AccessibilityService in Monodroid - xamarin.android

Simple question... quite possibly not simple answers :)
I want to write an accessibility service for android in monodroid. I'm finding it difficult to work out the pieces. I can inherit from AccessibilityService, but there isn't an AccessibilityServiceAttribute. I need specific content in the manifest file, but apparently the intent filter and service xml is not directly supported by monodroid... I believe.
I doubt this is something that many people have done, but as a beginner with Monodroid, I think I'm mainly just finding it difficult to put together the well supported "normal" app development, with the "supported" but not quite, accessibility service development.
I would appreciate any pointers. Thanks guys.

According to the docs:
An accessibility is declared as any other service in an AndroidManifest.xml but it must also specify that it handles the "android.accessibilityservice.AccessibilityService" Intent. Failure to declare this intent will cause the system to ignore the accessibility service.
Since it is declared the same way as any other service, you can make use of ServiceAttribute and IntentFilterAttribute to generate the entry in AndroidManifest.xml. For example:
[Service]
[IntentFilter(new[] { "android.accessibilityservice.AccessibilityService" })]
public class MyAccessibilityService : AccessibilityService
{
public override void OnAccessibilityEvent(AccessibilityEvent e)
{
}
public override void OnInterrupt()
{
}
}
When you build the application, Mono for Android will generate this in the manifest:
<service android:name="sample.MyAccessibilityService">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.accessibilityservice.AccessibilityService" />
</intent-filter>
</service>

Related

Genexus Extensions SDK - Where can I find the avaliable Menu Context strings?

Im trying to use the Genexus Extensions SDK to place buttons on the IDE, in this case, i want to place it in the "context" menu, avaliable only in objects of type "Webpanel/Webcomponent" and "Transaction", Just like WorkWithPlus does here:
So far, digging up into the avaliable documentation, i've noticed that you need tu put the context type string into the xml tag and the GUID of the package that you're aiming to add the menu item, such as below in GeneXusPackage.package:
The Context ID above will add the item into the "Folder View" Context.
My questions:
Where can I find a list with all the possible ID Context strings?
What is that package attribute for, where can i get it's possible values?
I am using the SDK for Genexus 16 U11
I'm sorry to say that there is no extensive list of all the menus available. I'd never thought of it until now, and I see how it could be useful, so we'll definitely consider making it part of the SDK so that any package implementor may use it for reference.
In the meantime, in order to add a new command in the context menu you mentioned, you have to add it to the command group that is listed as part of that menu. That group is KBObjectGrp which is provided by the core shell package whose id is 98121D96-A7D8-468b-9310-B1F468F812AE.
First define your command in your .package file inside a Commands section:
<Commands>
<CommandDefinition id='MyCommand' context='selection'/>
</Commands>
Then add it to the KBObjectGrp mentioned earlier.
<Groups>
<Group refid='KBObjectGrp' package='98121D96-A7D8-468b-9310-B1F468F812AE'>
<Command refid='MyCommand' />
</Group>
</Groups>
Then in order to make your command available only to the objects you said before, you have to code a query handler for the command, that will rule when the command is enabled, disabled, or not visible at all. You can do that in the Initialize method of your package class.
public override void Initialize(IGxServiceProvider services)
{
base.Initialize(services);
CommandKey myCmdKey = new CommandKey(Id, "MyCommand");
AddCommand(myCmdKey, ExecMyCommand, QueryMyCommand);
}
private bool QueryMyCommand(CommandData data, ref CommandStatus status)
{
var selection = KBObjectSelectionHelper.TryGetKBObjectsFrom(data.Context).ToList();
status.Visible(selection.Count > 0 && selection.All(obj => obj.Type == ObjClass.Transaction || obj.Type == ObjClass.WebPanel));
return true;
}
private bool ExecMyCommand(CommandData data)
{
// Your command here
return true;
}
I'm using some helper classes here in order to get the objects from the selection, and then a class named ObjClass which exposes the guid of the most common object types. If you feel something isn't clear enough, don't hesitate to reach out.
Decompiling the Genexus dll and looking for the resource called package, you can infer what the names are.
It's cumbersome but it works

Configurable Application Insights Instrumentation Key

How can I best make the Application Inisghts' Instrumentation Key configurable in a way that allows an Azure Administrator to manage the settings for an App Services deployment of an MVC5 web application? Is there a certain event in an MVC application initialization where this should be done or is it okay to do it at pretty much any point? I am using the Trace Listener integration as well.
By default, the Instrumentation Key (iKey) is set in the ApplicationInsights.config file. Additionally, if you include the JavaScript portions, the iKey is again set in the _Layout.cshtml file. This is two different places with an iKey that you need to manage.
I want to be able to manage this key via the App Services -> Application settings tab of the Azure Portal. The reasons are:
I want to deploy multiple instances of this applications, each with its own unique iKey
I want to change this iKey periodically (because reasons)
I don't want this iKey stored in our code repository (it's okay for a "dev" iKey to be in code repo) nor do I want it to be managed by our build automation (again, because reasons)
Here is the implementation that I am currently using, and it seems to work. However, I had other implementations that seemed to set the iKey either too early or too late as it seemed it would use the iKey in the physical web.config file deployed to Azure instead of pulling from the Application settings tab from the Portal. Are there better options to do this in a best practice sort of way?
ApplicationInsights.config
<!-- Find the following node and *remove* it. It will have a GUID in it.
If you leave this, you may receive some errors even with all of the
other changes. -->
<InstrumentationKey>{GUID HERE}</InstrumentationKey>
Global.asax.cs
protected void Application_Start()
{
// Add this first line below
Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Extensibility.TelemetryConfiguration.Active.InstrumentationKey =
ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["ai:InstrumentationKey"];
// Showing the rest of this so you can see the order of operations
AreaRegistration.RegisterAllAreas();
GlobalConfiguration.Configure(WebApiConfig.Register);
FilterConfig.RegisterGlobalFilters(GlobalFilters.Filters);
RouteConfig.RegisterRoutes(RouteTable.Routes);
AutomapperConfig.Init();
}
web.config
<!-- Add the following to <appSettings> and put your iKey value in here. -->
<add key="ai:InstrumentationKey" value="*****" />
_Layout.cshtml (in the <head> section of the HTML. NOTE TO FUTURE READERS: I recommend you don't use this entire snippet but instead just use the line that begins instrumentationKey: and integrate that line into whatever the modern version is for the rest of this JS snippet!):
<script type = 'text/javascript' >
var appInsights=window.appInsights||function(config)
{
function r(config){ t[config] = function(){ var i = arguments; t.queue.push(function(){ t[config].apply(t, i)})} }
var t = { config:config},u=document,e=window,o='script',s=u.createElement(o),i,f;for(s.src=config.url||'//az416426.vo.msecnd.net/scripts/a/ai.0.js',u.getElementsByTagName(o)[0].parentNode.appendChild(s),t.cookie=u.cookie,t.queue=[],i=['Event','Exception','Metric','PageView','Trace','Ajax'];i.length;)r('track'+i.pop());return r('setAuthenticatedUserContext'),r('clearAuthenticatedUserContext'),config.disableExceptionTracking||(i='onerror',r('_'+i),f=e[i],e[i]=function(config, r, u, e, o) { var s = f && f(config, r, u, e, o); return s !== !0 && t['_' + i](config, r, u, e, o),s}),t
}({
instrumentationKey:'#(Microsoft.ApplicationInsights.Extensibility.TelemetryConfiguration.Active.InstrumentationKey)'
});
window.appInsights=appInsights;
appInsights.trackPageView();
</script>
All of the methods you specified are great. Our recommendation is to use a web.config app setting and using this in the global.asax.cs for standard initialization. No telemetry will be sent before the initlization as we hook into OnBeginRequest().
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/application-insights/app-insights-api-custom-events-metrics#a-namedynamic-ikeya-dynamic-instrumentation-key
Another method that might work well is to set the APPINSIGHTS_INSTRUMENTATIONKEY environment variable as it's picked up by the SDK. Of course that depends on if you have multiple apps on the same machine.
https://github.com/Microsoft/ApplicationInsights-dotnet/blob/v2.2.0/src/Core/Managed/Net40/Extensibility/Implementation/TelemetryConfigurationFactory.cs#L22

Can I pass other components into Castle Windsor config?

Lets say I have a main component that I want to initialize in a specific way and I have it's constructor take an Interface for this purpose. Is there a way to define the implementation I want for this interface in my xml and in turn inject that into the main component as a parameter? Like this:
public interface IComponent2 {
void DoStuff();
}
public class ConcreteCompImpl2 : IComponent2 {
IComponent1 _comp;
public ConcreteCompImpl2(IComponent1 comp) {
_comp = comp;
}
public void DoStuff(){
//do stuff
}
}
<component id="component1" service="ABC.IComponent1, ABC" type="ABC.ConcreteCompImpl1, ABC" />
<component id="component2" service="ABC.IComponent2, ABC" type="ABC.ConcreteCompImpl2, ABC" >
<parameters>
<component1>???</component1>
</parameters>
</component>
Or am I thinking about this all wrong and there is a much simpler way to accomplish this? The main thing I want to be able to do is configure what 'kind' of IComponent1 will get injected whenever an IComponent2 is created. Thanks
If you have only one concrete class implementing IComponent1, then it will automatically be injected when you resolve IComponent2.
If you have several classes implementing IComponent1 and want a specific one every time IComponent2 is resolved, you need to specific an inline dependency:
container.Register(
Component.For<IComponent2>()
.ImplementedBy<Component2>()
.DependsOn(Dependency.OnComponent<IComponent1, YourSpecialComponent1>())
);
I'm not completely sure you can specify this in the XML configuration, but honestly you should use the Fluent API instead of the XML configuration unless you have a really compelling reason to use it. As mentioned in the above link:
Ability to register components in XML is mostly a leftover from early days of Windsor before Fluent Registration API was created. It is much less powerful than registration in code and many tasks can be only accomplished from code.

Resolving a type without registering first - prism 4 and Untiy

First of all I would like to remark I am new with the concept of prism, DI and containers. I am looking on one of the code samples provided with the Prism Library:
The code simply injects a view with the "Hello World" string (in a TextBlock element) to a region in the shell.
When the application starts-up, it creates a new BootStrapper instance, which creates and initializes the shell:
public class Bootstrapper : UnityBootstrapper
{
protected override DependencyObject CreateShell()
{
return Container.Resolve<Shell>();
}
protected override void InitializeShell()
{
base.InitializeShell();
Application.Current.RootVisual = (UIElement)this.Shell;
}
protected override void ConfigureModuleCatalog()
{
base.ConfigureModuleCatalog();
ModuleCatalog moduleCatalog = (ModuleCatalog)this.ModuleCatalog;
moduleCatalog.AddModule(typeof(HelloWorldModule.HelloWorldModule));
}
}
My question refers to the method CreateShell(). I couldnt find nowhere in the supplied code (including not in a configuration file or any xaml file...) where do they register the type Shell, and even if it was registered - the supplies Shell class doesnt implement any interface... what is the meaning of resolving a specific type?
the Shell implementation:
public partial class Shell : UserControl
{
public Shell()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
This looks like a magic to me, so I tried to create my own type (MyType) and resolve it the same way:
Container.Resolve<MyType>();
By setting a breakepoint inside MyType constructor, I saw that it DID resolved MyType. Can somebody please explain to me how does it work?
These couple of threads should answer your question:
http://compositewpf.codeplex.com/Thread/View.aspx?ThreadId=230051
Does unity just make clasess with out needing anything registered?
Additionally, if you are eager to get more detail into how Unity can do this, simple download Unity 2.0 and open the source code that is provided with the installer.
I hope this helps.
Thanks,
Damian
You do not need to register a type you want to resolve. You need to register the dependencies of a type, that you want to resolve. In this case, the Shell doesn't need any dependencies, so you can resolve it simply. But for an example (not really), if your shell getting an interface IService as a parameter, then you must register IService, before you resolve Shell.
Otherwise you will get Dependency Resolution Failed Exception. In Prism 4.1 it will be swallowed silently due to TryResolve.

SpringSecurity3.0 AuthenticationSuccessEvent cannot be detected

I want to prepare some data after user login system. After some google, I implemented a ApplicationListener to listen AuthenticationSuccessEvent:
import org.springframework.context.ApplicationListener;
import org.springframework.security.authentication.event.AuthenticationSuccessEvent;
import org.springframework.security.core.userdetails.UserDetails;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
#Component
public class MyApplicationListener implements
ApplicationListener<AuthenticationSuccessEvent> {
#Override
public void onApplicationEvent(AuthenticationSuccessEvent event) {
UserDetails userDetails = (UserDetails) event.getAuthentication()
.getPrincipal();
System.out.println("Successed login:" + userDetails.getUsername());
}
}
I updated to Spring 3.0 RELEASE, and Spring Security 3.0.0.RC2. But I can never get called for AuthenticationSuccessEvent:( (I tried other event, such as AuthenticationFailureBadCredentialsEvent, it worked).
I use my own authentication-manager and do nothing about the event:
Do I need to podcast the event by myself?
Thank you.
You don't specify the details of your configuration. You state that you use your own authentication-manager - does this mean you are configuring the ProviderManager explicitly using Spring Bean configuration?
If so, you need to configure the AuthenticationEventPublisher on the ProviderManager, as the default implementation is a null implementation, which doesn't publish events.
The bean declaration for the default implementation is like this:
<bean id="defaultAuthEventPublisher" class="org.springframework.security.authentication.DefaultAuthenticationEventPublisher"/>
You'll then need to map this bean to the appropriate property on the ProviderManager:
If you aren't declaring your own ProviderManager, unfortunately there is not a way to enable this functionality using the security namespace style of configuration. Hope that answers your question!
I'm using Spring-Security 2.0.4, but I think it's pretty the same.
From what that I saw the ProviderManager is the one that publish the event in case of successful authentication.
Few questions that might help:
Do you use the standard ProviderManager (org.springframework.security.providers.ProviderManager) or supply one of your own?
Maybe the #Component doesn't work?, maybe (just for testing) you can try the regular addListener() function.
The best way to understand what happens is to Ito debug Spring security (locate a break point in ProviderManager), I use to do it a lot and find it pretty useful.
Shay
Maybe you want to listen for the InteractiveAuthenticationSuccessEvent. OpenID for example emits that event only. See also SEC-1534.
I have the same problem and I found a few things that might help.
I think that we should include the following listener in web.xml
<listener-class>org.springframework.security.web.session.HttpSessionEventPublisher</listener-class>
If you wonder if your problem is in the listener detection or the publising you may tray to lauch events yourself.
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication();
AuthenticationSuccessEvent event = new AuthenticationSuccessEvent(
SecurityContextHolder.getContext().getAuthentication());
eventPublisher.publishEvent(event);

Resources