I am using Neo4j 1.8.2 with Neo4j Spatial 0.9 for 1.8.2 (http://m2.neo4j.org/content/repositories/releases/org/neo4j/neo4j-spatial/0.9-neo4j-1.8.2/)
Followed the example code from here http://architects.dzone.com/articles/neo4jcypher-finding-football with one change- instead of SpatialIndexProvider.SIMPLE_WKT_CONFIG, I used SpatialIndexProvider.SIMPLE_POINT_CONFIG_WKT
Everything works fine until you execute the following query:
START n=node:stadiumsLocation('withinDistance:[53.489271,-2.246704, 5.0]')
RETURN n.name, n.wkt;
n.name is null. When I explored the graph, I found this data:
Node[80]{lon:-2.20024,lat:53.483,id:79,gtype:1,bbox:-2.20024,53.483,-2.20024,53.483]}
Node[168]{lon:-2.29139,lat:53.4631,id:167,gtype:1,bbox:-2.29139,53.4631,-2.29139,53.4631]}
For Node 80 returned, it looks like this is the node created for the spatial record, which contains a property id:79. Node 79 is the actual stadium record from the example.
As per the source of IndexProviderTest, the comments
//We not longer need this as the node we get back already a 'Real' node
// Node node = db.getNodeById( (Long) spatialRecord.getProperty( "id" ) );
seem to indicate that this feature isn't available in the version I am using.
My question is, what is the recommended way to use withinDistance with other match conditions? There are a couple of other conditions to be fulfilled but I can't seem to get a handle on the actual node to actually match them.
Should I explicitly create relations? Not use Cypher and use the core API to do a traversal? Split the queries?
Two options:
a) Use GeoPipline.startNearestNeighborLatLonSearch to get a starting set of nodes, supply to subsequent Cypher query to do matching/filtering on other properties
b) Since my lat/longs are common across many entities [using centroid of an area], I can create a relation from the spatial node to all entities that are located in that area and then use one Cypher query such as:
START n=node:stadiumsLocation('withinDistance:[53.489271,-2.246704, 5.0]')
MATCH (n)<-[:LOCATED_IN]-(something)
WHERE something.someProp=5
RETURN something
As advised by Peter, went with option b.
Note though, there is no way to get the spatially indexed node back so that you can create relations from it. Had to do a withinDistance query for 0.0 distance.
can you execute the enhanced testcase I did at https://github.com/neo4j/spatial/blob/2803093d544f56d7dfe8f1d122e049fa73489d8a/src/test/java/org/neo4j/gis/spatial/IndexProviderTest.java#L199 ? It shows how to find a location, and traverse with cypher to the next node.
Related
The answer to this question shows how to get a list of all nodes connected to a particular node via a path of known relationship types.
As a follow up to that question, I'm trying to determine if traversing the graph like this is the most efficient way to get all nodes connected to a particular node via any path.
My scenario: I have a tree of groups (group can have any number of children). This I model with IS_PARENT_OF relationships. Groups can also relate to any other groups via a special relationship called role playing. This I model with PLAYS_ROLE_IN relationships.
The most common question I want to ask is MATCH(n {name: "xxx") -[*]-> (o) RETURN o.name, but this seems to be extremely slow on even a small number of nodes (4000 nodes - takes 5s to return an answer). Note that the graph may contain cycles (n-IS_PARENT_OF->o, n<-PLAYS_ROLE_IN-o).
Is connectedness via any path not something that can be indexed?
As a first point, by not using labels and an indexed property for your starting node, this will already need to first find ALL the nodes in the graph and opening the PropertyContainer to see if the node has the property name with a value "xxx".
Secondly, if you now an approximate maximum depth of parentship, you may want to limit the depth of the search
I would suggest you add a label of your choice to your nodes and index the name property.
Use label, e.g. :Group for your starting point and an index for :Group(name)
Then Neo4j can quickly find your starting point without scanning the whole graph.
You can easily see where the time is spent by prefixing your query with PROFILE.
Do you really want all arbitrarily long paths from the starting point? Or just all pairs of connected nodes?
If the latter then this query would be more efficient.
MATCH (n:Group)-[:IS_PARENT_OF|:PLAYS_ROLE_IN]->(m:Group)
RETURN n,m
My database contains about 300k nodes and 350k relationships.
My current query is:
start n=node(3) match p=(n)-[r:move*1..2]->(m) where all(r2 in relationships(p) where r2.GameID = STR(id(n))) return m;
The nodes touched in this query are all of the same kind, they are different positions in a game. Each of the relationships contains a property "GameID", which is used to identify the right relationship if you want to pass the graph via a path. So if you start traversing the graph at a node and follow the relationship with the right GameID, there won't be another path starting at the first node with a relationship that fits the GameID.
There are nodes that have hundreds of in and outgoing relationships, some others only have a few.
The problem is, that I don't know how to tell Cypher how to do this. The above query works for a depth of 1 or 2, but it should look like [r:move*] to return the whole path, which is about 20-200 hops.
But if i raise the values, the querys won't finish. I think that Cypher looks at each outgoing relationship at every single path depth relating to the start node, but as I already explained, there is only one right path. So it should do some kind of a DFS search instead of a BFS search. Is there a way to do so?
I would consider configuring a relationship index for the GameID property. See http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/milestone/auto-indexing.html#auto-indexing-config.
Once you have done that, you can try a query like the following (I have not tested this):
START n=node(3), r=relationship:rels(GameID = 3)
MATCH (n)-[r*1..]->(m)
RETURN m;
Such a query would limit the relationships considered by the MATCH cause to just the ones with the GameID you care about. And getting that initial collection of relationships would be fast, because of the indexing.
As an aside: since neo4j reuses its internally-generated IDs (for nodes that are deleted), storing those IDs as GameIDs will make your data unreliable (unless you never delete any such nodes). You may want to generate and use you own unique IDs, and store them in your nodes and use them for your GameIDs; and, if you do this, then you should also create a uniqueness constraint for your own IDs -- this will, as a nice side effect, automatically create an index for your IDs.
I'm very new in using Neo4j and have a question regarding the computation of intersections of nodes.
Let's suppose, I have the three properties A,B,C and I want to select only the nodes that have all three properties.
I created an index for the properties and thus, I can get all nodes having one of the properties. However, afterwards I have to merge the IndexHits. Is there a way to select directly all nodes having the three properties?
My second idea was to create a node for each property and connect other nodes by relationships. I can then iterate over all relationships and get for each property a list of nodes which are connected. But again, I have to compute the intersection afterwards.
Is there a function I miss here, since I suppose it's a standard problem.
Thanks a lot,
Benny
Do you also have the values you look for? You would start with the property that limits the amount of found nodes most.
MATCH (a:Label {property1:{value1}})
WHERE a.property2 = {value2} AND a.property3 = {value3}
RETURN a
For the Java API and lucene indexes:
gdb.index().forNodes("foo").query("p1:value1 p2:value2 p3:value3")
Lucene query syntax
I have two nodes in neo4j say:
Node start = // set to some node;
Node end = // set to some other node;
And, I want to find if there is an edge between them that have the attribute key, "name" with val = "bubba".
What is the most efficient way to do this?
Thanks.
Notes:
Do not use Gremlin
Do not use Cypher
Use only Java API
Assuming you haven't got those relationship indexed in a manual index, just figure out which of the two nodes has got the least relationships of the type(s) you're looking for and iterate over those to see if the node on the other side of that relationship is the expected one and the relationship has got that property (check in that order since "other node" check is cheaper than property lookup).
I have a large network stored in Neo4j. Based on a particular root node, I want to extract a subgraph around that node and store it somewhere else. So, what I need is the set of nodes and edges that match my filter criteria.
Afaik there is no out-of-the-box solution available. There is a graph matching component available, but it works only for perfect matches. The Neo4j API itself defines only graph traversal which I can use to define which nodes/edges should be visited:
Traverser exp = Traversal
.description()
.breadthFirst()
.evaluator(Evaluators.toDepth(2))
.traverse(root);
Now, I can add all nodes/edges to sets for all paths, but this is very inefficient. How would you do it? Thanks!
EDIT Would it make sense to add the last node and the last relationship of each traversal to the subgraph?
As for graph matching, that has been superseded by http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/snapshot/cypher-query-lang.html which would fit nicely, and supports fuzzy matchin with optional relationships.
For subgraph representation, I would use the Cypher output to maybe construct new Cypher statements for recreating the graph, much like a SQL export, something like
start n=node:node_auto_index(name='Neo')
match n-[r:KNOWS*]-m
return "create ({name:'"+m.name+"'});"
http://console.neo4j.org/r/pqf1rp for an example
I solved it by constructing the induced subgraph based on all traversal endpoints.
Building the subgraph from the set of last nodes and edges of every traversal does not work, because edges that are not part of any shortest paths would not be included.
The code snippet looks like this:
Set<Node> nodes = new HashSet<Node>();
Set<Relationship> edges = new HashSet<Relationship>();
for (Node n : traverser.nodes())
{
nodes.add(n);
}
for (Node node : nodes)
{
for (Relationship rel : node.getRelationships())
{
if (nodes.contains(rel.getOtherNode(node)))
edges.add(rel);
}
}
Every edge is added twice. One time for the outgoing node and one time for the incoming node. Using a Set, I can ensure that it's in the collection only once.
It is possible to iterate over incoming/outgoing edges only, but it is unclear how loops (edge from a node to itself) are handled. To which category do they belong to? This snippet does not have this issue.
See dumping the database to cypher statements
dump START n=node({self}) MATCH p=(n)-[r:KNOWS*]->(m) RETURN n,r,m;
There's also an example for importing the subgraph of first database (db1) into a second (db2).