I am building a REST API using Grails. I want it to be protected using OAuth2.0 client_credentials flow(grant_type). My use-case is as follows:
a external agent will send a request to something like
http://server-url/oauth/token?client_id=clientId&client_secret=clientSecret&grant_type=client_credentials
and obtain a access_token. Then, my URL(protected resource) should be accesible with something like
http://server-url/resource?access_token={access-token obtained before}
I am looking for something that makes doing this on Grails easy and quick. What will be the best way/tool/plugin to use for this ? Scribe library is an option, if there are any tutorials for my specific use-case, it will be great.
P.S.: I have tried the spring-security and related plugins, no joy there. Any alternatives would be nice.
I have the same issue. I found a lot of grails plugins that helped you authenticate your app against other oauth providers, but nothing that would help me make my app the oauth provider. After a lot of digging, I came across this grails plugin that will do exactly what you want.
https://github.com/adaptivecomputing/grails-spring-security-oauth2-provider
I'm still configuring it for my application, and I think the docs might need a few edits (specifically the authorization_code flow) but I got the simple client_credentials flow to work with minimal configuration. Hope that helps!
Based on my experiences, Scribe was built for OAuth 1.0 and has only very limited support for OAuth 2.0. In fact, for testing our own OAuth 2 implementation, all we could use from it was an HTTP request wrapper, we had to do anything else manually. Fortunately, doing it manually is suprisingly easy.
Since I still haven't found a fine open OAuth 2.0 library for Java (frankly I'm not familiar with Groovy), I encourage you to write the client code for yourself. You don't even need a client callback endpoint to use the client credentials grant flow. So you simply create an HTTP request (as you've written above already, take care to escape the GET parameters though) and get the response content. Your flow does not use redirects, so simply parse the JSON object in the response content, e.g. with the org.json library. Finally, send an HTTP request using the extracted access token.
Note that your examples are not completely standard compliant. The standard requires using HTTPS, sending the token in an HTTP header instead of a GET parameter and suggests using a HTTP basic authorization header instead of GET parameters to specify client credentials.
I may have misunderstood your question, and you may want to implement the server side, too. The scribe library supports only client side, so you can find a commercial implementation or implement your own server. It is a complex task, but if you support only the client credentials flow, it almost becomes easy. ;-)
This isn't a plugin, it's just a sample Grails application that acts as an OAuth provider. It was really easy to get up and running with Grails 3.
https://github.com/bobbywarner/grails3-oauth2-api
Related
I am creating new product. for that I have to use available security features. should I use Oauth2 or Json web token? which is better and in which situation these should be used?
I think you may find your answer in using org.apache.oltu.oauth2.
https://www.programcreek.com/java-api-examples/?api=org.apache.oltu.oauth2.client.request.OAuthClientRequest.AuthenticationRequestBuilder
You can see an implementation for oauth and openID here oauth server and resource server
Just to explain what they are,
oauth server creates the tokens
resource server uses that token and processes it to give you the requested data
You can also go through the following docs to understand what they mean and how to implement them,
sample implementation in java , oracle tutorial on the concept of tokens
If you want to do google API auth then you can go through this
I also found this stackoverflow link which is sort of similar question and has shared few of similar links. You should check that out as well.
I have been implementing a skeleton Claims Based architecture for our services and websites. I'm using WIF, .NET 4.5, MVC / Web Api.
I have the STS (WS-Federation / WS-Trust) and several Relying Parties implemented, and all is working fine.
Now, I want to be able to authenticate in one Relying Party and use that same token (the bootstrap token, I assume) to make Ajax calls to another Relying Party. I can get the Bootstrap Token down in the HTML (is this even a good idea?), and add it to the Ajax call headers as some form of Authentication (Basic, etc).
What I don't know is how to intercept the request in the final Relying party, and "tell" WIF to use that bootstrap token and do it's magic with it (Load, Validate, Authenticate, Authorize, Create Principal, Create Session Token, Write it down in a cooke).
I guess I could do all this by hand using the available classes, but there must be a point where I can just hook up for this. Probably around the SAM / FAM modules, but I can't understand exactly how.
Any ideas?
Thanks
SAML is not a good fit for being consumed in html. The format is complex and relies too much on WS-Security for cryptography. I see more adoption these days of OAuth2 (It was OAuth-Wrap in the past), although is complex as well. If you want to explore that path, I recommend the ThinkTecture Identity Server as a quick solution.
http://weblogs.thinktecture.com/cweyer/2012/11/oauth2-in-thinktecture-identityserver-v2-implicit-grant-flow-with-javascript.html
Thanks
Pablo.
I'm trying to secure my MVC4 Web Api. Actually, I just really need an identity provider with some light security. My service is similar to twitter, from a security standpoint, there's not a lot of private data, but the service does need to know the userid for the caller.
It's also important to know that the web service will only be consumed by mobile devices right now, although a website may accompany it at some future point.
S.O. and the internet have led me to Thinktecture.IdentityModel, but man it seems complex and I can find exactly zero documentation or samples. I also haven't yet had a pleasant experience with claims-based authentication. I don't have a claims server, token provider, or anything like that, and it seems like you would need that to use this method. This all seems far to heavy for my situation.
I've also read about people implementing their own HMAC solution (https://github.com/cuongle/WebAPI.Hmac) or using OAuth (https://github.com/maksymilian-majer/DevDefined.OAuth) but these also seem a bit complex (I've read that OAuth without the helper class is enough to make the best developers cry, and I'm not the best). Janrain looks like it might work, but it looks like you have to pay for more than 2,500 authenticated users per year ...
What is the best way to implement a simple identity provider and security for Web Api?
Thanks!
I have attempted to answer a similar question to this before Create an OAuth 2.0 service provider using DotNetOpenAuth where I highlighted the Thinkecture Identity Server. The Setup instructions not too difficult (IMHO) The installation video is here and should help a lot.
I have updated my older answer with this too but there is also a fairly lightweight O-Auth 2.0 implementation example here Sample code here http://code.google.com/p/codesmith/downloads/detail?name=OAuth2.zip&can=2&q=#makechanges
Have you also read this well articulated question here Authenticating requests from mobile (iPhone) app to ASP.Net Web API (Feedback requested on my design)
Well, security is hard :)
As for Thinktecture.IdentityModel -- this is a token processing library (among other things) that you'd use in your WebAPI application. You'd use this so you don't need to do the logic to accept tokens (basic auth, SAML, SWT, JWT). Claims are just a side-effect.
If you're looking for an identity provider, then the sister open source project Thinktecture.IdentityServer is in beta for version 2. It's an identity provider that supports a custom database and issues tokens. The project URL is:
http://thinktecture.github.com/Thinktecture.IdentityServer.v2/
In response to the problem of finding example code as documentation, consider the samples folder in the Thinktecture github repo: https://github.com/thinktecture/Thinktecture.IdentityModel.45/tree/master/Samples
(Why do you need more reputation to comment on SO than to answer?)
I need to develop an API to be the core of a web APP.
My initial idea was making a REST API that would treat all the request and then create some clients for web, mobile and desktop.
My question is, How should I manage the authentication for this situation?
I thought about using a token that would be passed with all requests to the REST API.
Im my case, I would not like to have something like OAuth because the ecosystem will not have multiple apps like Facebook/Twitter does.
NOTE: I must have the API separated from the client for web.
In more details, I would request POST /users/auth passing their password and username, and receive an auth token.
Is it a good approach or there is something better?
Agree that Devise is great for the auth in the application. For the API level, 3scale could help a lot (http://www.3scale.net) - it takes care of rate limits, keys, oauth secret distribution, analytics, developer portal and other stuff. There's a ruby plugin to get started here: https://github.com/3scale/3scale_ws_api_for_ruby.
Devise is a fantastic gem that handles authentication in rails apps. It also provides token based authentication. You can find many resources on the web (for example here) explainig how to use it. No doubt it will fit for your situation.
I am building a RESTFul API and wondering what's the best way to do auth? Users will need to authenticate. I know of three ways:
1.) Pass API key in every RESTFul requests:
http://api.mydomain.com/api-key-here/get-users
This is nice because developers can immediately start using the API by simply copying URL string into the browser. Are there any potential security risks though?
2.) Every request passes the API key in the header of the request.
This seems to be more secure, but developers can't make requests via their browser. CURL is required.
3.) oAuth
I must admit I don't know much about it, but seems very popular. My concern is that its a barrier for developers to start using the API. They first must be familiar with oAuth, and have it setup.
Thoughts? Thanks greatly.
If your concern is burdening developers with a high cost to entry, I suggest basic auth, but running your API over https.
I do this with Diligent Street and it works really well. I use an API Key and couple it with a Secret as the username/password combination for basic auth.
I have employed the technique found here: Build a RESTful API. This solution uses an MD5 hash of your API ID, API secret and the UNIX Time stamp and passed in the HTTP header. This authentication method is the same used by Mashery’s Authentication.
This link references and contains a full blown starter kit for creating an API that has Auth, Membership and*API Usage Metering* along with a supporting EF database.
As for testing the service you can use RESTClient to execute HTTP calls with custom headers instead of using Curl.