I am making a simple UDP P2P Chat Program with a well known server.
The client's send and recieve data from server and clients through a single IdUDPServer.
The clients as of now can login and logout i.e. they can send data to the server.
Whenever the server sends any data it gets dropped at the NIC side of the node as the embedded ip header checksum is 0x00 as notified by wireshark.
IdUDPServer Settings (Client/Server)
Active : True
Bindings :
Broadcast : False
BufferSize : 8192
DefaultPort : 10000
IPVersion : Id_IPv4
ThreadedEvent : False
Command Used
only one command is used within
UDPServer.SendBuffer ( ED_Host.Text, StrToInt ( ED_Port.Text ), Buffer );
A similar configuration is working perfectly in another program of mine.
Most NICs will perform checksum validation and generation these days instead of the os network stack. This is to improve performance and is known as checksum offloading. As such wiresshark will report the fact the checksum is missing as an error but it can usually be ignored or the error turned off in the wire shark settings.
Some NIC drivers allow you to turn off checksum offloading. Try this and retest the code
Related
Need to post a byte message to solace queue using Jmeter. I have tried in following manner might be am incorrect but tried with following:
Use JMSPublisher sampler
create jndi.properties file and put in jmeter/lib
jndi.properties
java.naming.factory.initial = com.solacesystems.jndi.SolJNDIInitialContextFactory
java.naming.provider.url = smf://<remote IP and port>
java.naming.security.principal=<username>
java.naming.security.credentials=<password>
Solace_JMS_VPN=<VPN Name>
in JMSPublisher sampler (in GUI)
Connection Factory = connectionFactory
Destination = (Queue Name )
Message Type (radio button---Byte message)
Content encoding -- RAW
in text area ---> (Byte message)
Note : I have used actual values of IP/port/username/port/queuename/bytemessage, cannot share those. Soljms jar is available in lib folder too.
getting error :
Response message: javax.naming.NamingException: JNDI lookup failed - 503: Service Unavailable [Root exception is (null) com.solacesystems.jcsmp.JCSMPErrorResponseException: 503: Service Unavailable]
Though it is working perfectly fine when did with java spring boot. There used properties files in place of JNDI.
It would be great if anyone can guide me , please do not give activeMQ JNDI am actively looking for posting on solace queue or create connection to solace appliances through Jmeter.
I don't think you should be putting your Byte message into the textarea as it accepts either plain text or an XStream object, consider providing your payload via binary file(s) instead
If you're capable of sending the message using Java code you should be able to replicate the same using:
JMeter's JSR223 Sampler with Groovy language (Java syntax will work)
Or JUnit Request sampler if you need "strict" java
I am new to network programming, and I have some confusion with select function.
For a server program, we need to first create a fd to socket endpoint (server's ip and port without client's ip and port) with socket, bind and listen, then if there is a TCP connection to this socket endpoint, then accept returns the fd to the socket (server's ip, port and client's ip, port). Then we use recv on this socket's fd, and if there is no data to receive, the recv will block (for blocking socket).
I learned that select is used to handle non-blocking multiple connections. But which connection level does it handles? Does it handles multiple socket endpoints, or handles multiple sockets of one single socket endpoint?
For a normal server program, I think the socket endpoint is always single, and there are maybe hundreds of sockets connected to this endpoint. So I think handling multiple socket endpoints may be less useful to handling multiple sockets. But when talking about IO multiplexing, I find that many articles seems talking about handling multiple socket endpoints. While for handling multiple sockets to a single socket, I can't find a way to get all sockets, and put them to select's set of fds, since accept only accepts one sockets a time.
"Does it handles multiple socket endpoints or handles multiple sockets of one single socket endpoint?" -- There is no such thing as multiple sockets of a single socket endpoint. Every socket is an endpoint to the network communication. It just happens that the piece of code which deals with that socket might be different from the others. Consider the following socket descriptors:
int sock_acpt = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP);
listen(sock_acpt, 5);
int sock_cli = accept(sock_apt, ....);
Both the socket descriptors sock_acpt and sock_cli are the endpoints of different communications. After setting sock_acpt in passive mode by calling listen(), the socket just listens for TCP connection, and the server's TCP stack will manage any data that appears on that socket (most probably TCP Handshakes). While sock_cli is the end of an already established connection, and in general, the data on that socket is managed by the user-level application.
Now coming to select(), it is an IO Multiplexer, not a Network IO multiplexer. So any descriptor which can be viewed as an IO endpoint can be used with the select(). Referring to our socket descriptors sock_acpt and sock_cli, both are IO endpoints of different communications, so you can use both of them with select(). You generally do something like below
for ( ; ; ) {
fd_set rd_set;
FD_ZERO(&rd_set);
FD_SET(sock_acpt, &rd_set);
FD_SET(sock_cli, &rd_set);
if (select(sock_acpt > sock_cli ? sock_acpt + 1 : sock_cli + 1, \
&rd_set, NULL, NULL, NULL) <= 0) {
continue;
}
if (FD_ISSET(sock_acpt, &rd_set)) {
// Accept new connection
// accept(sock_acpt, ...);
}
if (FD_ISSET(sock_cli, &rd_set)) {
// Read from the socket
// read(sock_cli, ...);
}
}
But using select() is not limited to sockets, you can use with the file IO (fileno(stdin)), with the signal IO (signalfd()) and any other which can be viewed as IO endpoint.
I have a custom device with a TCP/IP stack implemented that's sending a byte each 5 seconds to a remote IP.
On that remote IP, I'm building a site with rails 3.1.3 that will have to receive, store and display the data sent by the custom device.
I was thinking on having a TCP Socket running in the background, something like this, but i don't have a clue on how to integrate this with a rails site. Where to place it, how to start it and how to propagate the data to the views.
Does anybody have a clue on how shall I proceed?
To solve this I created a raketask that starts a TCP Server that will handle messages.
Note: This code has more than a year so I'm not 100% sure how it behaves, but I think the core part is this:
#server = TCPServer.new(#host, port)
loop do
Thread.start(#server.accept) do |tcpSocket|
port, ip = Socket.unpack_sockaddr_in(tcpSocket.getpeername)
begin
loop do
line = tcpSocket.recv(100).strip # Read lines from the socket
handle_message line # method to handle messages from the socket
end
rescue SystemCallError
#close the sockets logic
end
end
end
I have written a web-service using Erlang and Mochiweb. The web service returns a lot of results and takes some time to finish the computation.
I'd like to return results as soon as the program finds it, instead of returning them when it found them all.
edit:
i found that i can use a chunked request to stream result, but seems that i can't find a way to close the connection. so any idea on how to close a mochiweb request?
To stream data of yet unknown size with HTTP 1.1 you can use HTPP chunked transfer encoding. In this encoding each chunk of data prepended by its size in hexadecimal. Last chunk is a zero-length chunk, with the chunk size coded as 0, but without any data.
If client doesn't support HTTP 1.1 server can send data as binary chunks and close connection at the end of the stream.
In MochiWeb it's all works as following:
HTTP response should be started with Response = Request:respond({Code, ResponseHeaders, chunked}) function. (By the way, look at the code comments);
Then chunks can be send to client with Response:write_chunk(Data) function. To indicate client the end of the stream chunk of zero length should be sent: Response:write_chunk(<<>>).
When handling of current request is over MochiWeb decides should connection be closed or can be reused by HTTP persistent connection.
i want to check my server connection to know if its available or not to inform the user..
so how to send a pkg or msg to the server (it's not SQL server; it's a server contains some serviecs) ...
thnx in adcvance ..
With all the possibilities for firewalls blocking ICMP packets or specific ports, the only way to guarantee that a service is running is to do something that uses that service.
For instance, if it were a JDBC server, you could execute a non-destructive SQL query, such as select * from sysibm.sysdummy1 for DB2. If it's a HTTP server, you could create a GET packet for index.htm.
If you actually have control over the service, it's a simple matter to create a special sub-service to handle these requests (such as you send through a CHECK packet and get back an OKAY response).
That way, you avoid all the possible firewall issues and the test is a true end-to-end one. PINGs and traceroutes will be able to tell if you can get to the machine (firewalls permitting) but they won't tell you if your service is functioning.
Take this from someone who's had to battle the network gods in a corporate environment where machines are locked up as tight as the proverbial fishes ...
If you can open a port but don't want to use ping (i dont know why but hey) you could use something like this:
import socket
host = ''
port = 55555
s = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
s.setsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_REUSEADDR, 1)
s.bind((host, port))
s.listen(1)
while 1:
try:
clientsock, clientaddr = s.accept()
clientsock.sendall('alive')
clientsock.close()
except:
pass
which is nothing more then a simple python socket server listening on 55555 and returning alive