i have created a multibox helper in mvc3 using div and all the items appear perfectly and vertical scrolling works fine too but when i scroll down slowly within div some text appear blur and if i let it go for few secs it adjusts and the text is visible good. This appears as if i am buffering the data while scrolling.
Any suggestions?
This is the css i am using on div
border: gray 1px solid;
width: 350px;
height: 150px;
float: left;
overflow-y: scroll;
background-color: White;
Related
So I made a search bar, and everything works fine. Except the css.
This is what it looks like on computers:
Search bar on computer
And this is what it looks like on iOS: (tested on iPhone, iPad, and iPod)
Search bar on iPad
You'll notice that on the iPad, the search text height is greater than the button.
This is my css:
input.searchFormText {
-webkit-appearance: none;
-webkit-border-radius: 0;
padding-left: 2.25px;
border-top-left-radius: 4.25px;
border-bottom-left-radius: 4.25px;
height: 19.5px;
border-color: gray;
border-style: solid;
border-right: none;
border-width: 0.5px;
background-color: white;
font-size: 12.25px;
font-family: "Open Sans";
transition-duration: 0.225s;
}
So I need the search text input height to be less, but only on iOS.
For some reason iOS Safari gives the input element a different default padding than other browsers. Just set the padding-top and padding-bottom of your input and it should have the same height in every browser ;)
I have an iFrame generated by ThingLink that I need to drop into an existing web page and behave responsively.
I would have thought that the usual CSS used to make YouTube or Vimeo iFrames would do the job. Which it does on most browsers, but for whatever reason this does not seem to be the case for Safari on IOS (Safari desktop appears to work). Why is this? Is there something in the Iframe's HTML that is causing an issue?
Here's a Fiddle showing the iFrame in question misbehaving (top) and a sample YouTube iFrame behaving (bottom).
And of course the actual code I am using
HTML:
CSS:
div.iwrap {
width: 100% ;
position: relative;
padding-bottom: 60%;
height: 0;
-webkit-overflow-scrolling:touch;
overflow: hidden;
}
.iwrap object,
.iwrap iframe,
.iwrap embed {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
bottom: 0;
right: 0;
width: 100% !important;
height: 100% !important;
border: none;
}
iframe,
object,
embed {
max-width: 100%;
}
You can see I've tried trying out the absolutely positioning each corner of the iframe, but with no joy.
I should stress that it is only Safari on IOS that it breaks. Safari for desktop and Android for mobile look good.
Any pointers to get that working would be much appreciated, but more importantly, why isn't it.
Using responsive iframe code I devised for myself, and using your src= url, I created and tested this Pen on CodePen.
Using CodePen's CrossBrowser Testing, the Pen displays and functions correctly on Android mobile devices. (With one exception: the embedded Youtube video has no audio in CrossBrowser Testing although in normal view it does.) But on iOS devices it displays only a black square where the content should be.
I'm not certain from your post whether this is the failure you are talking about.
I have other Pens, e.g., Responsive Iframe - Base Code, which function correctly on iOS devices. Just the one using your src= url does not.
This leads me to wonder whether, even though using known responsive HTML and CSS, there is something about the source that's not playing nicely with iOS.
I'm not sufficiently versed in the technology to be able to suggest what that might be, however, I hope I've demonstrated that even with code known to be responsive the source document doesn't display in iOS. Thus, the problem appears not to be with the code but rather some conflict inherent between the source and iOS.
Sorry I couldn't be of more help, but maybe this will help you to rephrase the question and question title more narrowly and specifically so that it will grab another user's attention.
The editor insists that, with a link to CodePen, I must include some code. So, merely to satisfy that requirement, here is my responsive HTML and CSS code.
HTML:
<div id="Iframe-Thinglink"
class="set-margin set-padding set-border set-box-shadow
center-block-horiz">
<div class="responsive-wrapper
responsive-wrapper-wxh-600x480"
style="-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch; overflow: auto;">
<iframe src="//www.thinglink.com/channelcard/632903487365054466">
<p>Error Message Here</p>
</iframe>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
/* CSS for responsive iframe */
/* ========================= */
/* outer wrapper: set the iframe's width and height by setting
max-width & max-height here; max-height greater than
padding-bottom % will truncate to padding-bottom % of max-width */
#Iframe-Thinglink {
max-width: 600px;
max-height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
/* inner wrapper: make responsive */
.responsive-wrapper {
position: relative;
height: 0; /* gets height from padding-bottom */
/* put following styles (necessary for overflow and scrolling
handling on mobile devices) inline in .responsive-wrapper around
iframe because potentially unstable in CSS:
-webkit-overflow-scrolling: touch; overflow: auto; */
}
.responsive-wrapper iframe {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: none;
}
/* padding-bottom = h/w as % -- sets aspect ratio */
/* YouTube video aspect ratio */
.responsive-wrapper-wxh-650x315 {
padding-bottom: 56.25%;
}
.responsive-wrapper-wxh-600x480 {
padding-bottom: 80%;
}
/* general styles */
/* ============== */
.set-border {
border: 5px inset #4f4f4f;
}
.set-box-shadow {
-webkit-box-shadow: 4px 4px 14px #4f4f4f;
-moz-box-shadow: 4px 4px 14px #4f4f4f;
box-shadow: 4px 4px 14px #4f4f4f;
}
.set-padding {
padding: 40px;
}
.set-margin {
margin: 30px;
}
.center-block-horiz {
margin-left: auto !important;
margin-right: auto !important;
}
See the following link: http://www.howru.nl/preken/new/test3.html
For some reason I keep getting space at the right of the three main buttons.
To better identity this on this forum, I've enabled the border of the relevant table temporary.
The issue is inside the following class I reckon:
.button
{
display: block;
width: 350px;
height: 135px;
margin-left: 7px;
margin-right: 7px;
margin-top: 10px;
margin-bottom: 20px;
text-decoration: none;
background-position: top;
color: #FFFFFF;
}
The specified width is the actual width of the background image.
The full CSS sheet can be found at http://www.howru.nl/preken/new/styles.css
Right column (text) should float at the right, as is the case currently. Left column (buttons) should float at the left (as is currently the case), and the center picture should float in the center. Strange thing is the left column takes more space in the table, while none have a fixed width.
Ideally I don't want to specify a width of a column twice (for the TD and for the content, in case of a BG image on the display-block'd content); in the proposed solutions below the display-block'd has a width specified (width of the background image) and the parent TD element as well... That is what I don't like and for which I started this post. Because I still don't understand why the TD's aren't equally sharing the available table space:
Now column 1 (left) seems to take the most, while it doesn't need so much, the second takes a little less, and the right column takes only what was specified for the inner width, whilst the left (1st) column has the same (width specified for the content instead of the TD) and does not stick to that width apparantly, while the right TD does...)
Both in IE as Opera I get this; any idea what I am missing??!
Goal is to understand what is happening, and why. So I'm not looking for a cheap fix - as one can thing of 100 'ugly' ways to do this.
here are the changes i have made. Try this. Btw you should use % instead of px
.top {
vertical-align: top;
width: 350px;
}
removed float from .blkright
.blkright {
}
.title {
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: bold;
letter-spacing: -1px;
padding-bottom: 5px;
text-align: center;
}
.column {
margin-left: 12px;
overflow: hidden;
width: 325px;
}
Change right table .top .column width in the to change this space to right of buttons
.column {
overflow: hidden;
padding: 5px 5px 25px;
width: 290px;
(originally width was 250px) because it is trying to fit the width: 100% you have set
you can also remove the 250px , since the right column is the only column you've set a width on
I am not ultimately sure how you want the rest (e.g. the text paragraph) aligned then, but here is my approach.
First, give each body-column a class or an id. You assign these classes to the three <td>s respectively.
.content-left {
float: left;
}
.content-mid {
float: left;
}
.content-right {
display: table-row;
}
Although this solution takes a bit more effort than IanO.S.'s, this solution is also more dynamic. If your button or image sizes change someday you don't have to hack into your code, find and edit your pixel-widths.
Add declaration of width on the first table cell
.top:first{
width: 364px;
}
and you wont see any spaces anymore
I have a button image I'm using as a background image for some links.
The background image has rounded corners.
I want to use a css drop shadow instead of putting the drop shadow in the image
The problem is, the drop shadow appears to be drawn around the element. Although I kind of expected to see the drop shadow color through the transparent parts of the background image, I'm seeing the background color instead (see this jsfiddle).
My actual goal is a little more complex, but if I can satify my first three bullet points then I can nail this task. Specifically, what I want to do is use two nested elements with background images of the right and left parts of a button image (rounded corners) so that I can use the same css to wrap a 'button' around text of any length. Since the backgrounds overlap in a css 'sliding doors' style, a png alpha drop shadow shows a 2x dark section where the images overlap. Soo.. I thought I'd use a css shadow, but as you can see in the jsFiddle, there are problems with that too.
Any ideas?
Box-shadows don't show through transparent backgrounds. A more simple test case would be:
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 20px;
background-color: transparent;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px #000;
}
The output expected would be a nice blurred black square right? Well... no, it's a white square with a dropshadow. http://jsfiddle.net/UjhrW/
To achieve what you want to do you will need separate markup for the dropshadow, fill it with white, and then set the spill of the shadow so it looks like a blurry square...
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 20px;
background-color: #000;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px 6px #000;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/Etmty/
.box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
margin: 20px;
background-color: #000;
box-shadow: 0 0 10px 6px #000;
}
<div class="box"></div>
I'm trying to come up with my own star image that's slightly smaller and different style than the one provided in the gem/plugin, but Ajaxful_rating doesn't have an easy way to do this. Here's what I've figured out so far:
The stars.png in the public folder is three 25x25 pixel tiles stacked vertically, ordered empty star, normal star, and hover star.
I'm assuming as long as you keep the above constraints, you should be fine without modifying any other files.
But what if you want to change the image size of the stars to larger or smaller?
I've found where you can change the height in the stylesheets/ajaxful_rating.css
.ajaxful-rating{
position: relative;
/*width: 125px; this is setted dynamically */
height: 25px;
overflow: hidden;
list-style: none;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-position: left top;
}
.ajaxful-rating li{ display: inline; }
.ajaxful-rating a,
.ajaxful-rating span,
.ajaxful-rating .show-value{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
text-indent: -1000em;
height: 25px;
line-height: 25px;
outline: none;
overflow: hidden;
border: none;
}
You just need to change every place that says "25px" above to whatever height your new star image is. This works fine but doesn't display the horizontal part correctly. Anyone know where I would look to set the horizontal part as well? (I'm assuming it's in an .rb file somewhere based upon how many stars you specified in your ajaxful_rating setup)
Nevermind, I'm stupid.
In the lib/axr/stars_builder.rb, find the following:
def ratings_tag
......
#css_builder.rule('.ajaxful-rating', :width => (rateable.class.max_stars * 25))
....
end
Change the 25 to your new width.