I am converting a library from Jackson to json-b, but I cannot find the equivalent of JsonFormat.Feature.ACCEPT_SINGLE_VALUE_AS_ARRAY. Does such a thing exist?
I got the following to work, but I hate to use Yasson internals to do so.
public static class ResultDeserializer implements JsonbDeserializer<List<Result>>
{
public ResultDeserializer()
{
}
#Override
public List<Result> deserialize(JsonParser parser, DeserializationContext ctx, Type rtType)
{
// I have to use internals as there are no other ways to get this data
if (((UserDeserializerParser) parser).getCurrentLevel().getLastEvent() == JsonParser.Event.START_ARRAY) {
return ctx.deserialize(rtType, parser);
} else
return List.of(ctx.deserialize(Result.class, parser));
}
}
I have a combo box over my GUI in JavaFX.
This Combo Box is composed of a complex type elements :
public class DureeChoiceBoxElement extends ObservableValueBase<DureeChoiceBoxElement> {
private IntegerProperty duree;
#Override
public String toString() {
return duree.get() + " an";
}
}
I want to map (or bind) the selected complex element with my model which contains the simple type :
public class Pel {
private IntegerProperty duree = new SimpleIntegerProperty(1);
public Property<Number> dureeProperty() {
return duree;
}
public void setDuree(Integer duree) {
this.duree.setValue(duree);
}
public Integer getDuree() {
return duree.getValue();
}
}
How to do it ?
I tried in the controller with :
public class PelController {
#FXML
private ChoiceBox<DureeChoiceBoxElement> duree;
//etc..
pel.dureeProperty().bind(createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(duree.getValue()));
/*
* #return an ObjectBinding of immutable TimeElapsed objects for the player
*/
private ObjectBinding<Property<Number>> createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(
final DureeChoiceBoxElement dureeChoiceBoxElement) {
return Bindings.createObjectBinding(new Callable<Property<Number>>() {
#Override
public IntegerProperty call() throws Exception {
return dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty();
}
}, dureeChoiceBoxElement.dureeProperty());
}
}
But it doesn't work (even not compile). I want to say that "Bind this simple property to this complex Object calling the method I give you through the method named "createElapsedBindingByBindingsAPI2(..)".
It is logical read but I didn't managed to make it works anyway.
That's poor ....
Any help please :).
Example that (obviously) works with legacy code style (Swing coding) :
duree.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<DureeChoiceBoxElement>() {
#Override
public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends DureeChoiceBoxElement> observable,
DureeChoiceBoxElement oldValue, DureeChoiceBoxElement newValue) {
// changement durée
log.debug("Durée sélectionnée : {}", duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
log.debug("Durée bindée ? : {}", pel.getDuree());
pel.setDuree(duree.getSelectionModel().getSelectedItem().getDuree());
}
});
Like this my model is set to selected item. But it implies some boilerplate code. Any better idea based on high level bindings of JavaFX ?
so I was asked this question:
Consider the ADT stack. In addition to the operations Push, Pop
and Top, we want to support a new operation FindMin, which returns the smallest
element in the stack. Design the data structure and algorithms to support these
operations such that each of the four operations (Push, Pop, Top and FindMin) takes
constant time. No need to check the over and under conditions and no need
to give the procedures for Empty and Full. [Hint: use an extra stack.]
So I have seen some answers but they all seemed to take O(n) time once the FindMin function is used. And I don't really get what the hint is trying to tell me...Please help me!!! Thankssss!!
import java.util.Stack;
public class StackWithMin extends Stack<Integer> {
private Stack<Integer> minStack;
public StackWithMin () {
minStack = new Stack<Integer>();
}
public void push(int value){
if (value <= min()) { // Note the '=' sign here
minStack.push(value);
}
super.push(value);
}
public Integer pop() {
int value = super.pop();
if (value == min()) {
minStack.pop();
}
return value;
}
public int min() {
if (minStack.isEmpty()) {
return Integer.MAX_VALUE;
} else {
return minStack.peek();
}
}
public static void main(String args[]) {
StackWithMin stackWithMin = new StackWithMin();
stackWithMin.push(7);
stackWithMin.push(5);
stackWithMin.push(6);
stackWithMin.push(7);
stackWithMin.push(4);
System.out.println(stackWithMin.min());
stackWithMin.pop();
System.out.println(stackWithMin.min());
}
}
I'm rolling my own ActivatableCollection<T> for db4o but cribbing heavily from the builtin ActivatableList<T> implementation. I'm running into the problem where transparent persistence doesn't seem to be working correctly. In the test code below:
[Fact]
void CanStoreActivatableCollection()
{
var planets = new ActivatableCollection<Planet>();
var pagingMemoryStorage = new PagingMemoryStorage();
var config = Db4oEmbedded.NewConfiguration();
config.Common.Add(new TransparentActivationSupport());
config.Common.Add(new TransparentPersistenceSupport());
config.File.Storage = pagingMemoryStorage;
var objectContainer = Db4oEmbedded.OpenFile(config, "Memory.yap");
planets.Add(new Planet("Mercury"));
objectContainer.Store(planets);
planets.Add(new Planet("Venus"));
planets.Add(new Planet("Earth"));
objectContainer.Commit();
objectContainer.Close();
config = Db4oEmbedded.NewConfiguration();
config.Common.Add(new TransparentActivationSupport());
config.Common.Add(new TransparentPersistenceSupport());
config.File.Storage = pagingMemoryStorage;
objectContainer = Db4oEmbedded.OpenFile(config, "Memory.yap");
planets = objectContainer.Query<ActivatableCollection<Planet>>().FirstOrDefault();
Assert.NotNull(planets);
Assert.Equal(3, planets.Count);
objectContainer.Close();
}
The planet "Mercury" is stored, but not "Venus" and "Earth". If I change from ActivatableCollection to ActivatableList, then all 3 planets are stored.
What am I missing? My ActivatableCollection is just minimal implementation of ActivatableList as best as I can tell.
Below is my implementation of ActivatableCollection:
public class ActivatableCollection<T>
: ICollection<T>
, IActivatable
, INotifyCollectionChanged
{
List<T> _list;
List<T> List
{
get
{
if (_list == null)
_list = new List<T>();
return _list;
}
}
public ActivatableCollection()
{
}
public int Count
{
get
{
ActivateForRead();
return List.Count;
}
}
public bool IsReadOnly
{
get
{
ActivateForRead();
return ((IList) List).IsReadOnly;
}
}
public void Add(T t)
{
ActivateForWrite();
List.Add(t);
OnCollectionChanged(new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs(NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add, t));
}
public void Clear()
{
ActivateForWrite();
List.Clear();
OnCollectionChanged(new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs(NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Reset));
}
public bool Contains(T t)
{
ActivateForRead();
return List.Contains(t);
}
public void CopyTo(T[] array, int index)
{
ActivateForRead();
List.CopyTo(array, index);
}
public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator()
{
ActivateForRead();
return List.GetEnumerator();
}
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()
{
return GetEnumerator();
}
public bool Remove(T t)
{
ActivateForWrite();
bool removed = List.Remove(t);
if (removed)
OnCollectionChanged(new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs(NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove, t));
return removed;
}
[Transient]
private IActivator _activator;
public virtual void Bind(IActivator activator)
{
if (_activator == activator)
return;
if (activator != null && _activator != null)
throw new InvalidOperationException();
_activator = activator;
}
public virtual void Activate(ActivationPurpose purpose)
{
if (_activator == null)
return;
_activator.Activate(purpose);
}
protected virtual void ActivateForRead()
{
Activate(ActivationPurpose.Read);
}
protected virtual void ActivateForWrite()
{
Activate(ActivationPurpose.Write);
}
[Transient]
public event NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler CollectionChanged;
protected virtual void OnCollectionChanged(NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (CollectionChanged != null)
CollectionChanged(this, e);
}
}
I've also tried copying the code from GenericTypeHandlerPredicate and registering my ActivatableCollection to use the GenericCollectionTypeHandler. That results in a crash in GenericTypeFor() throwing an InvalidOperationException() when "Mercury" is being stored.
Just want to mention my answers from the db4o forums also here, for people with a similar problem:
First part of the issue:
From db4o's point of view nothing has changed in the 'ActivatableCollection' object and therefore no changes are stored. This is what is happening:
When you add the items, the ActivatableCollection is marked as changed.
When you commit the changes are stored. However the ' ActivatableCollection' holds the reference to the same object. db4o only stores the changes in the ActivatableCollection-object, which is the reference to the List. Since it is the same, no actual change is stored.
The List of the ActivatableCollection is never updated, because it wasn't marked as 'changed'
So the transparent activation doesn't see the changes in the list. You can fix your issue simply by using an ActivatableList in you're ActivatableCollection implementation. Just change the List with a IList interface and instantiate a ActivatableList instead of an List.
The second part of the issue: Why doesn't it work even when registering the GenericCollectionTypeHandler for this type? Here we hit a implementation detail. The GenericCollectionTypeHandler has an internal list of supported types, which doesn't include the self made 'ActivatableCollection'. GenericCollectionTypeHandler is not really part of the public API and intendet for internal use only.
Workaround / Fix
Just use an ActivatableList<T> instead of a List<T>. then everything works fine.
I have read lots of information about page caching and partial page caching in a MVC application. However, I would like to know how you would cache data.
In my scenario I will be using LINQ to Entities (entity framework). On the first call to GetNames (or whatever the method is) I want to grab the data from the database. I want to save the results in cache and on the second call to use the cached version if it exists.
Can anyone show an example of how this would work, where this should be implemented (model?) and if it would work.
I have seen this done in traditional ASP.NET apps , typically for very static data.
Here's a nice and simple cache helper class/service I use:
using System.Runtime.Caching;
public class InMemoryCache: ICacheService
{
public T GetOrSet<T>(string cacheKey, Func<T> getItemCallback) where T : class
{
T item = MemoryCache.Default.Get(cacheKey) as T;
if (item == null)
{
item = getItemCallback();
MemoryCache.Default.Add(cacheKey, item, DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(10));
}
return item;
}
}
interface ICacheService
{
T GetOrSet<T>(string cacheKey, Func<T> getItemCallback) where T : class;
}
Usage:
cacheProvider.GetOrSet("cache key", (delegate method if cache is empty));
Cache provider will check if there's anything by the name of "cache id" in the cache, and if there's not, it will call a delegate method to fetch data and store it in cache.
Example:
var products=cacheService.GetOrSet("catalog.products", ()=>productRepository.GetAll())
Reference the System.Web dll in your model and use System.Web.Caching.Cache
public string[] GetNames()
{
string[] names = Cache["names"] as string[];
if(names == null) //not in cache
{
names = DB.GetNames();
Cache["names"] = names;
}
return names;
}
A bit simplified but I guess that would work. This is not MVC specific and I have always used this method for caching data.
I'm referring to TT's post and suggest the following approach:
Reference the System.Web dll in your model and use System.Web.Caching.Cache
public string[] GetNames()
{
var noms = Cache["names"];
if(noms == null)
{
noms = DB.GetNames();
Cache["names"] = noms;
}
return ((string[])noms);
}
You should not return a value re-read from the cache, since you'll never know if at that specific moment it is still in the cache. Even if you inserted it in the statement before, it might already be gone or has never been added to the cache - you just don't know.
So you add the data read from the database and return it directly, not re-reading from the cache.
For .NET 4.5+ framework
add reference: System.Runtime.Caching
add using statement:
using System.Runtime.Caching;
public string[] GetNames()
{
var noms = System.Runtime.Caching.MemoryCache.Default["names"];
if(noms == null)
{
noms = DB.GetNames();
System.Runtime.Caching.MemoryCache.Default["names"] = noms;
}
return ((string[])noms);
}
In the .NET Framework 3.5 and earlier versions, ASP.NET provided an in-memory cache implementation in the System.Web.Caching namespace. In previous versions of the .NET Framework, caching was available only in the System.Web namespace and therefore required a dependency on ASP.NET classes. In the .NET Framework 4, the System.Runtime.Caching namespace contains APIs that are designed for both Web and non-Web applications.
More info:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd997357(v=vs.110).aspx
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/performance/caching-in-net-framework-applications
Steve Smith did two great blog posts which demonstrate how to use his CachedRepository pattern in ASP.NET MVC. It uses the repository pattern effectively and allows you to get caching without having to change your existing code.
http://ardalis.com/Introducing-the-CachedRepository-Pattern
http://ardalis.com/building-a-cachedrepository-via-strategy-pattern
In these two posts he shows you how to set up this pattern and also explains why it is useful. By using this pattern you get caching without your existing code seeing any of the caching logic. Essentially you use the cached repository as if it were any other repository.
I have used it in this way and it works for me.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.caching.cache.add(v=vs.110).aspx
parameters info for system.web.caching.cache.add.
public string GetInfo()
{
string name = string.Empty;
if(System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache["KeyName"] == null)
{
name = GetNameMethod();
System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache.Add("KeyName", name, null, DateTime.Noew.AddMinutes(5), Cache.NoSlidingExpiration, CacheitemPriority.AboveNormal, null);
}
else
{
name = System.Web.HttpContext.Current.Cache["KeyName"] as string;
}
return name;
}
AppFabric Caching is distributed and an in-memory caching technic that stores data in key-value pairs using physical memory across multiple servers. AppFabric provides performance and scalability improvements for .NET Framework applications. Concepts and Architecture
Extending #Hrvoje Hudo's answer...
Code:
using System;
using System.Runtime.Caching;
public class InMemoryCache : ICacheService
{
public TValue Get<TValue>(string cacheKey, int durationInMinutes, Func<TValue> getItemCallback) where TValue : class
{
TValue item = MemoryCache.Default.Get(cacheKey) as TValue;
if (item == null)
{
item = getItemCallback();
MemoryCache.Default.Add(cacheKey, item, DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(durationInMinutes));
}
return item;
}
public TValue Get<TValue, TId>(string cacheKeyFormat, TId id, int durationInMinutes, Func<TId, TValue> getItemCallback) where TValue : class
{
string cacheKey = string.Format(cacheKeyFormat, id);
TValue item = MemoryCache.Default.Get(cacheKey) as TValue;
if (item == null)
{
item = getItemCallback(id);
MemoryCache.Default.Add(cacheKey, item, DateTime.Now.AddMinutes(durationInMinutes));
}
return item;
}
}
interface ICacheService
{
TValue Get<TValue>(string cacheKey, Func<TValue> getItemCallback) where TValue : class;
TValue Get<TValue, TId>(string cacheKeyFormat, TId id, Func<TId, TValue> getItemCallback) where TValue : class;
}
Examples
Single item caching (when each item is cached based on its ID because caching the entire catalog for the item type would be too intensive).
Product product = cache.Get("product_{0}", productId, 10, productData.getProductById);
Caching all of something
IEnumerable<Categories> categories = cache.Get("categories", 20, categoryData.getCategories);
Why TId
The second helper is especially nice because most data keys are not composite. Additional methods could be added if you use composite keys often. In this way you avoid doing all sorts of string concatenation or string.Formats to get the key to pass to the cache helper. It also makes passing the data access method easier because you don't have to pass the ID into the wrapper method... the whole thing becomes very terse and consistant for the majority of use cases.
Here's an improvement to Hrvoje Hudo's answer. This implementation has a couple of key improvements:
Cache keys are created automatically based on the function to update data and the object passed in that specifies dependencies
Pass in time span for any cache duration
Uses a lock for thread safety
Note that this has a dependency on Newtonsoft.Json to serialize the dependsOn object, but that can be easily swapped out for any other serialization method.
ICache.cs
public interface ICache
{
T GetOrSet<T>(Func<T> getItemCallback, object dependsOn, TimeSpan duration) where T : class;
}
InMemoryCache.cs
using System;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Runtime.Caching;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
public class InMemoryCache : ICache
{
private static readonly object CacheLockObject = new object();
public T GetOrSet<T>(Func<T> getItemCallback, object dependsOn, TimeSpan duration) where T : class
{
string cacheKey = GetCacheKey(getItemCallback, dependsOn);
T item = MemoryCache.Default.Get(cacheKey) as T;
if (item == null)
{
lock (CacheLockObject)
{
item = getItemCallback();
MemoryCache.Default.Add(cacheKey, item, DateTime.Now.Add(duration));
}
}
return item;
}
private string GetCacheKey<T>(Func<T> itemCallback, object dependsOn) where T: class
{
var serializedDependants = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(dependsOn);
var methodType = itemCallback.GetType();
return methodType.FullName + serializedDependants;
}
}
Usage:
var order = _cache.GetOrSet(
() => _session.Set<Order>().SingleOrDefault(o => o.Id == orderId)
, new { id = orderId }
, new TimeSpan(0, 10, 0)
);
public sealed class CacheManager
{
private static volatile CacheManager instance;
private static object syncRoot = new Object();
private ObjectCache cache = null;
private CacheItemPolicy defaultCacheItemPolicy = null;
private CacheEntryRemovedCallback callback = null;
private bool allowCache = true;
private CacheManager()
{
cache = MemoryCache.Default;
callback = new CacheEntryRemovedCallback(this.CachedItemRemovedCallback);
defaultCacheItemPolicy = new CacheItemPolicy();
defaultCacheItemPolicy.AbsoluteExpiration = DateTime.Now.AddHours(1.0);
defaultCacheItemPolicy.RemovedCallback = callback;
allowCache = StringUtils.Str2Bool(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["AllowCache"]); ;
}
public static CacheManager Instance
{
get
{
if (instance == null)
{
lock (syncRoot)
{
if (instance == null)
{
instance = new CacheManager();
}
}
}
return instance;
}
}
public IEnumerable GetCache(String Key)
{
if (Key == null || !allowCache)
{
return null;
}
try
{
String Key_ = Key;
if (cache.Contains(Key_))
{
return (IEnumerable)cache.Get(Key_);
}
else
{
return null;
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
return null;
}
}
public void ClearCache(string key)
{
AddCache(key, null);
}
public bool AddCache(String Key, IEnumerable data, CacheItemPolicy cacheItemPolicy = null)
{
if (!allowCache) return true;
try
{
if (Key == null)
{
return false;
}
if (cacheItemPolicy == null)
{
cacheItemPolicy = defaultCacheItemPolicy;
}
String Key_ = Key;
lock (Key_)
{
return cache.Add(Key_, data, cacheItemPolicy);
}
}
catch (Exception)
{
return false;
}
}
private void CachedItemRemovedCallback(CacheEntryRemovedArguments arguments)
{
String strLog = String.Concat("Reason: ", arguments.RemovedReason.ToString(), " | Key-Name: ", arguments.CacheItem.Key, " | Value-Object: ", arguments.CacheItem.Value.ToString());
LogManager.Instance.Info(strLog);
}
}
I use two classes. First one the cache core object:
public class Cacher<TValue>
where TValue : class
{
#region Properties
private Func<TValue> _init;
public string Key { get; private set; }
public TValue Value
{
get
{
var item = HttpRuntime.Cache.Get(Key) as TValue;
if (item == null)
{
item = _init();
HttpContext.Current.Cache.Insert(Key, item);
}
return item;
}
}
#endregion
#region Constructor
public Cacher(string key, Func<TValue> init)
{
Key = key;
_init = init;
}
#endregion
#region Methods
public void Refresh()
{
HttpRuntime.Cache.Remove(Key);
}
#endregion
}
Second one is list of cache objects:
public static class Caches
{
static Caches()
{
Languages = new Cacher<IEnumerable<Language>>("Languages", () =>
{
using (var context = new WordsContext())
{
return context.Languages.ToList();
}
});
}
public static Cacher<IEnumerable<Language>> Languages { get; private set; }
}
I will say implementing Singleton on this persisting data issue can be a solution for this matter in case you find previous solutions much complicated
public class GPDataDictionary
{
private Dictionary<string, object> configDictionary = new Dictionary<string, object>();
/// <summary>
/// Configuration values dictionary
/// </summary>
public Dictionary<string, object> ConfigDictionary
{
get { return configDictionary; }
}
private static GPDataDictionary instance;
public static GPDataDictionary Instance
{
get
{
if (instance == null)
{
instance = new GPDataDictionary();
}
return instance;
}
}
// private constructor
private GPDataDictionary() { }
} // singleton
HttpContext.Current.Cache.Insert("subjectlist", subjectlist);
You can also try and use the caching built into ASP MVC:
Add the following attribute to the controller method you'd like to cache:
[OutputCache(Duration=10)]
In this case the ActionResult of this will be cached for 10 seconds.
More on this here