I've noticed that when I deployed my project to Heroku that its able to find coding errors where I had forgotten to change calls to methods that I had refactored (ie changes to method name or signature). It just failed to deploy until the code has been fixed.
This seems to suggest that Heroku has some sort of preprocessor or interpreter built in that does a pseudo "compile" on the code before it allows it finish deployment. Is anyone else aware of this?
Is there a gem out there that will allow me to run a quick sanity check on my code?
Naturally, there needs to be specs / unit tests of course, but having another tool in the toolbox can't hurt.
I'd guess that it's more the differing behaviour of how a Rails application is loaded/started in production mode as opposed to development mode.
If you start you local application in production mode locally you should see the same behaviour as on Heroku.
Related
I've been working with RoR for a while but now I need to work with designers and other developers. Is there a tool like github or something like dropbox where you can share with your team the files but with a URL where you can check live any change. For example for my own I just run Rails s and I can see what happen on my localhost but for a designer it isn't that simple. And also we don't want everybody running his own rails project on his localhost.
So is there a tool or what do you do guys when you have to work with others collaborates?
You consider to use a staging environment?
A staging environment (stage) is a nearly exact replica of a production environment for software testing. Staging environments are made to test codes, builds, and updates to ensure quality under a production-like environment before application deployment. The staging environment requires a copy of the same configurations of hardware, servers, databases, and caches. Everything in a staging environment should be as close a copy to the production environment as possible to ensure the software works correctly.
See the Font
To use it, i recommend you a application like Heroku, after configure, you can 'deploy' your app commiting in a branch (its not real time, but works for your case).
If you have a VM, i recommends you this tutorial: https://emaxime.com/2014/adding-a-staging-environment-to-rails.html
Open questions like this are not really best placed on StackOverflow, which is geared more toward solving specific issues, with provided code examples and errors etc.
However, in answer to your question:
I see you mention Github in your question, but do you fully understand the underlying concept of Git Version Control, or is there a speficic reason as to why it doesn't meet your needs? As far as I believe, it's main purpose is to solve your exact scenario.
https://guides.github.com/introduction/git-handbook/
Can someone explain to me what the Rails environments are and what they do? I have tried researching myself, but could not find anything. From what I gather, the environments are:
Development
Productions
Test
Each "environment" is really just a config. You can launch your app in various different modes, and the modes are called "environments" because they affect the app's behaviour in lots of different ways. Ultimately, though, they are just configs.
BTW you can't have looked very hard when you looked "everywhere", because i just googled "rails environment" and the top result was this
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/configuring.html
which is the official explanation of configuring the rails environment.
From what you have provided in your question, it seems that you are asking:
"What are the difference between each environment configuration in Rails?"
Rails comes packages with 3 types of environments. Each have its own server, database, and configuration. See Rails Guides: Configuration for more information on options available to you.
Setting up the environment
To set your Rails environment, you will want to enter in command line:
export RAILS_ENV=<env>
Where <env> can be test, development, or production. Setting this environment variable is crucial, as it will determine what gems are installed, or what env is touched when running rails console or rails server.
Included in configuration is the gemset used for the app. When you run rails new, you will find a Gemfile with groups test, development, and production. These groups correspond to the environment currently set. When the environment is set to one of those, running bundle install installs all gems related to that group (and gems not listed in a group).
Included environments
test is designed for running tests/specs. This database will likely be bare bones, except for seeds you may call before running the suite. After each test is complete, the database will rollback to its state before the test began. I do not recommend launching rails server, as running tests (via MiniTest or RSpec) will do this for you, and close the server once the suite is finished.
development allows you to "test" your app with a larger database, typically a clone of production. This allows you to test actual real-world data without breaking production (the version that customers or end-users will experience). To view the development environment in action, change the RAILS_ENV and launch rails server. This is good for deciding how you want your pages to look (CSS, HTML). It is also good practice to briefly "test" your app yourself, clicking around making sure everything "looks" good and the JavaScript works.
production is reserved for the customer and end-user. Configuration includes the actual domain of the app, which ports to use, and initializers or tasks to run. You do not want to play around with your database, as it may be customer-impacting. Ideally, the app should work as best as it can, since this is considered your "final product."
Here are some good reads about Rails Environments
http://teotti.com/use-of-rails-environments/
and
https://signalvnoise.com/posts/3535-beyond-the-default-rails-environments
good luck !!
For testing purposes for Ruby/Rails I use RSpec and I have well over 1000 tests that are already written in my application. Once the app goes live I want to have the tests run once a day on the production server (since all the code is there) and see if anything fails. The test itself will be run against test data and now production data. This is an effort so that any new code that is added in the future will not cause anything to unknowingly break.
I have found a few solutions:
Travis-CI (only open-source ... not suitable for closed-source projects)
Jenkins-CI (not sure if it works with or well with Ruby/RSpec/Rails)
Watir (not sure if Ruby/Rspec works with it, but the tool itself is written in Ruby).
Preferably something that checks the codebase daily and then emails me when something isn't working.
I also plan on integrating JavaScript testing with the a testing library of my choice (I just need the automation platform for testing it).
Can someone provide me some insight as to which tool to use? Or does anyone have any other tools to recommend?
Jenkins-CI works great with rspec, and can run your jasmine javascript testing, and your cucumber javascript tests as well.
The only thing I'd recommend is not to test on your production server itself. When you push changes to your source-control repository, Jenkins will download the new code and run your tests there. When you're green (tests pass), push the code to production.
Although Rails and PHP have different deployment methods, what is the preferable way to distribute a FOSS Rails app? Suppose one of the major PHP apps - Magento, Drupal, Wordpress had been build upon RoR, what would have been the preferable way for them to have distributed their application?
Packaging up the code as a gem seems to be the wrong approach for a complete out-of-the-box application, but I could be wrong.
Coming from the world of PHP with its upload-and-go approach, and being a newcomer to Rails, it's rather opaque at the moment to see how code could be easily and effectively distributed.
Packaging a completed Rails app as a gem is probably the wrong approach. I think the best solution is to provide access to a git repository or a tarball of your git repo.
If you want to offer your users something more than rake db:schema:load to setup your app it's pretty easy to create custom setup commands.
Many applications are packaged with the source code just like typical PHP applications. While deploying Rails applications may seem difficult its expected that the user will know how to set up the server properly according to their environment and needs. The only issue you need to worry about is distributing the code, setting up the server is not a domain that you are going to want to help with.
For information on deployment in Rails you should see the deployment page here.
Well, usually Rails apps run in environment running Apache + Passenger (aka mod_rails).
Deployment is easily done with Capistrano gem.
When you're running Rails app in shared host environment, they usually use fcgi/cgi dispatchers to run Ruby.
I posted this very same item on SERVERFAULT, but got no reply. So here goes:
I'm currently in the process of finishing up a Rails application. I am using Warbler to package it up as a ".war" file and am using GlassFish to deploy it. I do this because the application is to be distributed to companies for in-house use. Arguably i could/should have used another framework to develop an application of this nature, however, I chose ease/speed of development over deployment hassle.
That said, I've got the setup working reasonably well on my development machine. However, I'm curious as to how to go about automating environment initialization. In other words, I need to figure out how to ensure that all DBs, files,etc. are configured upon deployment.
All of the examples I've seen thus far assume you're running your IDE on the system to which you wish to deploy and they have you run your rake tasks manually before deployment. However I need to simply give the end user the ".war" and be able to run all rake tasks upon application deployment/launch.
Can someone point me in the right direction regarding this? FWIW there is nothing in the Glassfish manual about environment initialization etc. -- then again, I don't suppose I should expect them to cover every single aspect of deployment.
Best.
Depending on your database requirements you can embed Derby within the Glassfish environment. You can easily create a blank/default database and then put that clean version in each Glassfish environment you have to set up.
I'm not sure what else you need to configure and initialize, but I'd say that if you can, script it up, either with some rake tasks. Embedding Derby takes care of database startup and initialization. Remember that a war file is just a zip file, so adding config files via a script shouldn't be so hard. You can use rails initializers (/config/initializers/) to load up yml files for configuration or whatever you need to do as the app starts up.
You won't be able to have the intializers create the schema in the database, but you could have them check for default seed data and put it in if it isn't there.
You should be able to access any part of the file system that Glassfish and the JVM can access. I don't know much about Glassfish but the only problems I've had with jruby rails apps on Tomcat were related to relative paths being relative to where the startup script was called from, and not always relative to the installation root. This could probably be solved with the right startup scripts in Tomcat or setting the appropriate start-in folder, I just haven't had a need to dive in to that very much.