I found a question very similar to mine here, but it was un-replied to and unanswered so I will try again.
I may be missing something in regards to cascade deletes and core data. I am used to cascade deletes working as designed in RDBMS apps but having issues with core data.
I have an object record that get's inserted into entity via an "add form" called modally from a table view. No problem.
In another session I will insert objects into a related details entity (many) where there is a common loadID attribute in both. No problem.
In another session, I will call up the original table view to view the parent "loads", and swipe-delete, save the context, and the parent load gets deleted from the one side entity. No problem, (except apparently details objects in a many side entity do not get removed)
When I open the sqlite data source with a db manager, I see the child records (pay detail items) are being orphaned. I have double and triple checked the cascade delete settings in the relationships. Have tried different entity relationship settings combinations, but nothing seems to get the many records to automatically delete along with the parent record.
If you can't define corresponding keys in core data, how does core data know what belongs to what when you operate in multiple sessions (contexts) adding child objects to the many-side entity?
I don't know if I'm doing something wrong or missing a vital step prior to inserting new child objects in the many table, or doing something wrong or missing a step when deleting the parent object.
But I would suggest all with cascade deletes set to open your data file and be sure there are not orphaned objects (records)
Related
I read data from one of more remote files into coredata. If a remote file is changed the data in core data needs to be updated. For instance, assume one file is filled with departments, the other with employees.
As the company is restructured, one department is renamed and a second department without employees is deleted in the file. The employees file is not changed, so I only want to reread the file with departments. In my code I read the file, fetch the department from coredata and updates its name property. But since the second department is no longer in the file, I want to delete it from core data.
My pseudocode solution is as follows:
the department entity gets a hasChanged attribute
before reading from the file, all hasChanged attributes are set to false
if a department is present in the file, its hasChanged attribute is set to true
after the file is read, all departments with hasChanged attribute set to false are fetched and deleted
Somehow the seems not very efficient. Deleting all departments and building them a new seems also not very efficient, because core data will delete all employees with the departments and now I have to reread the employees (and probably all other files) also.
Is there a better way to approach this problem of data becoming superfluous? If you answer with code, swift is preferable.
First the delete rule should not be cascade - change it to nullify.
When you get new data from the server follow these steps:
fetch all of the entities that are effected. If you are updating departments - then fetch all the departments
store the results in a dictionary where the ID is the key.
Also store all the results in a mutable set called objectsToDelete
now iterate through all the data that you got from the server. lookup the department using the dictionary you made in step #2. If you find the object, then update it and remove it from the set you created in step #3. If you don't find the object then create it.
If there are any objects left in objectsToDelete then delete them
save the context.
It is the same principle for the employees. You match up the ones you already have using a dictionary, and delete the ones that don't get matched up.
When you mark an entity as deleted by setting the entityAspect it marks its children as deleted as well. Is there a way to only mark the parent deleted? Or a way to go through and mark the children as unchanged after the fact?
You don't want to mess with the navigation properties - I will tell you that straight away. My suggestion is to model your question as if you had to ask it using T-SQL.
In T-SQL, can you delete a parent record, but leave the children? No. I mean you could, but why? You just created orphaned child records in the database. Are you going to delete the foreign key but leave the data? What a mess.
The only reason you are able to map a parent child relationship in Breeze is because of the navigation properties that were created based on the parent / child relationships defined in the database. If you can't do it in the database, you can't do it in Breeze.
If the model refuses to budge and you decide to go forward with this anyway, you need to return data that is not linked via relationships. You can create a view for the parent and children... but you will need to manually manage the load. If your entities are based on a view, they probably are not going to be updatable.
Sorry, no code to post. I gave up on this a long time ago.
Breeze does not mark child entities as deleted if you delete the parent. We haven't implemented cascading deletes in Breeze. You must have code in your application that is doing this. Breeze disconnects the child entities from the deleted parent by clearing the foreign key properties, so the child entities will be in modified state. However, you won't be able to successfully save w/o violating FK constraints in your DB. You either have to implement cascading deletes on the server or manually delete the child entities.
I have a static table for settings where I want to pull some stuff from an entity in Core Data. The use case does not lend itself to a table of records as you usually see. Rather each row of the static table is really a field related to the user--as in a user profile. I have a feeling that in testing I may have created more than one record in the entity. I know there are programs that let you see the SQL lite database underneath, but my question assumes you do not have this tool and are relying just on Xcode.
My question is when you have more than one record in a Core Data entity/table, and you try to load data from the managed object context into a VC, one field into one element, what record is shown by default?
Related to this, if you don't know how many managed object or rows are in the database, is there anyway to specify which record you want since there are no auto ids as you would use in a traditional database?
The record that gets loaded from the fetch first. Depending on your sort that might be consistent or it might be random.
I am using coredata to save the server data through web services in my application and I am storing relationships as an object to the entity.
I have many entities e.g "Inspirations" and "Products" and both are related to each other. I have a problem whenever the records are updated in the third entity which is "Filters" then the relations of the entities broke and I cannot apply filters on the entities.
[object addRelatedInspirationsObject:related];
This is how I save relationships. I am not able to figure out why the relations are being broken once the entity is updated which has no direct link with the entity.
One thing more if I fetch and save the data of any one of the entities like "Inspirations" then all the relations start to work again.
Your code should work. Here are 2 things you need to check:
Make sure related is not nil when you call your method.
Make sure you call save on a valid managed object context.
From your question it seems that entities have 1 to many relationship between them. And by the code you supplied, every things should work fine. Just make sure, you are using the Filter object from the relationship like object.filter (or obj1.obj2.filter), not accessing it via a direct NSPredicate on Filter entity and updating it. And if you are using FRC, you might also need to generate a fault against the parent entities, to get your UI updates.
When I retrieve an entity from the one side of a one-to many relationship, I create a mutable array from the set that is the collection of entities from the relationship. I manipulate, edit or otherwise change those entities, possibly delete existing or add new.
When through with the changes I simply use the array to create a new set then replace the original set with that which I created like so:
self.myOneSideEntity.theManySideEntitiesRelationship = [NSSet setWithArray:myNewArrayOfEntities];
It occurred to me that replacing the set may not be deleting the old members. What happened to them? Is this the proper way to edit the collection of related objects? Am I leaving any kind of orphans or going against best practices with this technique?
My relationship is set up with an inverse, cascade delete on the one side, nullify on the many side and the inverse relationship is not optional.
I've spent some days to understand similar behavior in my application.
Relation's "Delete Rule" works only when the object that contains relation is deleted itself. If you simply replace one set of objects with another (as you do) - nothing happens. Child objects that were in old set will simply have inverse relations set to nil. So if that relation (from child side) is not optional, you will get CoreData error when saving context.
For now I didn't find any way to manage this, except manual deletion of old objects.
For me the issue was with getting objects which were wired with current object. (groupObject.docs)
It was solved when I add context by which I get this data.
I'm using MagicalRecord:
[GroupObject MR_findAllInContext:[NSManagedObjectContext MR_defaultContext]]
instead of
[GroupObject MR_findAll]