What does the return value of the sendTicket method indicate? Sending was successful? Unfortunately it is not documented.
virtual bool Glympse::IGlympse::sendTicket (const GTicket &ticket) [pure virtual]
Glympse::IGlympse::sendTicket() presents Send Glympse wizard. The method also performs some validation (checks input arguments and platform state). false is returned if any of those checks fail. The value of true indicates that Send Wizard is successfully presented.
Related
I am just starting with language-ext, trying to use it in my Azure Function.
In this function, I first parse/validate the POSTed data from the HTTP request using some validator.
This validator returns an Either<ValidationErrors, RequestModel>.
Then I would like to chain onto the either result a service call that should use the request model to grab some data from an API an return an Option.
At the end of the chain I would then like to return an IActionResult BadRequest if there were ValidationErrors in the first step, or otherwise perform a Match on the result of the service call Option to either return a NotFoundResult or ObjectResult.
The issue I run into is that if I want to chain my service call (using Bind, or BiBind) after the Either<ValidationErrors, GetRequestModel>, then the signature of my service method must be some Either<ValidationErrors, ...>, which is incorrect, since my service method has nothing to do with ValidationErrors. It should just return an Option.
So I guess my question is how can preserve any ValidationErrors until the end of the chain, and be able to chain my service call with a Option signature onto an Either?
You have to decide what the result of your chained expression is.
Option:
var maybeResult = from validated in GetValidationResult(...).ToOption()
from apiResult in ApiCall(...)
select apiResult;
Either:
var resultOrError = from validated in GetValidationResult(...)
from apiResult in ApiCall(...).ToEither(*LEFT*)
select apiResult;
You have to replace *LEFT* by some error value or error generating function returning same type like left type of GetValidationResult.
Replace above pseudo code with your own code and look at the return types of the functions used above to see what's going on.
The reason why you need a common left type is that the bind operation can return some left (error) of first (GetValidationResult) or second (ApiCall) function call -- or right of your last (ApiCall) function if your reach successful end of your chain.
Recommendation: If you mix different left (error) return types you might want to use some thing like LanguageExt's built-in Error type or maybe just a plain string (or Exception).
Either with string as error type:
var resultOrError = from validated in GetValidationResult(...).MapLeft(Prelude.toString)
from apiResult in ApiCall(...).ToEither("api call failed")
select apiResult;
Additional note: I use LINQ style here, you can use method style:
var resultOrError = GetValidationResult(...)
.MapLeft(Prelude.toString)
.Bind(validated => ApiCall(...)
.ToEither("api call failed"));
What is the proper/recommended method to pass data between the callbacks in a C module in FreeRADIUS?
For example, I want to create a unique request_id for the request and use it for all log entries during that request. If I create this value inside mod_authorize, how do I pass it over to mod_authenticate on the same request thread, and how do I retrieve it?
static rlm_rcode_t CC_HINT(nonnull) mod_authorize(void *instance, REQUEST *request)
{
// Generate uuid
uuid_t uuid;
uuid_generate_random(uuid);
// Convert to a string representation
char *request_id = talloc_array(mem_ctx, char, UUID_STR_LEN);
uuid_unparse(uuid, request_id);
// Do stuff and log authorize messages
radlog(L_INFO, "request_id inside mod_authorize: %s", request_id);
// How do I pass request_id to mod_authenticate callback
// ?????????????
return RLM_MODULE_OK;
}
static rlm_rcode_t CC_HINT(nonnull) mod_authenticate(void *instance, REQUEST *request)
{
char *request_id = NULL;
// How do I retrieve the request_id value
// ???????????????????
// Do stuff and log authenticate messages
radlog(L_INFO, "request_id inside mod_authenticate: %s", request_id);
return RLM_MODULE_OK;
}
Attaching the value to the request object seems like a logical thing, but I don't see a way of doing it, other than adding a value pair to the request->reply (and I don't want to return this value to NAS).
Thank you.
Apparently, there is a range of "Temporary attributes, for local storage" (defined in the dictionary.freeradius.internal file) that can be used with one of the requests object's collections (request->config, request->reply->vps and request->packet->vps). You can find the start of this range by searching dictionary.freeradius.internal file in the FreeRADIUS repository for
ATTRIBUTE Tmp-String-0
In this case I found request->packet->vps to be appropriate, and used Tmp-String-3 to add my request_id to it while inside MOD_AUTHORIZE callback:
pair_make_request("Tmp-String-3", request_ctx->request_id, T_OP_EQ);
where pair_make_request is a macro defined as
fr_pair_make(request->packet, &request->packet->vps, _a, _b, _c)
I then retrieved it, while inside MOD_AUTHENTICATE callback:
VALUE_PAIR *vp = fr_pair_find_by_num(request->packet->vps, PW_TMP_STRING_3, 0, TAG_ANY);
The numerical values of these attributes change between the versions, you must use macro definitions instead
The macros for these attributes, such as PW_TMP_STRING_3 in the esample above, are located in the file "attributes.h" which is auto-generated during the build. Here is a quote from Arran Cudbard-Bell, that I found here:
If you really want to know where each one is used, download,
configure, build the source. Then see src/include/attributes.h for the
macro versions, and grep -r through the code. That'll at least tell
you the modules, and if you're familiar with C you should be able to
figure out how/when they're added or checked for. – Arran Cudbard-Bell
Apr 12 '15 at 20:51
In my case, the resulting file is located at /usr/include/freeradius/attributes.h
I must say that it took me unreasonable amount of effort to track this information down. There is no other trace, none whatsoever, of these attribute macros. Not in the code, not in the FreeRADIUS documentation, not in Google search results.
I have this method:
Future<Either<Failure, WorkEntity>> updateWorkEntity({int id, String title, TimeType timeType, int times, DateTime executed})
that is being called like this:
repository.updateWorkEntity(id: workEntity.id, executed: DateTime.now())
the id I can control in a test, but the "DateTime.now()" I ofcourse can not. What I tried was this in my test:
when(repository.updateWorkEntity(id: expected.id, executed: any)).thenAnswer((_) async => Right(expected));
to be able to make my mock return a object for my test, by using "any" in the place of the "DateTime.now()", but I get this error:
Invalid argument(s): The "any" argument matcher is used outside of
method stubbing (via when) or verification (via verify or
untilCalled). This is invalid, and results in bad behavior during
the next stubbing or verification.
So I guess I can not use any here, but then how do I get my mock to return an object when I do not control one of the input parameters?
Thank you
Søren
Use executed: anyNamed('executed') instead of executed: any
Here is the pseudocode of my unit test:
int invocationCount
given(mock).willDo {
invocationCount++
return value
}
doSomeProcessing()
verify(mock)
doSomeMoreProcessing()
verifyCount(mock, 2)
At this point, invocationCount == 2, as expected. However, verifyCount fails, saying it was only called once. In addition, if I exclude the first verify call, the test passes as expected. It might be relevant to note that each verify call is capturing a new argument for assertion later.
My question is this: when the first verify() is called, is the mock's invocation count reset? If this is not the case, what could be happening?
Yes, verification only counts the matches since the last verification.
Further discussion can be found here: https://github.com/jonreid/OCMockito/issues/116
I am not able to understand the concept behind the return type of intercept().Is it any time related to the return type of actionInvocationInstance.invoke().Need guidance.Thanks in advance.
It's a String, and should be the name of a result.
It may be the result from invoke, or an interceptor's result that "intercepts" the action invocation, e.g., the workflow interceptor returns "input" on a validation error.
It isn't related, but the ActionInvocation::invoke() can return a result code which is suitable to return by the interceptor's intercept method. It's up to you to decide which result code to return by the interceptor, but the result code type is a String defined as a return type by the method Interceptor::intercept(). Note, that a result code corresponds to the result name in the action config, and a result with such name should be available to the configuration at runtime.