I believe what my code complies to LoadImage specification, but despite of explicitly specified dimensions, loaded image is largest non-PNG icon.
procedure TForm1.FormCreate(Sender: TObject);
begin
Image1.Picture.Icon.Handle := LoadImage(
0,
MakeIntResource(OIC_SHIELD),
IMAGE_ICON,
GetSystemMetrics(SM_CXSMICON),
GetSystemMetrics(SM_CYSMICON),
LR_SHARED
);
Win32Check(Image1.Picture.Icon.HandleAllocated);
OutputDebugString(PChar(Format('%d×%d', [
Image1.Picture.Icon.Width,
Image1.Picture.Icon.Height
]))); // 128×128
end;
Note: i prefer to be compliant to newer LoadImage semantics rather than to rely on the explicit module and resource id (essentially falling back to LoadIcon semantics) as specified in the answer to this question.
Quotes from LoadImage specs are exactly outlining my problem with mutually exclusive LoadImage behaviours (either fail or use previously loaded stock resource, ignoring desired dimensions) - see Adrian McCarthy's answer.
While OIC_SHIELD is Windows 6.0+ specific, the same happens with other stock icons (OIC_xxx constants) present in Windows since version 4.0.
Use SHGetStockIconInfo on Vista and up, and the solution from the other question for all other operating systems.
From the notes on LR_SHARED in the LoadImage documentation that you linked to:
This function finds the first image in the cache with the requested resource name, regardless of the size requested.
Unfortunately, you can't just drop the LR_SHARED because:
When loading a system icon or cursor, you must use LR_SHARED or the function will fail to load the resource.
So that explains the problem, but it's not clear what to do about it. You could use SHGetStockIconInfo. That requires Vista+, but since you're trying to get the shield icon, I assume you're already limited to Vista+.
I'm not a .NET programmer, but it looks like there's an API to get the shield icon.
Related
Is there any information available to the running program about which Win10 theme is being used?
I am looking primarily to get more debug information, as I have a user with a reported "scrambled GUI".
Is there any way to kill themes, or force to a default theme, from within the running program?
If I understood your question correctly I would recommend to you to use SetWindowTheme.
You should check out information provided with link above to see what docs.microsoft (former msdn) tells us in Remark section:
When pszSubAppName and pszSubIdList are NULL, the theme manager removes the previously applied associations. You can prevent visual styles from being applied to a specified window by specifying an empty string, (L" "), which does not match any section entries.
So, having this in your mind you can easily restrict theming for any window those Handle is known by calling SetWindowTheme with both arguments set to "there should be whitespace between braces".
By the way I wouldn't highly recommend to kill themes for entire OS from your application. Personally, I delete any soft that has such a useful feature.
Important addendum!
I've read your question again after some time passed and I can answer to the first part of your question.
You can obtain theme's info via UXTheme unit.
Primarily you must use this two functions:
GetCurrentThemeName
GetThemeDocumentationProperty
Here is some code that shows how to do this.
uses
..., UXTheme;
var
ThemeName: Array[0..512] of Char;
ThemeColorScheme: Array[0..512] of Char;
ThemeSizeName: Array[0..512] of Char;
PropertyName: Array[0..512] of Char;
begin
UXTheme.GetCurrentThemeName(#ThemeName, SizeOf(ThemeName), #ThemeColorScheme, SizeOf(ThemeColorScheme), #ThemeSizeName, SizeOf(ThemeSizeName));
UXTheme.GetThemeDocumentationProperty(#ThemeName, SZ_THDOCPROP_CANONICALNAME, #PropertyName, SizeOf(PropertyName));
end;
Please read about GetThemeDocumentationProperty attentively - this function takes one of arguments that is in a charge of what property of OS theme will be return. According to docs.microsoft, the flag SZ_THDOCPROP_CANONICALNAME in the code above will return string property for
Retrieves the name of the theme.
So you will be able to check what theme is being using at the moment.
But you still can just disable themes for your own application.
I want my application to always run using the real gpu on nVidia Optimus laptops.
From "Enabling High Performance Graphics Rendering on Optimus Systems", (http://developer.download.nvidia.com/devzone/devcenter/gamegraphics/files/OptimusRenderingPolicies.pdf):
Global Variable NvOptimusEnablement (new in Driver Release 302)
Starting with the Release 302 drivers, application developers can
direct the Optimus driver at runtime to use the High Performance
Graphics to render any application–even those applications for which
there is no existing application profile. They can do this by
exporting a global variable named NvOptimusEnablement. The Optimus
driver looks for the existence and value of the export. Only the LSB
of the DWORD matters at this time. A value of 0x00000001 indicates
that rendering should be performed using High Performance Graphics. A
value of 0x00000000 indicates that this method should be ignored.
Example Usage:
extern "C" { _declspec(dllexport) DWORD NvOptimusEnablement = 0x00000001; }
The problem is that I want to do this using Delphi. From what I've read Delphi does not support export of variables even though some hacks exists. I did try a few of them but couldn't make it work.
In the same nvidia document I read that forcing the proper GPU can be accomplished via linking statically to one of a handful listed dlls. But I don't want to link to dlls I'm not using. (Why the opengl.dll is not one of them is beyond me.) A simple exported variable seems much cleaner.
From what I've read Delphi does not support export of variables.
That statement is incorrect. Here's the simplest example that shows how to export a global variable from a Delphi DLL:
library GlobalVarExport;
uses
Windows;
var
NvOptimusEnablement: DWORD;
exports
NvOptimusEnablement;
begin
NvOptimusEnablement := 1;
end.
I think your problem is that you wrote it like this:
library GlobalVarExport;
uses
Windows;
var
NvOptimusEnablement: DWORD=1;
exports
NvOptimusEnablement;
begin
end.
And that fails to compile with this error:
E2276 Identifier 'NvOptimusEnablement' cannot be exported
I don't understand why the compiler doesn't like the second version. It's probably a bug. But the workaround in the first version is just fine.
I'm not a Delphi expert, but AFAIK it is possible to link to static libraries implemented in C from Delphi. So I'd simply create a small stub library, just providing this export, which is statically linked into your Delphi program. This adds the very export you need.
One of my users at a large university (with, I imagine, the aggressive security settings that university IT departments general have on their computers) is getting an empty string returned by Windows XP for CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA or CSIDL_PERSONAL. (I'm not sure which of these is returning the empty string, because I haven't yet examined his computer to see how he's installed the software, but I'm pretty sure it's the COMMON_APPDATA...)
Has anyone encountered this or have suggestions on how to deal with this?
Here's the Delphi code I'm using to retrieve the value:
Function GetSpecialFolder( FolderID: Integer):String;
var
PIDL: PItemIDList;
Path: array[0..MAX_PATH] of Char;
begin
SHGetSpecialFolderLocation(Application.Handle, FolderID, PIDL);
SHGetPathFromIDList(PIDL, Path);
Result := Path;
end; { GetSpecialFolder }
ShowMessage(GetSpecialFolder(CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA)); <--- This is an empty string
Edit:
Figuring out this API made me feel like I was chasing my tail - I went in circles trying to find the right call. This method and others similar to it are said to be deprecated by Microsoft (as well as by a earlier poster to this question (#TLama?) who subsequently deleted the post.) But, it seems like most of us, including me, regularly and safely ignore that status.
In my searches, I found a good answer here on SO from some time ago, including sample code for the non-deprecated way of doing this: what causes this error 'Unable to write to application file.ini'.
If you want to find out why an API call is failing you need to check the return values. That's what is missing in this code.
You need to treat each function on its own merits. Read the documentation on MSDN. In the case of SHGetSpecialFolderLocation, the return value is an HRESULT. For SHGetPathFromIDList you get back a BOOL. If that is FALSE then the call failed.
The likely culprit here is SHGetSpecialFolderLocation, the code that receives the CSIDL, but you must check for errors whenever you call Windows API functions.
Taking a look at the documentation for CSIDL we see this:
CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA
Version 5.0. The file system directory that contains application data for all users. A typical path is C:\Documents and Settings\All
Users\Application Data. This folder is used for application data that
is not user specific. For example, an application can store a
spell-check dictionary, a database of clip art, or a log file in the
CSIDL_COMMON_APPDATA folder. This information will not roam and is
available to anyone using the computer.
If the machine has a shell version lower than 5.0, then this CSIDL value is not supported. That's the only documented failure mode for this CSIDL value. I don't think that applies to your situation, so you'll just have to see what the HRESULT status code has to say.
I have got a dll that I load in my program which reads and writes its settings to the registry (hkcu). My program changes these settings prior to loading the dll so it uses the settings my program wants it to use which works fine.
Unfortunately I need to run several instances of my program with different settings for the dll. Now the approach I have used so far no longer works reliably because it is possible for one instance of the program to overwrite the settings that another instance just wrote before the dll has a chance to read them.
I haven't got the source of the dll in question and I cannot ask the programmer who wrote it to change it.
One idea I had, was to hook registry access functions and redirect them to a different branch of the registry which is specific to the instance of my program (e.g. use the process id as part of the path). I think this should work but maybe you have got a different / more elegant.
In case it matters: I am using Delphi 2007 for my program, the dll is probably written in C or C++.
As an alternative to API hooking, perhaps you could use RegOverridePredefKey API.
Instead of hooking the registry access for the dll, you can use an inter-process lock mechanism for writing the values to the registry for your own app. The idea being that the lock acquired by instance1 isn't released until its dll "instance" has read the values, so that when instance2 starts it won't acquire the lock until instance1 has finished. You'd need a locking mechanism that works between processes for this to work. For example mutexes.
To create mutexes:
procedure CreateMutexes(const MutexName: string);
//Creates the two mutexes checked for by the installer/uninstaller to see if
//the program is still running.
//One of the mutexes is created in the global name space (which makes it
//possible to access the mutex across user sessions in Windows XP); the other
//is created in the session name space (because versions of Windows NT prior
//to 4.0 TSE don't have a global name space and don't support the 'Global\'
//prefix).
const
SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR_REVISION = 1; // Win32 constant not defined in Delphi 3
var
SecurityDesc: TSecurityDescriptor;
SecurityAttr: TSecurityAttributes;
begin
// By default on Windows NT, created mutexes are accessible only by the user
// running the process. We need our mutexes to be accessible to all users, so
// that the mutex detection can work across user sessions in Windows XP. To
// do this we use a security descriptor with a null DACL.
InitializeSecurityDescriptor(#SecurityDesc, SECURITY_DESCRIPTOR_REVISION);
SetSecurityDescriptorDacl(#SecurityDesc, True, nil, False);
SecurityAttr.nLength := SizeOf(SecurityAttr);
SecurityAttr.lpSecurityDescriptor := #SecurityDesc;
SecurityAttr.bInheritHandle := False;
CreateMutex(#SecurityAttr, False, PChar(MutexName));
CreateMutex(#SecurityAttr, False, PChar('Global\' + MutexName));
end;
To release a mutex, you'd use the ReleaseMutex API and to acquire a created mutex, you'd use the OpenMutex API.
For CreateMutex see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms682411(VS.85).aspx
For OpenMutex see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684315(v=VS.85).aspx
For ReleaseMutex see: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms685066(v=VS.85).aspx
dirty method: open the dll in a hexeditor and change/alter the registry-path from the original hive to any other you want to use or have your proper settings.
As far as I've been able to find out, Windows doesn't offer an API function to tell what application has registered a global hotkey (via RegisterHotkey). I can only find out that a hotkey is registered if RegisterHotkey returns false, but not who "owns" the hotkey.
In the absence of a direct API, could there be a roundabout way? Windows maintains the handle associated with each registred hotkey - it's a little maddening that there should be no way of getting at this information.
Example of something that likely wouldn't work: send (simulate) a registered hotkey, then intercept the hotkey message Windows will send to the process that registered it. First, I don't think intercepting the message would reveal the destination window handle. Second, even if it were possible, it would be a bad thing to do, since sending hotkeys would trigger all sorts of potentially unwanted activity from various programs.
It's nothing critical, but I've seen frequent requests for such functionality, and have myself been a victim of applications that register hotkeys without even disclosing it anywhere in the UI or docs.
(Working in Delphi, and no more than an apprentice at WinAPI, please be kind.)
One possible way is to use the Visual Studio tool Spy++.
Give this a try:
Run the tool (for me, it's at C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio\2017\Community\Common7\Tools\spyxx_amd64.exe or you can download it). Note: there is spyxx.exe (32-bit version) and spyxx_amd64.exe (64-bit version) - if you don't see anything in 64-bit use the 32-bit version (ie.catches messages only in same architecture)
In the menu bar, select Spy -> Log messages... (or hit Ctrl + M)
Check All Windows in System in the Additional Windows frame
Switch to the Messages tab
Click the Clear All button
Select WM_HOTKEY in the listbox, or check Keyboard in Message Groups (if you're OK with more potential noise)
Click the OK button
Press the hotkey in question (Win + R, for example)
Select the WM_HOTKEY line in the Messages (All Windows) window, right click, and select Properties... in the context menu
In the Message Properties dialog, click the Window Handle link (this will be the handle for the window that received the message)
Click the Synchronize button on the Window Properties dialog. This will show the window in the main Spy++ window treeview (if it's windows itself or some popup application it shows nothing).
On the Window Properties dialog, select the Process tab
Click the Process ID link. This will show you the process (In my Win + R case: EXPLORER)
Your question piqued my interest, so I've done a bit of digging and while, unfortunately I don't have a proper answer for you, I thought I'd share what I have.
I found this example of creating keyboard hook (in Delphi) written in 1998, but is compilable in Delphi 2007 with a couple of tweaks.
It's a DLL with a call to SetWindowsHookEx that passes through a callback function, which can then intercept key strokes: In this case, it's tinkering with them for fun, changing left cursor to right, etc. A simple app then calls the DLL and reports back its results based on a TTimer event. If you're interested I can post the Delphi 2007 based code.
It's well documented and commented and you potentially could use it as a basis of working out where a key press is going. If you could get the handle of the application that sent the key strokes, you could track it back that way. With that handle you'd be able to get the information you need quite easily.
Other apps have tried determining hotkeys by going through their Shortcuts since they can contain a Shortcut key, which is just another term for hotkey. However most applications don't tend to set this property so it might not return much. If you are interested in that route, Delphi has access to IShellLink COM interface which you could use to load a shortcut up from and get its hotkey:
uses ShlObj, ComObj, ShellAPI, ActiveX, CommCtrl;
procedure GetShellLinkHotKey;
var
LinkFile : WideString;
SL: IShellLink;
PF: IPersistFile;
HotKey : Word;
HotKeyMod: Byte;
HotKeyText : string;
begin
LinkFile := 'C:\Temp\Temp.lnk';
OleCheck(CoCreateInstance(CLSID_ShellLink, nil, CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER, IShellLink, SL));
// The IShellLink implementer must also support the IPersistFile
// interface. Get an interface pointer to it.
PF := SL as IPersistFile;
// Load file into IPersistFile object
OleCheck(PF.Load(PWideChar(LinkFile), STGM_READ));
// Resolve the link by calling the Resolve interface function.
OleCheck(SL.Resolve(0, SLR_ANY_MATCH or SLR_NO_UI));
// Get hotkey info
OleCheck(SL.GetHotKey(HotKey));
// Extract the HotKey and Modifier properties.
HotKeyText := '';
HotKeyMod := Hi(HotKey);
if (HotKeyMod and HOTKEYF_ALT) = HOTKEYF_ALT then
HotKeyText := 'ALT+';
if (HotKeyMod and HOTKEYF_CONTROL) = HOTKEYF_CONTROL then
HotKeyText := HotKeyText + 'CTRL+';
if (HotKeyMod and HOTKEYF_SHIFT) = HOTKEYF_SHIFT then
HotKeyText := HotKeyText + 'SHIFT+';
if (HotKeyMod and HOTKEYF_EXT) = HOTKEYF_EXT then
HotKeyText := HotKeyText + 'Extended+';
HotKeyText := HotKeyText + Char(Lo(HotKey));
if (HotKeyText = '') or (HotKeyText = #0) then
HotKeyText := 'None';
ShowMessage('Shortcut Key - ' + HotKeyText);
end;
If you've got access to Safari Books Online, there is a good section about working with shortcuts / shell links in the Borland Delphi 6 Developer's Guide by Steve Teixeira and Xavier Pacheco. My example above is a butchered version from there and this site.
Hope that helps!
After some research, it appears that you'd need to get access to the internal structure that MS uses to store the hotkeys. ReactOS has a clean room implementation that implements the GetHotKey call by iterating an internal list and extracting the hotkey that matches the parameters to the call.
Depending on how close ReactOS' implementation is to the MS implementation, you may be able to poke around in memory to find the structure, but that's over my head...
BOOL FASTCALL
GetHotKey (UINT fsModifiers,
UINT vk,
struct _ETHREAD **Thread,
HWND *hWnd,
int *id)
{
PHOT_KEY_ITEM HotKeyItem;
LIST_FOR_EACH(HotKeyItem, &gHotkeyList, HOT_KEY_ITEM, ListEntry)
{
if (HotKeyItem->fsModifiers == fsModifiers &&
HotKeyItem->vk == vk)
{
if (Thread != NULL)
*Thread = HotKeyItem->Thread;
if (hWnd != NULL)
*hWnd = HotKeyItem->hWnd;
if (id != NULL)
*id = HotKeyItem->id;
return TRUE;
}
}
return FALSE;
}
I presume this thread on sysinternals was asked by someone related to this question, but I thought I'd link to it anyway to keep the two together. The thread looks very intriguing, but I suspect that some deep dive spelunking would need to happen to figure this out without access to the MS internals.
Off the top of my head, you might try enumerating all windows with EnumWindows, then in the callback, send WM_GETHOTKEY to each window.
Edit: Apparrently I was wrong about that. MSDN has more information:
WM_HOTKEY is unrelated to the WM_GETHOTKEY and WM_SETHOTKEY hot keys. The WM_HOTKEY message is sent for generic hot keys while the WM_SETHOTKEY and WM_GETHOTKEY messages relate to window activation hot keys.
Note: Here is a program purporting to have the functionality you are looking for. You could try decompiling it.
Another thread mentions a global NT level keyboard hook:
Re-assign/override hotkey (Win + L) to lock windows
maybe you can get the handle of the process that called the hook that way, which you can then resolve to the process name
(disclaimer: I had it in my bookmarks, haven't really tried/tested)
I know you can intercept the stream of messages in any window within your own process - what we used to call subclassing in VB6. (Though I do not remember the function, perhaps SetWindowLong?) I am unsure if you can do this for windows outside your own process. But for the sake of this post lets assume you find a way to do that. Then you can simply intercept the messages for all top level windows, monitor for the WM_HOTKEY message. You wouldn't be able to know all the keys right off the bat, but as they were pressed you could easily figure out what application was using them. If you persisted your results to disk and reloaded each time your monitor application was run you could increase the performance of your application over time.
This doesn't exactly answer the part of the question that is about the Windows API, but it answers the part of the question that is about a list of global hotkeys and the applications that "own" them.
The free Hotkey Explorer at http://hkcmdr.anymania.com/ shows a list of all global hotkeys and the applications that own them. This just has helped me figure out why an application-specific shortcut key stopped working and how to fix it (by reconfiguring the registered global hotkey in the app that had it registered), within a few seconds.