Capture keyword used when user clicks on adwords ad - keyword

I wanted to know if it is possible to be able to capture the keyword that was searched when the user clicks on one of my ads. For instance say a user searches for "HVAC Installation" I would like to match a lead with a particular keyword searched for. Is that possible?
I'm assuming maybe from a POST I could capture the keyword?

If you just need the keyword as the user is entering your site, take a look at ValueTrack parameters, especially matchtype and keyword: ValueTrack documentation at support.google.com
On the other hand, there's the Search Query Performance Report which gives you detailed statistics for every search term that caused at least one impression of your ads for a given time frame. It's available under the "Dimensions" tab in the Adwords Web UI or using the ad-hoc reporting functionality of the Adwords API: Report definition at developers.google.com.

Related

Difference in results between google ad words API and keyword planner console

I’m trying to forecast the value of various keywords using the google Adwords API, using the traffic estimator service. So far, the clicks, costs per click, and other metrics returned through the API don’t come anywhere close to those retrieved through the Keyword Planner console. There are several adjustable forecast parameters in the console such as language, location, and search network, and I tried to match these parameters in the API.
I'm wondering if there is some other element that needs to be adjusted that I'm missing. For example, the console gives you the option to "select an ad group" for the forecast, and I'm not sure how this would be applied within the API.
If you're interested in obtaining the results that the KW planner provides in the Ads web UI, you'd need to use the TargetingIdeaService instead of the TrafficEstimatorService.
There's also a reference document with some pointers explaining how to map the web settings with the TargetingIdeaSelector values available in the API.
Note that in my experience, you'll sometimes still find discrepancies between what's shown in the web UI and the stats provided by the API. This is also a recurring theme in the Ads API forum (just search for "TargetingIdeaService Difference" or similar).

Trouble Showing Value of SFDC Conversion in AdWords

Screenshots and similar explanation found at my post in the AdWords community help forum
Whereas most, usual AdWords conversions center around an event happening on your site (often via Google Analytics), Google now (as of ~6 months ago, I believe) offers the ability to track conversions that occur in Salesforce, automatically, by looking for specified "Opportunity Stages" on the Opportunity object in Salesforce. Example: When a given lead is qualified, and their stage is updated to reflect that, this now counts as a secondary conversion in AdWords.
Now I have normal conversions which measure how many people have created an account, and I can measure how many of those accounts are actually potential customers. I love this. It's automatic and gives us pretty granular insight.
The workflow is:
Lead clicks on search or display ad
Arrives at landing page, is assigned a GCLID
Ideally the lead signs up and self identifies
Code on our site sends all the lead's self-provided information PLUS their GCLID into our database AND into Salesforce, where the GCLID is retained in a separate field (called GCLID)
When that lead is converted to an opportunity in Salesforce, the GCLID transfers from the individual lead to the Opportunity object for the account
AdWords polls once daily at midnight for any opportunities where the GCLID field is filled out AND they have reached a specified stage (post qualification)
When AdWords polls the SFDC API and a record matches those criteria, it imports that GCLID, the date of creation, and the value (field named "Amount") that is assigned to the lead.
AdWords is supposed to measure that 1) the conversion occurred (which it does) and 2) the VALUE of the conversion that is determined by a field in SFDC.
I'm having trouble with step 8. I can see the AdWords import history and it's detecting the conversion AND the value, but the VALUE is not appearing in any AdWords report of any kind. All values associated with that conversion are 0, though the conversions themselves are registering.
I've now spoken with AdWords support reps directly and have solicited advice from their community forum, no luck. Anyone have any idea of why this might happen?
Per this FAQ, it sounds like AdWords looks for the conversion value in the Opportunity's Expected Review field.

How to deal with a "low search volume" keyword on AdWords

Let say I made a print ad for a product, where I ask viewer to search online for a specific keyword to know more about it.
Before publishing the ad, I want to make sure my promotional website will shows up on top google search result by purchasing the keyword via AdWords, but this keyword has a "Low search volume" and is not elegible.
Google says that:
"Users don't search for this term very often on Google properties, so it's not eligible to trigger your ads. If this is a term that you expect to increase in popularity soon (like a new brand name), then you don't need to do anything; the keyword will start triggering ads automatically. Otherwise, we recommend trying Keyword Planner to find different keyword ideas to increase the traffic to your campaign. Learn more about building an effective keyword list"
So my question is:
Is waiting really the best thing I can do ?
I know once the print ad will be out, search will start to increase and the keyword will become elegible. But Google says it can take up to 1 week for them to update their elegible keyword list, which means for 1 week, consumer will search for this keyword without finding my ad which is quite a waste. Is there a way I can avoid that ?
There really isn't much else to be done. You are at the mercy of Google (as always) as to when they allow you to show an ad on thier platform.
It isnt a 'waste' as such, however, because you won't pay for traffic unless or until there is enough to show for.

Facebook Search in Graph API

I'm developing an iOS application that let the user to search for a person throught the Graph API.
What I want is the SAME behavior that it's present on the Facebook website. You know when you begin to search for a person in the top text input? The first results will be mostly your friends AND some people you MAY know or people you already looked for.
The problem? Try to use the same search pattern here to search a person: Graph Api Explorer
The Graph Api returns DIFFERENT results than the search input on the Facebook website.
Does anyone knows why? Is there a way to achieve the same results?
Facebook are using many algorithms to display search result like Relevance Indicators, Complexities of User-Centric Search and The Product.
One of the algorithm to display result on their page as below.
Personal Context:
Unlike most search engines, every Facebook search involves two key elements - a query and a querier.
Just as we need to understand the query, it’s as essential to understand the person behind the query.
People are more likely to be looking for things located in their own city/country or for people who share the same college/workplace.
We consider this information and much more when ranking results. The more we know about you, the better your search results will be.
In Graph API, they are not using this algorithm.They are just displaying the queried result. Hence you can not achieve same result using graph search API.
To achieve this you can use following apporach -
Get the friend list of user using me/friends?limit=1&offset=1
Get the user list using search api
merge both the result
show result(s) to user
For more information(approach/algorithm) you can check Intro to Facebook Search
Is there a way to achieve the same results? - NO
Does anyone knows why? - NOT REALLY
(Edit: Seems in another answer, someone does actually, but it doesn't change the answer for "If you can achieve it")
But its safe to presume that Facebook does not allow all functionality through the API, why would they after all ? They need to keep the people coming to their own platform. So I can't give you a straight forward response on WHY, but IF ? Not possible, there is zero documentation about more specified search for type user. When you request user friends, you will only get the user friends who are using the same app starting v2.0
Am afraid that you will have to drop the functionality you want to achieve.
It is not just the graph search. When you refresh your TimeLine. The order of posts gets changed every time because Facebook takes a Pull on Demand approach. Which means whenever you login, the data from your friends is fetched. Which is why facebook has a limit to maximum number of friends.
Talking about the Graph search and Graph API. They are not same and the Graph Search cannot be accessed through the Graph API. So, you would have to change your approach.
To explain why the graph search gives different results on same search term. I would guess that it follows the game Pull on Demand model ( although it is not open and we cannot know for sure ). Following that model makes sense though.
Thanks

Find the number of times a tweet has been viewed

There have been quite a few number of start-up pertaining to analyzing Twitter data. There is CrowdBooster, then there is Klout, which use Twitter data to tell the user their True reach.
I have got the following two questions:
1) Is there a way to find out who has viewed one's tweet, or the number of people that have viewed a tweet. Crowdbooster claims to tell you how many impression one received per tweet. How do they do it?
2) Thousands and thousands of links are shared each day on Twitter. Can we find out which user has clicked the link in a tweet?
I have looked through Twitter API and some of the companies that have licensed Twitter's Firehose, but have not found anything that meet my needs.
Also, to give you a short answer to your 2nd question. Now that we've established that view analysis is impossible. Can you find out which user has clicked on that link, absolutely. And depending on what your talking about, user as far as the user who has clicked on the link or the user that has the link on their Twitter stream. Both are possible,
in the case of A, you would get the referring users IP address. Methods vary depending on language.
But what I think your asking for is scenario B, finding out which user has the link in their Twitter stream. This can be done by querying the link, the API response you will get can include tweet entities which will list all this information out for you and more. Open up a firehose with your link and watch what comes in.
https://dev.twitter.com/docs/streaming-api/methods
1) Is there a way to find out who has viewed one's tweet, or the
number of people that have viewed a tweet. Crowdbooster claims to tell
you how many impression one received per tweet. How do they do it?
No, in the case of a view - this would be impossible. The tweet impression can happen in multiple silos. On the website, in a widget, in a mobile app. You can imagine that it's simply not possible to get the impression of a tweet on a view because of this reason and because unlike a click, there is no I viewed this tweet identifier sent when a view has been enacted. I spent a great deal of time researching for a way to get the tweet impression even based on a similar clicked link and this is not even possible. (edit: it's possible see the last paragraph) This brings us to question 2.
2) Thousands and thousands of links are shared each day on Twitter.
Can we find out which user has clicked the link in a tweet?
Yes, what these websites are mainly doing is analyzing links that you process through their website. If you can have a unique hash marker on a link then analysis becomes possible. Without a unique hash marker, Twitter will re-interrupt two of the same links in a exactly the same way, even in the case that it shortens your link to it's custom t.co wrapper.
This means the only reliable way to do tweet analysis is by including a unique link marker code on your tweet and analyze the the fact that somebody that has hit your server has clicked on that link.
There is a somewhat hidden Twitter API feature that helps you understand how popular a particular link is. That being the link count API .. http://urls.api.twitter.com/1/urls/count.json?url=
Something really outside of the box you can do if your set on analyzing multiple versions of exactly the same link without using markers and if your also using the Streaming (firehose) would be to analyze the tweet views (using the link count API) on similar links that hit your server. The link that got the +1 boost in view is the one that hit your server. But that's about the extent of creative analysis you can get with your tweets and more specifically the links, as mentioned links are the only thing your really able to analyze when it comes to Twitter.
1) Is there a way to find out who has viewed one's tweet, or the number of people that have viewed a tweet. Crowdbooster claims to tell you how many impression one received per tweet. How do they do it?
Yes, sign up for Twitter Analytics https://analytics.twitter.com (free service provided by Twitter) and you can see how many people view (impressions) for each tweet and totals for specific dates or a date range.
2) Thousands and thousands of links are shared each day on Twitter. Can we find out which user has clicked the link in a tweet?
Yes, you can do this. Using a URL shortening service like Bitly.com you can track how many clicks you had from Twitter (only give out that Bitly link on Twitter to do this). But if you want more indept information you may need to create a tracking software, as I don't know of any available. To do that you would need the tracking software to track the link and find out the refer header and see if it's from Twitter (or better yet, just give out a unique URL for your tweets), then you would need to use the Twitter API to find out the handle (username) of that visitor who clicked your link. Lastly store this information in a database so you can review who clicked what link.

Resources