I have a Rails 3.1 app with a User model and a Venue model. These two models have a HABTM relationship - A user may manage many venues and a venue may be managed by many users.
I'd like users to be able to select a default venue so I'm trying to add a default_venue_id attribute to User with the following migration:
class AddDefaultVenueIdToUser < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
add_column :users, :default_venue_id, :integer
end
def self.down
remove_column :users, :default_venue_id
end
end
The problem is that when I run that migration against my PostgreSQL database, it's assuming that default_venue_id is the foreign key for a relationship with the non-existent default_venues table and throws the following error:
PGError: ERROR: relation "default_venues" does not exist
: ALTER TABLE "users" ADD FOREIGN KEY ("default_venue_id") REFERENCES "default_venues" ("id")
Should I be doing something to tell the database that I'm not trying to create a relationship or am I going about this the wrong way?
Edit: I've just realised that another developer who worked on the project added the schema_plus gem which automatically defines constraints for columns ending in _id
That explains why I've never run into this behaviour before!
It would be helpful to see the Models as well to diagnose this problem.
However with that being said, I think that if you are using HABTM associations here it might be a good idea to take a look at a has many through relationship. example: VenueManagement which would have your user_id and venue_id. That way you could handle extra attributes on the association where it makes sense, like a default flag.
Hope that helps.
Since Rails seems to pick up on the _id part of the tag and tries linking it to a table, the easy solution to this is to try name it differently as convention says a field with _id links to a table.
An example of which could be
:default_id_for_venue, or just :defualt_venue
Related
I have two models in rails 5.1
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :sub_categories, join_table: "categories_join_table"
end
class SubCategory < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :categories, join_table: "categories_join_table"
end
I have added multiple migrations the problem is when I try to run migration I get the error ERROR: relation "comfort_factor_sub_categories" does not exist because in the migration to create table comfort_factor_sub_categories will run in later migrations. How can I handle this?
Note: I can't change the name of join_table as it is just an example I have long names.
This question is over three years old at the time of this writing, but I just ran into the same problem so I thought I'd share my solution here.
In my case, I was running Rails 6.1, so my error message looked a bit different:
StandardError: An error has occurred, this and all later migrations canceled:
Could not find table 'officers_users'
The officers_users table is a join table that is created in a later migration, but the migration in question doesn't make any use of it, so why was I getting this error?
At first, I thought it might be a Rails bug as my migration was using update_columns to modify the users table, which shouldn't run any callbacks, but then I noticed that the values that I was updating them with were dependent on a computed attribute, which in turn was dependent on the officers_users join table. So Rails was right and I was wrong (once again, hah)! The solution was simply to make the failing migration self-sufficient without needing that computed attribute. Once I did that, everything was good again.
So if you run into the same problem, I would suggest checking your migration with a fine toothed comb and look for any hidden dependencies that might be using the later migration's join table.
If I understood your problem correctly, you have added several migrations and you cannot run them because some relationship is not found.
In that case, you should duplicate the classes in migrations:
class CreateCategories < ActiveRecord::Migration[5.1]
class Category < ActiveRecord::Base
# without declaring the relationship with the table which does not exist yet
end
def up
create_table :categories do |t|
# t.something
end
end
def down
drop_table :categories
end
end
You should then do the same thing for SubCategory.
For creating a proper join_table, you can refer to Rails official documentation
I have a number of many-to-many relationships in my app.
I do not need to store information about the relationships themselves, so am using the has_and_belongs_to_many relation in my models.
I've read the Active Record documentation and it seems to confirm my strategy, BUT I'm not clear if I still need to create join tables in the database or if ActiveRecord in Rails 3.2 is smart enough to handle it using the model relations alone.
Any references or explanations would be appreciated.
----- Break -----
If I did need to store data about the relationship itself and I were using has_many => through in my model, would I need to remove the Primary Key from the "through" table (e.g. so that it only has the two foreign keys?)
Thank you!
Yes, you need to create the join table for a has_and_belongs_to_many association. Remember in Rails you need to 'migrate to create'. Using this article as an example, say we have an Account model and a Role model, we can create a join table through this migration:
rails generate migration create_accounts_roles_join_table
Now we will edit the migration file that was just created
create_table :accounts_roles, :id => false do |t|
t.integer :account_id
t.integer :role_id
end
It is important to include :id => false as this will leave off the primary key that is normally generated when you create a table. Also, we specified the two foreign keys account_id and role_id.
run rake db:migrate and add the HABTM associations in both models and everything is set up.
Also, as a side note, adding join_table to the end of the migration generator is not required but is more descriptive and integer can be replaced with references when adding the foreign keys. They are equivalent but maybe a bit more descriptive.
On the second part of your question, you don't need to remove the primary key from the table.
I have a blog like set up were there are things called events (which are essentially posts) but they have different types ("kinds") which will help me categorize where to put them in my layout. Anyway when I go to the events/edit page I get this error:
Mysql2::Error: Unknown column 'event_kinds.event_id' in 'where clause': SELECT event_kinds.* FROM event_kinds WHERE event_kinds.event_id = 1 LIMIT 1
I thought it might be an association issue, so is this right?
EventKind has_many :events
Event has_one :event_kind
?
EDIT:
I've renamed event_kinds to kinds. Right now I don't have a table called event_kinds that links together events and kinds models since each event can only be of one kind I just put the kind id inside the events table. Is there a way so that I can skip the events_kind...
You need to add event_id column to the event_kinds table.
Just create a migration
rails g migration add_event_id_to_envent_kind
Edit he file and add the below content.
def change
add_column :envent_kinds, :event_id, :integer
end
Run migration
rake db:migrate
This should solve the error.
I am new to RoR. I used "rails generate model ServiceConfigs" command to generate a table.
so may commands are as below
rails generate model ServiceConfigs configs:string
rake db:migrate
-- can see app/db/service_config.rb created.
Now edited service_config.rb file to add 2 columns and which has a foreign key relation to service table. So here is code
class ServiceConfigs < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :service, :dependent => :destroy
validates_presence_of :configs
end
Now when I login to underline database, and look at the table I don't see foreign key relation in table schema. Whats wrong/more I need to do?
highly appreciate your time and help
Krishna
So a few notes for you as you're getting started here: Firstly, I'd name your model in the singular form, as though you are describing a single instance of it: ServiceConfig and in the case where it belongs to a service, you may want to think of a different name all together.
Secondly validates_presence_of suggests that you have that field, so firstly, I'd remove the validation until you know that your DB has that column and that the migration worked. You can make sure by looking at your migration file and confirming that the column is being created.
You can define the relationship the "rails way" in your migration too:
http://guides.rubyonrails.org/association_basics.html
create_table :service_configs do |t|
t.string :configs
t.references :service
t.timestamps
end
Update
If you want to rerun a particular migration run:
rake db:migrate:redo VERSION=20100421175455
You can take a look in your schema to see what migration you are currently at as well. And you can also take a look at the schema to see what your DB is expected to look like as well.
I created a new model in my rails app. Since it's a one-to-one relation with another table, there's no need for the new model to have an id column. Everything is working fine, but for some reason, all of my Shoulda tests on this model are failing. For example:
should_validate_presence_of :first_name
is throwing this error:
ActiveRecord::StatementInvalid: Mysql::Error: Unknown column 'my_new_table.id'
in 'field list': SELECT `my_new_table`.id FROM `my_new_table` WHERE
(`my_new_table`.`some_other_column` IS NULL) LIMIT 1
Does Shoulda require an ID column? If so, is there a way around this?
Did you alias the primary key for Rails purposes?
set_primary_key :my_fk_id
Rails expects your models to have an integer id column as a primary key. You can set it to the foreign key like #MattMcKnight suggests but I'd recommend you create the id column even if you don't strictly need it. In my experience it will save you tons of headaches like this, with basically no downside.
Did you run rake db:migrate and rake db:test:prepare after you created the new model?
All tables require an id column that's just the way that ActiveRecord works. As MattMcKnight points out, you can designate another column as the primary key. You can also specify that a table have no id column is creatied by providing :id => false as an option to create_table.
Matt's answer covers renaming the primary key in the model definition. Here's how to do it in a migration.
Note, providing the primary key option without giving the id option as false means that you do not have to add to column's definition to the block. Rails will create it for you. And automatically use it in any join tables.
Example:
class CreateTableWithOUtID < ActiveRecord::Migration
def self.up
create_table :my_new_table, :primary_key => :another_table_id do |t|
t.string :some_other_column
end
end
def self.down
drop_table, :my_new_table
end
end