I have a combo box over my GUI in JavaFX.
This Combo Box is composed of a complex type elements :
public class DureeChoiceBoxElement extends ObservableValueBase<DureeChoiceBoxElement> {
private IntegerProperty duree;
#Override
public String toString() {
return duree.get() + " an";
}
}
I want to map (or bind) the selected complex element with my model which contains the simple type :
public class Pel {
private IntegerProperty duree = new SimpleIntegerProperty(1);
public Property<Number> dureeProperty() {
return duree;
}
public void setDuree(Integer duree) {
this.duree.setValue(duree);
}
public Integer getDuree() {
return duree.getValue();
}
}
How to do it ?
I tried in the controller with :
public class PelController {
#FXML
private ChoiceBox<DureeChoiceBoxElement> duree;
//etc..
pel.dureeProperty().bind(createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(duree.getValue()));
/*
* #return an ObjectBinding of immutable TimeElapsed objects for the player
*/
private ObjectBinding<Property<Number>> createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(
final DureeChoiceBoxElement dureeChoiceBoxElement) {
return Bindings.createObjectBinding(new Callable<Property<Number>>() {
#Override
public IntegerProperty call() throws Exception {
return dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty();
}
}, dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty());
}
}
But it doesn't work (even not compile). I want to say that "Bind this simple property to this complex Object calling the method I give you through the method named "createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(..)".
It is logical read but I didn't managed to make it works anyway.
That's poor ....
Any help please :).
Example that (obviously) works with legacy code style (Swing coding) :
duree.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<DureeChoiceBoxElement>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends DureeChoiceBoxElement> observable,
DureeChoiceBoxElement oldValue, DureeChoiceBoxElement newValue) {
// changement durée
log.debug("Durée sélectionnée : {}", duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
log.debug("Durée bindée ? : {}", pel.getDuree());
pel.setDuree(duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
}
});
Like this my model is set to selected item. But it implies some boilerplate code. Any better idea based on high level bindings of JavaFX ?
Related
In a grid I want to display different elements. Depending on the type of the element I want to use a different TemplateRenderer. One solution to this problem would be to use dom-if elements in the template. if the «if» parameter is false, the element should not get rendered. The problem is, that in my templates all the elements get rendered, even though the debugger shows me that the method, that is responsible for determining the truth value, sometimes returns false.
every template gets rendered twice
Here is my code for the grid:
// these are the two javascript templates
#JsModule("./src/views/parts/card/graphics-card-card.js")
#JsModule("./src/views/parts/card/memory-card.js")
public class PcPartsDomIfGrid extends Grid<AbstractPcPart> {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 7474489703766322949L;
public PcPartsDomIfGrid() {
super();
initColumn();
}
private boolean isMemory(AbstractPcPart pcPart) {
return pcPart.getClass().equals(Memory.class);
}
private boolean isGraphicsCard(AbstractPcPart pcPart) {
return pcPart.getClass().equals(GraphicsCard.class);
}
private void initColumn() {
addColumn(Objects.requireNonNull(CardFactory.getTemplate())
.withProperty("partCard", CardFactory::create)
.withProperty("isMemory", this::isMemory)
.withProperty("isGraphicsCard", this::isGraphicsCard));
}
}
Here is the Code for the Factory:
public class CardFactory {
public static AbstractPcPartCard create(AbstractPcPart pcPart) {
if (pcPart.getClass().equals(GraphicsCard.class)) {
return GraphicsCardCard.create((GraphicsCard) pcPart);
} else if (pcPart.getClass().equals(Memory.class)) {
return MemoryCard.create((Memory) pcPart);
} else {
// different PC parts
return null;
}
}
public static TemplateRenderer<AbstractPcPart> getTemplate() {
String memoryTemplate = MemoryCard.getTemplateString();
String graphicsCardTemplate = GraphicsCardCard.getTemplateString();
String combinedTemplate = memoryTemplate + graphicsCardTemplate;
return TemplateRenderer.of(combinedTemplate);
}
}
Both MemoryCard and GraphicsCardCard are similar, here is the code for MemoryCard:
public class MemoryCard extends AbstractPcPartCard {
Memory pcPart;
public MemoryCard(Memory pcPart) {
this.pcPart = pcPart;
}
public static MemoryCard create(Memory pcPart) {
return new MemoryCard(pcPart);
}
// getters
public static String getTemplateString() {
return "<memory-card is='dom-if' if='[[item.isMemory]]'"
+ " part-card='[[item.partCard]]'>"
+ "</memory-card>";
}
}
The complete code can be found on github. The relevant view is located in the package:
com.example.application.ui.views.partsDomIf
The dom-if attribute must be used on a <template> tag, such as
<template is='dom-if' if='[[item.important]]'>this is shown when the item is <b>important</b></template>
<template is='dom-if' if='[[!item.important]]'>this is shown when the item is <b>NOT important</b></template>
Note that the !property.name negation is the only logical operation available, you can't use e.g. comparators there.
The pattern of using a factory method CardFactory::create also does not make much sense to me. The Grid receives a list of items through the DataProvider (either through setItems or setDataProvider) and the Renderer just processes those items to show them in the UI. You should not create new data objects in the Renderer if you can avoid it.
I am writing a code that can take some boolean values from a part of some other code and change colours of certain circles on the screen accordingly. However I ran into problems trying to bind the boolean values to colours. I ended up with this:
unit1.getNeuron().getWorkingProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<Boolean>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Boolean> observable, Boolean oldValue, Boolean newValue) {
if (newValue == Boolean.FALSE) {
controller.paint1 = new ObservableValueBase<Paint>() {
#Override
public Paint getValue() {
return Color.RED;
}
};
} else {
controller.paint1 = new ObservableValueBase<Paint>() {
#Override
public Paint getValue() {
return Color.DODGERBLUE;
}
};
}
}
});
but I'll have to repeat it for n times for n variables I use. Is there a different way to implement this?
Let' s say you want to create an ObservableObjectValue<Paint> you want to toggle based on an ObservableBooleanValue, then Bindings is your friend:
final ObservableBooleanValue booleanCondition = unit1.getNeuron().getWorkingProperty();
final ObservableObjectValue<Paint> paintProperty = Bindings.when(booleanCondition).then(Color.RED).otherwise(Color.DODGERBLUE);
So basically, I have a situation where I want to inject primitive types into a class (i.e. a String and an Integer). You can think of a URL and port number for an application as example inputs. I have three components:
Now say I have a class, which does take in these params:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
private String a;
private Integer b;
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample(String a, Integer b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
}
So my question here is simple. How do I inject a and b into class PrimitiveParamsDIExample?
In general, this is also asking how to inject parameters that are decided on runtime as well. If I have a and b above, read from STDIN or from an input file, they're obviously going to be different from run to run.
All the more, how do I do the above within the HK2 framework?
EDIT[02/23/15]: #jwells131313, I tried your idea, but I'm getting the following error (this one for the String param; similar one for int):
org.glassfish.hk2.api.UnsatisfiedDependencyException: There was no object available for injection at Injectee(requiredType=String,parent=PrimitiveParamsDIExample,qualifiers
I set up classes exactly as you did in your answer. I also overrode the toString() method to print both variables a and b in PrimitiveParamsDIExample. Then, I added the following in my Hk2Module class:
public class Hk2Module extends AbstractBinder {
private Properties properties;
public Hk2Module(Properties properties){
this.properties = properties;
}
#Override
protected void configure() {
bindFactory(StringAFactory.class).to(String.class).in(RequestScoped.class);
bindFactory(IntegerBFactory.class).to(Integer.class).in(RequestScoped.class);
bind(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class).to(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class).in(Singleton.class);
}
}
So now, I created a test class as follows:
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class TestPrimitiveParamsDIExample extends Hk2Setup {
private PrimitiveParamsDIExample example;
#Before
public void setup() throws IOException {
super.setupHk2();
//example = new PrimitiveParamsDIExample();
example = serviceLocator.getService(PrimitiveParamsDIExample.class);
}
#Test
public void testPrimitiveParamsDI() {
System.out.println(example.toString());
}
}
where, Hk2Setup is as follows:
public class Hk2Setup extends TestCase{
// the name of the resource containing the default configuration properties
private static final String DEFAULT_PROPERTIES = "defaults.properties";
protected Properties config = null;
protected ServiceLocator serviceLocator;
public void setupHk2() throws IOException{
config = new Properties();
Reader defaults = Resources.asCharSource(Resources.getResource(DEFAULT_PROPERTIES), Charsets.UTF_8).openBufferedStream();
load(config, defaults);
ApplicationHandler handler = new ApplicationHandler(new MyMainApplication(config));
final ServiceLocator locator = handler.getServiceLocator();
serviceLocator = locator;
}
private static void load(Properties p, Reader r) throws IOException {
try {
p.load(r);
} finally {
Closeables.close(r, false);
}
}
}
So somewhere, the wiring is messed up for me to get an UnsatisfiedDependencyException. What have I not correctly wired up?
Thanks!
There are two ways to do this, but one isn't documented yet (though it is available... I guess I need to work on documentation again...)
I'll go through the first way here.
Basically, you can use the HK2 Factory.
Generally when you start producing Strings and ints and long and scalars like this you qualify them, so lets start with two qualifiers:
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Target( { TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER })
#javax.inject.Qualifier
public #interface A {}
and
#Retention(RUNTIME)
#Target( { TYPE, METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER })
#javax.inject.Qualifier
public #interface B {}
then write your factories:
#Singleton // or whatever scope you want
public class StringAFactory implements Factory<String> {
#PerLookup // or whatever scope, maybe this checks the timestamp?
#A // Your qualifier
public String provide() {
// Write your code to get your value...
return whatever;
}
public void dispose(String instance) {
// Probably do nothing...
}
}
and for the Integer:
#Singleton // or whatever scope you want
public class IntegerBFactory implements Factory<Integer> {
#PerLookup // or whatever scope, maybe this checks the timestamp?
#B // Your qualifier
public Integer provide() {
// Write your code to get your value...
return whatever;
}
public void dispose(String instance) {
// Probably do nothing...
}
}
Now lets re-do your original class to accept these values:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
private String a;
private int b;
#Inject
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample(#A String a, #B int b) {
this.a = a;
this.b = b;
}
}
Note I changed Integer to int, well... just because I can. You can also just use field injection or method injection in the same way. Here is field injection, method injection is an exercise for the reader:
public class PrimitiveParamsDIExample {
#Inject #A
private String a;
#Inject #B
private int b;
public PrimitiveParamsDIExample() {
}
}
There are several ways to bind factories.
In a binder: bindFactory
Using automatic class analysis: addClasses
An EDSL outside a binder: buildFactory
I am developing for android using android annotations but I don't unterstand how to use it with CursorAdapters.
There is already a example for BaseAdapters, but if I add #EBean to a class that extents CursorAdapter I get the error message "#EBean annotated element should have a constructor with one parameter max, of type android.content.Context". CursorAdapter already has two constructors.
public class SongInfoAdapter extends CursorAdapter {
...
#Override
public void bindView(View view, Context context, Cursor cursor) {
...
rowData.id.setOnClickListener(new OnClickListener() {
public void onClick(View v) {
itemOnClick(rowData);
}
});
}
public void itemOnClick(RowDataHolder rowData) {
switch(audioPlayer.getPlayingplayer()) {
case AudioPlayer.RIGHT:
case AudioPlayer.NONE:
audioPlayer.load(rowData.songInfo, AudioPlayer.LEFT);
break;
case AudioPlayer.LEFT:
audioPlayer.load(rowData.songInfo, AudioPlayer.RIGHT);
break;
}
}
...
}
AudioPlayer is a class that uses annotations (#EBean), but I can't write
#Bean
AudioPlayer audioPlayer;
because I can't use annotations in this class. How can I use AndroidAnnotations in CursorAdapter?
Many thanks in advance .
Create a constructor that takes one argument, the context.
SongInfoAdapter (Context context) {
super(context, null, FLAG_AUTO_REQUERY);
}
Create an init method and set the cursor for the adapter in init.
public void init(Cursor c) {
this.changeCursor(c);
}
Now you can annotate SongInfoAdapter with #EBean and use annotations.
I am studying orchard architecture.i have faced with a strange concept in display management section.
in Partial view page there is a 'function call like' syntax like so Display(Model.Head). that is not a function thought, it is a dynamic object defined in orchard WebViewPage.
I am wondering how to define a dynamic object so that you can call it (and pass it an argument as well) like a function as i mentioned.
thanks in advance.
A lighter weight way to do it without clay would be to subclass the built-in DynamicObject class.
public static dynamic Display;
void Main()
{
Display = new MyCallableObject();
//this is what i was after
Console.Write(Display("bla bla bla"));
}
public class MyCallableObject:DynamicObject
{
public override bool TryInvoke(InvokeBinder binder, object[] args, out Object result)
{
result = string.Format("This is response for {0}",args.FirstOrDefault());
return true;
}
}
I finally found it my self!
all the operations have done with Clay Library behind the scene.i have wrote a sample console app for demonstrating the process.
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Display = ClayActivator.CreateInstance<MyResponser>(new List<IClayBehavior> {new MyFunctionCallBehavior()});
//this is what i was after
Console.Write(Display("bla bla bla"));
}
public static dynamic Display;
}
public class MyFunctionCallBehavior : IClayBehavior
{
public object InvokeMember(Func<object> proceed, object self, string name, INamedEnumerable<object> args)
{
return ((MyResponser)self).ResponseForRequest(args.FirstOrDefault().ToString());
}
}
public class MyResponser
{
public string ResponseForRequest(string param)
{
return string.Format("This is response for {0}",param);
}
}