I have an NSScrollView that needs to display a variable amount of NSViews in it. I made a custom NSView that has isFlipped return YES and put my NSViews in that before I set it to be the NSScrollView's documentView. That works well. It displays my items top to bottom like I would expect.
But, when the contents changes and I need to change the NSScrollView's documentView's frame, my contents disappears.
This would be WAY easier with a UIScrollView, but alas.
I'm assuming these are equivalent:
[NSScrollView.documentView setFrame:newFrame];
[UIScrollView setContentSize:newSize];
I would imagine that a lot of coders need to have a flipped NSScrollView, but how do you deal with changing the content size without this madness? Obviously, I'm missing something.
Anyone? Thanks!
can you try just setting
[scrollView.documentView setFrameSize:newFrame.size];
to see if your content disappears?
The problem was with the internal views and autoresizing/constraints. My internal views are actually a series of view controllers with their own xib file. In each view controller, I added the following line:
[self.view setAutoresizingMask:NSViewNotSizable];
And that solved everything.
Special thanks to lead_the_zeppelin for helping me (in chat) go through everything.
Related
I want to ask a simple question how can I temporary bring a subview to front to view its element without changing its position by dragging and dropping. The problem i face all the time is i forgot to put the views back to there position and that causes lot of trouble specially if you are working on the view that have large number of subviews.
Question : Is there any shortcut or any functionality that can show the view temporary without dragging, changing its frame or making any changes in its hierarchy.
For a view controller like this :-
FYI, for those who are wondering, the view closest to the bottom of the list (on the left) will show in the front. So in the case below, view 'a' will be in front of 'b' and 'b' will be in front of 'c'
XIB:
If you need your views to be readily accessible for viewing/editing without having to rearrange them, I would actually recommend breaking them out into their own view and then stitching them together in the correct order in your code. This will ensure that all elements will be put in the proper order and will always be easily editable. Something like this:
And then in your code, in somewhere like viewDidLoad:
[self.view addSubview:view2];
[self.view addSubview:view3];
I am developing a little MS tweak that adds a view on the Springboard. I want it to be constantly updated so I called it into the
- (void)showSpringBoardStatusBar
Then I create and add the view using this:
[[UIApplication sharedApplication].keyWindow addSubview:view1];
Is this the right way?
But the problem is this view uses a low alpha level to be transparent and every time the view is updated by the showSpringBoardstatus bar another UIView is added onto of it eventually just making the view solid. This also is uneconomical in terms of memory. so then I went back an added what I thought would remove the code:
view1 = nil;
[view1 removeFromSuperview];
But it seems like this doesn't make a difference as it is still there and nothing changes.
I have been searching for the last few days for anything to help me with this but got nothing out of it. All I can think of is that I can't remove an added subview from a key window like I would from a normal view or I just don't how to do it correctly.
Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
Setting view1 to nil and than calling "removeFromSuperView" might be a bad idea. How about adding the view only once, keeping a reference and updating this reference constantly without adding it to keyWindow again?
I know this has been asked before, but none of these solutions work, and that's the reason of my posting. Please do not close before considering my case.
My plist already has UIViewControllerBasedStatusBarAppearance = false.
I have already tried applying deltas, but to no result.
Changing the top level view frame in ViewWillAppear (like self.view.frame) did not succeed.
I thought of increasing the view height (storyboard attribute inspector), in combination with deltas, but my top level view X, Y are disabled in storyboard attribute inspector.
My main view doesn't have any children views because I load them into main view either dynamically or load them from XIBs which are again shared by more than view controllers. These XIBs provide layout for both Portrait and Landscape. I don't know what approach is ideal for this kind of configuration, but I would like it better if solution lies along these lines.
This approach worked partially, but gave me inconsistent results.
What makes the solution tricky is the fact that I have to support all 4 orientations - this is something I handle in code via didRotate and willRotate delegates for my other views, but failing to do it for statusbar.
Please help...
Could this link be of any help?
You might have to use the new setEdgesForExtendedLayout: method to get this working consistently?
Also, have a look at these official docs if you haven't already done so.
I ended up writing my own function to shift my all subviews (remember, not top level views whose frame is fixated by IB).
It didn't spoil my work but imagine if this was the case for a very big project with so many screens, the limitations would have made it a nightmare.
I modified programmatically one autolayout constraint. It takes effect on one certain view, but other views that are bound with other constraints to that view, do not change their positions. Is there an "updateAllConstraints" method?
Call those two methods on the view you want to be updated:
-setNeedsLayout
-layoutIfNeeded
The first one says to the layout system that this view needs to be laid out, because it has some changes and, everything should be recalculated. The second force the layout system to be run now, layout system is triggered at specific times during runtime, with this method you are saying:"do it now".
Yes There is a method on UIView called - (void)updateConstraintsIfNeeded
https://developer.apple.com/Library/ios/documentation/UIKit/Reference/UIView_Class/UIView/UIView.html#//apple_ref/occ/instm/UIView/updateConstraintsIfNeeded
However I don't think this is your problem
The problem was that constrains were not set up properly, and in this case non of the setNeedsLayout or updateConstraintsIfNeeded can help.
Those of you that come across this topic, and are looking where to find this in the menus.
Best I have found is:
Select the items that you want to "pop" back to your constraints
Top menu: Editor/Update Frames (or/) shortcut: command + option + =
Hopefully this helps
I have an iPad application and in one of my views i use UIScrollView and UIPageControl together to navigate between views array. when my simulator is on Portrait mode there is no problem but when i rotate it to Landscape just down side of the scrollview appears and i can see just about 30 per 100 of the whole view. How can i fix this situation can anyone help?
EDIT : I dynamically add some buttons-subviews on the subview that i have added to Scrollview, can some one give any idea about how to detect the orientation of the device and decide the frames. I need something like the pseudo below:
if(device_orientation == landscape){
subButton.frame=....;
textfield.frame=...;
}
else{
subButton.frame=....;
textfield.frame=...;}
}
i tried but i got black screen..
EDIT-2
I used Interface builder for some views and there are some dynamically created views.I played a little with Autoresizing properties on the .xib file and now it looks perfect but the dynamic ones(they are all objects of a subclass of UIButton) dont response to any code(resizing, bacground color-photo ect..)
Are you using interface builder or creating your view programmatically?
It would be helpful if you could post some more of your source or some screenshots so that we can see a bit more clearly what's going on. As a stab in the dark, you might want to try setting the 'autoresizingMask' property of the views which you want to resize to '~UIViewAutoresizingNone' (not-none/flexible). If you can provide some more details, I'll try to help you some more :)