I have a gui that keeps scrolling on the 8520 screen. I have used setPadding(XYEdges) and setMargin(XYEdges) to remove the spaces around the components on the UI but there's still space left in between these components. Are there other API calls i can make to remove spaces around components?
You need to consider the following:
setPadding refers to a boundary inside the border of a field and controls how close the internal content of the field can be to the border.
setMargin refers to a boundary outside the border of a field and controls how close the field can be to an adjacent field on that edge.
BUT note that the margins of adjacent fields overlap, so that if field A has it's right margin set to 0, and right adjacent field B has it's left margin set to 20, then the two fields will still be placed no closer than 20 pixels apart.
i.e. you have to take into account the margins set for the edges of all adjacent fields.
Returning to padding, the same applies for managers if you set their internal padding. This will determine how close to the inside of the manager's border an included field can be placed.
Somewhere in the blackberry documentation and/or support forum, there is a document explaining this pictorially, I just can't find my link to it right now, but will post it here when I find it again.
Related
While using Delphi Seattle 10 and Steema TeeChart Pro VCL FMX 2016.18, I am looking to Highlight a Selection of a Line Graph (multiple series) in the way that Zooming allows / makes a square around a highlighted selection of a Line Graph to indicate which part of it to zoom into (as long as the onmousedown action is in progress).
The purpose of this would be to allow the selection to remain highlighted while the mouse is no longer being clicked, to potentially "Delete" the highlighted Data points. All I need this for is to obtain the (X0 Y0 X1 Y1) values to possibly obtain the CalcPosPoint(X) and remove all the points inside. The data is currently obtained through a Record Struct (Memory Mapped) file, and it will there for be used to set/check for a property "deleted" to indicate on the next redraw of the graph which rows to completely ignore and which to continue printing.
I hope to be able to do this (select from 1 chart), and have it simultaneously draw on multiple graphs. I have tried to look for an example of this feature through the use of TSelectorTool (FMXTee). One of the pages I found referring to such a tool is Interactive data point selection as well as Multiple selections with Selector Tool
And my second question has to do with TeeCharts directly. Where would I find fmx240.bpl as TeeChart_Pro_Firemonkey_Demo.exe requires this file in order to run? I did manage to copy vcl240.bpl from "Embarcadero\Studio\18.0\bin" and put it into "Embarcadero\Studio\17.0\bin"
[Edited]
I have managed to capture / create a sample code (MVCE) from which I can now select a portion and create a square around a particular sample of graph lines.
The control graph right now is the bottom graph (Chart5). If anyone is interested in seeing the code, I have put up a pastebin sample.
PasteBin Sample Code
And a TeeCharts.tar.gz is accessible to anyone who wishes to see a sample of the code, as well as the data sample.
filetolink.com Source Files
I no longer feel the need for mathematical equation to differentiate the top graphs from the bottom (because the bottom axes are automatic where as the top are defined). I intend to only use the space which is adherent to the visible space, and do not intend to extend in either direction (left or right). That means at this point the size of the graph does not matter, because once I over populate the charts above, the position in the bottom graph would become irrelevant, and therefor I do not intend to use the bottom chart.
The next step is to save the positions of the boxes so that they can reappear when the graph is shift from left (past data) to the right (live data). And then uses the buttons above to make the appropriate action to the graphs.
I would like to know what way would be the most sufficient way to record the positions of the rectangles, so when the chart is shifted (via the ScrollBar1), the rectangles are moving with the direction of the scrollbar. But I'm sure I can achieve that.
I think I have found a solution. The red squares are only prevalent for the visual aspect, they can be drawn on, I don't need to do anything special with each chart, as I already know what the X0..Y1 parameters are, they are known from the initial chart. The problem h/e has to do with the initial chart. As long as the screens are all full, I can zoom in correctly w/ alignment with on all the charts (ZoomRect/Rectf(X0..Y1))
But what kind of equation would it take to adjust the charts that are not in the same zoom / max / min when the Chart5.Axes.Bottom.Automatic = True?
From there I just simply have to disable the immediate zoom feature, and allow buttons to become functional, to decide what the next course of action would be.
I would like to align the start of the text of two UILabels. I aligned the two UILabels (with the yellow and grey background) and used sizeToFit: to shrink the UILabels to the content but the text is not perfectly left aligned. There is a gap on the left. The gap is bigger or smaller depending on the first character. I would like to align the red lines in the following picture. There is even a small gap with the small font in the grey UILabel but it's barely visible.
With the Z character the gap is smaller but still visible by the yellow area left to the Z
A simple UILabel alignment does not help for my specific problem, because the text content is dynamic and not static. So there could be any combination depending on the data I get from the backend. Therefore I was hoping for a UIFont or UILabel attribute that could return the size of the gap based on the current rendering of the text.
I know that there are great UIFont related attributes like baseline, capHeight and ascender one can access to align text but there seems to be no attribute that would return the value of this gap on the left.
If this doesn’t need to be two UILabels, you could have one with attributed text. Then both lines would be subject to the same layout.
I haven't tried the GUI which people have been posting Screen Shots of, however... the behaviour is consistent with the very nature of typography.
The font sizes are completely different, therefore the width of an em is different, subsequently the letter-spacing is also different.
See this: http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/css2em.htm for more information.
I know this answer doesn't give you what you have asked for, however it should explain why this is happening.
For customisation such as this (if HTML and CSS) I would use a negative / positive margin on the sub text, however seeing as you are using backgrounds use padding (or the equivalent in your GUI).
Use attributed text of UILabel
set indentation as per your requirement
ref screen shot
Select both the labels and add a constraint called align leading edges.
In the documentation for TAlignLayout, a type which addresses visual alignment settings for FireMonkey controls, I'm trying to figure out the difference between the alTop and alMostTop constants, the only difference is that the definition of alMostTop contains the phrase "set to be the topmost".
(The same goes for the constants alMostLeft, alMostRight and alMostBottom, which are distinguished from alLeft, alRight and alBottom with similar phrases using the words
"leftmost", "rightmost" and "bottommost".)
I don't know what "set to be the topmost" means, and none of the guesses I make seem to fit with observed FireMonkey behaviour:
If it means displaying that control on top (at the front of the display) relative to its siblings, then what does leftmost mean?
If "leftmost" means it is the sibling shown furthest to the left, out of all siblings that have a alLeft alignment, then why does the CustomListBox demo use a layout with two elements that have a alMostLeft alignment? How does it decide to place the two elements that particular way round?
The Embarcadero forums don't shed any light on this either.
[Update]
To be clear, experiments do indeed suggest that with two components aligned to the top, you can choose which one is to be further up the screen by setting that one to have alMostTop, and the other to alTop.
However, I thought of another possibility: suppose you have two child components, one to be aligned at the left, another aligned at the top. Then they will fight for ownership of the top-left corner. Experiments seem to suggest that some influence can be obtained by choosing between alTop and alMostLeft alignments for the two controls vs alMostTop and alLeft alignments. I can't see exactly what is going on here, and it's not clear in the documentation. It's also not clear what should/might happen if two child controls are both set to alMostTop.
When you have 2 (or more) controls aligned to top, the alMostTop will be on the top of all others. Same wise with alMostRight, alMostLeft, and alMostBottom.
I'm using PHP to generate docx documents from a database. The generated document contains column charts which have labels attached (i.e. user shapes containing textboxes). In an attempt to get the textboxes to accommodate and display all of the text (i.e. it shouldn't be necessary for the user to resize a textbox to see all the text) my code calculates how many characters will fit into 3cm, adds linefeeds to the string as required and tells me how many lines of text are needed. I have:
<a:xfrm xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main">
<a:off x="1638276" y="1676399"/>
<a:ext cx="1257325" cy="'.(252000 * $labelLeftLines).'"/>
</a:xfrm>
which I believe should give me a text box around 3.5cm wide (extra .5 for the internal padding) and a height of .7cm multiplied by whatever is the value of $labelLeftLines. However, the text box always turns up as 3.cm wide by .86cm high, which only ever displays one line of text.
If I add in 'autofit':
<a:bodyPr xmlns:a="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/main" vertOverflow="clip" wrap="square" rtlCol="0">
<a:spAutoFit/>
</a:bodyPr>
the generated file looks just the same, though, when I right click on the textbox to inspect the properties, 'autofit' is indeed applied. I have to uncheck it and recheck it to make it affect the textbox.
Any openXML gurus out there?
Hmm, some random floundering around revealed that the values I need to manipulate are here:
<cdr:relSizeAnchor xmlns:cdr="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/drawingml/2006/chartDrawing">
<cdr:from>
<cdr:x>0.47</cdr:x>
<cdr:y>0.75</cdr:y>
</cdr:from>
<cdr:to>
<cdr:x>0.67</cdr:x>
<cdr:y>1</cdr:y>
</cdr:to>
Changing those values does actually change the size of the texbox, though I haven't a clue what units are being used. From 0.75 to 1 produces a height of 1.43cm.
One day I'll maybe be able to find my way around the doucmentation.
I've got a TCheckListBox on a form. Its Columns property is set to 2, and if there are more items than can fit on-screen in two columns, it puts a horizontal scrollbar across the bottom of the control.
Thing is, the way this form it laid out, it would be much more convenient to scroll vertically. But I can't seem to figure out how to make the box do that. I thought setting Columns to 1 should work, but it doesn't.
Anyone know how to make a TCheckListBox scroll vertically instead of horizontally?
You need to set Columns to 0.
For all positive values the VCL sends a LB_SETCOLUMNWIDTH message to the underlying native list box control, with the width parameter set to the list box client width divided by the number of columns. Items that don't fit will start a new column with the same column width, so the horizontal scrollbar becomes visible.
If Columns is 0 then there is a single column that spans the entire client width of the list box, and items that don't fit will make the vertical scrollbar visible, and hide the horizontal scrollbar.
Edit:
There seems to be genuine interest what happens when a negative value is used for the Columns property.
The method TCustomListBox.CreateParams() sets the LBS_MULTICOLUMN list box style depending on the Columns property being different from 0. For negative values the style flag is set, but the VCL doesn't send the LB_SETCOLUMNWIDTH message, so the native control uses the default column width. It is documented to be:
15 times the average character width for the font used by the list box.
(Search for "The LBS_MULTICOLUMN style specifies" to find the relevant passage of text.)