Adding a method to an attribute in Ruby - ruby-on-rails

How do you define a method for an attribute of an instance in Ruby?
Let's say we've got a class called HtmlSnippet, which extends ActiveRecord::Base of Rails and has got an attribute content. And, I want to define a method replace_url_to_anchor_tag! for it and get it called in the following way;
html_snippet = HtmlSnippet.find(1)
html_snippet.content = "Link to http://stackoverflow.com"
html_snippet.content.replace_url_to_anchor_tag!
# => "Link to <a href='http://stackoverflow.com'>http://stackoverflow.com</a>"
# app/models/html_snippet.rb
class HtmlSnippet < ActiveRecord::Base
# I expected this bit to do what I want but not
class << #content
def replace_url_to_anchor_tag!
matching = self.match(/(https?:\/\/[\S]+)/)
"<a href='#{matching[0]}'/>#{matching[0]}</a>"
end
end
end
As content is an instance of String class, redefine String class is one option. But I don't feel like to going for it because it overwrites behaviour of all instances of String;
class HtmlSnippet < ActiveRecord::Base
class String
def replace_url_to_anchor_tag!
...
end
end
end
Any suggestions please?

The reason why your code is not working is simple - you are working with #content which is nil in the context of execution (the self is the class, not the instance). So you are basically modifying eigenclass of nil.
So you need to extend the instance of #content when it's set. There are few ways, there is one:
class HtmlSnippet < ActiveRecord::Base
# getter is overrided to extend behaviour of freshly loaded values
def content
value = read_attribute(:content)
decorate_it(value) unless value.respond_to?(:replace_url_to_anchor_tag)
value
end
def content=(value)
dup_value = value.dup
decorate_it(dup_value)
write_attribute(:content, dup_value)
end
private
def decorate_it(value)
class << value
def replace_url_to_anchor_tag
# ...
end
end
end
end
For the sake of simplicity I've ommited the "nil scenario" - you should handle nil values differently. But that's quite simple.
Another thing is that you might ask is why I use dup in the setter. If there is no dup in the code, the behaviour of the following code might be wrong (obviously it depends on your requirements):
x = "something"
s = HtmlSnippet.find(1)
s.content = x
s.content.replace_url_to_anchor_tag # that's ok
x.content.replace_url_to_anchor_tag # that's not ok
Wihtout dup you are extending not only x.content but also original string that you've assigned.

Related

How to improve lisibility/split "fat" class method (inside ruby class/rails model)

as a new Rubyist, I'm running into a recurring problem when it comes to structure my models.
When a method is too long:
I try to refactor to a better/shorter syntax
I try to split some parts into "sub methods"
PROBLEM: I don't know how to split the method properly + whith which tool (private method, modules etc.)
For example:
I need to run Foo.main_class_method
My model looks like this:
class Foo < Applicationrecord
def self.main_class_method
[...] # way too long method with nasty iterations
end
end
I try to split my method to improve lisibility. It becomes :
class Foo < Applicationrecord
def self.main_class_method
[...] # fewer code
self.first_splitted_class_method
self.second_splitted_class_method
end
private
def self.first_splitted_class_method
[...] # some code
end
def self.second_splitted_class_method
[...] # some code
end
end
Result: It works, but I fell like this is not the proper way to do it + I have side effects
expected: splitted_methods are not accessible, except inside main_class_method
got: I can call Foo.first_splitted_class_method since class methods "ignore" Private. splitted_class_methods under Private are not private
Question: Is it an acceptable way to split main_class_method or is it a complete misuse of private method ?
Using private method to split your code:
Possible but not the real solution if the code belongs somewhere else
It's rather about "does it belongs here?" than "does it look nicer?"
To fix the "not private" private class method (original post) :
use private_class_method :your_method_name after you defined it
or right before
private_class_method def your_method_name
[...] # your code
end
If your splitting a class/instance method:
the splitted_method must be the same type(class/instance) as the main_class_method calling it
In the main_method you can call the splitted_method with or without using self.method syntax
class Foo < Applicationrecord
def self.main_class_method
# Here, self == Foo class
# first_splitted_class == class method, I can call self.first_splitted_class_method
self.first_splitted_class_method
# I can also call directly without self because self is implicit
second_splitted_class_method
end
def self.first_splitted_class_method
end
def self.second_splitted_class_method
end
private_class_method :first_splitted_class_method, :second_splitted_class_method
end

No method error for class variable defined with attr_accessor

I want to define methods dynamically using an array of strings.
Here is a simple piece of code that should achieve that.
class SomeClass
attr_accessor :my_array
def initialize(user, record)
#my_array=[]
end
my_array.each do |element|
alias_method "#{element}?".to_sym, :awesome_method
end
def awesome_method
puts 'awesome'
end
end
When I instantiate this class in the console, I get the following error
NoMethodError (undefined method `each' for nil:NilClass)
What is wrong with this code and how to make it work. any help highly appreciated :)
Edit 1:
What I ultimately want to achieve is to inherit from SomeClass and override my_array in the child class to dynamically define methods with its attributes like so
class OtherClass < SomeClass
my_array = %w[method1 method2 method3]
# Some mechanism to over write my_array.
end
And then use self.inherited to dynamically define methods in child class.
Is there a good way to achieve this?
In your code, you use an instance variable (#my_array) and an attr_accessor over it, and then try to access my_array from class level (that is, from the body of the class definition, outside of any methods). But instance variables only exist at instance level, so it is not available in the class scope.
One solution (the natural one, and the one which you would probably use in other languages) is to use a class variable: ##my_array. But class variables in ruby are a little problematic, so the best solution would be to make use of class instance variables, like that:
class SomeClass
class << self
attr_accessor :my_array
end
#my_array=[]
def initialize(user, record)
end
#my_array.each do |element|
alias_method "#{element}?".to_sym, :awesome_method
end
def awesome_method
puts 'awesome'
end
end
The syntax is a little tricky, so, if you look that up and it still doesn't makes sense, try just reading about scopes and using a regular class variable with ##.
Edit:
Ok, so, after your edit, it became more clear what you are trying to accomplish. A full working example is like follows:
class SomeClass
class << self
attr_accessor :my_array
end
#my_array=[]
def awesome_method
puts 'awesome'
end
def self.build!
#my_array.each do |element|
self.define_method("#{element}?".to_sym){ awesome_method }
end
end
end
class ChildClass < SomeClass
#my_array = %w[test little_test]
self.build!
end
child_instance = ChildClass.new
child_instance.test?
>> awesome
child_instance.little_test?
>> awesome
So, I've made some tweaks on SomeClass:
It does not need an initialize method
I tried to use the inherited hook for this problem. It won't ever work, because this hook is called as soon as "ChildClass < SomeClass" is written, and this must be before you can define something like #my_array = %w[test little_test]. So, I have added a self.build! method that must be called in the child instances so that they build their methods from my_array. This is inevitable, but I think it is also good, because it makes more explicit in the subclasses that you are doing something interesting there.
I think you want "define_method", not "alias_method".
awesome_method in passed in a block, which is ruby's way of doing functional programming.
With that done, ChildClass inherits from SomeClass, and it's instances have the dynamically created methods 'test?' and 'little_test?'.
You need to change my_array to class level accessible, in my case class constant.
class SomeClass
DYNAMIC_METHOD_NAMES = %w(method_a method_b method_C).freeze
def initialize(user, record)
end
DYNAMIC_METHOD_NAMES.each do |element|
alias_method "#{element}?".to_sym, :awesome_method
end
def awesome_method
puts 'awesome'
end
end

Ruby - automatically initialize class instance variables of child classes without inheriting the value

I am looking for a solution to automatically initialize a class variable through inheritance (make it available as an accessor and initialize it to some value). But I do NOT want to inherit the value, just start with a new fresh object each time on each class.
I have been looking at class_attributes and thought I had found a workaround but it does not seem to be working as I thought (and even if it worked, it would most likely not do the thing I want since the same array would be used everywhere so it would behave like a ## variable)
class AbstractClass
class_attribute :metadata
#metadata = [] # initialize metadata to an empty array
def self.add_metadata(metadata)
#metadata << metadata
end
end
def ChildClass < AbstractClass
add_metadata(:child_class1)
end
def ChildClass2 < AbstractClass
add_metadata(:child_class2)
end
I'd like to have the following :
AbstractClass.metadata # Don't really care about this one
ChildClass1.metadata # => [:child_class1]
ChildClass2.metadata # => [:child_class2]
I can think of a way to do this using modules with AS::Support
module InitializeClassInstanceVars
extend ActiveSupport::Concern
included do
class_attribute :metadata
self.metadata = []
end
end
...and include this module in every nested class (and I believe this is what mongoid actually does for instance)
but I was hoping I could do this directly via inheritance
You don't have to initialize the class variable when it is being inherited. The Ruby style is to return and assign default value when the variable has not been set and is being accessed for the first time.
Just create another class method for that:
class AbstractClass
def self.metadata
#metadata ||= []
end
def self.add_metadata(metadata)
self.metadata << metadata
end
end
class ChildClass1 < AbstractClass
add_metadata(:child_class1)
end
class ChildClass2 < AbstractClass
add_metadata(:child_class2)
end
AbstractClass.metadata # => []
ChildClass1.metadata # => [:child_class1]
ChildClass2.metadata # => [:child_class2]
Hooks are a great idea, you're just working off of the wrong one :) If you want to run code every time something inherits your class, then inherited is the one to use:
class AbstractClass
class << self
attr_accessor :metadata
def inherited(child)
child.instance_variable_set(:#metadata, [child.name])
end
end
end
class ChildClass1 < AbstractClass; end
class ChildClass2 < AbstractClass; end
ChildClass1.metadata
# => ["ChildClass1"]
ChildClass2.metadata
# => ["ChildClass2"]
Given that the question is tagged rails, you should also have String#underscore available; replace child.name with child.name.underscore.to_s to get [:child_class1].
EDIT: I might have misunderstood the question. If you just want to start with an empty array that you can add to, chumakoff's answer is simpler.

How to call a parent class and instead create one of it's children?

I have a model directory structure like this:
/alerts
base_alert.rb
panic_alert.rb
hardware_alert.rb
alert.rb
With the /alerts/x_alert.rb models setup like this:
class base_alert < ActiveRecord::Base
...
end
class panic_alert < base_alert
...
end
class hardware_alert < base_alert
...
end
etc.
Is there any way to call create on alert.rb in the top directory, and, based on a parameter passed, it would create one of the children instead of alert.rb.
I.E. Alert.create({type:"panic_alert"})
And it would create and return one of the panic_alert types of alerts?
By making few changes to the class definitions, like subclassing the Alert from ActiveRecord::Base rather than BaseAlert, you could achieve what you are trying to accomplish.
Following are the updated classes:
# app/models/alert.rb
class Alert < ActiveRecord::Base
end
# app/models/alerts/base_alert.rb
module Alerts
class BaseAlert < ::Alert
end
end
# app/models/alerts/panic_alert.rb
module Alerts
class PanicAlert < BaseAlert
end
end
# app/models/alerts/hardware_alert.rb
module Alerts
class HardwareAlert < BaseAlert
end
end
Following are few ways to create the subclasses from the base class:
#panic_alert = Alert.create!(
type: 'Alerts::PanicAlert', #this has to be string
#other attributes
)
#alert = Alert.new
#alert.type = 'Alerts::PanicAlert' #this has to be string
# assign other attributes, if necessary
#alert.save
#alert = Alert.new
#panic_alert = #alert.becomes(Alerts::PanicAlert) #this has to be class
# assign other attributes, if necessary
#panic_alert.save
You can use the constantize or the safe_constantize methods to do that. What they do is take a string and try to return the class the string refers to. For instance:
"BaseAlert".safe_constantize
=> BaseAlert
or
def method_name(alert_type)
alert_type.safe_constantize.create()
end
The difference between the two is constantize will throw an error if there isn't a match for the string, while safe_constantize will just return nil. Remember, if you pass in a underscored string (say panic_alert) then you would have to camelize it.
What seems like a lifetime ago I created StiFactory for this. That said, I don't find much use for STI these days (hence the lack of maintenance).

Executing Rails virtual attribute setters in order

I have an ActiveRecord model with several virtual attribute setters. I want to build an object but not save it to the database. One setter must execute before the others. How to do?
As a workaround, I build the object in two steps
#other_model = #some_model.build_other_model
#other_model.setup(params[:other_model)
Where setup is:
class OtherModel < ActiveRecord::Base
def setup(other_params)
# execute the important_attribute= setter first
important_attribute = other_params.delete(:important_attribute)
# set the other attributes in whatever order they occur in the params hash
other_params.each { |k,v| self.send("#{k}=",v) }
end
end
This seems to work, but looks kludgy. Is there a better way?
EDIT
per neutrino's suggestion, I added a method to SomeModel:
class SomeModel < ActiveRecord::Base
def build_other_model(other_params)
other_model = OtherModel.new(:some_model=>self)
other_model.setup(other_params)
other_model
end
end
It's a good thing that you have this manipulations done in an OtherModel's method, because you can just call this method and not worry about the order of assignments. So I would leave this part but just call it from a SomeModel's method:
class SomeModel < ActiveRecord::Base
def build_other_model(other_params)
other_model = build_other_model
other_model.setup(other_params)
other_model
end
end
So then you would have
#other_model = #some_model.build_other_model(params[:other_model])
I took your idea of deleting the important attribute first in your setup method, but used alias_chain_method instead to make it more of a transparent process:
def attributes_with_set_important_attribute_first=(attributes = {})
# Make sure not to accidentally blank out the important_attribute when none is passed in
if attributes.symbolize_keys!.include?(:important_attribute)
self.important_attribute = attributes.delete(:important_attribute)
end
self.attributes_without_set_important_attribute_first = attributes
end
alias_method_chain :attributes=, :set_important_attribute_first
This way none of your code should change from the normal Rails style
#other_model = #some_model.other_models.build(params[:other_model])

Resources