I'm very new in using Neo4j and have a question regarding the computation of intersections of nodes.
Let's suppose, I have the three properties A,B,C and I want to select only the nodes that have all three properties.
I created an index for the properties and thus, I can get all nodes having one of the properties. However, afterwards I have to merge the IndexHits. Is there a way to select directly all nodes having the three properties?
My second idea was to create a node for each property and connect other nodes by relationships. I can then iterate over all relationships and get for each property a list of nodes which are connected. But again, I have to compute the intersection afterwards.
Is there a function I miss here, since I suppose it's a standard problem.
Thanks a lot,
Benny
Do you also have the values you look for? You would start with the property that limits the amount of found nodes most.
MATCH (a:Label {property1:{value1}})
WHERE a.property2 = {value2} AND a.property3 = {value3}
RETURN a
For the Java API and lucene indexes:
gdb.index().forNodes("foo").query("p1:value1 p2:value2 p3:value3")
Lucene query syntax
Related
Suppose I have 3 subgraphs in Neo4j and I would like to select and delete the whole subgraph if all the nodes in the subgraph matching the filtering criteria that is each node's property value <= 1. However if there is atleast one node within the subgraph that is not matching the criteria then the subgraph will not be deleted.
In this case the left subgraph will be deleted but the right subgraph and the middle one will stay. The right one will not be deleted even though it has some nodes with value 1 because there are also nodes with values greater than 1.
userids and values are the node properties.
I will be thankful if anyone can suggest me the cypher query that can be used to do that. Please note that the query will be on the whole graph, that is on all three subgraphs or more if there are anymore.
Thanks for the clarification, that's a tricky requirement, and it's not immediately clear to me what the best approach is that will scale well with large graphs, as most possibilities seem to be expensive full graph operations. We'll likely need to use a few steps to set up the graph for easier querying later. I'm also assuming you mean "disconnected subgraphs", otherwise this answer won't work.
One start might be to label nodes as :Alive or :Dead based upon the property value. It should help if all nodes are of the same label, and if there's an index on the value property for that label, as our match operations could take advantage of the index instead of having to do a full label scan and property comparison.
MATCH (a:MyNode)
WHERE a.value <= 1
SET a:Dead
And separately
MATCH (a:MyNode)
WHERE a.value > 1
SET a:Alive
Then your query to mark nodes to delete would be:
MATCH (a:Dead)
WHERE NOT (a)-[*]-(:Alive)
SET a:ToDelete
And if all looks good with the nodes you've marked for delete, you can run your delete operation, using apoc.periodic.commit() from APOC Procedures to batch the operation if necessary.
MATCH (a:ToDelete)
DETACH DELETE a
If operations on disconnected subgraphs are going to be common, I highly encourage using a special node connected to each subgraph you create (such as a single :Cluster node at the head of the subgraph) so you can begin such operations on :Cluster nodes, which would greatly speed up these kind of queries, since your query operations would be executed per cluster, instead of per :Dead node.
The answer to this question shows how to get a list of all nodes connected to a particular node via a path of known relationship types.
As a follow up to that question, I'm trying to determine if traversing the graph like this is the most efficient way to get all nodes connected to a particular node via any path.
My scenario: I have a tree of groups (group can have any number of children). This I model with IS_PARENT_OF relationships. Groups can also relate to any other groups via a special relationship called role playing. This I model with PLAYS_ROLE_IN relationships.
The most common question I want to ask is MATCH(n {name: "xxx") -[*]-> (o) RETURN o.name, but this seems to be extremely slow on even a small number of nodes (4000 nodes - takes 5s to return an answer). Note that the graph may contain cycles (n-IS_PARENT_OF->o, n<-PLAYS_ROLE_IN-o).
Is connectedness via any path not something that can be indexed?
As a first point, by not using labels and an indexed property for your starting node, this will already need to first find ALL the nodes in the graph and opening the PropertyContainer to see if the node has the property name with a value "xxx".
Secondly, if you now an approximate maximum depth of parentship, you may want to limit the depth of the search
I would suggest you add a label of your choice to your nodes and index the name property.
Use label, e.g. :Group for your starting point and an index for :Group(name)
Then Neo4j can quickly find your starting point without scanning the whole graph.
You can easily see where the time is spent by prefixing your query with PROFILE.
Do you really want all arbitrarily long paths from the starting point? Or just all pairs of connected nodes?
If the latter then this query would be more efficient.
MATCH (n:Group)-[:IS_PARENT_OF|:PLAYS_ROLE_IN]->(m:Group)
RETURN n,m
I need to find the N nodes "nearest" to a given node in a graph, meaning the ones with least combined weight of relationships along the path from given node.
Is is possible to do so with a pure Cypher only solution? I was looking about path functions but couldn't find a viable way to express my query.
Moreover, is it possible to assign a default weight to a relationship at query time, according to its type/label (or somehow else map the relationship type to the weight)? The idea is to experiment with different weights without having to change a property for every relationship.
Otherwise I would have to change the weight property's value to each relationship and re-do it to before each query, which is very time-consuming (my graph has around 10M relationships).
Again, a pure Cypher solution would be the best, or please point me in the right direction.
Please use variable length Cypher queries to find the nearest nodes from a single node.
MATCH (n:Start { id: 0 }),
(n)-[:CONNECTED*0..2]-(x)
RETURN x
Note that the syntax [CONNECTED*0..2] is a range parameter specifying the min and max relationship distance from a given node, with relationship type CONNECTED.
You can swap this relationship type for other types.
In the case you wanted to traverse variably from the start node to surrounding nodes but constrain via a stop criteria to a threshold, that is a bit more difficult. For these kinds of things it is useful to get acquainted with Neo4j's spatial plugin. A good starting point to learn more about Neo4j spatial can be found in this blog post: http://neo4j.com/blog/neo4j-spatial-part1-finding-things-close-to-other-things
The post is a little outdated but if you do some Google searching you can find more updated materials.
GitHub repository: https://github.com/neo4j-contrib/spatial
I have two nodes in neo4j say:
Node start = // set to some node;
Node end = // set to some other node;
And, I want to find if there is an edge between them that have the attribute key, "name" with val = "bubba".
What is the most efficient way to do this?
Thanks.
Notes:
Do not use Gremlin
Do not use Cypher
Use only Java API
Assuming you haven't got those relationship indexed in a manual index, just figure out which of the two nodes has got the least relationships of the type(s) you're looking for and iterate over those to see if the node on the other side of that relationship is the expected one and the relationship has got that property (check in that order since "other node" check is cheaper than property lookup).
I am using Neo4j 1.8.2 with Neo4j Spatial 0.9 for 1.8.2 (http://m2.neo4j.org/content/repositories/releases/org/neo4j/neo4j-spatial/0.9-neo4j-1.8.2/)
Followed the example code from here http://architects.dzone.com/articles/neo4jcypher-finding-football with one change- instead of SpatialIndexProvider.SIMPLE_WKT_CONFIG, I used SpatialIndexProvider.SIMPLE_POINT_CONFIG_WKT
Everything works fine until you execute the following query:
START n=node:stadiumsLocation('withinDistance:[53.489271,-2.246704, 5.0]')
RETURN n.name, n.wkt;
n.name is null. When I explored the graph, I found this data:
Node[80]{lon:-2.20024,lat:53.483,id:79,gtype:1,bbox:-2.20024,53.483,-2.20024,53.483]}
Node[168]{lon:-2.29139,lat:53.4631,id:167,gtype:1,bbox:-2.29139,53.4631,-2.29139,53.4631]}
For Node 80 returned, it looks like this is the node created for the spatial record, which contains a property id:79. Node 79 is the actual stadium record from the example.
As per the source of IndexProviderTest, the comments
//We not longer need this as the node we get back already a 'Real' node
// Node node = db.getNodeById( (Long) spatialRecord.getProperty( "id" ) );
seem to indicate that this feature isn't available in the version I am using.
My question is, what is the recommended way to use withinDistance with other match conditions? There are a couple of other conditions to be fulfilled but I can't seem to get a handle on the actual node to actually match them.
Should I explicitly create relations? Not use Cypher and use the core API to do a traversal? Split the queries?
Two options:
a) Use GeoPipline.startNearestNeighborLatLonSearch to get a starting set of nodes, supply to subsequent Cypher query to do matching/filtering on other properties
b) Since my lat/longs are common across many entities [using centroid of an area], I can create a relation from the spatial node to all entities that are located in that area and then use one Cypher query such as:
START n=node:stadiumsLocation('withinDistance:[53.489271,-2.246704, 5.0]')
MATCH (n)<-[:LOCATED_IN]-(something)
WHERE something.someProp=5
RETURN something
As advised by Peter, went with option b.
Note though, there is no way to get the spatially indexed node back so that you can create relations from it. Had to do a withinDistance query for 0.0 distance.
can you execute the enhanced testcase I did at https://github.com/neo4j/spatial/blob/2803093d544f56d7dfe8f1d122e049fa73489d8a/src/test/java/org/neo4j/gis/spatial/IndexProviderTest.java#L199 ? It shows how to find a location, and traverse with cypher to the next node.