My and my fellow students are deciding on a choosing a simple microcontroller to do very basic image processing. We are basically trying to implement template matching to find a set of objects in specific portions of the image. We'd like to use a connect a webcam to the microcontroller to do the job take the pictures and look for the objects. We also require basic wireless communication (e.g. bluetooth or wifi).
I don't think we will have the luxury of using state-of-the-art microcontroller, but something thats been around for a while (due to budget and stuff). Could anyone please advise on which specs of the microcontrolelr would be the most relevant for the above task (e.g. CPU, MIPS, etc).
Thanks a lot!
For this kind of a task, I would say the amount of RAM is the most relevant spec.
A microcontroller with an external memory interface allows you to extend the data space with additional SRAM to hold your image data.
Also note, that memory is needed for any protocol stacks you need to implement (Bluetooth, TCP/IP even more so).
You probably want to have total RAM in tens of kilobytes, preferably 100+ kB.
It is also nice to have plenty of program memory available when learning and experimenting. Later on you can try to optimize and squeeze your code into a more confined device.
As for the architecture, choose something you can easily find development tools and examples for.ARM, AVR and PIC are all good candidates among others.
Also find out what interfaces you need to use to
control the camera (e.g. I2C or SPI)
read pixel data (e.g. parallel or analog)
Connecting directly to a webcam's USB interface would not be a straightforward task, as the microcontroller would need to act as a USB host.
Good luck with your project!
You may need a microcontroller with following features:
USB 2.0 Host controller
1.2MB of memory for buffer 640*480*2(bytes per pixel)*2(double buffer)
(you may use lower resolution if there are not enough memory)
Wifi controller
CPU power strong enough for your task
Ready open source code
It seems that broadcom controllers may be useful here.
Also, you can by off-the-shell Wifi router with usb port and use it for your project
(i.e. Linksys E3000 )
Related
Background
I'm very new to electronics/IoT dev. I'm trying to create a solution to be able to read my wife's Car's CAN Bus signal (messages) and store it to an SD card. I hope to analyze the data and build a dashboard based on the car's telemetry.
This specific question is in relation to a chip (STM32F1) on an IoT board (MXChip AZ3166) I already own, which I hope to incorporate into my overall solution as the data acquisition layer.
For reference the:
Chips is the: STMicroelectronics STM32F103C8T6, 32bit ARM Cortex M3 Microcontroller
and the IoT board is the: (MXChip AZ3166 IoT DevKit)
Reading the MXChip AZ3166 board's spec and after doing some research, I have found out that the MXChip AZ3166 comprises two main chipsets:
Vendor
Part Number
Ref Link
STMicroelectronics
STM32F103C8T6
https://uk.rs-online.com/web/p/microcontrollers/1023545
MXChip
EMW3166
https://www.mxchip.com/en/products/module/54
Main Question
The product specification mentions the STM32F1 features Comprising of motor control peripherals plus CAN and USB full speed interfaces, it also states it has 1x CAN Channel. Does that mean I can interface the MXChip AZ3166 board featuring this chip via the GPIO pins to the CAB bus in my wife's car and receive the CAN Bus signals (I presume adhering to the
ISO 11898-1 CAN data communication protocol).
How would I find out which pins to connect to the CAN Hi & CAN low connections on the cars CAN Bus?
Concerning power, how would I determine that the CAN signal received doesn't fry the MXChip Board with a stated max Operation voltage of 3.3v?
Yes you'll want an MCU with a built-in CAN controller for communicating on a CAN bus. However, the CAN standard only covers the physical and data link layers. You need to know the application layer in order to meaningfully interact with a bus.
The application layer on a car may or may not be proprietary. It may even be encrypted. If you don't know what protocol is uses, then no can do. Reverse-engineering CAN protocols is hackish, hard and dangerous. Plugging into a CAN bus where you have no clue about timing considerations etc is also very dangerous.
But cars usually have an "on-board diagnostics" (OBD) port used for service purposes, with standardized application layers, through which you may have access to various parts of the car. There's lots of different standards for OBD and older ones didn't even use CAN. It depends on the car model.
In case of the OBD port the pinouts are standardized and you can find them on the Internet. Otherwise it is very simple to find out which signal that's CANH and CANL with an oscilloscope. CANH goes 2.5V +1V and CANL 2.5V -1V. A more hacky solution is to measure this with a multimeter, but it's perfectly possible since one signal with be slightly above 2.5V and the other slightly below.
CAN is standardized so if you have a CAN bus on the board, you connect there. In some cases there may be 12V supply wired together with the signal and that's the only one which could fry something.
Overall, please note that the project you describe here is very difficult and not a beginner task. It sounds as you have next to no experience of electronics/embedded systems, so I would recommend picking a far simpler project.
Furthermore, modifying car electronics or installing your own electronics in a car is illegal in most parts of the world. Third party type approvals with EMC tests are mandatory (and very expensive). If your car is involved in an accident and they find custom electronics without type approval in it, you could be facing serious legal consequences.
I'm new to using VHDL and have run into an issue with my project. I'm trying to make an FPGA to converts from one communication protocol to a different one, and for this purpose it would be useful to be able to store (hopefully multiple) packets before converting.
Before I tried to store this data in arrays, but it became quickly apparent that this takes up far too much space on the FPGA. Therefore, I have been searching for a way to store the data on the DDR3 ram on the SP605 board (http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/boards_and_kits/xtp067_sp605_schematics.pdf, page 9). I however cannot find instructions on how to write or read data from this. I'm trying to store one 8bit std_logic_vector per clock cycle to later be accessed.
Can anyone advise me on how to proceed?
Xilinx offers an IP Core generator. This IP catalog contains a Memory Interface Generator (MIG) which generates an IP Core to access different memory types. Configure this core for DDR3.
Writing a DDR3 controller in VHDL is not a project for a beginner not even for an experienced designer.
The state machine is simple and well known, but the calibration logic is very costly.
You should consider a caching or burst read/write technique, because DDR memory can not be accessed in every cycle.
I can't seem to find a good comprehensive list of available ioctls for netbsd.
I am looking to do some operations on harddisk (getting size, physical sector size, model). I have the code working in linux. It looks something like this, I removed errors etc to make it more compact:
ioctl(fileno(driveptr[i]),HDIO_GET_IDENTITY,&hd);
ioctl(fileno(driveptr[i]),BLKGETSIZE64,&drivesize[i]);
ioctl(fileno(driveptr[i]),BLKPBSZGET,&psztemp);
Is there an equivalent to these ioctls in netbsd?
regards
The driver source for a given type of disk interface (or any other kind of device driver) is probably the best canonical place to find device specific ioctls.
NetBSD at a systems level, like many unix-based systems, tries hard to avoid being hardware specific, even in terms of providing detailed hardware specific information to user level. The goal of unix, after all, is to provide a system that is uniform across a wide variety of hardware platorms, not to provide detailed low-level access to specific hardware. The very best you can get in terms of hardware specific details is the information printed by the drivers at boot time about the hardware as it is probed and attached.
At a more generic level you can basically only get disk and partition labels -- i.e. information pertinent to the way the system presents disk devices to userland. Unfortunately the only driver manual page that documents these is sd(4) (cd(4) has some more detail about more ioctls specific to cd-rom devices). scsi(4) documents bus-level ioctls for SCSI and ATAPI interfaces.
On x86 platforms there's "sysctl machdep.diskinfo" (and the equivalent C level interface via sysctl(3)) to get details about what the BIOS reported about the disks it knew about at boot time, but that may be incomplete.
Is it possible to get location data out of Google Gears, Google Gelocation API or any other web location API (such as Fire Eagle) in such a format that it appears to other software as a GPS device?
It occured to me reading these answers to my question regarding WiFi location finding, on Super User, that if I could emulate a GPS unit, many of these web services could act as a 'poor-mans' GPS to otherwise less useful software that requires it.
Is GPSD an option?
Preferably OSX & Python, but I would be interested in any implementation.
There is a very similar thread on a Python mailinglist that mentions Windows virtual COM ports and discusses Unix's pseudo-tty capabilities. If the app(s) you want to use let you type in a specific tty device file, this may be the easiest route. (Short of asking the authors to provide a plugin API for what you're trying to do, or buying yourself a $20 bluetooth GPS mouse.)
Are you using OS X?
There is a project macosxvirtualserialport on Google code that provides a graphical wrapper around some of the features of a utility called socat. I'd recommend taking a look at socat if you see potential in the pseudo-tty route. I believe you could use socat to link a pipe from a Python program to a pseudo-tty.
Most native Mac apps will be querying IOServiceMatching for a device with kIOSerialBSDRS232Type, and I doubt that a pseudo-tty will show up as an IOKit service.
In this case, unless you can find a project that has already implemented such a thing, you will need to implement a driver as described in this How to create virtual COM port thread. If you're going to the trouble of create a device driver, you would want to base it on IOKit because of that likely IOServiceMatching query. You can find the Apple16X50Serial project mentioned in that post at the top of Apple's open source code list (go to the main page and pick an older OS release if you want to target something pre-10.6).
If your app is most useful with realtime data (e.g. the RouteBuddy app mentioned in the Python mailinglist thread can log current positions) then you will want to fetch updates from your web sources (hopefully they support long-polling) and convert them to basic NMEA RMC sentences. You do not want to do this from inside your driver code. Instead, divide your work up into kernel-land and user-land pieces that can communicate, and put as little of the code as possible into the kernel part.
If you want to let apps both read and write to these web services, your best bet would probably be to simulate a Garmin device. Garmin has more-or-less documented their protocol in the IntfSpec.pdf file included with their Device Interface SDK. Again, you'd want to split as much as you could into user-space code.
I was unable to find a project or utility that implements the kernel side of an IOKit-based virtual serial interface, but I'd be surprised if there wasn't one hiding somewhere out there. Unfortunately, most of the answers I found to that question were like this, with the developer being told to get busy writing a kext.
I'm not exactly sure how to accomplish what you're asking, but I may be able to lend some insight as to how you might begin to get it done. So here goes:
A GPS device shows up to most systems as nothing more than a serial device -- a.k.a. a COM port if you're dealing with Windows, /dev/ttySx if you're in *nix. By definition, a serial port's specific duty is to stream data across a bus, one block at a time. So, it would then follow logically that if you want to emulate the presence of a GPS device, you should gather the data you're consuming and put it into a stream that somehow acts like an active serial port.
There are, however, some complications you might want to consider:
Most GPS devices don't just send out location data; there's also information on satellite locations, fix quality, bearing, and so on. Then again, nobody's made any rules saying you have to make all that data available. There's probably more to this, but I'll admit that I need to do more research in this area myself.
I'm not sure how fast you can receive data when dealing with Google Latitude, etc., but any delays in receiving would definitely result in visible pauses in your "serial port"'s data stream. Again, this may not be as big a complication as it seems, because GPS devices are known to "burst" data across the bus anyway, but I'd definitely keep an eye on that. You want to make sure there's always a surplus of data coming across, not a shortage.
Along the way you'll also have to transform the coordinates you receive into valid GPS sentences, as well. You can find specifications for those, but I would definitely make friends with the NMEA standard -- even though it is a flawed standard, it's the one everyone seems to agree on anyway.
Hope this helped you, at least a little bit. Are there anymore details specific to your problem that you think could be useful in answering this question?
Take a look to Franson GPS Gate which allows you to connect to Google Earth among other things (like simulating GPS and so on). Is windows only though but I think you could get some useful ideas from it.
I haven't looked into it very much, but have you considered using Skyhook's SDK? It might provide you with some of what you are looking for. It's available for every major desktop and mobile OS.
Where would you recommend that I find a company to develop or buy a CD/DVD loading arm similar to: http://www.dextimus.com/
Preferably programmable via USB but if I only can get one with a serial interface that would be fine. Drivers dont matter - I can interface directly with the unit as my situation is very unique.
If you have some experience with electronics, you can give it a shot and build it yourself, like this or this.
I should add that the schematics and the source code are included, and in more details in the first project.
I suppose I might just shorten this by giving a list of resources first:
http://www.embedinc.com/ I trust this company to do good work. Expensive (actually, they are reasonably priced in the design community, but would be considered expensive by most hobbyists and individuals). Not great at people skills, but very very very good at what they do.
You should check out the various microcontroller communities and forums for hobbyists and professionals that can do this. Search for microchip, atmel, msp430, arm, powerpc, etc.
Sparkfun is a supplier to the electronics community - they have great forums where you can post your request, and you'll find people who might do it for fun with only the cost of materials. Might take longer, might not be as 'professional' or well packaged and delivered, but it might be your best low cost option.
There are many electronic design companies that could do this (for instance, I can do this sort of thing).
But there are many questions you haven't answered (and may not have researched) that could prevent success:
Is this patented?
What CD loading/unloading methods are not patented, are out of patent, or otherwise available?
What is your design goal - a one off just for you, or a device that can be built in the hundreds for industrial use, or a device meant for general office workers/consumers that is built in the millions?
Do you realize that this design qould surely cost mroe than simply buying one, if one is all you need?
As an example, assuming you don't need the nice enclosure and don't mind a 'prototype' look, just the mechanicals, electronics, and firmware design (no software on the PC) would likely be 100-250 billable hours for a design firm. At a cheap $90/hr, that's $9k to nearly $25k for one prototype. Add PC software and the nice enclosure, etc and you'll double that.
If you can find a local 'Make' group (techshop, GoTech, or similar) then you might be able to find a hobbyist that is willing to play with this idea for the cost of materials.
But if you define what your goal is, and give us an idea of your resources you may find a better answer.
-Adam
You can create a very nice simple solution using radio control servos. They come in many sizes, but even the small ones have enough torque to move a big arm to move a cd.
The real bonus with servos is that they normally have 180 degrees of rotation and internally have a variable resistor (rheostat) for positioning feedback. Positioning accuracy is normally within 1 degree of rotation which should be fine for a cd loader.
For picking up the CDs, nothing will beat a vacuum. I recommend a small battery powered vacuum cleaner. Funnel the suction into a 1/4 inch pipe. At the other end of the pipe a one inch diameter cup should provide more than enough lift from the small amount of suction.
As for the pile of blank CDs to be burnt, I would advise in moving the pile up rather than an arm down to it. probably having the top blank cd about 1/4 inch higher than the cd tray - By doing this, the arm only needs to rotate in one axis and the vacuum should be enough to suck the cd back out of the tray.
Now, for the electronics. For the servo control I suggest an rs232 serial servo controller. I've used the one from http://www.basicx.com/Products/servo/servo8t.htm as it also gives back torque information from the current draw.
For the low sample rate digital i/o, i suggest (for windows) inpout32.dll which is a dll to give you direct access to the bits of a parallel port. This will allow you to turn on the vacuum at the correct time and possibly sense when cd's have run out. Note that a parallel port can sink more current than it sources so for outputs you should connect to the 5v power line and set the output pin to 0 to turn on the output and 1 to turn it off.
The other nice option, which is very, very simple to interface and very cheap is to get hold of a picaxe from http://www.rev-ed.co.uk/picaxe/. These use a very simple programming language (a BASIC spin off) allowing you to read serial data in and control the servos and digital I/O on one chip. Last time I used one, the language was a bit simple - if statements had to jumped labels, else didn't exist.
If you do use a microcontroller and servos, it is best to use a dual voltage power supply as servos are noisy and can cause the microcontrollers to reset.
As for switching loads such as the vacuum on, you'll need to use a mosfet or (if money is no object) the simpler option, a solid state relay.
All digital inputs you use on the microcontroller should be pulled either to +V or ground with say a 5k resistor so they never float.
I cannot stress how simple and cheap the picaxes are. They have a built in interpreter so although code space is minimal on the small 8 pin units, they are programmable via a simple serial lead.
Good luck. Once you get into automation control, you'll never be able to stop. I'm in the middle of building a 3 axis CNC router so I can cut parts for other projects (I tell my girlfriend it's so she can cut out xmas decorations!).
You might want to contact Aaron Shephard about his Florian project.
I've found that a really easy board to control stepper motors or sorvos are produced by phidgets - the API is incredibly easy, and available for a vast array of platforms.