I recently updated the stock Indy that installs with Delphi 2007 (I think it is 10.5.1.1) with 10.6.2.0, which I downloaded from GitHub.
I'm now getting a compile error:
EAttachmentFileNotFound.IfFalse (FileExists (parActualAttachmentFileID), 'File ' + parActualAttachmentFileID + ' not found.') ;
Error: E2003 Undeclared identifier: 'IfFalse'
The fragment is from my own code but I'm pretty sure that bit came from something I found probably on S/Overflow.
I received a couple of other errors also:
SMTPClient.AuthType := atDefault ;
Error: E2003 Undeclared identifier: 'atDefault'
and
SMTPClient.OnWork := EmailThread.EmailOnWork ;
Error: E2010 Incompatible types: 'Int64' and 'Integer'
but the first is a member that was renamed, and the second a data type that was changed. While these were a simple enough workaround, I'm left wondering
whether there was ever a "breaking changes" document generated.
maybe I accidentally somehow got the wrong source set.
EAttachmentFileNotFound is not a standard Indy exception, so it must be coming from your own code, or another 3rd party library.
Delphi 2007 was released almost 16 years ago. A lot has changed in Indy during that time. In fact, I think the changes you mention were actually made prior to, or maybe around, the release of Delphi 2007 (as they already existed in Indy's code in early 2008).
For instance:
in EIdException, the If(True|False) methods were removed (I don't know when exactly that change happened). In which case, you will have to use your own if and raise expressions now, eg:
if not FileExists(parActualAttachmentFileID) then
raise EAttachmentFileNotFound.Create('File ' + parActualAttachmentFileID + ' not found.');
in TIdComponent, the AWorkCount/Max parameters of the OnWork... events were changed from Integer to Int64 in 2006 (see OnWork Events changed to 64 bit on Indy's blog).
in TIdSMTP, the atDefault value was renamed to satDefault (again, I don't know exactly when this change was made).
So, you need to update your code accordingly.
I'm left wondering whether there was ever a "breaking changes" document generated.
No such document was ever created, no. However, changes that affect user code are typically announced on Indy's blog, under the Changelog category.
I'm wondering why if the compiler directives was typed on multi lines will effects the selected IDE error line.
For example:
{$SETPEFlAGS IMAGE_FILE_DEBUG_STRIPPED or
IMAGE_FILE_LINE_NUMS_STRIPPED or
IMAGE_FILE_LOCAL_SYMS_STRIPPED or
IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED}
.....
procedure Foo();
begin
WriteLn('1');
WWriteLn('2');
WriteLn('3');
WriteLn('4');
WriteLn('5');
end;
IDE Error
[dcc32 Error] Crypter.dpr(29): E2003 Undeclared identifier: 'WWriteLn'
Inside the source code the selected line is WriteLn('5'); not WWriteLn('2');
But if the compiler directives was typed on this way (one line) :
{$SETPEFlAGS IMAGE_FILE_DEBUG_STRIPPED or IMAGE_FILE_LINE_NUMS_STRIPPED or IMAGE_FILE_LOCAL_SYMS_STRIPPED or IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED}
Will fix the issue!.
If things are as you say, then this is a defect in the IDE. Report the issue as a bug to Quality Portal.
It's easy to work around the issue. Simply don't use multi-line directives. In this case you can extract the flag into a separate constant and refer to it in the directive.
const
PEFlags = IMAGE_FILE_DEBUG_STRIPPED or
IMAGE_FILE_LINE_NUMS_STRIPPED or
IMAGE_FILE_LOCAL_SYMS_STRIPPED or
IMAGE_FILE_RELOCS_STRIPPED;
{$SETPEFlAGS PEFlags}
The reason I hesitate in the first paragraph is that what you describe would also occur if the linefeeds were incorrect. If your linefeeds are not CR+LF then the IDE gets confused about line numbers. So, it's worth checking that your linefeeds are CR+LF. You could simply re-type the code and the linefeeds will be correct. Typically you get mixed up linefeeds when you paste from another source.
I am having a problem with Delphi XE3's Indy10. I cannot locate the class TIdHash128.
Indy's documentation states this should be found in IdHash.pas but this is not the case on my PC. Oddly enough the comment at the top of IdHash.pas reads "Rev 1.10 7/24/04 12:54:32 PM RLebeau Compiler fix for TIdHash128.HashValue()" despite having no definition for TIdHash128 in the file. I have also done a search through the source files but no TIdHash128 was found.
Is this supposed to be missing from XE3's version of Indy10?
I'm here again to ask for a help to you. This time I believe that few will respond given the great particularity of the problem which I will relate. I'm starting in the world of DataSnap, and still have things I do not understand how this error I will relate.
My Delphi is XE (version 1, Update1). I am using Postgres which generates error messages in Portuguese (Portuguese Brazil) and for this reason the error messages have accents. The connection components are ZeosLib package.
I am using a dialog box "reconcile error" to display errors arising from the application of updates and to test, I tried to insert a record that already existed, thus violating a unique key and thus displaying the reconcile error dialog.
In the memo of the dialog, the message that appears is truncated, ie cut. Check it out:
ERRO: duplicar valor da chave viola a restrição de unicidade "uc_usu_va_login"
DETAIL: Chave (va_login)=(admin) já existe.
CONTEXT: comando SQL "INSERT INTO USUARIOS (VA_NOME
,VA_LOGIN
,CH
But actually what should be returned is this:
ERRO: duplicar valor da chave viola a restrição de unicidade "uc_usu_va_login"
DETAIL: Chave (va_login)=(admin) já existe.
CONTEXT: comando SQL "INSERT INTO USUARIOS (VA_NOME
,VA_LOGIN
,CH_SENHA
,VA_EMAIL)
VALUES (pVA_NOME
,pVA_LOGIN
,pCH_SENHA
,pVA_EMAIL)"
PL/pgSQL function "idu_usuarios" line 7 at comando SQL
I have done a debug on the server to see if the problem is ZeosLib, but I found that the error message generated on the server is complete, proving that ZeosLib does not truncate the message. Everything is unicode. All strings are WideString (the default) on both my program and in ZeosLib.
As you know, to be thrown on the server, the exception is forwarded to the client, roughly speaking, by DataSnap, and on the client, the Reconcile method of TClientDataSet verify if there were problems and then throw the famous exception EReconcileError that can be handled in the OnReconcileError event of TClientDataSet, therefore I believe that the message is being truncated by DataSnap.
On the client I debug the Reconcile method (DBClient.pas) and immediately before the exception is thrown the flow enters a function within a cpp source code that I think part of the library midas.dll, MidasLib.obj more specifically, since I am using this strategy, not to have to distribute the DLL with my application.
Check(FDSBase.Reconcile_MD(FReconcileDataSet.FDSBase, FDeltaPacket, VarToDataPacket(Results), Integer(Self), RCB));
This call is done at line 1952 of the unit DBClient.pas on Delphi XE Update1. Pressing F7, the debugger enters a source C++ (cpp), so I believe it is within the midaslib.obj. How I do not understand C++ well, I press Shift-F8 to exit the current method and return the next instruction, that is already inside the event OnReconcileError!! Therefore, the truncation must be done within the function I mentioned, within a cpp source, within midaslib.
My intention is to make the Reconcile Error dialog a tool not only for the final user but to support personals, providing separately information of Error, Details and Context. This helps a lot to discover a problem.
The problem now is to make the message appear in full. Has anyone had this kind of problem with messages being truncated by midas?
Also another point DSClient.pas I could extract the error message as it is passed to the exception:
'Erro SQL: ERRO: duplicar valor da chave viola a restrição de unicidade "uc_usu_va_login"'#$A'DETAIL: Chave (va_login)=(admin) já existe.'#$A'CONTEXT: comando SQL "INSERT INTO USUARIOS (VA_NOME'#$A' ,VA_LOGIN'#$A' ,CH'
If you remove the quotes and replace #$A (1 character) by a white space (one character), you will see that the string has exactly 255 characters!!
I also discovered that the "GetErrorString" in dspickle.cpp uses the constant DBIMAXMSGLEN which is defined in bdetypes.h as 127 (half of 255). As we are in the world of Unicode, it would not be a question of increasing this value to 255 in order to have two bytes per character? This is only a guess...
I leave the question in the air because I lack the knowledge to understand C++ :) Who can help, just look at the function implementation "GetErrorString" in dspickle.cpp. There is this:
LoadString((HINSTANCE)hDll, iErrCode, pString, DBIMAXMSGLEN)
pString is the error message and DBIMAXMSGLEN = 127.
Contradicting the opinion of others I decided to tweak further and finally figured out how to increase the number of characters in the "Reconcile" error message. As I thought the problem was in midas.dll, or more specifically the sources that make up the midas dll because the same set of sources can create MidasLib, which does not require a midas dll. To resolve I had to install the Delphi C++ personality to compile the midas.
After finding the line of the error, I discovered that there is even a request for repairs to the QC (http://qc.embarcadero.com/wc/qcmain.aspx?d=84960) which seems to have been ignored by the staff of Embarcadero, as that the "Resolution" as is "Deferred to Next Rel" (Deferred to Next Release) but the request is from 2010 and I'm using Delphi XE which in my opinion should have the solution but here I am correcting by myself ;)
The problem is inside the method "Clone" of the "DSBASE" class, inside source "ds.cpp" at line 2133 (Delphi XE, Update1). Below is the code block. The red line is the problematic line:
// Set the third field for the error string.
LdStrCpy((pCHAR)pFldDes->szName, szdsERRMESSAGE);
pFldDes->iFldType = fldZSTRING;
pFldDes->iUnits1 = 255; // Increased on request.. DBIMAXMSGLEN;
pFldDes++;
Note that it is very interesting the problem line. It has a constant value of 255, which limits the size of the error messages and a comment "Increased on request". Also note that next to the comment, there is a constant DBIMAXMSGLEN, which I had found and already suspected as being responsible for the problem, but as it was not being used I changed the value of DBIMAXMSGLEN but the error message always came without changes. It is worth mentioning that there is a semicolon (;) after DBIMAXMSGLEN which leads me to think that before (I do not know when) this line was one that was just after my fix:
pFldDes->iUnits1 = DBIMAXMSGLEN;
It's as if someone had deliberately set the field value to 255, removing the previous implementation that was really dynamic and seemingly more correct. After performing the replacement of the line I increased the value of DBIMAXMSGLEN to 1024. DBIMAXMSGLEN is declared "bdetypes.h" as a define. After correcting the line went like this:
#define DBIMAXMSGLEN 1024 // Max message len
After these two changes in "ds.cpp" and "bdetypes.h" I build, test, and the result was as expected: the error message was presented in full in the Reconcile dialog.
To the brave who want to try if they have seen this problem, you need the sources of MIDAS, which comes with Delphi from 2010 if I remember correctly. Good luck to all.
A few month a go i wrote a program, now when i try to compile it i receive this error :
[DCC Fatal Error] PVCM.dpr(7): F1026
File not found: 'dxGDIPlusClasses.dcu'
I don't know which component I've used .
That is a Devexpress component for GDI+. Devexpress units invariably have cx or dx prefixes.
It sounds like a DevExpress component.
I just encountered this problem right now !!!
Go to the unit that generates the error. Look at the top of its source code.
You will find under Uses a unit called: dxGDIPlusClasses. Remove it and you should be fine.
Hint: Next time when you remove a set of components. You have to update the USES block in your previous projects or at least, give'em a double check.