I've taken over the maintenance job of a device driver from another guy recently.
The driver works with a pci-e board. when the system starts up, the driver will allocate a 128Mb memory, and then set some registers on the board to pass the information about the allocated memory. Later when the board is working, it will write some data to the memory and some other application will access those data through the driver.
The board is powered by a standalone adapter (not powered by pci-e slot, it's a demo or development board). So when sometimes the fpga program in the board goes wrong, we will re-powered on the board (this is fast) and restarted the pc also (this is slow, otherwise the board will know nothing about the driver-allocated memory).
Here comes my problem: is it possbile for driver to know the board has been re-powered on? if it can detect the event and do something like those done when the system starts up, it will save us much time.
I haven't got much knowledge about driver development before, it would be helpful if there is any not-too-complicated tutorial/article for this kind of job. Or maybe I must find some thick books to learn from scratch?
Hope I've made myself understood and any suggestions would be greatly appreciated:-)
Check Supporting PnP and Power Management in Function Drivers might help you.
Related
I understand that the computer loads the first sector of memory known as BIOS, which runs diagnostics on hardware and the proceeds to load the OS. I guess my question leans towards the hardware side. How does the computer know which memory to boot from (RAM, ROM, FLASH, etc). I understand the differences between memory and I understand computers boot from the hard drive, but Im attempting to make an 8 bit computer with a z80 microprocessor, which will need to boot from ROM or Flash memory. The only problem is that the processor reads only from whatever memory the address pins are connected to and there are no separate address pins for ram and rom. Its also impractical to run the system on rom or flash due to the much slower read/write time compared to ram. The z80 to the best of my knowledge doesnt have separate commands for reading from rom and ram, and it wouldnt matter even if it did because the ram will be blank upon powering up. How does a computer choose to read from rom only upon booting and then switch to ram once the OS has been loaded. Is it hardwired in using logic gates? And how does a computer choose to write to flash memory or a hard drive instead of ram once the OS has been loaded? Would flash memory be treated as a device? Or is this also hardwired into the motherboard using logic gates? Sorry for giving so much background, I just dont want you to waste your time explaining things Ive already grasped. Ive just researched this to a great extent and thought about it for hours on end and cant seem to figure it out, and everywhere Ive looked doesnt explain how the computer chooses which memory to read from, it just says that it does. Thanks
I'm not sure I'm answering what you are asking, but I'll give it a try.
Some computers (at least, IBM PC-compatible computers), after powering up, usually run this BIOS (Basic Input/Output System) program. For this to happen, to the best of my knowledge, the hardware must make the jump to this code, and this code must be accessible (that is, mapped) from the physical memory, since that's where the CPU will execute code from. So, a physical address space with some read-only areas where this code is hard-wired to would do the trick.
Once the BIOS code is running, it can select how to proceed next. It can copy a sector from a hard disk to memory, (or a bunch of data from a Flash drive) and then jump to it, or whatever. That's up to the BIOS writer.
I will try to explain the Pentium boot up process very briefly.
On the flash ROM mounted on the Motherboard. there is a small program called BIOS (basic input, output system). After pressing the power button the BIOS program is executed.
The BIOS contains low level software that performs the following operations :-
checks how much RAM is installed and if all other PCI and ISA buses peripherals are connected.
it checks if all IO devices are connected.
scans a list of boot devices and selects the boot devices based on BIOS configurations setup earlier by the user.
once the boot devices is selected. the first sector from the boot device is read into memory and executed. it contains a simple program which examines the partition table and selects the Active one (Holding the OS). The secondary bootloader is read from that partition. this loader then reads the OS from the partition into the memory and runs it. After running, the OS asks the BIOS for the configuration info for each device and configure the new devices (those have no stored configurations). after all devices configurations are set. they are delivered to the kernel. Then it initializes tables, background boot up processes and starts login program or GUI.
Problem
I am working on modifications to one of my applications that communicates with a telescope.
One of the most annoying problems due to nothing else but reckless poor design, is the GOTO controller and its keypad.
If anyone of you remember the Sinclair Spectrum you know what I mean. As well as the rubber keys, the crucial keys for guiding and slewing the telescope are awkward to locate when your eye is trying to adapt to the view.
All it takes is the wrong key and you spend another 30 minutes or so re-aligning the telescope.
Workaround
My solution is a game controller such as a wingman, it fits neatly into your hands and is easy to locate the buttons. Also there is no risk of reseting the mount.
Question
My question is this, how does Delphi interact with game controllers because tthere is no mention in the documentation? Otherwise how do I access a gameport when it is connected through a USB dongle?
Working with the game controller is part of the Windows API. JEDI's JVCL has a Human Interface Device (HID) constroller (TJvHIDDeviceController) component that does what you want.
Delphi applications running on "NT" line operating systems (NT, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 2003, 2008...) can't access hardware devices directly. Only drivers can, because the I/O ports required to access them can be accessed only by code running at the right IOPL level (which is 0 in Windows). There are some generic drivers available that open any I/O port (thus creating a security hole) that user code can call.
But tt's far better to rely on device drivers, and use the HID API to interact with them. Windows will recognize most older devices (like the serial/game port Wingman), while newer USB ones or use the standard drivers that come with Windows, or come with their own. Once the system recognizes the devices, you can use them in a standard way with no need to dig in the low-level details.
What would be the best way of sending a signal from an iPad to an Arduino?
I am trying to use XBee, with iPad and Arduino to send a wireless signal.
I want to make a big red virtual button on an iPad that, when pressed, turns on an LED on the Arduino.
I am a total newbie when it comes to iOS, but OK with Arduino and XBee.
So I'm not sure if I understood correctly, but in my meaning there is only one simple way to solve the problem:
Connect an XBee to a Computer and another to the Arduino. On the computer you launch a webserver, which will be accesible from the iPad over Safari. This server handles the clickes and writes to the XBee Com Port, for communication.
Here are some examples, people already made:
http://www.projectallusion.com/1/post/2009/11/iphone-controlled-solar-powered-arduino-tank.html
http://www.sparkfun.com/tutorials/152 (not with xbee, but you can implement that by yourself)
I know it's been a while but I just came across to this question and yesterday I was doing the exact same thing so I'll share the method I used and the source of it.
In order to set a LED on or off in an Arduino board from the iPad you really don't need anything more than a browser. This is of course if you have a way to connect that Arduino to the local network.
Today you have at least two options. The WiFi and the Ethernet shields. Once you have your Arduino board inside the network you can send the instructions (HIGH or LOW) to the board form the browser.
These are my two boards connected waiting to be plugged to the local network:
Of course, you'll have to code the board to process those instructions. There are many examples on how to configure network settings and state instructions:
If you have a bit of time and want to do something more elaborated you could create a simple app to graphically control the state of those LED(s).
Inside you'll basically do the same thing, create the URL command and send it to the Arduino IP but it'd look much nicer. If you integrate later more controls the sky in the limit.
My experiment is a combination of what I learned from this nice tutorial and some tips I've read here and there.
I hope it becomes also useful to someone else.
Cheers,
Since you need to use a network connection from the iPad, a possibly simpler way to do this would be to use a WiFi module on the Arduino to poll a web script, and have the iPad write a state (button press) to that web script.
There's a handy WiFi module called the RN-XV that's designed like an XBee. I wrote up two tutorials on it:
http://log.liminastudio.com/programming/getting-started-with-the-rn-xv-wifi-module-node-js
http://log.liminastudio.com/itp/physical-computing/using-the-rn-xv-wifi-module-as-a-remote-switch
I am developing Delphi application on Delphi 2010 XE RAD Studio under Windows 7. My application talks on the serial port non-stop. I am using AsyncPro for Delphi 2010. Serial communication and everything else on the computer I develop with works great without any problem. However, when my release version of my application is run on another Windows 7 system, serial communication completely fails. We probed the serial communication itself for an answer and found out that Request to Send (RTS) line is not dropped right after sending all the bytes, whereas on my development computer RTS line is dropped correctly.
Even when I explicitly drop the RTS line to low or false state, RTS line doesn't drop right away but after good 15 milliseconds. Thus, serial communication on my release version is failing.
Am I missing important information about Windows 7 and serial communication issues?
UPDATE: I just found the bug with my Aysncpro 5.0 for Delphi XE. It is weird. When my Delphi XE IDE is open or running, my program is communicating flawlessly. When I shutdown or close my Delphi XE IDE while my program is running, the same program doesn't communicate very well or it times out.
Chime in if you have any idea why it is happening.
Any help will be appreciated.
Thank you,
Sounds like a timer resolution problem to me. I had the same problem trying to write to a USB FTDI driver using an event based timer with timeSetEvent()... When Delphi loads, it changes the timer resolution to less than 20ms, which made my app work fine. When the IDE wasn't running I couldn't get things to work below 20ms +/- 5ms (the default Windows resolution I believe).
To fix the problem, I call timeBeginPeriod(1) in the thread to set the minimum system wide timer resolution.
I believe this affects the resolution of other time based events, because I get better than +/-5ms accuracy on other (non-multimedia timer) wait events in my app when I use timeBeginPeriod().
So, what I'm suggesting is that somewhere in the AsyncPro code it's using some time based event or call back... That would be affected by Delphi's change to the timer resolution when it is loaded. Try calling timeBeginPeriod(1) somewhere in your app when it starts and see if there is a change.
Oh, and don't forget to call timeEndPeriod(1) when your app shuts down.
N#
Last few times I saw random inexplicable crap like I tried everything, and was unable to solve it for months.
I found two different common causes:
ASYNC Professional has some weird glitches that I was unable to solve, so I dropped it, and moved to TComPort.
I found all kinds of strange flow control bugs in USB drivers. I found FTDI chipset USB-to-serial more reliable than others.
The Debug build not having the problem could be two things:
Certain timing changes cause the USB device driver that was failing, not to fail.
You actually have some kind of a thread problem, like a race condition, leading to your ASync Pro components messing up in a way that looks like something's happening to your port, but really it's ASYNC pro.
The easiest thing to do is to try it with a different USB to serial adapter, and if that doesn't solve your problem, I would be tempted to pull out AsyncPro which I have also had many random problems with, and either write your own serial port class, or use TComPort. I have some long experience using a TThread that uses a com port "reader/writer" class and have found this the most reliable way to go, because you can tweak low level elements of the Win32 overlapped-IO calls, directly to meet your needs, and also be sure that you don't have some extra complexity/overhead getting in your way. (AsyncPro's complexity and overhead, are a significant potential source of bugs.)
This has to be a driver problem on the other machine, surely? Hardware flow control works fine on my W7 test box as well, (and Vista development machine). If your Apro has set the DCB correctly, and it sounds like it does because of your 'manual' tests, the driver should work...
15ms for a 'manual' RTS change from user mode is sad, but not at all unusual on Windows - that's why the driver should do it.
Rgds,
Martin
I am writing device software for a PC and for that, I want the PC to be usable as a device. When power is supplied, it should switch on without requiring to press the power button. There are power options in BIOS settings but it starts the PC only when its uncleanly shutdown. The other concern I have is how would unclean shutdown affect the hard disk, filesystem and the OS (XP or Linux).
What you need is another PC and one of these devices attached to it.
http://www.relaypros.com/mm5/merchant.mvc?Screen=CTGY&Store_Code=NCD&Category_Code=RS-232_Relay_Boards&gclid=CMna8_yOo5wCFQxM5QodWjoflQ
What you do is send this some RS232 commands for a quick closure on one of the relays. The relay is connected to the Power On pins of the computer you want to control.
You possibly could find another relay contact closure for AC current that allows you to close a relay when AC is flowing, but you would only want to for a brief second.
Unsafe shut downs can be quite detrimental depending where the filesystem state is in. It would be quite hard on the hardware too.
There is also the alternative of booting from the network device. A quick search led to some information on wikipedia. Also, there is something related called preboot execution environment which seem to be something like what you are looking for.
Some software options - these aren't exactly what you asked for, but they might help
Mac OS X: In the energy saver control pane's options tab, select "Restart automatically after a power failue. shutdown -hu now should then bring the system down but give you 5 minutes to remove power to simulate a dirty shutdown, and have the computer reboot automatically when power is restored. It's a slightly dirty shutdown anyway, I think. (ie, it doesn't log you off first)
Windows:
I don't have a windows machine so I can't try this, but you used to be able to tell windows not to power down the computer when you select shut down, but rather to put it in a safe state and display "It is now safe to turn off your computer". Perhaps you could then remove the power and have the bios believe it was a non-clean shutdown, and turn the machine on again when power is restored. There are some instructions on how to do this in Windows Server 2003 at the bottom of this microsoft help document. This forum discussion seems to suggest it might work on XP.
Linux: Not sure about this one, but maybe this website can help.
I haven't tried any of these, so no guarantees that they'll work or work safely.