Having read around it appears this should be possible. I have the following content tree:
Home Page
Cars
-- List Of Cars (From my Hive provider).
I assumed I would be able to do something like this in my provider Uri:
content://*/Cars/*
as described in an Umbraco blog post (http://jupiter.umbraco.org/Data-Access-in-Umbraco-5.ashx). However it appears Umbraco does not accept this as an Uri. Also the blog post specified use of Type="Wildcard" on the mapping, however this is no longer in Umbraco??
Does anyone have an example on how to accomplish this?
Umbraco 5 does not yet support this.
Related
I recently decided to start to take advantage of rich snippets to improve my personal website's content for the search engines and, IMHO most importantly, the site readers – hi, Mam! ;-). One of these are Google Authorship. Personally, I think the idea behind Google Authorship is a sound one: it helps to brings a sense of identity, personality and – arguably, most importantly – credibility to what is still largely an anonymous web.
Normally, I would link my article to Google Authorship using the following line of HTML:
<A REL="author" HREF="https://plus.google.com/112431363835029530079?rel=author">Jordan Clark</A>
However, in the instance of a website that publishes articles that are written by multiple authors, manually entering each another’s Google+ UID string starts to become a tiresome process.
Is is valid to do the following:
(a) Link to the author like so, using the script "author.php" (or other type of server-side script).
<A REL="author" HREF="/author.php?by=Alice&rel=author/[UID]?rel=author">Alice</A>
(b) The file "author.php" scripts simply do a quick check for Alice's (or whoever) User ID string provided by Google, and then uses a simple HTTP redirect header to pass this data to Google.
What I would like to know is:
Is it okay to use a local script to redirect to your Google+ user profile? (i.e. will it affect the PageRank of already indexed page or have any other unforeseen negative effects on new and indexed pages?)
Why do I not see more people linking with Google’s “prettified” version:
http://profiles.google.com/clarky.y2k?rel=author
Are there any drawbacks to using the “prettified” version of this method?
Ideally, I would like to use the intermediate PHP script, as I have already described above (see part 1). However, any tips, suggestions or other ways you may have implemented on your websites are very welcome!
For item (1), you can maintain your own app's profiles (author.php in your case) for your authors. On your own app's profile page (author.php), you would add a link from that page to Google and specify the rel="me" attribute on that link. So Alice's profile page might say something like "Find Alice on Google+.
This indirect authorship linking is supported. You also will need the link from Alice's Google+ profile that lists her as a contributor to your site. Once the linking is setup in both directions, authorship can start to show up. Authorship won't always display in all cases and can take some time for it to start appearing as Google would need to reindex your pages.
For item (2), I don't think the profiles URL will enable authorship. Some people use that URL as a vanity URL, but as far as I know it isn't supported for use with things like authorship, badges, etc.
You should test if your redirects are followed using the Rich Snippets Testing Tool: http://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/richsnippets
rel="author" is no longer supported.
I used Node js for my webapp and I wanted to create a new user with unique email ID and hence that required me to look up the index table but then I realised that the Node Driver doesn't have the index() function as the one in Java( graphDb.index() ). Any work around for such an issue, like using REST or some Cypher connetor
Neo4j just so happens to have a wonderful REST API that should work for your application. The docs for the api are detailed here:
http://docs.neo4j.org/chunked/milestone/rest-api.html.
It even has an entire section devoted to indexing.
I'm working on a collaborative document editing application where clients can open up a document, post edits via a webservice, and subscribe to updates made to the document using SignalR. I'm experimenting with my SignalR setup and can't quite get what I want.
My gut tells me that I should shoot for a setup where each document has an endpoint with a name like "subscribe", so the full path would be "/documents/1/subscribe" for document 1 and "/documents/2/subscribe" for document 2. However, as far as I can tell, SignalR wants me to have a single endpoint, and then manage which clients get updates either by using Groups or by managing the list of subscribers for a document in code myself and send out individual messages.
As a result I have two questions.
Is there a way to do what I want to do what I want to do with SignalR?
Is there a reason what I want to do is totally wrong headed and silly?
Aside from "dedicated", friendly looking URLs I don't really see any value to this vs. just using groups. In fact, the only thing I could see it doing is adding more overhead because of the way the message bus internals of SignalR work with respect to scale.
If you did want to try this, the base thing you'd need to figure out would be registering routes on the fly per document, which, as Phil Haack's RouteMagic has done for MVC, I suppose it might be possible for SignalR route configurations as well.
I'm on the way of creating a blog through ASP.NET MVC framework. All the articles I'm going to submit have the same layout only the main content differs. So I created a common view that dynamically loads the content from a physical file(contains only the particular article markup) in a section. So all the url requests send by users points to a same physical file that dynamically loads a particular section based upon the article. Is this the right approach? Is this create some problems in SEO? I'm eager to hear from you. [UPDATED] The urls of the articles look like http://myblog.com/blog/archives/2011/1/using_asp_mvc. All these kind of requests are received by a single page that loads the content of the article from another physical file in it.
I think you need to rewrite the url like in
http://www.cricandcric.com/Cricket-News/4182/Cricket-West-Indies-:-I-am-sure-that-West-Indies-will-bounce-back-,-said-Hooper.html
If you obesrve this I have done the URL Rewriting, which will be user friendly for the search engines.
You can find good references at following url
http://www.webconfs.com/url-rewriting-tool.php
http://corz.org/serv/tricks/htaccess2.php
To make it more understandable about the power of url rewriting
if you search for "I am sure that West Indies will bounce back , said Hooper"
in google, you can see our cricandcric.com in the first page
I'm having a hard time finding out where to start with this one. I pull information from an external website and put some of the content on my page. I think I need two things done. 1. A google search that takes the url of the top search given a name of my current object. 2. A way to examine the source of the result and output the information of a tag with a specific class.
To better explain this, I'll create a hypothetical situation: Say I have a website that lists mattresses and gives reviews. Say I want to add other websites reviews and in this website there's a tag like 3.5/5. Then I want to display this review along with a link to the external page. Is there a way to search the site like "site:http://mattressreviewsite/ #matress.name", pull that top url, and then search the source for the string "class='rating'" and display this in my view?
Thanks for any help or guidance. I'm using Rails 3.
You need an HTTP client (httparty, net/http-default) for that and do some parsing to get the required results.
Go study the url patterns of google (as far as I remember it was google.com?q=search_string) and use the http client for requests (get/post). Parse the result (there are many HTML parser gems available too) to get what you need and for any subsequent HTTP requests. And don't forget the 'I am feeling lucky' feature of google which returns only one result.
All the best!