im running windows 7 as host and ubuntu 11.04 as guest.
Which would be the best way to access a webserver on a guest from host via a defined url
(and vise versa)
e.g http://myvirtualbox and http://myhost
For now i have configured a network bridge, but the guest is gets a different ip assigned everytime. A simple solution would be to assign a staic ip and configure a name resolution localy on each machine, but maybe there is an other way (internal netwok perhaps?)
You can modify the hosts file on machines to map the hostname to the IP addresses of the machines (and change their IP addresses to static).
Or another more flexible (more hosts, faster integration for new machines) option: you're going to want to set up a DNS service, configure the machines to work with it, then add the IP of the DNS as a name server in your network adapter for the hosts to use.
That will be a more flexible, maintainable and scalable solution.
From the looks of it though, if you want a 10 minute fix, go for the first option. There are lots of tutorials on it.
Related
I've been trying to configure Node-RED running locally at http://localhost:1880 to run on a static IP address that I would configured via my router's "DHCP Static IP Configuration" so that Node-RED could be accessible within the entire LAN.
How would I go about changing the IP address that Node-RED is hosted on, cause I haven't seemed to find any resources for it.
Would love to know the exact approach of running Node-RED on a LAN via a router; like should the static IP address be assigned to a particular device with a specific MAC address or can Node-RED reside on the router itself.
By default Node-RED binds to 0.0.0.0 which is the shortcut to say bind to all available interfaces (the log says to access via http://localhost:1880 because this will always be available). You should find that if you know the IP address of the machine running Node-RED and you enter http://ip-address:1880 from another machine on your LAN it should connect to the Node-RED editor.
You can change this bind address in the settings.js file (found in the userDir which is logged early on when Node-RED starts and is by default in ~/.node-red on a Linux/Unix machine). You can uncomment the uiHost line and change the IP address to what ever the static IP address of your host machine is. Under 99.9% of circumstances you should not do this and just leave it as the default 0.0.0.0
As for how you set your device that is hosting Node-RED to have a fixed IP address, that will be entirely dependent on the type of router you have, but usual approach would be to set the routers built in DHCP server to just asign a static IP address to that device as identified by it's MAC address. This means that you do not need to change anything on the device.
It is unlikely you will be able (or want) to to run Node-RED actually on your router, most home (or enterprise) routers are specialist devices and running a programming environment like Node-RED on them is really not a good idea from a security point of view unless you 110% know what you are doing.
Speaking of security, make sure you enable adminAuth in your settings.js before setting up any port forwarding on the router to expose Node-RED to the outside world. An unsecured Node-RED editor is likely to be quickly scanned by something like Shodan and promptly ushttps://nodered.org/docs/user-guide/runtime/securing-node-reded to host Crypto mining or much worse. Read the following carefully https://nodered.org/docs/user-guide/runtime/securing-node-red
The new version of Docker (version 1.10) includes a DNS server to pass alias information from other hosts on the same network. There used to be hosts file entries for resolving linked containers (or containers on the same network). I am wondering if it is possible to use this embedded DNS server on an overlay network? I have looked in the documentation (and in issues) and cannot find information about this.
So the way the new embedded DNS "server" works is that it isn't a formal server. It's just an embedded listener for traffic to 127.0.0.11:53 (udp of course). When docker sees that query traffic on the container's network interface, it steps in with its embedded DNS server and replies with any answers it might have to the query. The documentation has some options you can set to affect how this DNS server behaves, but since it only listens for query traffic on that localhost address, there is no way to expose this to an overlay network in the way that you are thinking. However this seems to be a moving target, and I have seen this question before in IRC, so it may one day be the case that this embedded DNS server at least becomes pluggable, or possibly exposable in the way you would like.
I have created a VM which has a server running at localhost:8675/ which I had wanted to connect to my host machine at the same port for ease of understanding. I was following these to documents for information:
https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch06.html
http://www.howtogeek.com/122641/how-to-forward-ports-to-a-virtual-machine-and-use-it-as-a-server/
When I was in my VMWare Workstation, I clicked on my VM, then did: Edit > Virtual Network Editor. After that, enabled Change Settings which relaunched the window in admin mode. I clicked on the Row with Type NAT and external Connection NAT and in the VMNet Information with the NAT radio button pressed, I clicked the NAT Settings Button.
I said: Add... and then did:
Host: 8675
Type: TCP
VMIP: 127.0.0.1:8675
Description: Port Foward of 8675 from Host to VM.
It looks like everything is good. I say Ok and Apply in succession. It looked like it shut down nat and restarted some services.
I confirmed in the VM, the 127.0.0.1:8675 is correct.
In the HOST, I tried to go to: http://localhost:8675/ and it says: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED
I figured this was all I needed to do.
I was looking up some additional information and noticed that some people have had to configure firewalls. I wasnt sure if i needed to though, as I was thinking that the HOST and VM are all in 1 actual machine, it might be entirely self contained.
Is there a critical task I am missing?
I saw this post: https://superuser.com/questions/571196/port-forwarding-to-a-vmware-workstation-virtual-machine
which told me to just adjust it to bridged and use it that way. Does this solve the issue of connecting HOST / VM Issue.
I don't want to say this is the correct answer though as the question itself is particular to NAT, but this is a valid alternative answer that does work.
This is solves the base issue at hand, but not the question.
When you use NAT, the host system and the guest boxes have completely different IP addresses on their virtual subnet, so my guess is that when from the host system you try to connect to localhost:8675 you are actually trying to connect to port 8675 of the host and not of the guest. So don't use the localhost or 127.0.0.1 syntax, but discover the real IP address of the guest and use it.
If your guest is Windows use the ipconfig command, if Linux use ifconfig.
Probably you will also have to configure the firewall on the guest side.
EDIT:
Commenting the sentence "NAT: Used to share the host's IP address.": it probably refers to the IP address of the real ethernet adapter you have on your host and that is shared by host and guests to access the internet. That's not related to the way your host and guests communicate together. For example I use VMware Workstation to run a virtual Linux box in Windows. Selecting NAT, VMware creates a virtual subnet called VMnet8. In this subnet the virtual router has address 192.168.120.0, my Windows host is assigned a virtual ethernet adapter with address 192.168.120.1 and my Linux guest has got address 192.168.120.128. So when I want to access a Samba shared folder from Windows I type "net use * \192.168.120.128" in a Windows command prompt. When I want to access a Windows shared folder from Linux I type "sudo mount.cifs //192.168.120.1/path_to_shared_folder target_folder".
I believe you actually answered your question correctly as I was following it and achieved desired outcome.
IMHO, the error: ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED indicates that a firewall on your host OS or guest OS (your VM) or on both doesn't allow the communication through the given ports.
The easiest thing would be to try to disable firewalls on boths, your HOST and GUEST OS.
Not sure what are your OSes, but here is just a good guide for setting up firewall rules on Ubuntu
So I'm really green with setting up a server and I am trying to get some experience. I've set up a simple local LAMP server in Ubuntu Server on Virtual Box VM and been able to find my own resources up to this point, I just cant figure out how to allow external connections.
From what I have been able to find, I need to forward port 80 connections to my server machine's local ip within my router. Then I should be able to connect from outside my network by just using it's ip? I gather that I need to use a dns to pair my server with a domain name.
I just cant find a straight overview of the process and its driving me crazy!
Any resources would be great, unless what I have above is correct!
Using WEBrick you could navigate to an app you were serving from another device/virtual machine by navigating to your.ip.address.here:port
Is it possible to do something similar with pow.cx?
The latest version of Pow (0.4.0) now includes xip.io support. You can read about the release here.
Here's a quick explanation of how this helps Pow serve your Rails apps across your entire local network, from their post:
Say your development computer’s LAN IP address is 10.0.0.1. With the
new version of Pow, you can now access your app at
http://myapp.10.0.0.1.xip.io/. And xip.io supports wildcard DNS, so
any and all subdomains of 10.0.0.1.xip.io resolve too.
Here's a description of xip.io, from their site:
xip.io runs a custom DNS server on the public Internet. When your
computer looks up a xip.io domain, the xip.io DNS server extracts the
IP address from the domain and sends it back in the response.
There are basically two options:
Don't use pow: run your applications on localhost as usual and access them as usual
Edit the hosts file (or local DNS) to point your server machine ip
Example accessing from a virtual windows machine:
Suppose you are running two rails applications in pow: store.dev and auth.dev, and you want to access them from a windows xp virtual machine to test them with IE, you only need to edit your hosts file to add the lines:
C:\WINDOWS\system32\drivers\etc\hosts
# Allow to access applications in pow.
# The ip address points to the host machine localhost, that usually is the default gateway
10.0.2.2 store.dev
10.0.2.2 auth.dev
And then open the IE browser to access your applications in http://store.dev and http://auth.dev respectivelly.
Specifically, no, because Pow uses the Host header of the request to determine which app you need to access. To get that working remotely, you would have to have the remote machine map the required domain name to your IP address - either with a local DNS server or by editing the HOSTS file. Both of which are possible but annoying.
The simplest thing to do in that case is to start up a standalone Rails server as you mentioned (using ./script/server or rails s depending on the version), and then you can address http://[ip address]:3000 as before.
In other words, Pow works because it intercepts your local domain resolution, something that isn't affected by (or available to) remote machines.