In the documentation and in the broad literature the generated factory method to delete/remove a subclassed managed object in CoreData for IOS is
(void)removeXXXObject:(NSManagedObject *)value
where XXX is the corresponding relationship or we can use simply removeObject.
In my code I used this:
Data *lastData = [[self sortedPersonDatas] objectAtIndex:0];
[selectedPerson removePersonDatasObject:lastData];
where PersonDatas is a one-to-many relationship to Data managed object from I took the last data (lastData resulted from a sorted array of all data)
But using the first two remove methods and checking the SQL database behind we can find that the actual data is existing just the inverse relationship is null.
To completely delete the data (all attributes and the object) I had to use:
[selectedPerson.managedObjectContext deleteObject:lastData];
The question: which is the better method and is it correct that CoreData leaves the data intact?
removeXXXObject only removes an object from a to-many relationship, but does not delete the object from the store. To do so, you have to indeed use deleteObject - this is the desired behavior. Calling deleteObject will by default also set the corresponding relationships to nil (see https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/#documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CoreData/Articles/cdRelationships.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40001857-SW1).
Related
I wish to save a dictionary containing some Core Data objects (bunch of different entities). The objects also have quite a few relationships (and inverse relationships) defined. What would be the best way to go about it?
I tried using NSKeyedArchiver and writing to a file. While that works great, when trying to read from the file using NSKeyedUnarchiver, it fails on one of the classes with the error
-[SomeEntity initWithCoder:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance
EDIT - More details
I have a bunch of objects, each having properties based on which they can be filtered. The properties are in themselves Core Data entity objects since they have a complex structure.
I wish to save the filters the user has selected so that the next time they view the objects, the objects can be filtered as per their previous selection.
Say there are 3 filters, Filter A, B and C and each can have 5 different values. Now the user might select Filter A1, A2, B1 and C3 (or a different combination). My question, how do I save these selected filters (A1, A2, B1 and C3 in this case) using Core Data?
Let me see if I understand your question: You have a collection of managedObjects that are already saved in a context. They may already be persisted in the SQL database. You want to save that collection ALSO to another file for other purposes. You have already considered saving the information of this collection inside core-data in some way and have already rejected it. You have also considered simply saving the query generation tokens to save the state of the database as it currently is, but that also is not what you want. The point is to have a file that contains a copy of some of the managedObjects organized in a way that you can get the data back without using the SQL database that was already designed exactly for that purpose.
Solution 1: Turn each managed object in a dictionary.
You can get every attribute and every property of every object by getting a managed object's entity and then accessing the attributesByName and
relationshipsByName property of the entity. From there you make a simple loop to put each property into a dictionary. I also suggest you store the objectID and point to the objectID when encoding the relationships. Then replace the managedObject in your dictionary with dictionary that contains all the attributes and relationship. This new dictionary should be easy to archive and unarchive.
This make sure that the data when you unarchive is exactly how you left it. When you unarchive you will get a COPY of data and if the managed objects have changed in your database since then, you will get the OLD values. Also these copies are not core-data object because they are unconnected to a managed Object Context.
Solution 2: Just save the Managed Object's ObjectId.
Replace every managed object in your collection with the object's objectId. This dictionary can be easily archived. When you unarchive it replace every objectId with a core data object (if found) using existingObjectWithID: on the context. If entities have been deleted then you won't get them back. If entities have changed then you will get the NEW values.
Solution 3: Don't do any of this
It seems to me that you may not be aware core-data are already saved in a database. If you have some collection of managedObjects, you should be able to recreated it from your database. If you aren't able to, then you should add properties and/or relationships that will allow you to so.
Try like this :
ARCHIVE :
NSDictionary *yourDictData = [NSDictionary dictionaryWithObject:json forKey:#"key"]; // This is for example. Here you have to replace ur dictionary
NSData *myData = [NSKeyedArchiver archivedDataWithRootObject:yourDictData];
UNARCHIVE :
NSDictionary *myData = [NSKeyedUnarchiver unarchiveObjectWithData:yourDictData];
Say I have a CoreData entity type called Player and it has a to-one relationship (purpose) with an entity type called PlayerPurpose. For completeness, say we have an inverse relationship in PlayerPurpose called parentPlayer. Consider the following swift code:
// Assume we already have a player object in a NSManagedObjectContext called context:
player.purpose = NSEntityDescription.insertNewObjectForEntityForName("PlayerPurpose",
inManagedObjectContext: context) as PlayerPurpose;
// Later in the code, we set the value to nil (or we could have replaced
// it with another call to insertNewObjectForEntityForName)
player.purpose = nil;
// What happens to the previous playerPurpose object within the Managed Object Context?
My question: what happens to the original playerPurpose object within the Managed Object Context when the only reference it has in the data is set to nil (or replaced with another object)?
This is not really related to relationship deletion rules because I'm not explicitly deleting any object -- I'm removing it from any meaningful relationships, making it an orphan.
From an ARC perspective (if the PlayerPurpose was just a normal, non-managed object), the original PlayerPurpose instance now has no references, so it can be cleared from memory -- but what happens in the Managed Object Context? Does CoreData recognize this as an orphaned object and delete it via the context?
If not, then I assume I have to be careful to delete any managed object created via a context if I'm going to get rid of all references to it. Assuming that's the case, is there a good pattern go use for making sure that orphaned objects get cleared from the NSManagedObjectContext and that they are no longer stored in the persistent store?
Thanks!
Core Data does not automatically delete objects in this scenario, because "orphaned" is a concept that your code has but not one that Core Data recognizes. There's no reason for it to delete a PlayerPurpose object just because one of its relationships is nil.
The most reliable way to ensure that PlayerPurpose instances are deleted would be to
Create custom NSManagedObject subclasses for your entities (if you don't have them already).
Override the setter method for purpose on the Player subclass. If the new value is nil, delete the old one.
You can also handle this by just making sure to call deleteObject: at the appropriate times. Or you could run a clean-up step where you fetch every PlayerPurpose with a nil value for parentPlayer and delete them.
I have two objects Contact and DealContact with a to-many and inverse relationship set. I have Core Data generated accessors on DealContact called removeContactsObject. DealContact has a relationship to-many to Contact called contacts. When I do this:
[dealContact removeContactsObject:oneContact];
it results in dealContact object becoming null before I can save or perform any other operation. I've also attempted the following:
NSSet *contactSet = [dealContact mutableSetValueForKey:#"contacts"];
[contactSet removeObject:oneContact];
[dealContact setContacts:contactSet];
with no success. The dealContact object becomes null after either operation. How can I remove a contact object from the relationship (not delete).
Assuming you are not using ARC. You may simply need to send a retain message to the contact object before removing it. When the object is removed from the set it will be released, the managedObjectContext does not retain it's registered objects by default so the set may be the only object holding on to it. e.g.
[dealContact retain];
[dealContact removeContactsObject:oneContact];
//.... add to new relationship
[dealContact release];
I have an NSManagedObject that has a to-many relationship to another NSManagedObject.
During creation of the NSManagedObject I can use the generated accessors 'removeNotesObject' and the deletion works fine. I can create an object to add to the parent object, save the object, delete the object and then save again. When I fetch this parent object the object I created and deleted is still deleted.
However, after I add the object and then save it (but don't delete and save after) and then fetch it, I can't seem to delete the object that was previously created. I am using the generated accessors to try and remove the object, which appears to work but when I fetch it again the object hasn't been deleted.
(Note: Adding objects does work so it is not a problem with the saving)
To delete the object I retrieve the set of object and select the objects I want to delete. Then I remove the objects
NSSet *notes = summary.notes;
NSSet *oldNotes = [notes objectsPassingTest:^(id obj,BOOL *stop){
Note *oldNote = (Note *)obj;
BOOL sameRow = (oldNote.row == newNote.row);
BOOL sameColumn = (oldNote.column == newNote.column);
BOOL success = (sameRow && sameColumn);
return success;}];
[summary removeNotes:oldNotes];
I have tried making the relationship inverse to delete the objects which didn't delete them. I have also tried different delete rules (cascade and nullify) which again didn't work. Finally, I tried to remove each object separately and deleting each object from the context after I had removed it from the parent object which again unfortunately didn't work.
I assume the problem must be something to do with it being a fetched object. If anyone could help I would really appreciate it as I can't think of any other ways to test or solve this problem.
You need to do
NSManagedObjectContext * moc = .......;
[moc deleteObject:note]
edit: The core data generated accessors simply remove the object from the relationship, but do not delete the object permanently. This makes sense because you may have one NSManagedObject associated to multiple other NSManagedObjects via relationships.
edit: Deleting in the above mentioned fashion will invoke the deletion rules. I suggest you double check that they are setup correctly.
The reason the above code did not work is that == will not actually compare the NSNumber. Instead you need to call 'isEqualTo:'. I think before it was checking the address hence working before I saved it. What's more it was returning an object in the NSSet so appeared to be working. During debugging it wasn't clear what the object was but clearly wasn't the one I needed.
I would like to separate my reference data from my user data in my Core Data model to simplify future updates of my app (and because, I plan to store the database on the cloud and there is no need to store reference data on the cloud as this is part of my application). Therefore, I've been looking for a while for a way to code a cross-store relationship using fetched properties. I have not found any example implementations of this.
I have a Core Data model using 2 configurations :
data model config 1 : UserData (entities relative to user)
data model config 2 : ReferenceData (entities relative to application itself)
I set up 2 different SQLite persistent stores for both config.
UserData config (and store) contains entity "User"
ReferenceData config (and store) contains entities "Type" and "Item".
I would like to create two single-way weak relationships as below :
A "User" has a unique "Type"
A "User" has many "Items"
Here are my questions :
How do I set up my properties?
Do I need 2 properties for each relation (one for storing Unique ID and another to access my fetched results)?
Could this weak relationship be ordered?
Could someone give me an example implementation of this?
As a follow-on to Marcus' answer:
Looking through the forums and docs, I read that I should use the URI Representation of my entity instance instead of objectID. What is the reason behind this?
// Get the URI of my object to reference
NSURL * uriObjectB [[myObjectB objectID] URIRepresentation];
Next, I wonder, how do I store my object B URI (NSURL) in my parent object A as a weak relationship? What attribute type should I use? How do I convert this? I heard about archive... ?
Then, later I should retrieve the managed object the same way (by unconvert/unarchive the URIRepresentation) and get Object from URI
// Get the Object ID from the URI
NSManagedObjectID* idObjectB = [storeCoordinator managedObjectIDForURIRepresentation:[[myManagedObject objectID] URIRepresentation]];
// Get the Managed Object for the idOjectB ...
And last but not least, shouId I declare two properties in my entity A, one for persisting of URI needs and another for retrieving direclty object B?
NSURL * uriObjectB [objectA uriObjectB];
ObjectB * myObjectB = [objectA objectB];
As you can read, I really miss some simple example to implement thes weak relationships ! I would really appreciate some help.
Splitting the data is the right answer by far. Reference data should not be synced with the cloud, especially since iCloud has soft caps on what it will allow an application to sync and store in documents.
To create soft references across to stores (they do not need to be SQLite but it is a good idea for general app performance) you will need to have some kind of unique key that can be referenced from the other side; a good old fashioned foreign key.
From there you can create a fetched property in the model to reference the entity.
While this relationship cannot be ordered directly you can create order via a sort index or if it has a logical sort then you can sort it once you retrieve the data (I use convenience methods for this that return a sorted array instead of a set).
I can build up an example but you really are on the right track. The only fun part is migration. When you detect a migration situation you will need to migrate each store independently before you build up your core data stack. It sounds tricky but it really is not that hard to accomplish.
Example
Imagine you have a UserBar entity in the user store and a RefBar entity in the reference store. The RefBar will then have a fetchedProperty "relationship" with a UserBar thereby creating a ToOne relationship.
UserBar
----------
refBarID : NSInteger
RefBar
--------
identifier : NSInteger
You can then create a fetched property on the RefBar entity in the modeler with a predicate of:
$FETCHED_PROPERTY.refBarID == identifier
Lets name that predicate "userBarFetched"
Now that will return an array so we want to add a convenience method to the RefBar
#class UserBar;
#interface RefBar : NSManagedObject
- (UserBar*)userBar;
#end
#implementation RefBar
- (UserBar*)userBar
{
NSArray *fetched = [self valueForKey:#"userBarFetched"];
return [fetched lastObject];
}
#end
To create a ToMany is the same except your convenience method would return an array and you would sort the array before returning it.
As Heath Borders mentioned, it is possible to add a sort to the NSFetchedProperty if you want but you must do it in code. Personally I have always found it wasteful and don't use that feature. It might be more useful if I could set the sort in the modeler.
Using the ObjectID
I do not recommend using the ObjectID or the URIRepresentation. The ObjectID (and therefore the URIRepresentation of that ObjectID) can and will change. Whenever you migrate a database that value will change. You are far better off creating a non-changing GUID.
The weak relationship
You only need a single value on the M side of the relationship and that stores the foreign identifier. In your object subclass you only need to implement accessors that retrieve the object (or objects).
I would go with just one store.
For storing stuff in the cloud, you will anyway have to serialize the data, either as JSON or SQL statements, or whatever scheme you prefer.
You will need a local copy of the data on the user's device, so he can access it quickly and offline. The cloud store can have only the user entity, while the local store (part of the app) can also have the reference entity.
I have a similar project with a huge reference store (20000 records) with geographic information, and user generated content ("posts"). I use a single store. When I ship the app, the "posts" entity is also defined but empty. When I update the data model I simply re-generate the whole reference store before shipping.
I see absolutely no reason to go for a cross store solution here.