I am creating an API (Restlet, GAE) and implemented OpenId for authentication and OAuth2 to protect access to the API. When testing this from a client web app that I built, everything is fine. When the user hits a part of the web app that wants access to the API, the user is asked to login via OpenId and then is asked to grant access to the web app to grab resources from the API.
However, I noticed that the web app doesn't know who the user is (!). All the web app has is an auth token. Thus, the web app can't say "Hello, username", since it doesn't know who the user is.
With Restlet technology, the authentication is essentially:
// Authentication code
OpenIdVerifier verifier = new OpenIdVerifier(OpenIdVerifier.PROVIDER_YAHOO);
verifier.addRequiredAttribute(AttributeExchange.EMAIL);
Authenticator au = new MyRedirectAuthenticator(getContext(), verifier, null);
While the following handles both authentication and OAuth2 authorization:
// Authentication + OAuth code:
OAuthParameters params = new OAuthParameters("2345678901", "secret2", "http://localhost:8888/v3/", roles);
OAuthProxy local = new OAuthProxy(params, getContext());
Initially I was only using the "Authentication + OAuth" in my web app and the authentication was happening "invisibly" (as mentioned above).
I figured that one way around the "problem" is that if the web app handles the authentication "visibly". So I added the Authentication code to the web app. The flow looks the exact same to the user, but the web app is able to capture the user info (email) and all is fine. There doesn't seem to be any conflict with the "both" code either.
Another way around the problem is to add something to the API that would return the user info associated with an authToken (a la Twitter's verify_credentials).
My question: Is the approach I have taken reasonable? Should I use the Twitter approach instead? Or something completely different? (I am pretty new to all this stuff, so it is hard to figure out if I am choosing a solution that seems to work, only to hit a brick wall later on).
The short answer is that when a client web app gets permission to access OAuth resources on behalf of a user, the client web app isn't supposed to know anything about the user (login, password, etc.). If the client web app wants to know who the user is, it can provide authentication.
I have implemented the above scheme with Restlet and google app engine, allowing the user to authenticate to the resource server via OpenId and also adding Google Authentication for the web client app (just so it can give a "hello" message). All seems fine.
Related
At my company we are developing several web applications that uses a REST API server.
First a little introduction.
The app provides the ability to manage users through the REST API and allows the users to login to the app.
Right now the REST API is for internal use only because we plan to develop more apps and communicate to the REST API as the central point of data access. We are handling the REST API authentication with a "Resource Owner Password Credentials Grant" implementation for the internal apps.
What we need is a Single-Sign on service for all the apps, we want a user to login to an app and if he/she access to another of our apps he/she will be already loged in.
We have been experimenting with the CAS protocol, with the CASino library specifically and it works great.
The problem is we don't know how to handle the flow between the apps, the REST API and the SSO service, also I don't know if there is a better choice regarding SSO services.
My questions are...
How we could handle the flow between the apps, the REST API and the
SSO service, because the REST API should be stateless it should not
communicate to the SSO service? or is there a way to communicate the
REST API to the SSO service?
Is there a better choice to implement a Single-Sign on service,
maybe OAth or OpenID and are this options suitable for REST APIs?
Thanks in advance!
Your REST API will have to talk to the SSO server to validate the Access Token, unless all the information it needs is encrypted inside the Access Token. Not sure what you mean by "flow between the apps", you should have all apps talking to a central SSO server.
When a user wants to create an account on WebApp1, the account should be created on the SSO server, either by redirecting them there or if you need a differently styled signup form for each web app, then via an AJAX call to the SSO server's REST API. I would recommend the latter as redirecting is more difficult to debug and it can make a bad user experience.
Make sure the messaging is clear, i.e. not "Sign up for a WebApp1 account", but "Sign up for a MyCompany account to get access to WebApp1".
OAuth 2.0 is very popular and people have more experience with it, so it's easier to get help or integrate with apps created by others.
The doorkeeper gem is a good server library.
OAuth 2.0 is normally used when the SSO server doesn't trust the client apps (e.g. Facebook, Twitter), but it can be implemented in such a way to skip the client authorization step (where the user is asked to approve the client app), and you can use the Resource Owner Password Credentials Grant via a REST API.
CAS is easier than OAuth. It is fairly easy to implement the basic endpoints and that way you can customize it as you wish.
I worked on a CAS-based server with a custom implementation (not sure if it was even really CAS-compliant). The authentication was done with Devise (I don't recommend Devise if you're going to customise it a lot, make your own in this case). The original flow was that the user went to the website, clicked Login/Register and then was redirected to the SSO server and after the user logged in, redirected back with a one-time ticket that the website's backend exchanged to an access token via a REST API call.
Then we added a REST API that was called from each website with AJAX. You send the username/password/captcha/etc and get back an auth token, which the site sends to its own backend. The SSO REST API can also set a cookie on its own domain, so that if the user visit another of our web apps it makes a call on pageload to check if the user is logged in. This way you're automatically logged in on every webapp without the redirect mess.
All tokens issued + the associated user info were sent to a fast Node.js app that would save them to Redis, and the app backends would call this app to validate the access tokens really fast, without putting load to the SSO Rails app.
I am working on a AngularJS web app and I am trying to implement single sign on. I had a nice implementation using Identity server and authorization server with implicit flow and oAuth tokens, however I need a mechanism to sign the user out of all apps they are signed into.
I am currently redirecting the user to authorization server, this then redirects the user to identity server. The user logs on and it shown a consent screen, a Json web token is then sent to the app via the query string and is put into local storage. This token is attached to the Authorization header which the web api (that is on a different domain) receives and either allows or denies the request.
The problem is oAuth has no way of singing a user out of all apps. I have now looked at WS-Federation using Json web tokens but this approach still appears to use cookies which I would like to avoid as the api and client app are on different domains.
Does Thinktecture Identity Server have any way to do this and if so are there any examples I could take a look at.
Thanks
As you already said - OAuth2 is not an authentication protocol and hence does not have the concept of (single) signout.
I'm creating an app for iOS that consumes an API I've created, which requires authentication and authorization of users. I'm thinking of using OAuth to let the mobile users do this with Facebook. This is an internal API that isn't meant to be exposed to third parties.
Anyway, I'm a little confused about the abilities and limitations of OAuth consumers versus OAuth providers. Basically, I want to implement "Login with Facebook" functionality from the iOS app. It seems to me that this implies that my API should be an OAuth consumer, but the problem with this is that the login flow for a web app assumes a browser -- an NSURLConnection instance isn't going to know what to do with an HTML login page, and even if the redirect to the login page was made to work by prefixing the redirect URI with the fb:// schema, surely the login form is going to pass the authorization token back to the iOS app and not my API?
So my question is: is there a way to implement my API as an OAuth consumer? If not, and I should implement it as an OAuth provider, what does logging in with credentials from another provider like Facebook even mean?
I think things are a bit mixed up:
OAuth is to Authenticate your app against facebook. A user grants
access to his FB account to your app on behalf of him
"Login with FB" is the other way round and is not OAuth: A User
with an FB account is using this data to register AND login to your
app.
The entire flow of the # 2 can be read here.
Goal:
Allow a user to authentication with Facebook into an iOS application which requires access to a protected web service that I'm running.
Assumptions:
There is a native authentication (and registration) system in place for those users that opt not to use Facebook for sign in.
Details:
Assume we want to offer the option for a user to sign in with Facebook without creating a separate account/credential for our system.
Because we support our own native auth mechanism (username and password) we have our own user IDs and issue an authentication token that is used for subsequent interactions after the initial credential validation.
I'm surprised that Facebook doesn't have best practices for this in their developer documentation. All the existing documentation is either assuming you are building FB auth into a website, or a standalone mobile app with no service that requires authentication.
Here's my initial thoughts on how this would be designed but want validation on whether it's correct.
Client pops the Facebook iOS Login
UI User signs in with Facebook credentials and gets access token
iOS App passes access token to our server
Our server talks to FB graph API using access token to (a) validate the token and (b) get the FB user ID for that access token.
e.g. Our server would call https://graph.facebook.com/me/?access_token=XYZ which would return profile info in a JSON object
Assuming it's valid, our server extracts the User ID from the JSON object and checks whether the user already has an account. If so, we issue our own auth ticket to client to use for that session. If user doesn't have an account, we create a new one with the Facebook User ID, assign our own unique UserID and issue our auth ticket.
Client then passes auth ticket back on subsequent interactions that need authentication.
This seems like the right approach to me but not sure if I'm missing something insanely basic and going down the wrong (complicated) path.
I just dealt with this myself, and here's the part that bit me:
In your step 5... It's possible for a user to register for an account with you entirely separate from their Facebook ID, right? Then some other time they log in with Facebook.... And you just created them a second account and lost their first one.
There needs to be a way to be logged in to your web service, then log in to facebook, and capture the association between the facebook ID and the local account.
Apart from that, your plan sounds solid.
Update: Facebook has added a doc outlining such a scenario HERE
Use https to transmit the auth token to your server, as stated by Facebook
Sharing of Access Tokens
Our Data Policies explicitly prohibit any sharing of an Access Token
for your app with any other app. However, we do allow developers to
share Tokens between a native implementation and a server
implementation of the same App (ie. using the same App ID) as long as
the transfer takes place using HTTPS.
One problem I can see with this strategy, is that somebody can give you an access token obtained for a different facebook app. As far as I know, there's no way to verify that the access token is for your application, so you'll just go on and use it.
It doesn't sound very harmful, though. Generally people/apps try to protect the access tokens, rather than sharing them.
One possible exploit of this would be, for somebody to create their own site or mobile app, obtain access tokens for their users and try to authenticate them, using your API. If this succeeds (the user is has a facebook account in your site), the malicious site will be able to use your API impersonating the user.
It's a bit of a long shot, but I think it could work.
Edit: It looks like there is a way to validate the access token after all. See the answer by #Daaniel on question Get application id from user access token (or verify the source application for a token).
your solution totally works.
Maybe an alternative: why not just get the email on the client from the initial social service request and send to your web service? The web service could just store the email, and maybe a social_provider as well. I understand that your web service will not be able to validate where the email came from, but isn't there a high-trust relationship between your web service and your client? If there is, seems like you can depend on the email coming from the right place. Someone please let me know what obvious thing I'm missing that makes the email-based approach silly...
I'm trying to use OAuth with .NET (DotNetOpenAuth) to send updates to a Twitter account via a web application. I understand the basic workflow of OAuth and Twitter.
Where I'm confused if is it useful in a server web application? I don't want any user interaction.
But how it seems after an application start, the request token needs to be recreated and also an access token. This involves user interaction.
What is the correct workflow for my case?
Storing the request token or access token in config file?
Or the easist way, using HTTP basic authentication?
Thanks
If I understand you correctly your application will not be interacting with Twitter on behalf of your users but will be acting as the Twitter account for your application.
In this case there are 2 main factors to consider.
1) Do you want "from API" attached to each status as will be if you use basic auth or your applications name will happen if you use OAuth.
2) Do you want to put in the extra effort to implement OAuth.
If you decide to go with OAuth you would store your apps consumer key/secret and the accounts access token in configuration just like you would store the accounts screenname/password.
Your "request token needs to be recreated" phrase suggests you might be running into the problem where every time your user visits you need to re-authorize to Twitter, and perhaps you're looking for a way to access the user's Twitter account while he's not at your web site, and how can you do this when their token isn't fresh from being re-authorized. Is that right?
If so, the user isn't supposed to have to re-authorize Twitter every time they visit your site. The token is supposed to last a long time, which would also allow your site to access their Twitter account when they are not directly interacting with your web site. The problem may be that you haven't implemented the IConsumerTokenManager interface, but are instead using the default InMemoryTokenManager, which is for sample use only, since this memory-only token manager loses tokens every time the web app is restarted. Your own implementation of this simple interface should store and read the tokens out of some persistent storage such as a database.