/workstat/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.1.4#rails4/gems/actionpack-4.2.5.1/lib/action_dispatch/routing/polymorphic_routes.rb:114:inpolymorphic_url'
respond_with is a helper method that exposes a resource to mime requests.
From the documentation
respond_with(#user)
for the create action, is equivalent (assuming respond_to :xml in the example) to:
respond_to do |format|
if #user.save
format.html { redirect_to(#user) }
format.xml { render xml: #user, status: :created, location: #user }
else
format.html { render action: "new" }
format.xml { render xml: #user.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
end
end
end
The precise equivalent is dependent upon the controller action.
The key takeaway is that respond_with takes a #instance variable as an argument and first attempts to redirect to the corresponding html view. Failing that, it renders an xml response, in the case above.
You are passing in an ostruct, which doesn't correspond to an instance of your model. In this case, respond_with doesn't know where to redirect to in your views and doesn't have an instance from which to render a mime response.
See this RailsCast and this blogpost from José Valim.
A note: The error undefined method persisted? is generated by Devise and probably because it can't find a route.
Rails scaffold generated the following:
respond_to do |format|
if #student.save
format.html { redirect_to #student, notice => 'Student was successfully created.' }
format.json { render :show, status: :created, location: #student }
else
format.html { render :new }
format.json { render json: #student.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
end
end
After reading this I understand how the respond_to is working (sort of), but I don't get what format is doing. Shouldn't it be either format.html or format.json and not both? What are these two lines actually doing?
format.html { render :new }
format.json { render json: #student.errors, status: :unprocessable_entity }
Is there an implied if in there? Is it something like
if (format == html) {}
if (format == json) {}
Side note: Why does update require the respond_to block while show will handle /students/1.json or /students/1 without any logic at all?
format is a local variable that respond_to yields. When you do format.html {} you are actually registering a callback block for a format.
Rails goes through the registered formats and tries to find a compatible format to the MIME type in the request. If there is no handler it will raise an error.
This could be explained as something like using syntactic sugar on top of a case statement (the Ruby equivalent of a switch statement). But the analogy is not completely accurate since Rails does a bit of work in matching the request type.
Also the code inside your block is not executed when the format.html block is registered (as it would be if it was just a conditional statement) but rather when respond_to finishes or not at all if you are using for example E-Tag caching.
Why does update require the respond_to block while show will handle
/students/1.json or /students/1 without any logic at all?
Rails handles many actions by using a convention over configuration approach and guessing the intent of the action.
def PostsController < ApplicationController
def index
# rails auto-magically fills in the controller with something
# like this
#posts = Post.all
respond_to do |format|
format.html { render :index }
format.json { render json: #posts }
end
end
def show
# convention over configuration is awesome!
#post = Post.find(params[:id])
respond_to do |format|
format.html { render :show }
format.json { render json: #post }
end
end
def new
#post = Post.new
render :new
end
def edit
#post = Post.find(params[:id])
render :edit
end
end
Rails assumes that there is a resource with the same name as the controller and auto-magically fills in the controller action. It also assumes there is a view in app/views/posts/(:action).html.[erb|haml|slim|jbuilder]. This is known as implicit rendering.
The comments show roughly what action rails attempts.
It does not fill in actions which operate on data (create, update, destroy) since the actual implementation can vary greatly and it's hard to make useful guesses.
Well, it depends on the format of the request. If a request demands HTML from the server, format.html block will be executed, and in the same way, if a request demands JSON format, format.json will be executed.
Rails will automatically(read: magically) handle the if (format == html) part for you. All you have to do is fill in the blanks. Same way, you can write a block for XML starting with format.xml.
And for the side note, I think you have said it otherwise. update method doesn't require respond_to block, while show requires. And the reason is very simple: update method is there to update the Model, and then, redirect you to somewhere, while show will always return you something. In your case, /students/1 will return you the first student created in the database, and the response will be HTML, while /students/1.json will return you the same result, but response will be JSON this time.
Well you could very well replace 'format' with 'foo' or 'banana' or whatever you want. It is just the variable name in this case because the variable that is sent to your block by respond_to is passing along the format as requested by the incoming http request's Accept header.
Sometimes you'll see 422 "Unacceptable" errors in your logs because you are receiving a request with an Accept header that does not request a mime type your app knows about.
As it is, your callers should be using a browser or be a JSON consumer sending the proper headers to receive responses from the boilerplate.
I have a controller "UserController" that should respond to normal and ajax requests to http://localhost:3000/user/3.
When it is a normal request, I want to render my view. When it is an AJAX request, I want to return JSON.
The correct approach seems to be a respond_to do |format| block. Writing the JSON is easy, but how can I get it to respond to the HTML and simply render the view as usual?
def show
#user = User.find(params[:id])
respond_to do |format|
format.html {
render :show ????this seems unnecessary. Can it be eliminated???
}
format.json {
render json: #user
}
end
end
As per my knowledge its not necessary to "render show" in format.html it will automatically look for a respective action view for ex : show.html.erb for html request and show,js,erb for JS request.
so this will work
respond_to do |format|
format.html # show.html.erb
format.json { render json: #user }
end
also, you can check the request is ajax or not by checking request.xhr? it returns true if request is a ajax one.
Yes, you can change it to
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.json { render json: #user }
end
The best way to do this is just like Amitkumar Jha said, but if you need a simple and quick way to render your objects, you can also use this "shortcut":
def index
#users = User.all
respond_to :html, :json, :xml
end
Or make respond_to work for all the actions in the controller using respond_with :
class UserController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html, :json, :xml
def index
#users = User.all
respond_with(#users)
end
end
Starting from Rails 4.2 version you will need to use gem responder to be able to use respond_with.
If you need more control and want to be able to have a few actions that act differently, always use a full respond_to block. You can read more here.
respond_to do |format|
format.html { render :html => #something }
format.json { render :json => #something }
format.xml { render :xml => #something }
end
Here we have three different formats: html, json, xml. So which one is actually returned? Do we have three different files ending with .html, .xml, .json? Or in other words, does respond_to render all three html, json, xml files?
respond_to is a Rails helper method that is attached to the Controller class (or rather, its super class). It is referencing the response that will be sent to the View (which is going to the browser).
The block in your example is formatting data - by passing in a 'format' paramater in the block - to be sent from the controller to the view whenever a browser makes a request for html or json data.
in rails you can write this also
class PostsController < ApplicationController
respond_to :html, :xml, :js
def index
#posts = Post.all
respond_with(#posts)
end
end
respond_to can render each of the three, according to the current request. The right response is not what's returned from respond_to but what's actually rendered.
You can find the full explanation here
This is the code from internet and I am having trouble understanding what does respond_to, format.html and format.js do in the controller.
def create
#review = Review.create!(params[:review])
flash[:notice] = "Thank you for reviewing this product"
respond_to do |format|
format.html { redirect_to #review.product }
format.js
end
end
Thank you for your time.
Ramya
respond_to(*types, &block) public
Without web-service support, an action which collects the data for displaying a list of people might look something like this:
def index
#people = Person.find(:all)
end
Here’s the same action, with web-service support baked in:
def index
#people = Person.find(:all)
respond_to do |format|
format.html
format.xml { render :xml => #people.to_xml }
end
end
What that says is, "if the client wants HTML in response to this action, just respond as we would have before, but if the client wants XML, return them the list of people in XML format." (Rails determines the desired response format from the HTTP Accept header submitted by the client.)
Supposing you have an action that adds a new person, optionally creating their company (by name) if it does not already exist, without web-services, it might look like this:
def create
#company = Company.find_or_create_by_name(params[:company][:name])
#person = #company.people.create(params[:person])
redirect_to(person_list_url)
end
Here’s the same action, with web-service support baked in:
def create
company = params[:person].delete(:company)
#company = Company.find_or_create_by_name(company[:name])
#person = #company.people.create(params[:person])
respond_to do |format|
format.html { redirect_to(person_list_url) }
format.js
format.xml { render :xml => #person.to_xml(:include => #company) }
end
end
If the client wants HTML, we just redirect them back to the person list. If they want Javascript (format.js), then it is an RJS request and we render the RJS template associated with this action. Lastly, if the client wants XML, we render the created person as XML, but with a twist: we also include the person’s company in the rendered XML, so you get something like this:
http://apidock.com/rails/ActionController/MimeResponds/InstanceMethods/respond_to