I am studying orchard architecture.i have faced with a strange concept in display management section.
in Partial view page there is a 'function call like' syntax like so Display(Model.Head). that is not a function thought, it is a dynamic object defined in orchard WebViewPage.
I am wondering how to define a dynamic object so that you can call it (and pass it an argument as well) like a function as i mentioned.
thanks in advance.
A lighter weight way to do it without clay would be to subclass the built-in DynamicObject class.
public static dynamic Display;
void Main()
{
Display = new MyCallableObject();
//this is what i was after
Console.Write(Display("bla bla bla"));
}
public class MyCallableObject:DynamicObject
{
public override bool TryInvoke(InvokeBinder binder, object[] args, out Object result)
{
result = string.Format("This is response for {0}",args.FirstOrDefault());
return true;
}
}
I finally found it my self!
all the operations have done with Clay Library behind the scene.i have wrote a sample console app for demonstrating the process.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Display = ClayActivator.CreateInstance<MyResponser>(new List<IClayBehavior> {new MyFunctionCallBehavior()});
//this is what i was after
Console.Write(Display("bla bla bla"));
}
public static dynamic Display;
}
public class MyFunctionCallBehavior : IClayBehavior
{
public object InvokeMember(Func<object> proceed, object self, string name, INamedEnumerable<object> args)
{
return ((MyResponser)self).ResponseForRequest(args.FirstOrDefault().ToString());
}
}
public class MyResponser
{
public string ResponseForRequest(string param)
{
return string.Format("This is response for {0}",param);
}
}
Related
I have a combo box over my GUI in JavaFX.
This Combo Box is composed of a complex type elements :
public class DureeChoiceBoxElement extends ObservableValueBase<DureeChoiceBoxElement> {
private IntegerProperty duree;
#Override
public String toString() {
return duree.get() + " an";
}
}
I want to map (or bind) the selected complex element with my model which contains the simple type :
public class Pel {
private IntegerProperty duree = new SimpleIntegerProperty(1);
public Property<Number> dureeProperty() {
return duree;
}
public void setDuree(Integer duree) {
this.duree.setValue(duree);
}
public Integer getDuree() {
return duree.getValue();
}
}
How to do it ?
I tried in the controller with :
public class PelController {
#FXML
private ChoiceBox<DureeChoiceBoxElement> duree;
//etc..
pel.dureeProperty().bind(createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(duree.getValue()));
/*
* #return an ObjectBinding of immutable TimeElapsed objects for the player
*/
private ObjectBinding<Property<Number>> createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(
final DureeChoiceBoxElement dureeChoiceBoxElement) {
return Bindings.createObjectBinding(new Callable<Property<Number>>() {
#Override
public IntegerProperty call() throws Exception {
return dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty();
}
}, dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty());
}
}
But it doesn't work (even not compile). I want to say that "Bind this simple property to this complex Object calling the method I give you through the method named "createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(..)".
It is logical read but I didn't managed to make it works anyway.
That's poor ....
Any help please :).
Example that (obviously) works with legacy code style (Swing coding) :
duree.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<DureeChoiceBoxElement>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends DureeChoiceBoxElement> observable,
DureeChoiceBoxElement oldValue, DureeChoiceBoxElement newValue) {
// changement durée
log.debug("Durée sélectionnée : {}", duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
log.debug("Durée bindée ? : {}", pel.getDuree());
pel.setDuree(duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
}
});
Like this my model is set to selected item. But it implies some boilerplate code. Any better idea based on high level bindings of JavaFX ?
So basically, I have a situation where I want to inject primitive types into a class (i.e. a String and an Integer). You can think of a URL and port number for an application as example inputs. I have three components:
Now say I have a class, which does take in these params:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
private String a;
private Integer b;
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample(String a, Integer b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
}
So my question here is simple. How do I inject a and b into class PrimitiveParamsDIExample?
In general, this is also asking how to inject parameters that are decided on runtime as well. If I have a and b above, read from STDIN or from an input file, they're obviously going to be different from run to run.
All the more, how do I do the above within the HK2 framework?
EDIT[02/23/15]: #jwells131313, I tried your idea, but I'm getting the following error (this one for the String param; similar one for int):
org.glassfish.hk2.api.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: There was no object available for injection at Injectee(requiredType=String,parent=PrimitiveParamsDIExample,qualifiers
I set up classes exactly as you did in your answer. I also overrode the toString() method to print both variables a and b in PrimitiveParamsDIExample. Then, I added the following in my Hk2Module class:
public class Hk2Module extends AbstractBinder {
private Properties properties;
public Hk2Module(Properties properties){
this.properties = properties;
}
#Override
protected void configure() {
bindFactory(StringAFactory.class).to(String.class).in(RequestScoped.class);
bindFactory(IntegerBFactory.class).to(Integer.class).in(RequestScoped.class);
bind(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class).to(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class).in(Singleton.class);
}
}
So now, I created a test class as follows:
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class TestPrimitiveParamsDIExample extends Hk2Setup {
private PrimitiveParamsDIExample example;
#Before
public void setup() throws IOException {
super.setupHk2();
//example = new PrimitiveParamsDIExample();
example = serviceLocator.getService(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class);
}
#Test
public void testPrimitiveParamsDI() {
System.out.println(example.toString());
}
}
where, Hk2Setup is as follows:
public class Hk2Setup extends TestCase{
// the name of the resource containing the default configuration properties
private static final String DEFAULT_PROPERTIES = "defaults.properties";
protected Properties config = null;
protected ServiceLocator serviceLocator;
public void setupHk2() throws IOException{
config = new Properties();
Reader defaults = Resources.asCharSource(Resources.getResource(DEFAULT_PROPERTIES), Charsets.UTF_8).openBufferedStream();
load(config, defaults);
ApplicationHandler handler = new ApplicationHandler(new MyMainApplication(config));
final ServiceLocator locator = handler.getServiceLocator();
serviceLocator = locator;
}
private static void load(Properties p, Reader r) throws IOException {
try {
p.load(r);
} finally {
Closeables.close(r, false);
}
}
}
So somewhere, the wiring is messed up for me to get an UnsatisfiedDependencyException. What have I not correctly wired up?
Thanks!
There are two ways to do this, but one isn't documented yet (though it is available... I guess I need to work on documentation again...)
I'll go through the first way here.
Basically, you can use the HK2 Factory.
Generally when you start producing Strings and ints and long and scalars like this you qualify them, so lets start with two qualifiers:
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Target( { TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER })
#javax.inject.Qualifier
public #interface A {}
and
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Target( { TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER })
#javax.inject.Qualifier
public #interface B {}
then write your factories:
#Singleton // or whatever scope you want
public class StringAFactory implements Factory<String> {
#PerLookup // or whatever scope, maybe this checks the timestamp?
#A // Your qualifier
public String provide() {
// Write your code to get your value...
return whatever;
}
public void dispose(String instance) {
// Probably do nothing...
}
}
and for the Integer:
#Singleton // or whatever scope you want
public class IntegerBFactory implements Factory<Integer> {
#PerLookup // or whatever scope, maybe this checks the timestamp?
#B // Your qualifier
public Integer provide() {
// Write your code to get your value...
return whatever;
}
public void dispose(String instance) {
// Probably do nothing...
}
}
Now lets re-do your original class to accept these values:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
private String a;
private int b;
#Inject
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample(#A String a, #B int b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
}
Note I changed Integer to int, well... just because I can. You can also just use field injection or method injection in the same way. Here is field injection, method injection is an exercise for the reader:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
#Inject #A
private String a;
#Inject #B
private int b;
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample() {
}
}
There are several ways to bind factories.
In a binder: bindFactory
Using automatic class analysis: addClasses
An EDSL outside a binder: buildFactory
I have an external dll written in C# and I studied from the assemblies documentation that it writes its debug messages to the Console using Console.WriteLine.
this DLL writes to console during my interaction with the UI of the Application, so i don't make DLL calls directly, but i would capture all console output , so i think i got to intialize in form load , then get that captured text later.
I would like to redirect all the output to a string variable.
I tried Console.SetOut, but its use to redirect to string is not easy.
As it seems like you want to catch the Console output in realtime, I figured out that you might create your own TextWriter implementation that fires an event whenever a Write or WriteLine happens on the Console.
The writer looks like this:
public class ConsoleWriterEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public string Value { get; private set; }
public ConsoleWriterEventArgs(string value)
{
Value = value;
}
}
public class ConsoleWriter : TextWriter
{
public override Encoding Encoding { get { return Encoding.UTF8; } }
public override void Write(string value)
{
if (WriteEvent != null) WriteEvent(this, new ConsoleWriterEventArgs(value));
base.Write(value);
}
public override void WriteLine(string value)
{
if (WriteLineEvent != null) WriteLineEvent(this, new ConsoleWriterEventArgs(value));
base.WriteLine(value);
}
public event EventHandler<ConsoleWriterEventArgs> WriteEvent;
public event EventHandler<ConsoleWriterEventArgs> WriteLineEvent;
}
If it's a WinForm app, you can setup the writer and consume its events in the Program.cs like this:
/// <summary>
/// The main entry point for the application.
/// </summary>
[STAThread]
static void Main()
{
using (var consoleWriter = new ConsoleWriter())
{
consoleWriter.WriteEvent += consoleWriter_WriteEvent;
consoleWriter.WriteLineEvent += consoleWriter_WriteLineEvent;
Console.SetOut(consoleWriter);
Application.EnableVisualStyles();
Application.SetCompatibleTextRenderingDefault(false);
Application.Run(new Form1());
}
}
static void consoleWriter_WriteLineEvent(object sender, Program.ConsoleWriterEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(e.Value, "WriteLine");
}
static void consoleWriter_WriteEvent(object sender, Program.ConsoleWriterEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(e.Value, "Write");
}
It basically amounts to the following:
var originalConsoleOut = Console.Out; // preserve the original stream
using(var writer = new StringWriter())
{
Console.SetOut(writer);
Console.WriteLine("some stuff"); // or make your DLL calls :)
writer.Flush(); // when you're done, make sure everything is written out
var myString = writer.GetStringBuilder().ToString();
}
Console.SetOut(originalConsoleOut); // restore Console.Out
So in your case you'd set this up before making calls to your third-party DLL.
You can also call SetOut with Console.OpenStandardOutput, this will restore the original output stream:
Console.SetOut(new StreamWriter(Console.OpenStandardOutput()));
Or you can wrap it up in a helper method that takes some code as an argument run it and returns the string that was printed. Notice how we gracefully handle exceptions.
public string RunCodeReturnConsoleOut(Action code)
{
string result;
var originalConsoleOut = Console.Out;
try
{
using (var writer = new StringWriter())
{
Console.SetOut(writer);
code();
writer.Flush();
result = writer.GetStringBuilder().ToString();
}
return result;
}
finally
{
Console.SetOut(originalConsoleOut);
}
}
Using solutions proposed by #Adam Lear and #Carlo V. Dango I created a helper class:
public sealed class RedirectConsole : IDisposable
{
private readonly Action<string> logFunction;
private readonly TextWriter oldOut = Console.Out;
private readonly StringWriter sw = new StringWriter();
public RedirectConsole(Action<string> logFunction)
{
this.logFunction = logFunction;
Console.SetOut(sw);
}
public void Dispose()
{
Console.SetOut(oldOut);
sw.Flush();
logFunction(sw.ToString());
sw.Dispose();
}
}
which can be used in the following way:
public static void MyWrite(string str)
{
// print console output to Log/Socket/File
}
public static void Main()
{
using(var r = new RedirectConsole(MyWrite)) {
Console.WriteLine("Message 1");
Console.WriteLine("Message 2");
}
// After the using section is finished,
// MyWrite will be called once with a string containing all messages,
// which has been written during the using section,
// separated by new line characters
}
I was wondering if is possible to create an instance of a generic type in Dart. In other languages like Java you could work around this using reflection, but I'm not sure if this is possible in Dart.
I have this class:
class GenericController <T extends RequestHandler> {
void processRequest() {
T t = new T(); // ERROR
}
}
I tried mezonis approach with the Activator and it works. But it is an expensive approach as it uses mirrors, which requires you to use "mirrorsUsed" if you don't want to have a 2-4MB js file.
This morning I had the idea to use a generic typedef as generator and thus get rid of reflection:
You define a method type like this: (Add params if necessary)
typedef S ItemCreator<S>();
or even better:
typedef ItemCreator<S> = S Function();
Then in the class that needs to create the new instances:
class PagedListData<T>{
...
ItemCreator<T> creator;
PagedListData(ItemCreator<T> this.creator) {
}
void performMagic() {
T item = creator();
...
}
}
Then you can instantiate the PagedList like this:
PagedListData<UserListItem> users
= new PagedListData<UserListItem>(()=> new UserListItem());
You don't lose the advantage of using generic because at declaration time you need to provide the target class anyway, so defining the creator method doesn't hurt.
You can use similar code:
import "dart:mirrors";
void main() {
var controller = new GenericController<Foo>();
controller.processRequest();
}
class GenericController<T extends RequestHandler> {
void processRequest() {
//T t = new T();
T t = Activator.createInstance(T);
t.tellAboutHimself();
}
}
class Foo extends RequestHandler {
void tellAboutHimself() {
print("Hello, I am 'Foo'");
}
}
abstract class RequestHandler {
void tellAboutHimself();
}
class Activator {
static createInstance(Type type, [Symbol constructor, List
arguments, Map<Symbol, dynamic> namedArguments]) {
if (type == null) {
throw new ArgumentError("type: $type");
}
if (constructor == null) {
constructor = const Symbol("");
}
if (arguments == null) {
arguments = const [];
}
var typeMirror = reflectType(type);
if (typeMirror is ClassMirror) {
return typeMirror.newInstance(constructor, arguments,
namedArguments).reflectee;
} else {
throw new ArgumentError("Cannot create the instance of the type '$type'.");
}
}
}
I don't know if this is still useful to anyone. But I have found an easy workaround. In the function you want to initialize the type T, pass an extra argument of type T Function(). This function should return an instance of T. Now whenever you want to create object of T, call the function.
class foo<T> {
void foo(T Function() creator) {
final t = creator();
// use t
}
}
P.S. inspired by Patrick's answer
2022 answer
Just came across this problem and found out that although instantiating using T() is still not possible, you can get the constructor of an object easier with SomeClass.new in dart>=2.15.
So what you could do is:
class MyClass<T> {
final T Function() creator;
MyClass(this.creator);
T getGenericInstance() {
return creator();
}
}
and when using it:
final myClass = MyClass<SomeOtherClass>(SomeOtherClass.new)
Nothing different but looks cleaner imo.
Here's my work around for this sad limitation
class RequestHandler {
static final _constructors = {
RequestHandler: () => RequestHandler(),
RequestHandler2: () => RequestHandler2(),
};
static RequestHandler create(Type type) {
return _constructors[type]();
}
}
class RequestHandler2 extends RequestHandler {}
class GenericController<T extends RequestHandler> {
void processRequest() {
//T t = new T(); // ERROR
T t = RequestHandler.create(T);
}
}
test() {
final controller = GenericController<RequestHandler2>();
controller.processRequest();
}
Sorry but as far as I know, a type parameter cannot be used to name a constructor in an instance creation expression in Dart.
Working with FLutter
typedef S ItemCreator<S>();
mixin SharedExtension<T> {
T getSPData(ItemCreator<T> creator) async {
return creator();
}
}
Abc a = sharedObj.getSPData(()=> Abc());
P.S. inspired by Patrick
simple like that.
import 'dart:mirrors';
void main(List<String> args) {
final a = A<B>();
final b1 = a.getInstance();
final b2 = a.getInstance();
print('${b1.value}|${b1.text}|${b1.hashCode}');
print('${b2.value}|${b2.text}|${b2.hashCode}');
}
class A<T extends B> {
static int count = 0;
T getInstance() {
return reflectClass(T).newInstance(
Symbol(''),
['Text ${++count}'],
{Symbol('value'): count},
).reflectee;
}
}
class B {
final int value;
final String text;
B(this.text, {required this.value});
}
Inspired by Patrick's answer, this is the factory I ended up with.
class ServiceFactory<T> {
static final Map<Type, dynamic> _cache = <String, dynamic>{};
static T getInstance<T>(T Function() creator) {
String typeName = T.toString();
return _cache.putIfAbsent(typeName, () => creator());
}
}
Then I would use it like this.
final authClient = ServiceFactory.getInstance<AuthenticationClient>(() => AuthenticationClient());
Warning: Erik made a very good point in the comment below that the same type name can exist in multiple packages and that will cause issues. As much as I dislike to force the user to pass in a string key (that way it's the consumer's responsibility to ensuring the uniqueness of the type name), that might be the only way.
I am developing for android using android annotations but I don't unterstand how to use it with CursorAdapters.
There is already a example for BaseAdapters, but if I add #EBean to a class that extents CursorAdapter I get the error message "#EBean annotated element should have a constructor with one parameter max, of type android.content.Context". CursorAdapter already has two constructors.
public class SongInfoAdapter extends CursorAdapter {
...
#Override
public void bindView(View view, Context context, Cursor cursor) {
...
rowData.id.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() {
public void onClick(View v) {
itemOnClick(rowData);
}
});
}
public void itemOnClick(RowDataHolder rowData) {
switch(audioPlayer.getPlayingplayer()) {
case AudioPlayer.RIGHT:
case AudioPlayer.NONE:
audioPlayer.load(rowData.songInfo, AudioPlayer.LEFT);
break;
case AudioPlayer.LEFT:
audioPlayer.load(rowData.songInfo, AudioPlayer.RIGHT);
break;
}
}
...
}
AudioPlayer is a class that uses annotations (#EBean), but I can't write
#Bean
AudioPlayer audioPlayer;
because I can't use annotations in this class. How can I use AndroidAnnotations in CursorAdapter?
Many thanks in advance .
Create a constructor that takes one argument, the context.
SongInfoAdapter (Context context) {
super(context, null, FLAG_AUTO_REQUERY);
}
Create an init method and set the cursor for the adapter in init.
public void init(Cursor c) {
this.changeCursor(c);
}
Now you can annotate SongInfoAdapter with #EBean and use annotations.