Related
I have created a basic chunk generator, a chunk is area filled with squares, when the player moves a few blocks away from 0,0 it works correctly but after moving 4 chunks away it renders more then one chunk instead of one, I am not sure what I am doing wrong, I have given it a go changing some values, but I am left head scratching.
here is the full code, you can copy and paste into VSCODE with love2D to see what happens.
I think the main issue is somewhere around check_boarders function since that is what checks if the player is inside a chunk.
function Key_input(key)
if love.keyboard.isDown(key) then
return 1
else
return 0
end
end
function love.load()
Camera = require "camera"
Cam = Camera()
Basic_Player = {}
Basic_Player.X = 100
Basic_Player.Y = 100
Basic_Player.Speed = 15
Movement = {}
end
function love.update(dt)
Movement.X = Key_input("d") - Key_input("a")
Movement.Y = Key_input("s") - Key_input("w")
Basic_Player.X = Basic_Player.X + Movement.X * Basic_Player.Speed
Basic_Player.Y = Basic_Player.Y + Movement.Y * Basic_Player.Speed
Cam:lookAt(Basic_Player.X,Basic_Player.Y)
X, Y = Cam:position() -- Set cam position to global values
end
function love.draw()
love.graphics.setBackgroundColor(0.5,0.5,0.9)
Cam:attach() -- Renders the player and world inside its own scene
generate_world(10,0)
love.graphics.setColor( 0,0,1, 1 )
love.graphics.rectangle("fill",Basic_Player.X,Basic_Player.Y,30,30)
love.graphics.setColor( 1,1,1, 1 )
Cam:detach()
love.graphics.setColor( 1,0,0, 1 ) --Stays on the screen
love.graphics.print(X .. " / " .. Y ,300,400)
love.graphics.print(love.timer.getFPS( ) ,300,450)
love.graphics.setColor( 1,1,1, 1 )
end
function old_generate_world(_world_size, _seed) -- Before optimization
local _chunk_size = 30
local _block_size = 30
for i = 0, _world_size - 1 do
for f = 0, _world_size - 1 do
local x_val = (_chunk_size * _block_size) * i -- Position value for actually building the chunks
local y_val = (_chunk_size * _block_size) * f
gen_chunk(_chunk_size,_block_size,_seed,{X = x_val ,Y = y_val })
end
end
end
function generate_world(_world_size, _seed)
local _chunk_size = 10 -- Chunk size width and height
local _block_size = 30 -- block size inside the chunk
for i = 0, _world_size - 1 do -- loop through world size
for f = 0, _world_size - 1 do
local x_val = (_chunk_size * _block_size) * i -- Position value for actually building the chunks
local y_val = (_chunk_size * _block_size) * f
local chunk_x_local_size = 0 -- To make sure we get a length for when i and f = 0
local chunk_y_local_size = 0
if i == 0 then -- To make sure the size of the chunk isnt zero
chunk_x_local_size = _chunk_size * _block_size -- Get length of chunk when i = 0
else
chunk_x_local_size = x_val
end
if f == 0 then -- ditto
chunk_y_local_size = _chunk_size * _block_size
else
chunk_y_local_size = y_val
end
-- Checks if the player is inside a chunk if true draw it.
if Check_boarders({X = X,Y = Y},{X = x_val,Y = y_val}, {X = chunk_x_local_size, Y = chunk_y_local_size}) then
gen_chunk(_chunk_size,_block_size,_seed,{X = x_val ,Y = y_val }) -- Actually generate the chunk
end
love.graphics.setColor( 0,1,0, 1 )
love.graphics.rectangle("fill",x_val,y_val,15,15)
love.graphics.setColor( 1,1,1, 1 )
end
end
end
function Check_boarders(player_pos, boarder_pos, chunk_length) -- Checks player position is inside the boarder of the currently generated chunk
if player_pos.X > boarder_pos.X and player_pos.X < boarder_pos.X + chunk_length.X then -- Check if the player is greater then top left and less then top right
if player_pos.Y > boarder_pos.Y and player_pos.Y < boarder_pos.Y + chunk_length.Y then -- check if player is greater then top and less then bottom left
return true
end
end
return false
end
function gen_chunk(chunk_size,block_size,seed,position) -- chunk size is how many blocks inside the chunk, block size is self explain, seed n/a, pos starting chunk position
for i = 0, chunk_size - 1 do
for e = 0, chunk_size - 1 do -- loop until chunk size is met this is the amount of blocks being created
love.graphics.rectangle("fill",position.X + i * block_size,position.Y + e * block_size,block_size - 1,block_size - 1)
end
end
love.graphics.setColor( 1,0,0, 1 )
love.graphics.rectangle("fill",position.X ,position.Y,6,6)
love.graphics.setColor( 1,1,1, 1 )
end
You will need this camera.lua script just create it and paste this into it:
local _PATH = (...):match('^(.*[%./])[^%.%/]+$') or ''
local cos, sin = math.cos, math.sin
local camera = {}
camera.__index = camera
-- Movement interpolators (for camera locking/windowing)
camera.smooth = {}
function camera.smooth.none()
return function(dx,dy) return dx,dy end
end
function camera.smooth.linear(speed)
assert(type(speed) == "number", "Invalid parameter: speed = "..tostring(speed))
return function(dx,dy, s)
-- normalize direction
local d = math.sqrt(dx*dx+dy*dy)
local dts = math.min((s or speed) * love.timer.getDelta(), d) -- prevent overshooting the goal
if d > 0 then
dx,dy = dx/d, dy/d
end
return dx*dts, dy*dts
end
end
function camera.smooth.damped(stiffness)
assert(type(stiffness) == "number", "Invalid parameter: stiffness = "..tostring(stiffness))
return function(dx,dy, s)
local dts = love.timer.getDelta() * (s or stiffness)
return dx*dts, dy*dts
end
end
local function new(x,y, zoom, rot, smoother)
x,y = x or love.graphics.getWidth()/2, y or love.graphics.getHeight()/2
zoom = zoom or 1
rot = rot or 0
smoother = smoother or camera.smooth.none() -- for locking, see below
return setmetatable({x = x, y = y, scale = zoom, rot = rot, smoother = smoother}, camera)
end
function camera:lookAt(x,y)
self.x, self.y = x, y
return self
end
function camera:move(dx,dy)
self.x, self.y = self.x + dx, self.y + dy
return self
end
function camera:position()
return self.x, self.y
end
function camera:rotate(phi)
self.rot = self.rot + phi
return self
end
function camera:rotateTo(phi)
self.rot = phi
return self
end
function camera:zoom(mul)
self.scale = self.scale * mul
return self
end
function camera:zoomTo(zoom)
self.scale = zoom
return self
end
function camera:attach(x,y,w,h, noclip)
x,y = x or 0, y or 0
w,h = w or love.graphics.getWidth(), h or love.graphics.getHeight()
self._sx,self._sy,self._sw,self._sh = love.graphics.getScissor()
if not noclip then
love.graphics.setScissor(x,y,w,h)
end
local cx,cy = x+w/2, y+h/2
love.graphics.push()
love.graphics.translate(cx, cy)
love.graphics.scale(self.scale)
love.graphics.rotate(self.rot)
love.graphics.translate(-self.x, -self.y)
end
function camera:detach()
love.graphics.pop()
love.graphics.setScissor(self._sx,self._sy,self._sw,self._sh)
end
function camera:draw(...)
local x,y,w,h,noclip,func
local nargs = select("#", ...)
if nargs == 1 then
func = ...
elseif nargs == 5 then
x,y,w,h,func = ...
elseif nargs == 6 then
x,y,w,h,noclip,func = ...
else
error("Invalid arguments to camera:draw()")
end
self:attach(x,y,w,h,noclip)
func()
self:detach()
end
-- world coordinates to camera coordinates
function camera:cameraCoords(x,y, ox,oy,w,h)
ox, oy = ox or 0, oy or 0
w,h = w or love.graphics.getWidth(), h or love.graphics.getHeight()
-- x,y = ((x,y) - (self.x, self.y)):rotated(self.rot) * self.scale + center
local c,s = cos(self.rot), sin(self.rot)
x,y = x - self.x, y - self.y
x,y = c*x - s*y, s*x + c*y
return x*self.scale + w/2 + ox, y*self.scale + h/2 + oy
end
-- camera coordinates to world coordinates
function camera:worldCoords(x,y, ox,oy,w,h)
ox, oy = ox or 0, oy or 0
w,h = w or love.graphics.getWidth(), h or love.graphics.getHeight()
-- x,y = (((x,y) - center) / self.scale):rotated(-self.rot) + (self.x,self.y)
local c,s = cos(-self.rot), sin(-self.rot)
x,y = (x - w/2 - ox) / self.scale, (y - h/2 - oy) / self.scale
x,y = c*x - s*y, s*x + c*y
return x+self.x, y+self.y
end
function camera:mousePosition(ox,oy,w,h)
local mx,my = love.mouse.getPosition()
return self:worldCoords(mx,my, ox,oy,w,h)
end
-- camera scrolling utilities
function camera:lockX(x, smoother, ...)
local dx, dy = (smoother or self.smoother)(x - self.x, self.y, ...)
self.x = self.x + dx
return self
end
function camera:lockY(y, smoother, ...)
local dx, dy = (smoother or self.smoother)(self.x, y - self.y, ...)
self.y = self.y + dy
return self
end
function camera:lockPosition(x,y, smoother, ...)
return self:move((smoother or self.smoother)(x - self.x, y - self.y, ...))
end
function camera:lockWindow(x, y, x_min, x_max, y_min, y_max, smoother, ...)
-- figure out displacement in camera coordinates
x,y = self:cameraCoords(x,y)
local dx, dy = 0,0
if x < x_min then
dx = x - x_min
elseif x > x_max then
dx = x - x_max
end
if y < y_min then
dy = y - y_min
elseif y > y_max then
dy = y - y_max
end
-- transform displacement to movement in world coordinates
local c,s = cos(-self.rot), sin(-self.rot)
dx,dy = (c*dx - s*dy) / self.scale, (s*dx + c*dy) / self.scale
-- move
self:move((smoother or self.smoother)(dx,dy,...))
end
-- the module
return setmetatable({new = new, smooth = camera.smooth},
{__call = function(_, ...) return new(...) end})
While messing around with noise outside of Roblox, I realized Perlin/Simplex Noise does not like negative inputs. Remembering Roblox has a noise function, I tried there, and found out negative numbers do work nicely for Roblox's math.noise(). Does anybody know how they made this work, or how to get negative numbers to work for Perlin/Simplex noise in general?
The Simplex Noise I am using (copied from here but changed to have the bitwise and operation):
local function bit_and(a, b) --bitwise and operation
local p, c = 1, 0
while a > 0 and b > 0 do
local ra, rb = a%2, b%2
if (ra + rb) > 1 then
c = c + p
end
a = (a - ra) / 2
b = (b - rb) / 2
p = p * 2
end
return c
end
-- 2D simplex noise
local grad3 = {
{1,1,0},{-1,1,0},{1,-1,0},{-1,-1,0},
{1,0,1},{-1,0,1},{1,0,-1},{-1,0,-1},
{0,1,1},{0,-1,1},{0,1,-1},{0,-1,-1}
}
local p = {151,160,137,91,90,15,
131,13,201,95,96,53,194,233,7,225,140,36,103,30,69,142,8,99,37,240,21,10,23,
190, 6,148,247,120,234,75,0,26,197,62,94,252,219,203,117,35,11,32,57,177,33,
88,237,149,56,87,174,20,125,136,171,168, 68,175,74,165,71,134,139,48,27,166,
77,146,158,231,83,111,229,122,60,211,133,230,220,105,92,41,55,46,245,40,244,
102,143,54, 65,25,63,161, 1,216,80,73,209,76,132,187,208, 89,18,169,200,196,
135,130,116,188,159,86,164,100,109,198,173,186, 3,64,52,217,226,250,124,123,
5,202,38,147,118,126,255,82,85,212,207,206,59,227,47,16,58,17,182,189,28,42,
223,183,170,213,119,248,152, 2,44,154,163, 70,221,153,101,155,167, 43,172,9,
129,22,39,253, 19,98,108,110,79,113,224,232,178,185, 112,104,218,246,97,228,
251,34,242,193,238,210,144,12,191,179,162,241, 81,51,145,235,249,14,239,107,
49,192,214, 31,181,199,106,157,184, 84,204,176,115,121,50,45,127, 4,150,254,
138,236,205,93,222,114,67,29,24,72,243,141,128,195,78,66,215,61,156,180}
local perm = {}
for i=0,511 do
perm[i+1] = p[bit_and(i, 255) + 1]
end
local function dot(g, ...)
local v = {...}
local sum = 0
for i=1,#v do
sum = sum + v[i] * g[i]
end
return sum
end
local noise = {}
function noise.produce(xin, yin)
local n0, n1, n2 -- Noise contributions from the three corners
-- Skew the input space to determine which simplex cell we're in
local F2 = 0.5*(math.sqrt(3.0)-1.0)
local s = (xin+yin)*F2; -- Hairy factor for 2D
local i = math.floor(xin+s)
local j = math.floor(yin+s)
local G2 = (3.0-math.sqrt(3.0))/6.0
local t = (i+j)*G2
local X0 = i-t -- Unskew the cell origin back to (x,y) space
local Y0 = j-t
local x0 = xin-X0 -- The x,y distances from the cell origin
local y0 = yin-Y0
-- For the 2D case, the simplex shape is an equilateral triangle.
-- Determine which simplex we are in.
local i1, j1 -- Offsets for second (middle) corner of simplex in (i,j) coords
if x0 > y0 then
i1 = 1
j1 = 0 -- lower triangle, XY order: (0,0)->(1,0)->(1,1)
else
i1 = 0
j1 = 1
end-- upper triangle, YX order: (0,0)->(0,1)->(1,1)
-- A step of (1,0) in (i,j) means a step of (1-c,-c) in (x,y), and
-- a step of (0,1) in (i,j) means a step of (-c,1-c) in (x,y), where
-- c = (3-sqrt(3))/6
local x1 = x0 - i1 + G2 -- Offsets for middle corner in (x,y) unskewed coords
local y1 = y0 - j1 + G2
local x2 = x0 - 1 + 2 * G2 -- Offsets for last corner in (x,y) unskewed coords
local y2 = y0 - 1 + 2 * G2
-- Work out the hashed gradient indices of the three simplex corners
local ii = bit_and(i, 255)
local jj = bit_and(j, 255)
local gi0 = perm[ii + perm[jj+1]+1] % 12
local gi1 = perm[ii + i1 + perm[jj + j1+1]+1] % 12
local gi2 = perm[ii + 1 + perm[jj + 1+1]+1] % 12
-- Calculate the contribution from the three corners
local t0 = 0.5 - x0 * x0 - y0 * y0
if t0 < 0 then
n0 = 0.0
else
t0 = t0 * t0
n0 = t0 * t0 * dot(grad3[gi0+1], x0, y0) -- (x,y) of grad3 used for 2D gradient
end
local t1 = 0.5 - x1 * x1 - y1 * y1
if t1 < 0 then
n1 = 0.0
else
t1 = t1 * t1
n1 = t1 * t1 * dot(grad3[gi1+1], x1, y1)
end
local t2 = 0.5 - x2 * x2 - y2 * y2
if t2 < 0 then
n2 = 0.0
else
t2 = t2 * t2
n2 = t2 * t2 * dot(grad3[gi2+1], x2, y2)
end
-- Add contributions from each corner to get the final noise value.
-- The result is scaled to return values in the interval [-1,1].
return 70.0 * (n0 + n1 + n2)
end
return noise
The Lua programming language version that Roblox uses, LuaU (or Luau), is actually open-source since November of 2021. You can find it here. The math library can be found in this file called lmathlib.cpp and it contains the math.noise function along with internal functions to calculate it, perlin (main function), grad, lerp, and fade. It's a quite complicated thing I can't explain myself, but I have converted it into Lua here.
I'm trying to use fminunc in Octave for a logistic problem, but it doesn't work. It says that I didn't define variables, but actually I did. If I define variables directly in the costFunction,and not in the main, it doesn't give any problem, but the function doesn't work really. In fact the exitFlag is equal to -3 and it doesn't converge at all.
Here's my function:
function [jVal, gradient] = cost(theta, X, y)
X = [1,0.14,0.09,0.58,0.39,0,0.55,0.23,0.64;1,-0.57,-0.54,-0.16,0.21,0,-0.11,-0.61,-0.35;1,0.42,0.45,-0.41,-0.6,0,-0.44,0.38,-0.29];
y = [1;0;1];
theta = [0.8;0.2;0.6;0.3;0.4;0.5;0.6;0.2;0.4];
jVal = 0;
jVal = costFunction2(X, y, theta); %this is another function that gives me jVal. I'm quite sure it is
%correct because I use it also with other algorithms and it
%works perfectly
m = length(y);
xSize = size(X, 2);
gradient = zeros(xSize, 1);
sig = X * theta;
h = 1 ./(1 + exp(-sig));
for i = 1:m
for j = 1:xSize
gradient(j) = (1/m) * sum(h(i) - y(i)) .* X(i, j);
end
end
Here's my main:
theta = [0.8;0.2;0.6;0.3;0.4;0.5;0.6;0.2;0.4];
options = optimset('GradObj', 'on', 'MaxIter', 100);
[optTheta, functionVal, exitFlag] = fminunc(#cost, theta, options)
if I compile it:
optTheta =
0.80000
0.20000
0.60000
0.30000
0.40000
0.50000
0.60000
0.20000
0.40000
functionVal = 0.15967
exitFlag = -3
How can I resolve this problem?
You are not in fact using fminunc correctly. From the documentation:
-- fminunc (FCN, X0)
-- fminunc (FCN, X0, OPTIONS)
FCN should accept a vector (array) defining the unknown variables,
and return the objective function value, optionally with gradient.
'fminunc' attempts to determine a vector X such that 'FCN (X)' is a
local minimum.
What you are passing is not a handle to a function that accepts a single vector argument. Instead, what you are passing (i.e. #cost) is a handle to a function that takes three arguments.
You need to 'convert' this into a handle to a function that takes only one input, and does what you want under the hood. The easiest way to do this is by 'wrapping' your cost function into an anonymous function that only takes one argument, and calls the cost function in the appropriate way, e.g.
fminunc( #(t) cost(t, X, y), theta, options )
Note: This assumes X and y are defined in the scope where you do this 'wrapping' business
I'm trying to write a lua "class" with a private function like this:
local myTable = {}
function myTable.func()
private()
end
local function private()
print(":O")
end
return myTable
Let's say I'll require myTable and then run myTable.func() I'll get an error that says private is not defined.
I've found 2 ways to solve this:
move the function private in front of func
Forward declare local private before func and change the signature of private to function private.
But I'm a little confused about why they are working and which is the common way.
which is the common way
Both work and both are advisable. The second approach is needed in situations where you have two functions that call each other and both need to be local but not inside a table.
You could always use the second style and thus keep consistency, though it might not be as readable as you would need to go to a different place in code to see if your function is local.
However for readability and shorter code I would use the first approach so I don't need a separate "declaration" of my local functions.
im little confused about why they are working
The reason the original code does not work is because of local variable scope.
From lua reference manual:
Lua is a lexically scoped language. The scope of a local variable
begins at the first statement after its declaration and lasts until
the last non-void statement of the innermost block that includes the
declaration.
So in your original code the variable private is defined as the function only after the line where it is defined. And the code fails because you try to use it in code that is before that line.
The approaches work because both move the local variable scope to start above the code where you use the variable.
You may want to read about local variables and the scoping in the reference manual:
http://www.lua.org/manual/5.2/manual.html#3.3.7
http://www.lua.org/manual/5.2/manual.html#3.5
First of all: In your code snippet it's not clear to me where the "class" is, as myTable is just an object. If you put this in a module and require it, you just get an object.
You could do something like this:
local function MyTable() -- constructor
local function private()
print(":O")
end
return {
func = function()
private()
end
}
end
local m = MyTable()
m.func()
This may not be the usual way of doing OOP in Lua, but here private obviously is .. well .. private.
I created this samplecode:
local object = {}
do -- Creates Scope
-- Private Scope
local fire_rate = 5
-- Public Scope
function object:load()
end
function object:update()
end
function object:draw()
end
function object:setFireRate(rate)
fire_rate = rate
end
function object:getFireRate()
return fire_rate
end
end
return object
Hope this helps.
You'll basically need something like this:
local function Bezier(x1,y1,x2,y2,x3,y3)
--Private
local inf = 1/0
local x1 = x1
local y1 = y1
local x2 = x2
local y2 = y2
local x3 = x3
local y3 = y3
local maxY = y1 > y2 and (y1 > y3 and y1 or y3) or y2 > y3 and y2 or y3
local minY = y1 < y2 and (y1 < y3 and y1 or y3) or y2 < y3 and y2 or y3
local maxX = x1 > x2 and (x1 > x3 and x1 or x3) or x2 > x3 and x2 or x3
local minX = x1 < x2 and (x1 < x3 and x1 or x3) or x2 < x3 and x2 or x3
local xc = (x3 - 2*x2 + x1)
local xb = 2*(x2 - x1)
local yc = (y3 - 2*y2 + y1)
local yb = 2*(y2 - y1)
--Public
local self = {}
--Render
self.render = function(resolution)
local path = {}
local num = 1
for index=0, 1, 1/resolution do
path[num] = {(1-index)^2*x1+2*(1-index)*index*x2+index^2*x3, (1-index)^2*y1+2*(1-index)*index*y2+index^2*y3}
num = num + 1
end
return path
end
--Point
function self.point(index)
return {(1-index)^2*x1+2*(1-index)*index*x2+index^2*x3, (1-index)^2*y1+2*(1-index)*index*y2+index^2*y3}
end
--Get x of patricular y
function self.getX(y)
if y > maxY or y < minY then
return
end
local a = y1 - y
if a == 0 then
return
end
local b = yb
local c = yc
local discriminant = (b^2 - 4*a*c )
if discriminant < 0 then
return
else
local aByTwo = 2*a
if discriminant == 0 then
local index1 = -b/aByTwo
if 0 < index1 and index1 < 1 then
print("=====",y,1,maxY,minY)
return (1-index1)^2*x1+2*(1-index1)*index1*x2+index1^2*x3
end
else
local theSQRT = math.sqrt(discriminant)
local index1, index2 = (-b -theSQRT)/aByTwo, (-b +theSQRT)/aByTwo
if 0 < index1 and index1 < 1 then
if 0 < index2 and index2 < 1 then
print("=====",y,2,maxY,minY)
return (1-index1)^2*x1+2*(1-index1)*index1*x2+index1^2*x3, (1-index2)^2*x1+2*(1-index2)*index2*x2+index2^2*x3
else
print("=====",y,1,maxY,minY)
return (1-index1)^2*x1+2*(1-index1)*index1*x2+index1^2*x3
end
elseif 0 < index2 and index2 < 1 then
print("=====",y,1,maxY,minY)
return (1-index2)^2*x1+2*(1-index2)*index2*x2+index2^2*x3
end
end
end
end
--Get y of patricular x
function self.getY(x)
if x > maxX or x < minX then
return
end
if maxX == minX and x == minX then
return minY, maxY
end
local index1, index2, buffer1, buffer2
local a = (x1 - x)
if a == 0 then
return
end
local b = xb
local c = xc
local discriminant = b^2 - 4*a*c
if discriminant < 0 then
return
else
local aByTwo = 2*a
local theSQRT = math.sqrt(discriminant)
if discriminant == 0 then
local index1 = -b/aByTwo
return (1-index1)^2*y1+2*(1-index1)*index1*y2+index1^2*y3
else
local index1, index2 = (-b - theSQRT)/aByTwo, (-b + theSQRT)/aByTwo
return (1-index1)^2*y1+2*(1-index1)*index1*y2+index1^2*y3, (1-index2)^2*y1+2*(1-index2)*index2*y2+index2^2*y3
end
end
end
--Scanline render
function self.scanRender()
local path = {}
local counter = 1
local fX, sX
local a = (y3 - 2*y2 + y1)
local b = 2*(y2 - y1)
for i=minY, maxY do
fX, sX = self.getX(i,a,b)
if fX then
path[counter] = fX
path[counter+1] = i
counter = counter + 2
if sX then
path[counter] = sX
path[counter+1] = i
counter = counter + 2
end
end
end
return path
end
--More efficient
--Self
return self
end
By calling bezier, you get a Bezier object. This object will be able to access all the private attributes and the public interface that is in the self table.
As the title says, I'm trying to use a coordinate pair (x, y) as a key for a table. Here is what I have done so far
local test = {_props = {}}
local mt = {}
local xMax = 5
local yMax = 5
local function coord2index(x, y)
return ((x-1) * xMax) + y
end
mt.__index = function(s, k)
if s._props[coord2index(k[1], k[2])] ~= nil then
return s._props[coord2index(k[1], k[2])]
end
end
mt.__newindex = function(s, k, v)
s._props[coord2index(k[1], k[2])] = v
end
mt.__call = function (t, k)
if type(k) == "table" then print "Table" end
end
setmetatable(test, mt)
test[{1,2}] = 5
print( test[{1,2}])
This is actually working as expected. What I'm really wondering if there is a way to reduce this even more, something like test[1,2] = 5 and print(test[1,1]). There is no technical need for this, it's purely for my further edification into Lua.
I think your method is good. You can also use strings instead of numbers and do something like return x..';'..y in your coord2index function.