VMWare player and workstation has the ability to easily create a shared folder directly to the host:
http://www.vmware.com/support/ws5/doc/ws_running_shared_folders.html
This feature seems to be missing or is moved in vSphere. How do you set it up in vSphere?
Thanks.
Actually, we can't have shared folders using ESXi. But we can workaround it by creating a folder in the host datastore and copying files from/to it using scp protocol. Of course, you need to have administrative privileges on the host for that.
This link explains how to set up SSH Server and Shell Access on ESXi:
http://pubs.vmware.com/vsphere-50/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.vmware.vcli.migration.doc_50%2Fcos_upgrade_technote.1.4.html
This feature doesn't make sense with vSphere, which is why you can't find it.
Workstation, Player, Server all run on top of a "host OS" while ESX (vSphere managed) runs on bare-metal. You're not supposed to have access to the native file system on the host - so there is no option to do so.
Related
I'm working in an application to obtain some data from a web service, create a text file in the local filesystem send a command to a command line application, obtain the result and then send the results back via the web service.
I need to be able to write to the local file system, read from it and then delete the temporary file. I was reading about bind mounts and volumes but this folder can be delete if a new version of the image is uploaded is just a staging area.
Any ideas how this can be done, thanks.
When using containers in App Service, I believe you will have to link a storage account and mount file shares accordingly. Depending on the OS (windows / linux), the steps vary a bit.
If you are not using containers, then you should be able to access the temporary file locations for file-based requirements. Do note that the storage available this way is limited and not shared across site instances.
I am trying to mount a NAS using nfs for an application.
The Storage team has exported it to the host server and I can access it at /nas/data.
I am using containerized application and this file system export to the host machine will be a security issue as any container running on the host will be able to use the share. So this linux to linux mounting will not work for me.
So the only alternate solution I have is mounting this nas folder during container startup with a username /password.
The below command works fine on a share supporting Unix/Windows. I can mount on container startup
mount -t cifs -osec=ntlmv2,domain=mydomain,username=svc_account,password=password,noserverino //nsnetworkshare.domain.company/share/folder /opt/testnas
I have been told that we should use nfs option instead of cifs.
So just trying to find out whether using nfs or cifs will make any difference.
Specifying nfs option gives below error.
mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=3,domain=mydomain,username=svc_account,password=password,noserverino //nsnetworkshare.domain.company/share/folder /opt/testnas
mount.nfs: remote share not in 'host:dir' format
Below command doesnt' seem to work either.
mount -t nfs -o nfsvers=3,domain=mydomain,username=svc_account,password=password,noserverino nsnetworkshare.domain.company:/share/folder /opt/testnas
mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
I couldn't find a mount -t nfs option example with username /password. So I think we can't use mount -t nfs with credentials.
Please pour in ideas.
Thanks,
Vishnu
CIFS is a file sharing protocol. NFS is a volume sharing protocol. The difference between the two might not initially be obvious.
NFS is essentially a tiny step up from directly sharing /dev/sda1. The client actually receives a naked view of the shared subset of the filesystem, including (at least as of NFSv4) a description of which users can access which files. It is up to the client to actually manage the permissions of which user is allowed to access which files.
CIFS, on the other hand, manages users on the server side, and may provide a per-user view and access of files. In that respect, it is similar to FTP or WebDAV, but with the ability to read/write arbitrary subsets of a file, as well as a couple of other features related to locking.
This may sound like NFS is distinctively inferior to CIFS, but they are actually meant for a different purpose. NFS is most useful for external hard drives connected via Ethernet, and virtual cloud storage. In such cases, it is the intention to share the drive itself with a machine, but simply do it over Ethernet instead of SATA. For that use case, NFS offers greater simplicity and speed. A NAS, as you're using, is actually a perfect example of this. It isn't meant to manage access, it's meant to not be exposed to systems that shouldn't access it, in the first place.
If you absolutely MUST use NFS, there are a couple of ways to secure it. NFSv4 has an optional security model based on Kerberos. Good luck using that. A better option is to not allow direct connection to the NFS service from the host, and instead require going through some secure tunnel, like SSH port forwarding. Then the security comes down to establishing the tunnel. However, either one of those requires cooperation from the host, which would probably not be possible in the case of your NAS.
Mind you, if you're already using CIFS and it's working well, and it's giving you good access control, there's no good reason to switch (although, you'd have to turn the NFS off for security). However, if you have a docker-styled host, it might be worthwhile to play with iptables (or the firewall of your choice) on the docker-host, to prevent the other containers from having access to the NAS in the first place. Rather than delegating security to the NAS, it should be done at the docker-host level.
Well I would say go with CIFS as NFS (Old) few of linux/Unix bistro even stopped support for it.
NFS is the “Network File System” specifically used for Unix and Linux operating systems. It allows files communication transparently between servers and end users machines like desktops & laptops. NFS uses client- server methodology to allow user to view read and write files on a computer system. A user can mount all or a portion of a file system via NFS.
CIFS is abbreviation for “Common Internet File System” used by Windows operating systems for file sharing. CIFS also uses the client-server methodology where A client makes a request of a server program for accessing a file .The server takes the requested action and returns a response. CIFS is a open standard version of the Server Message Block Protocol (SMB) developed and used by Microsoft and it uses the TCP/IP protocol.
If I have a Linux <-> Linux I would choose nfs but if it's a Windows <-> Linux cifs would be the best option.
I am using docker for MacOS / Win.
I connect to external servers via ssh from shell in docker container,
For now, I generate ssh-key in docker shell, and manually send sshkey to servers.
However in this method, everytime I re-build container, sshkey is deleted.
So I want to set initial sshkey when I build images.
I have 2 ideas
Mount .ssh folder from my macOS to docker folder and persist.
(Permission control might be difficult and complex....)
Write scripts that makes the ssh-keymake & sends this to servers in docker-compose.yml or Dockerfile.
(Everytime I build , new key is send...??)
Which is the best practice? or do you have any idea to set ssh-key automatically??
Best practice is typically to not make outbound ssh connections from containers. If what you’re trying to add to your container is a binary or application code, manage your source control setup outside Docker and COPY the data into an image. If it’s data your application needs to run, again fetch it externally and use docker run -v to inject it into the container.
As you say, managing this key material securely, and obeying ssh’s Unix permission requirements, is incredibly tricky. If I really didn’t have a choice but to do this I’d write an ENTRYPOINT script that copied the private key from a bind-mounted volume to my container user’s .ssh directory. But my first choice would be to redesign my application flow to not need this at all.
After reading the "I'm a windows user .." comment I'm thinking you are solving the wrong problem. You are looking for an easy (sane) shell access to your servers. The are are two simpler solutions.
1. Windows Linux subsystem -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Subsystem_for_Linux. (not my choice)
Cygwin -- http://www.cygwin.com -- for that comfy Linux feel to your cmd :-)
How I install it.
Download and install it (be careful to only pick the features beyond base that you need. (there is a LOT and most of it you will not need -- like the compilers and X). Make sure that SSH is selected. Don't worry you can rerun the setup as many times as you want (I do that occasionally to update what I use)
Start the bash shell (there will be a link after the installation)
a. run 'cygpath -wp $PATH'
b. look at the results -- there will be a couple of folders in the begging of the path that will look like "C:\cygwin\bin;C:\cygwin\usr\local\bin;..." simply all the paths that start with "C:\cygwin" provided you installed your Cygwin into "C:\Cygwin" directory.
c. Add these paths to your system path
d. Start a new instance of CMD. run 'ls' it should now work directly under windows shell.
Extra credit.
a. move the all the ".xxx" files that were created during the first launch of the shell in your C:\cygwin\home\<username> directory to you windows home directory (C:\Users\<username>).
b. exit any bash shells you have running
c. delete c:\cygwin\home directory
d. use windows mklink utility to create a link named home under cygwin pointing to C:\Users (Administrator shell) 'mklink /J C:\Cygwin\home C:\Users'
This will make your windows home directory the same as your cygwin home.
After that you follow the normal setup for ssh under Cygwin bash and you will be able to generate the keys and distribute them normally to servers.
NOTE: you will have to sever the propagation of credentials from windows to your <home>/.ssh folder (in the folder's security settings) leave just your user id. then set permissions on the folder and various key files underneath appropriately for SSH using 'chmod'.
Enjoy -- some days I have to squint to remember I'm on a windows box ...
I am trying to use the ArtifactDeployer plugin to copy the artifacts from WORKSPACE/jobs/ directory into a remote directory on the windows 7 machine .The Jenkins machine OS is linux
However Jenkins never manages to succeed. Throwing errors like:
[ArtifactDeployer] - Starting deployment from the post-action ... [ArtifactDeployer] - [ERROR] - Failed to deploy. Can't create the directory ... Build step [ArtifactDeployer] - Deploy artifacts from workspace to remote directories' changed build result to FAILURE
I am not sure how to use the Remote Directory parameter.
Please check the sample code for how I am trying to specify the remote directory
remote Directory - \ip address of that machine\users\public
Is it possible to copy the artifacts which is on linux machine to windows 7 machine?
Please let me know how to specify the remote directory.
Reading the Plugin page doesn't seem to be very helpful when it comes to configuring it. The text seem to hint that you need to have local access (from the node where the job is running) to the (remote) folder you want to deploy too. For a first test, use a local directory (on your Linux box) to see if you get it to work. Second, the correct way to address a windows share is \\servername\sharename\subdirs. Remember that you might need to login to the share.
You might need to install samba or cifs to connect to the windows share from your linux system. There is also a setting in Windows that determines whether your windows box will accept connections to aliases. If that is not the case, you need to use the hostname in order to access the share. So IP and any alias for the server will not work then.
e.g
hostname: RTS3524
alias: JENKINSREPO
ip: 192.168.15.33
share: temp
For the example above, only \\RTS3524\temp will work but \\192.168.15.33 will not.
Lets say i have a rails app locally on my machine and i use vagrant with that app.
I have worked on that vagrant and made a box from it.
Now i give the box to some others.
Do the others need to have the source code of the rails app locally on their machines or they can just use the vagrant box that i gave without having the source code locally ?
We use Vagrant for VDE (virtual development environment) in next scheme(maybe it will be useful for you too):
we keep our sources under git (can be svn/csv/etc);
we keep Vagrantfile in root folder of git repository;
in Vagrantfile we add:
config.vm.box_url = "http://<url for our box>"
nfs = !Kernel.is_windows?
config.vm.share_folder "v-root", "/tmp/vde", ".", :nfs => nfs
we store our box on S3 its easy, but as easiest way can be dropbox.
so for share your sources you need just share repository. in Readme.md you
can describe few step to launch vde
with share_folder All your sources will be available from vde(inner instance) from folder /tmp/vde
Generally the source code to your Rails app is shared from your own filesystem to the virtual machine you're running with Vagrant; it is not stored on the virtual machine's drive. The application is never actually stored permanently on the box. Thus, sending it to someone else will not allow them to run the app, as the app doesn't exist on the VM.
For more info, see "Accessing the Project Files" on the Vagrant SSH Documentation:
Accessing the Project Files
Vagrant bridges your application with the virtual environment by using a VirtualBox shared folder. The shared folder location on the virtual machine defaults to /vagrant, but can be changed. This can be verified by listing the files within that folder in the SSH session:
vagrant#vagrantbase:~$ ls /vagrant
index.html Vagrantfile
The VM has both read and write access to the shared folder.
Remember: Any changes are mirrored across both systems.