read and execute ruby script - ruby-on-rails

script.rb:
puts 'hello'
puts 'foo'
main.rb:
puts `jruby script.rb` # receive the expected result
The question:
How can the same be achieved with reading the "script" before execution?
main.rb:
code=File.open('script.rb', 'r').read.gsub('"', '\"')
# puts `jruby -e '#{code}'` # Does not work for relatively big files;
Windows and unicode are the reasons of this question;
Please note that `jruby script.rb' creates a new process which is essential.

Store the modified script in a Tempfile and run that instead of passing the whole contents as an eval argument:
require 'tempfile'
code = IO.read('script.rb').gsub('"', '\"')
begin
tempfile = Tempfile.new 'mytempfile'
f.write code
f.close
puts `jruby '#{f.path}'`
ensure
f.close
f.unlink
end
The reason you’re likely getting an error is either a lack of proper escaping or a limit on the maximum argument length in the shell.
Also, beware that in your original implementation you never close the original file. I’ve fixed that by instead using IO.read.

In the command line, using
$ getconf ARG_MAX
will give the upper limit on how many bytes can be used for the command line argument and environment variables.
#Andrew Marshall's answer is better, but suppose you don't want to use a temp file, and assuming we can use fork in JRuby,
require 'ffi'
module Exec
extend FFI::Library
ffi_lib FFI::Platform::LIBC
attach_function :fork, [], :int
end
code = IO.read('script.rb')
pid = Exec.fork
if 0 == pid
eval code
exit 0
else
Process.waitpid pid
end

use require
main.rb:
require "script.rb"

Related

Can I display the log of system call in Ruby?

I need to call a command(in a sinatra or rails app) like this:
`command sub`
Some log will be outputed when the command is executing.
I want to see the log displaying continuously in the process.
But I just can get the log string after it's done with:
result = `command sub`
So, is there a way to implement this?
On windows i have the best experience with IO.popen
Here is a sample
require 'logger'
$log = Logger.new( "#{__FILE__}.log", 'monthly' )
#here comes the full command line, here it is a java program
command = %Q{java -jar getscreen.jar #{$userid} #{$password}}
$log.debug command
STDOUT.sync = true
begin
# Note the somewhat strange 2> syntax. This denotes the file descriptor to pipe to a file. By convention, 0 is stdin, 1 is stdout, 2 is stderr.
IO.popen(command+" 2>&1") do |pipe|
pipe.sync = true
while str = pipe.gets #for every line the external program returns
#do somerthing with the capturted line
end
end
rescue => e
$log.error "#{__LINE__}:#{e}"
$log.error e.backtrace
end
There's six ways to do it, but the way you're using isn't the correct one because it waits for the process the return.
Pick one from here:
http://tech.natemurray.com/2007/03/ruby-shell-commands.html
I would use IO#popen3 if I was you.

Ruby/Rails: pass arguments to command line application from rake task

How do you pass arguments from within a rake task and execute a command-line application from Ruby/Rails?
Specifically I'm trying to use pdftk (I can't find a comparable gem) to split some PDFs into individual pages. Args I'd like to pass are within < > below:
$ pdftk <filename.pdf> burst output <filename_%04d.pdf>
In the ruby code for your rake task:
`pdftk #{input_filename} burst output #{output_filename}`
You could also do:
system("pdftk #{input_filename} burst output #{output_filename}")
system() just returns true or false. backticks or %x() returns whatever output the system call generates. Usually backticks are preferred, but if you don't care, then you could use system(). I always use backticks because it's more concise.
More info here: http://rubyquicktips.com/post/5862861056/execute-shell-commands
e.g. as:
filename = 'filename.pdf'
filename_out = 'filename_%04d.pdf'
`pdftk #{filename} burst output #{filename_out}`
or
system("pdftk #{filename} burst output #{filename_out}")
system returns a retrun code, the backtick-version return STDOUT.
If you need stdout and stderr, you may also use Open3.open3:
filename = 'filename.pdf'
filename_out = 'filename_%04d.pdf'
cmd = "pdftk #{filename} burst output #{filename_out}"
require 'open3'
Open3.popen3(cmd){ |stdin, stdout, stderr|
puts "This is STDOUT of #{cmd}:"
puts stdout.read
puts "This is STDERR of #{cmd}:"
puts stderr.read
}

Issues while using sqlplus with ruby

I want to use sqlplus within ruby. Dont want to use any gems[bec I cannot get it installed on our servers without much help from other teams ..etc] and want to keep it very minimal.
I am trying something as simple as this in my ruby script:
`rlwrap sqlplus user/pswd#host << EOF`
`set serveroutput on;`
`commit;` #ERROR1: sh: commit: not found
sql = "insert /*+ APPEND*/ INTO table(col1, col2) values (#{data[0]},#{data[1]});"
`#{sql}` #ERROR2: sh: Syntax error: "(" unexpected
Can anyone help me with ERROR1 and ERROR2 above
Basically for "commit: not found" I think its getting executed on shell rather than in sqlplus. However seems like "set serveroutput on" seems to execute fine !
For ERROR2, I am clueless. I also tried using escape slash for the "/" in the sql.
Thanks
The answer is, don't use SQL*Plus. Don't call a command-line utility from inside your script; between the ruby-oci8 gem and the ruby-plsql gem, you can do anything you could accomplish from within SQL*Plus.
The reason you get the errors is that you are sending each line to the shell individually. If your entire statement was wrapped in a single pair of backticks, it might work.
But if you really are unable to install the proper gems, put the commands in a temporary file and tell sqlplus to execute that, eg:
require 'tempfile'
file = Tempfile.open(['test', '.sql'])
file.puts "set serveroutput on;"
file.puts "commit;"
file.puts "insert /*+ APPEND*/ INTO table(col1, col2) values (#{data[0]},#{data[1]});"
file.puts "exit;" # needed or sqlplus will never return control to your script
file.close
output = `sqlplus user/pswd#host ##{file.path}`
file.unlink
You'll have to be very careful about:
Quoting values (if using oci8/dbi you could use bind variables)
Error handling. If using ruby libraries, errors would raise exceptions. Using sqlplus, you'll have to parse the output instead. Yuck!
So it can be done but I highly recommend you jump through whatever hoops are required to get oci8 (and maybe ruby-DBI) installed properly :)
ps are you sure you want to commit before the insert?

Is there a way to achieve grep like functionality on output inside the Rails Console

In shell, I can do
$ cat name_of_file_with_a_lot_of_text | grep "What I am looking for"
Inside the Rails Console, can I achieve something similar, say when I run a command and the output is huge, especially say a DB query.
I am aware of outputting it as YAML but that Is not what I am looking for.
Thanks.
Yes, you can. The method is called gr... wait for it ...ep. Ruby's grep works on String, Array and many other built-in objects. For example to get all to_xxx methods of a number, just do:
1.methods.grep(/to_/)
I had the same question and wasn't very satisfied with the somewhat snarky response from ream88, so I decided to take a crack at it.
# Allows you to filter output to the console using grep
# Ex:
# def foo
# puts "Some debugging output here"
# puts "The value of x is y"
# puts "The value of foo is bar"
# end
#
# grep_stdout(/value/) { foo }
# # => The value of x is y
# # => The value of foo is bar
# # => nil
def grep_stdout(expression)
# First we need to create a ruby "pipe" which is two sets of IO subclasses
# the first is read only (which represents a fake $stdin) and the second is
# write only (which represents a fake $stdout).
placeholder_in, placeholder_out = IO.pipe
# This child process handles the grep'ing. Its done in a child process so that
# it can operate in parallel with the main process.
pid = fork {
# sync $stdout so we can report any matches asap
$stdout.sync
# replace $stdout with placeholder_out
$stdin.reopen(placeholder_in)
# we have to close both placeholder_out and placeholder_in because all instances
# of an IO stream must be closed in order for it to ever reach EOF. There's two
# in this method; one in the child process and one in the main process.
placeholder_in.close
placeholder_out.close
# loop continuously until we reach EOF (which happens when all
# instances of placeholder_out have closed)
read_buffer = ''
loop do
begin
read_buffer << $stdin.readpartial(4096)
if line_match = read_buffer.match(/(.*\n)(.*)/)
print line_match[1].grep(expression) # grep complete lines
read_buffer = line_match[2] # save remaining partial line for the next iteration
end
rescue EOFError
print read_buffer.grep(expression) # grep any remaining partial line at EOF
break
end
end
}
# Save the original stdout out to a variable so we can use it again after this
# method is done
original_stdout = $stdout
# Redirect stdout to our pipe
$stdout = placeholder_out
# sync $stdout so that we can start operating on it as soon as possible
$stdout.sync
# allow the block to execute and save its return value
return_value = yield
# Set stdout back to the original so output will flow again
$stdout = original_stdout
# close the main instances of placeholder_in and placeholder_out
placeholder_in.close
placeholder_out.close
# Wait for the child processes to finish
Process.wait pid
# Because the connection to the database has a tendency to go away when calling this, reconnect here
# if we're using ActiveRecord
if defined?(ActiveRecord)
suppress_stdout { ActiveRecord::Base.verify_active_connections! }
end
# return the value of the block
return_value
end
The obvious drawback of my solution is that the output is lost. I'm not sure how to get around that without calling yield twice.
EDIT I've changed my answer to only call fork once, which allows me to keep the output of the block and return it at the end. Win.
EDIT 2 You can get all of this functionality (and more!) in this gem now https://github.com/FutureAdvisor/console_util

Reading docs in irb

One thing I miss about ipython is it has a ? operator which diggs up the docs for a particular function.
I know ruby has a similar command line tool but it is extremely inconvenient to call it while I am in irb.
Does ruby/irb have anything similar?
Pry is a Ruby version of IPython, it supports the ? command to look up documentation on methods, but uses a slightly different syntax:
pry(main)> ? File.dirname
From: file.c in Ruby Core (C Method):
Number of lines: 6
visibility: public
signature: dirname()
Returns all components of the filename given in file_name
except the last one. The filename must be formed using forward
slashes (/'') regardless of the separator used on the
local file system.
File.dirname("/home/gumby/work/ruby.rb") #=> "/home/gumby/work"
You can also look up sourcecode with the $ command:
pry(main)> $ File.link
From: file.c in Ruby Core (C Method):
Number of lines: 14
static VALUE
rb_file_s_link(VALUE klass, VALUE from, VALUE to)
{
rb_secure(2);
FilePathValue(from);
FilePathValue(to);
from = rb_str_encode_ospath(from);
to = rb_str_encode_ospath(to);
if (link(StringValueCStr(from), StringValueCStr(to)) < 0) {
sys_fail2(from, to);
}
return INT2FIX(0);
}
See http://pry.github.com for more information :)
You can start with
irb(main):001:0> `ri Object`
Although the output of this is less than readable. You'd need to filter out some metacharacters.
In fact, someone already made a gem for it
gem install ori
Then in irb
irb(main):001:0> require 'ori'
=> true
irb(main):002:0> Object.ri
Looking up topics [Object] o
= Object < BasicObject
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
= Includes:
Java (from gem activesupport-3.0.9)
(from gem activesupport-3.0.9) [...]
No, it doesn't. Python has docstrings:
def my_method(arg1,arg2):
""" What's inside this string will be made available as the __doc__ attribute """
# some code
So, when the ? is called from ipython, it probably calls the __doc__ attribute on the object. Ruby doesn't have this.

Resources